Foundation Park Care Center
1621 S Byrne Rd, Toledo, OH 43614 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 109 certified beds · (419) 385-3958 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $91,025 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.54 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.89 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, review of a written staff statement and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or call nine-one-one (911) for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) assistance for Resident #100, who was found unresponsive, absent of breaths, without a pulse/heartbeat and was identified to have advance directives reflecting the resident was a Full Code (full life-saving measures to be taken in the event of cardiac/respiratory arrest) status. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/death on [DATE] when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #400 went to Resident #100's room to check his blood sugar levels and found the resident to be unresponsive and absent of vital signs. LPN #400 called for the shift supervisor, LPN #410, who confirmed Resident #100 was absent of vital signs and neither nurse initiated CPR, called 911 for EMS assistance, or contacted the physician for direction. Resident #100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent a pressure ulcer from increasing in size and stage. This resulted in actual harm beginning on 12/22/25 when one resident (#01), who was identified at low risk for pressure ulcer development, was discovered with a Stage II pressure ulcer which increased in size and depth and was assessed as an unstageable pressure ulcer with malodorous necrotic tissue 19 days after being discovered. The facility failed to provide any reassessment of the resident's condition and for a possible source of the pressure ulcer and no nutritional assessments had been completed from the time when the pressure ulcer was initially identified. This affected one (#01) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and wound healing. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #01 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a visually impaired resident who was at risk for falls, was provided a proper room set up to prevent falls. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #10 had a room change on 08/03/23 at 11:45 A.M., fell in the new room on 08/03/23 at approximately 3:50 P.M., was transported to the hospital and found to have a fracture of the right humerus (shoulder). This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 04/09/18. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, skin cancer, fracture of right arm humerus (08/03/23), fracture of lower end of left radius (07/27/23), fracture of left ulna styloid process (07/27/23), paranoid schizophrenia, bilateral cataracts, and macular degeneration. Review of Resident #10's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of meal intakes were completed in the medical record. This affected three (#28, #35, #86) of three residents reviewed for meal intake documentation. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 07/30/20. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and hypertension.Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for eating meals.Review of the nutrition care plan last revised 02/18/26 revealed to provide food, fluids, and supplements as ordered. Monitor intake and record every meal. Review of the physician order dated 11/07/23 revealed the resident was on a regular diet with pureed texture and nectar consistency liquids. Review of the meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, consultant interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine was functional, failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was practiced during meal service, and failed to ensure emergency water was stored in a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents received food without foreign substances. This affected one (#73) of four residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 03/10/26 at approximately 10:35 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #418 revealed a high-temperature dishwasher was used by the facility. Observation revealed no plastic or glass covers were over the washing temperature gauge or the rinsing temperature gauge. Further observation during a dishwashing cycle of the machine revealed the temperature gauges did not fluctuate through two washing and rinsing cycles. DM #418 confirmed the gauge needles did not fluctuate while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a risk assessment was developed with facility specific measures to prevent the growth of Legionella. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of Legionella control measures. This had the potential to affect all residents. Furthermore, the facility failed to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to residents with physician orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected two (#11 and #22) of four residents reviewed for EBP. The facility identified nine residents (#5, #6, #60, #13, #24, #12, #47, #11, and #22) requiring EBP. Finally, the facility failed to ensure three staff (#433, #472, and #492) completed annual Mantoux (Tuberculosis) risk assessments. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness, side effects and adverse effects. This affected three (#15, #35, and #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 66 residents receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/14/26. Diagnoses included psychosis, mood disorder, anxiety, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the plan of care initiated 10/02/25 revealed Resident #15 received psychotropic medications. Further review of the plan of care revealed an intervention to administer psychotropic medication as ordered by the physician and to monitor for side effects and effectiveness every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily life. This affected five (#65, #82, #73, #53, and #11) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 06/07/23 with diagnoses of dementia, Type II diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/26, revealed Resident #65 was rarely/never understood and was dependent on staff for eating. Review of a physician order dated 01/07/26 revealed Resident #65 received a regular diet with pureed textures and thin liquids, with double portions. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 11/08/23 with diagnoses of dementia and aphasia. Review of the significant change comprehensive MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing measures were implemented as ordered. This affected three (#22, #2, and #5) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 7/31/19 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hemiplegia, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/25, revealed Resident #22 was rarely/never understood, was at risk for skin breakdown, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility. Review of a physician order, initiated 05/14/24, revealed Resident #22 should be turned or repositioned every couple of hours around the clock to rotate pressure points. An order dated 03/20/25 revealed Resident #22 should have a washcloth inside of the left hand as tolerated. An order dated 12/03/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interview, recipe review, menu review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed menus and recipes for residents on a pureed diet. This affected 10 (#8, #11, #19, #29, #39, #42, #49, #53, #60, and #65) residents who received the pureed diet. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents received double portions as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#65) of four residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The facility census was 87. Findings include:1. Review of the planned menu for the midday meal on 03/10/26 revealed residents would receive fried fish, parmesan pasta, seasoned vegetable blend, and fruit cobbler. Observation on 03/10/26 at approximately 10:40 A.M. revealed [NAME] #462 preparing to puree parmesan pasta for 10 residents on a pureed diet. [NAME] #462 portioned 10 servings of pasta into the mixer and poured in an unmeasured amount of hot water. [NAME] #462 obtained two more servings of pasta, added them to the mixer, and added an additional unmeasured amount of hot water. Concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, review of the wheelchair cleaning schedule, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure floor mats and wheelchairs were maintained in a clean sanitary condition. This affected three (#22, #65, and #82) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 7/31/19 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hemiplegia, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, and epilepsy.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/25, revealed Resident #22 was rarely/never understood, had impairment to both sides and was dependent for all activities of daily life. Review of Resident #22's physician order, dated 11/12/24, revealed staff should place a bedside floor mattress next to bed when resident was in bed. Observation on 03/09/26 at 9:34 A.M. revealed Resident #22 lying in bed with his eyes closed. A fall matt was on the floor next to Resident #22's bed. The fall matt was discolored and stained over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate resident assessments were completed. This affected one (#05) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/24. Diagnoses included Lewy body dementia, diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of the abdominal wall, and left femur fracture.Review of Resident #05's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/21/26, revealed she had moderately intact cognition. She utilized a wheelchair and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of Resident #05's most recent care plan revealed she was at risk for falls related to cognitive impairment and a communication deficit. The resident was known to overestimate or forget her limits due to decreased safety awareness, decreased judgement, impulsivity, history of falling, mobility/balance deficits, incontinence, and prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement fall safety precautions. This affected one (#5) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87. Findings included:Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/24. Diagnoses included Lewy body dementia, diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of the abdominal wall, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #5's change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/21/26, revealed she had a moderate cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for transfers and bed mobility. Review of Resident #5's most recent care plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to cognitive impairment and communication deficits. The resident overestimated or forgot limits due to decreased safety awareness, decreased judgement, impulsivity, history of falling, mobility/balance deficits, weakness, incontinence, prescribed medications which could affect balance, requirement for assistive device for balance/mobility, easily fatigued, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended guidelines for indwelling urinary catheter insertion and maintenance, and policy review, the facility failed to provide an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) securement device. This affected one (#42) of one resident reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility identified one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, dated 02/22/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive deficits. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received enteral nutrition (tube feeding) as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 7/31/19 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hemiplegia, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, and epilepsy.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/25, revealed Resident #22 was rarely/never understood, had a gastrostomy tube, and relied on enteral nutrition to meet 51 percent (%) or more of his fluid and nutrition needs.Review of the current physician order dated 06/13/25 revealed Resident #22 received Isosource HN (high nitrogen) (a tube feeding formula) at 80 milliliters (ml) per hour. Observation on 03/10/26 at 1:09 P.M. revealed Resident #22 had tube feeding Fibersource HN running at 80 ml per hour. Further observation revealed the tube feeding bag was dated 03/10/26 at 4:00 A.M. Concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was receiving oxygen therapy per physician orders. This affected one (#56) of one resident reviewed for respiratory. The facility identified six residents who required supplemental oxygen. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/24/25. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, emphysema, Raynaud's syndrome, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 01/07/26, revealed the resident required continuous oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #56's most recent care plan revealed she had emphysema and had a history of shortness of breath on exertion, when sitting, and laying flat. Interventions included oxygen per nasal canula per physician orders. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 04/25/25 to apply oxygen at two liters per minute per nasal canula every shift for chronic respiratory deficit/shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to secure a provider agreement with a hemodialysis provider prior to the current annual survey. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure collaborative communication was shared between the facility and the hemodialysis center. This affected one (#12) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident receiving dialysis services The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbances, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Review of the Resident #12's care plan for end stage renal disease, revised 11/13/25, revealed interventions, including the assessment of central line site used for hemodialysis, to be completed every shift. Dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Resident to leave the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure specific interventions were provided to address triggers and care for post-traumatic stress disorde (PTSD). This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for PTSD care and treatment. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 admitted to facility on 08/14/25. Diagnoses included dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, lumbar vertebra fracture, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, hypertension, PTSD, depression, transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/13/26, Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, delusions, rejection of care one to three days during assessment period, and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. On 08/14/25 a Social History and Assessment was completed and signed by Social Services Director #408. Diagnoses included PTSD. No additional documentation contained in the medical record indicated the cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nutrition assessments were completed accurately and updated with new diet orders. This affected one (#65) for four residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 06/07/23. Diagnoses included dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/26, revealed Resident #65 was rarely/never understood and was dependent on staff for eating.Review of the current physician order, initiated 12/14/23, revealed Resident #65 should receive a cream cookie twice daily for nutritional adequacy.Review of Resident #65's progress notes, dated 01/01/26 through 03/12/26, revealed no incidents or concerns regarding eating, swallowing, or choking.Review of the Speech Language Pathology Evaluation and Plan of Treatment, dated 01/07/26, revealed Resident #65 was referred for therapy due to pocketing food.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician and responsible party were timely notified when a resident was discovered unresponsive on the floor with a laceration to the head. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for timely notification in a facility census of 89. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, malignant neoplasm of bladder wall, coronary artery disease, major depression with severe psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, history of transient ischemic attack, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #2 with severe cognitive impairment, no range of motion impairment, independent with ambulation and transfer, and no falls since admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility incident report, review of hospital documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and neurological assessments following the discovery of a resident on the floor unresponsive with a laceration to the head. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for timely care and treatment. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, malignant neoplasm of bladder wall, coronary artery disease, major depression with severe psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, history of transient ischemic attack, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #2 with severe cognitive impairment, no range of motion impairment, independent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an incident report, review of witness statements, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure notifications were made to resident representatives and hospice providers following an incident of a resident being lowered to the ground. This affected one (#12) of five residents reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 89.Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/31/24. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes, displaced fracture of the shaft of the right femur (10/22/25), generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, anemia, and terminal diagnosis of rectal cancer. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero (0) indicating Resident #12 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #12 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including bed mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an incident report, review of written statements, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly assess residents following an incident where the resident was lowered to the ground. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/31/24. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes, displaced fracture of the shaft of the right femur (10/22/25), generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, anemia, and terminal diagnosis of rectal cancer. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero (0) indicating Resident #12 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #12 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including bed mobility and transfer. Resident #12 displayed no behaviors at the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility incident report, review of the Enhanced Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC) system (system for reporting information) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report incidents of potential abuse and/or neglect to the State Survey Agency (SSA). This affected two (#100 and #68) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 86. Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behaviors, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage four, atrial fibrillation (A-fib) (abnormal heart rhythm), and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the plan of care, initiated on [DATE], revealed Resident #100 was care planned for advanced directives of Full Code (full life-saving measures to be taken in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility investigation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to initiate and thoroughly investigate potential neglect and physical abuse. This affected two (#100 and #68) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 86.Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behaviors, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage four, atrial fibrillation (A-fib) (abnormal heart rhythm), and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the plan of care, initiated on [DATE], revealed Resident #100 was care planned for advanced directives of Full Code (full life-saving measures to be taken in the event of cardiac/respiratory arrest) status. Interventions included: if resident was found unresponsive, staff were to call a stat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, review of facility job descriptions, review of staff cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certifications and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent and compliant with with implementing CPR per the physician orders and further failed to ensure nurse supervisors were qualified per the facility job description qualifications. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behaviors, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage four, atrial fibrillation (A-fib) (abnormal heart rhythm), and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the plan of care plan, initiated on [DATE], revealed Resident #100 was care planned for advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement the facility policy regarding the requirement to report a resident to resident altercation to the state agency. This affected one resident (#15) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/08/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had an impaired cognition and behaviors included wandering and rejection of care. Review of Resident #15's nurses note dated 02/20/25 revealed the resident was in the dining room sitting at the table eating lunch. An altercation between two other residents happened and in the process Resident #15 was hit in the face with a plate receiving a cut to her forehead. The nurse separated residents. Resident #15 was assessed by staff and received wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to report a resident to resident altercation. This affected one resident (#15) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/08/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had an impaired cognition and behaviors included wandering and rejection of care. Review of Resident #15's nurses note dated 02/20/25 revealed the resident was in the dining room sitting at the table eating lunch. An altercation between two other residents happened and in the process Resident #15 was hit in the face with a plate receiving a cut to her forehead. The nurse separated residents. Resident #15 was assessed by staff and received wound care. Neurological checks were begun. Review of Resident #15's health status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure treatments were provided with a physician's order. This affected one (#14) of four residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/18/23 with a readmission date of 04/1/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 07/01/24 through current revealed no orders for Nystatin powder (a powder used to treat fungal or yeast infections on the skin). Review of the Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record dated August 2024 revealed no documentation Resident #14 received Nystatin powder. Review of the Shower/Skin Assessment completed 08/01/24 revealed Resident #14 had dry/flaky skin and redness with excoriation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's recipes, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were followed when serving all diet textures. This affected 83 residents identified by the facility as receiving food from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed during preparation of pureed foods. This affected five (#18, #20, #21, #38, and #287) of five residents identified by the facility as having a physician ordered pureed diet. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Interview on 05/14/24 at 10:57 A.M. with [NAME] #506 revealed the facility had 14 residents who received mechanical soft diets and five residents who received a pureed diet. Observations on 05/14/24, beginning at 10:57 A.M., revealed [NAME] #506 used a utensil to portion 15 scoops of baked turkey crunch to process for residents on a mechanical soft diet. Continued observation revealed [NAME] #506 used a utensil to portion six scoops of baked turkey crunch to process for residents on a pureed diet. While processing the pureed turkey, [NAME] #506 added…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure floors were adequately maintained. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents of the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free from odors. This affected one (#43) one one resident reviewed for room odors. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/13/24 at approximately 7:30 A.M. of the Bayview Dining Room revealed a sticky substance covering the floor throughout the dining room, which caused shoes to stick to the floor, become tacky, and make a squeaking noise while walking. Shoes remained tacky after leaving the dining room. Interview on 05/13/24 at approximately 7:30 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #569 verified the floors were sticky in Bayview Dining Room and this occurred yearly when the air conditioning was turned off in the facility. 2. Observation on 05/13/24 from 8:57 A.M. to 9:07 A.M. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure at all times and further failed to ensure medications were stored in approved and labeled containers. This affected thirteen (#5, #8, #12, #13, #23, #24, #36, #38, #52, #58, #61, #69 and #71) residents of thirteen residents observed for the storage of medication. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23. Diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, emphysema, lymphedema, depression, epilepsy and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/24, revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact, with no behavioral symptoms, was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility and used antidepressant medication. Review of the care plan dated 06/01/23 revealed Resident #69 had dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the advanced directives were in the resident's medical record. This affected two (#59 and #236) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, dementia, iron deficiency anemia, long term use of insulin, hypomagnesemia, atrial fibrillation, personal history of other diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, stage III chronic kidney disease, heart disease, and cellulitis of face. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a physician order, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59's advanced directives were Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care - Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest). Review of the care plan, dated [DATE], revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of a hospital referral and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate skin assessments were completed upon admission. This affected one (#236) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #236 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #236, dated 05/09/24, revealed it was in progress at the time of review. Review of the hospital Community Referral Form, scanned to the facility on [DATE], revealed a traumatic face superior wound was first assessed on 04/27/24. A wound assessment dated [DATE] indicated the area had edema, ecchymosis (bruising), was red, dry, and intact. Review of the Nursing admission Screening, dated 05/09/24, revealed Resident #236 was alert and oriented to herself. Further review revealed Resident #236 had no identified skin concerns. Review of a Shower/Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate physician orders, failed to accurately assess a dialysis access sites and further failed to ensure a dialysis catheter site was covered. This affected one (#17) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident on dialysis. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 10/04/23. Diagnoses included dementia, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/20/24, revealed Resident #17 was rarely/never understood and received dialysis. Review of the physician orders for Resident #17 revealed an order dated 02/15/23 to check thrill and bruit every shift, an order dated 02/15/23 to 05/15/24 to assess and document in progress notes the upper right chest central line catheter site for dressing condition, redness, pain, drainage and swelling. An order dated 09/29/23 stated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological behavioral interventions were assessed or implemented to address resistance to care resulting in lack of timely care and/or treatment. This affected one (#46) of four residents reviewed for behavioral services. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Resident #46 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dysphagia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/24, Resident #46 was moderately cognitively impaired, sometimes understood/understands, rejected care daily, required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown and received antianxiety, antidepressant and antibiotic medications. Review of the plan of care (POC) revealed the following: on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Nutritional Assessment was completed. This affected one (#50) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 06/29/22 with diagnoses of dementia and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of a diet order dated 04/09/24 revealed Resident #50 should receive a no added salt (NAS) diet, with regular textures and thin liquid consistency. The order additionally noted low fat, 2000 milligram (mg) sodium and low cholesterol. Review of a diet order dated 04/09/24 through 05/01/24 revealed Resident #50 was on a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction and should receive 800 ml on first shift, 500 ml on second shift, and 200 ml on third shift. Review of a diet order dated 04/10/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident/family concerns were resolved timely. This affected one resident (#65) of three residents reviewed for grievances. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, delusional disorders, essential (primary) hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 09/06/23 revealed the resident was rarely understood. Review of a communication progress note for Resident #65 completed by Social Services #207, dated 09/21/23, revealed the family was in for a scheduled care conference. The note detailed the family's concern related to continued missing clothing including warm up pants black in color with light blue stripe down the side, a set black hoodie with black pants with gray camouflage stripe down the side. It was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and resident equipment were appropriately clean. This affected three residents (#10, #65 and #79) of four residents reviewed for a clean environment. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 10/02/23 at 9:42 A.M. of Resident #65's room revealed the air conditioning unit vents had a thick layer of dust, the floor of the corners of the room had dead bugs, debris, and cobwebs, and the base of the bedside table had a thick layer of dirt. Interview on 10/02/23 at 9:52 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #200 verified Resident #65's room condition and stated housekeeping does not thoroughly clean the resident's rooms. Observation on 10/02/23 at 10:00 A.M. revealed resident's (#10 and #79) room had cobwebs with dirt and debris in the corners near the floor and the air conditioning vents had a thick layer of dust. Interview on 10/02/23 at 10:01 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #201 verified the cobwebs in the corners of the room with dirt and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and sanitizer manufacturer instructions for use, the facility failed to maintain the facility food service kitchen environment, equipment and cleaning solution in a sanitary manner. This affected all 72 residents who received food from the facility. One resident (#34) was identified by the facility to receive nothing by mouth. The facility census was 73 Findings include: Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:00 A.M. a tour of the facility kitchen discovered the kitchen ceiling with peeling paint and ceiling overlayment material was breaking free above the food preparation table, steam table, tray line, and above the clean dishwasher discharge side. Located inside the microwave on the steam table was a heavy amount of food debris clinging to the walls inside. The food mixer was observed with food debris splatter on the surface. Inside the walk-in freezer was a case of mixed vegetables, case of pies and bag of rolls covered in frozen ice leading from refrigeration plumbing. Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:15 A.M. noted Dietary Helper (DH) #312 using a bucket…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:18 A.M. of Resident #33's room revealed deep scratches in the drywall above the bed and a round hole approximately one and half inches in diameter in the plaster in the corner above the baseboard behind the bed. There were two additional oblong holes in the plaster above the round hole in the wall behind the head of bed, both approximately one and half inches in length. Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:30 A.M. of Resident #10's room revealed a half moon shaped tear in the drywall above the baseboard in the hallway as you enter the room. The baseboard in the closet to the left as you enter the room was sitting face down on the floor. Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:33 A.M. of Resident #34 and Resident #69's room revealed splintering of the wood on the door around the lock with blond colored wood exposed on the dark brown door. Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and local health inspection documentation, the facility failed to maintain the facility food service kitchen environment free of pests. This affected all 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. One resident (#34) identified by the facility to receive nothing by mouth. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation on 12/12/22 at 8:00 A.M. a tour of the kitchen discovered the juice dispensing machine identified with multiple flying gnats on the dispensing nozzle and holder. Interview on 12/13/22 9:20 A.M. with Maintenance Director #1 revealed being unaware of the gnats in the area of the kitchen juice dispensing machine. Review of facility pest control contractor treatments dated 11/23/22, 10/26/22, and 09/26/22 revealed the last treatment applied for small fruit flies in the kitchen was applied on 09/26/22. Review of the local health department inspection results, dated 11/15/22, revealed a lot of gnats were discovered flying in the area of the dish machine. Interview on 12/12/22 at 11:55 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #323…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychoactive medications and psychiatric symptoms were consistently monitored for effective treatment and potential side effects of treatment medications, and the presence of adequate behaviors to warrant the use of psychotropic medications. This affected four (#17,#59, #62, #65) of five residents reviewed for the administration of unnecessary medications. The facility identified 38 residents who received psychotropic medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypothyroidism, hypertension, seizure disorder, mild intellectual disability, restlessness, and agitation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/16/22, assessed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and menu review, the facility failed to ensure all items listed on the menu were provided to residents. This affected 15 residents (#23, #46, #124, #1, #4, #15, #19, #20, #25, #27, #37, #41, #47, #50, and #52 ) receiving altered texture diets. The facility census was 73 Findings include: Review of the menu for the noon meal on 12/13/22 revealed all diet types were to rereceive dinner roll and a pat of butter. Observation on 12/13/22 at 10:55 A.M. noted Dietary Helper (DH) #312 to obtain and prepare the lunch puree meal items. DH #312 placed canned pears to a blender and pureed the food item. Once the pears were pureed the pears were removed from the blender and placed to a serving pan. DH #312 cleansed the blender and proceeded to place slices of pork loin into the blender with ladles of gravy added to the puree. Once the pork loin was mixed to a puree it was placed to a serving pan and the blender was cleansed. DH#312 then obtained boiled/cooked sliced green beans and proceeded to puree followed by placing to a serving pan. At no time did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Situation, Background, Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) documents and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure residents met criteria prior to the initiation of antibiotics. This affected four (#5, #34, #67 and #70) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility identified seven residents ordered antibiotics. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/21/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, unspecified mood disorder, venous insufficiency, depression and cellulitis of left lower limb. Review of a plan of care focus area revised 12/09/22 revealed Resident #5 had a left shin wound and infection. Interventions included the antibiotic Bactrim DS oral tablet 800-160 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth two times a day for cellulitis. Review of a physician order dated 12/08/22 revealed Resident #5 was ordered Bactrim DS oral tablet 800-160 mg one tablet by mouth two times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility COVID-19 testing line list, the facility failed to ensure resident's COVID-19 testing was documented in the medical record. This affected two (#29 and #62) of two residents reviewed for COVID-19, with the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/09/20. Diagnoses included hypertension, malignant neoplasm of unspecified right female breast, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a plan of care focus area initiated 12/12/22 revealed Resident #29 had COVID-19 infection. Interventions included assess per orders, document and notify the physician of changes, good hand hygiene for all direct care staff and isolate in a single occupancy room. Review of a nursing progress note dated 12/12/2022 revealed Resident #29's COVID-19 outbreak testing results came back positive.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified when their personal funds account balance was within $200.00 of the Medicaid resource limit. This affected three (#8, #15 and #23) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, cerebrovascular disease, hypothyroidism, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the current account statement for Resident #8 revealed a balance of $5,429.01. Review of both the medical and financial record for Resident #8 revealed no evidence Resident #8 or the representative were notified the personal account balance was above the $2,000.00 state Medicaid resource limit as required. Interview on 12/14/22 at 2:20 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #401 verified the resource limit notification had not been provided. 2. Record review revealed Resident #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant medication error. This affected one (#59) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/19/22. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, type II diabetes, restlessness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/22, revealed Resident #59 was severely cognitively impaired, had no mood symptoms, no behaviors, and no hallucinations or delusions. Additionally, active diagnoses included unspecified dementia, anxiety, depression and PTSD. Lastly, Resident #59 received anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications on a routine basis. Review of a psychiatric progress note dated 09/12/22 revealed a gradual dose reduction for Risperdal was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy for residents dependent for care. This affected two (#1 and #13) of two residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/10. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/22, revealed Resident #1 was severely impaired for decision making and required total dependence bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. 2. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/17. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, heart failure, hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, manufacturer instructions for use, and facility policy, the facility failed to transport residents in the hallway utilizing the appropriate device in a safe manner. This affected one (#44) of four residents reviewed for accidents in a facility census of 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, major depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis of right knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/22, revealed Resident #44 with severe cognitive impairment, dependent on the extensive assistance of one staff for the completion of activities of daily living including transfer, and dependent on staff for mobility utilizing a wheelchair. Review of the plan of care developed on 10/26/22 addressed the residents activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the care and management and continued need for an indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #63. This affected one resident (Resident #63) of one resident reviewed for having an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type II, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, hypertension, acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiomyopathy, dementia, and chronic kidney disease, stage 3. Review of the medical record reviewed Resident #63 had a scheduled Cardiologist appointment on 10/26/22. At the appointment Resident #63 was admitted to the hospital for a diagnosis of right sided heart failure. Resident #63 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility pharmacy policies, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) administration tubing was changed every 24 hours and failed to change dressings at IV cites per the policy. This had the potential to affect two (#224 and #12) out of two residents reviewed for IV medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #224's record revealed an admission date of 12/07/22. Diagnoses included acute cystitis, sepsis without acute organ dysfunction, Escherichia coli (e-coli), bacteremia and neoplasm of the bladder. Review of a physician order dated 12/07/22 revealed Resident #224 was ordered the antibiotic ceftriaxone sodium 2000 milligrams in 50 milliliters of 0.9% normal saline intravenously once daily for cystitis for ten days. Review of the medical record for Resident #224 revealed a midline single lumen catheter in the left basilic vein. Observation on 12/13/22 at 8:19 A.M. revealed a bag of ceftriaxone 2 grams in 100 milliliters labeled for Resident #224…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement interventions for the treatment of depressed mood. This affected one (#65) of one resident reviewed for mood and behavioral interventions. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypothyroidism, hypertension, seizure disorder, mild intellectual disability, restlessness, and agitation. Review of the Minimum Data Se (MDS) assessment, dated 11/16/22, assessed the resident with the ability to make needs known, cognitively intact, resistive to care daily, requires supervision assistance with activities of daily living, continent of bowel and bladder, and receives an antianxiety medication daily. Review of a nursing plan of care developed on 11/07/22 address the resident having a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order. This affected one (#62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/20/22. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), spinal stenosis, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, unspecified mood disorder and unspecified psychosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/22, revealed Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assist with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had active diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, and unspecified mood disorder. In addition, Resident #62 received antipsychotic, anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medications daily. Review of a plan of care focus area initiated 06/20/22 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#224) resident observed during medication administration and two (#224 and #59) residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #224's record revealed an admission date of 12/07/22. Diagnoses included acute cystitis, sepsis without acute organ dysfunction, Escherichia coli (e-coli), bacteremia and neoplasm of the bladder. Review of a physician order dated 12/07/22 revealed Resident #224 was ordered the antibiotic ceftriaxone sodium 2000 milligrams in 50 milliliters of 0.9% normal saline intravenously once daily for cystitis for ten days. Review of the medical record for Resident #224 revealed a midline single lumen catheter in the left basilic vein. Observation on 12/13/22 at 8:19 A.M. revealed a bag of the antibiotic ceftriaxone 2 grams in 100 milliliters labeled for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$91,025 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $59,000 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-08-04
- $14,680 — penalty dated 2023-08-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-26 for 11 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-27 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULVER, LEONARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 05/13/1986 |
| FARLEY, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 22% | since 05/13/1986 |
| SCHARFENBERGER, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/13/1986 |
| WYNNE, TIMOTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/13/1986 |
| BENNETT, JASON | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/20/2010 |
| SCHARFENBERGER, GEOFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/17/2018 |
| NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/18/1988 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365752. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.