Cedarwood Plaza

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 103.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a police report and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from a potential accident hazard when State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #563 was found to have an unsecured loaded firearm in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and potential for serious life-threatening harm when STNA #563 left a loaded firearm, with additional rounds of ammunition, wrapped in a fleece vest and in a clear plastic bag, unsecured on a cart on the 3 North Hallway where residents resided and had access to the bag. Resident #64 subsequently took the bag containing the loaded firearm to her room, without staff knowledge, found the firearm, and placed it under the mattress of her bed. This affected one (#64) resident and had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #9, #35 and #36 received a two-gram sodium (low sodium) and/or cardiac diet as ordered. This affected three residents (#9, #35, and #36) out of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets but had the potential to affect an additional six residents (#3, #7, #42, #54, #70, and #84) the facility identified as being on a two-gram sodium and/or a cardiac diet. The facility census was 102. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/07/25. Pertinent diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia. Review of the physician orders for Resident #9 revealed an order dated 03/27/25 for a low sodium, regular texture, thin consistency, two-gram sodium diet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, review of facility menus and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the zucchini and onions were palatable and served at a preferred temperature and failed to ensure the noodles were palatable for lunch on 10/08/25. This affected five residents (#5, #29, #41, #60, and #100) out of five residents reviewed for meal palatability but had the potential to affect an additional 94 residents the facility identified as receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#21, #43, and #55) as not receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 102. Findings include:1. Observation on 10/08/25 at 11:48 A.M. of Dietary [NAME] #311 taking the temperatures of meal items in the steam table revealed the parsley noodles were 161.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the baked chicken was 130.4 degrees F, the mushroom gravy was 157.9 degrees F, the zucchini and onions were 169.1 degrees F. Observation of the items on the steam table revealed the noodles appeared to seasoned with dried herbs, the chicken appeared to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, food temperature log review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the mechanical soft chicken was held at a safe holding temperature for lunch on 10/08/25, which had the potential to affect 18 residents (#3, #4, #8, #10, #11, #15, #20, #22, #30, #42, #45, #52, #61, #63, #69, #82, #93, and #99) the facility identified as receiving a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Review of the facility Food Temperature Log, dated 10/08/25, revealed all regular, mechanical and puree items for lunch had been cooked to safe internal temperatures with the regular texture chicken 179 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the noodles 169 degrees F, zucchini and onions 169 degrees F, mechanical soft chicken 176 degrees F, mechanical soft zucchini and onions 168 degrees F, puree chicken 174 degrees F, puree noodles 174 degrees F, and the puree zucchini and onions 169 degrees F. Observation on 10/08/25 at 11:48 A.M. of Dietary [NAME] #311 taking the food temperatures of the food items on tray line revealed the following concerns:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, review of infection surveillance logs and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was performed per appropriate standards of practice to mitigate the potential for contamination and urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#6) of one resident reviewed for catheter care and had the potential to affect four additional residents (#2, #49, #59, and #90) who the facility identified as having indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/12/24 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, arthritis due to bacteria right hip, hemiplegia or hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and left non-dominant side, paraplegia, slow transit constipation, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the physician's order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, hospital record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address a significant weight loss for Resident #104. This affected one resident (#104) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 08/22/23 and a discharge date of 09/04/25. Pertinent diagnoses included schizophrenia, severe sepsis with septic shock, adrenocortical insufficiency (a condition when adrenal glands don't make enough of the hormone cortisol with weight loss being one of the symptoms), other diseases of plasma-protein metabolism, depression, thyrotoxicosis (a condition when there is too much thyroid hormone in the body with unexplained weight loss being one of the symptoms) with diffuse goiter. Review of Resident #104's care plan initiated on 08/29/23 revealed the resident had altered nutritional status related to thyroid disorder, schizophrenia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during care for Resident #6, including appropriate donning and doffing procedures with use of personal protective equipment (PPE), appropriate catheter care, and proper handling of soiled linen and other soiled items. This affected one resident (#6) of one resident reviewed for catheter care and had the potential to affect all 16 residents (#6, #10, #19, #28, #31, #33, #43, 348, #56, #63, #68, #71, #75, #78, #98, and #102) who resided on the North unit of the second floor. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/12/24 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, arthritis due to bacteria right hip, hemiplegia or hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and left non-dominant side, paraplegia, slow transit constipation, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and neuromuscular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 104.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen area with Dietary Aide (DA) #750 on 08/30/25 beginning at 9:02 A.M. revealed the following that was verified at the time of discovery.Observation of the walk-in cooler revealed a spiral ham with no date, an onion chopped in half and stored in plastic wrap with no date, a large plastic container of diced turkey with no date, a metal container with butter that had no label or date, a metal container of bacon bits with no label or date, and a large plastic container of fat from the preparation of a beef roast with no label or date. Observation of the walk-in freezer revealed a box of beef slabs which was opened and the slabs of beef were sitting on the cardboard box and not in a plastic bag or any sort of container. The exposed beef slabs showed signs of significant freezer burn. Further observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain its dumpster area in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 104.Findings include: Observation of the outside dumpster area with Dietary Aide (DA) #750 on 08/30/25 beginning at 9:45 A.M. revealed to the left of the dumpster area, outside of the physical dumpster, were significant amounts of debris, including plastic gloves, used plastic silverware, paper plates (many with noticeable food residue), brown bags, and various other pieces of plastic laying around. In front of the dumpster, approximately fifteen feet away, was a cardboard box on the ground and the box appeared to have been run over multiple times by vehicles. To the right of the dumpster was the facility's grease barrel, used to store excess oil and grease from the kitchen, and it was observed to be open to the air with a stock pot of water placed on top of it.Interview with DA #750 on 08/30/25 confirmed the above findings of the outside dumpster area at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct serving sizes and all menu items were provided per the menu. This affected four residents (#28, #43, #55, and #99) but had the potential to affect all residents, except two residents (#36 and #51) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Interviews on 07/01/25 between 9:44 A.M. and 1:18 P.M. with Residents #28, #55, and #99 revealed they received small portions at mealtimes, but also stated they never knew what was on the menu prior to receiving meals. Review of the menu revealed lunch for 07/01/25 was deli meat and cheese sandwich, creamy coleslaw, and four ounces (oz) of cinnamon apple slices. Residents on a pureed diet were to get pureed soft, cooked vegetables servings size was #12 scoop (green handle which provides a 2.7 oz portion) and pureed cinnamon apple slice serving size was a #10 scoop (three oz). Residents on a mechanical soft diet were to receive ground deli meat and cheese using a #8 scoop (four oz). Observations on 07/01/25 between 12:20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dry silverware and serve food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except two (#36 and #51) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observations on 07/01/25 at 12:19 PM observed Dietary Aide (DA) #409 using a dish cloth to dry the silverware that was in a tray sitting on the end of the steam table. DA #409 proceeded to place the silverware after drying them in a silverware holder. DA #409 verified the observation and stated she didn't know they weren't supposed to dry them that way. Observations on 07/01/25 at 12:20 P.M. of the lunch tray line revealed a large pan of sliced deli meat sitting on the steam table (not in an ice bath), next to it was a large pan of lettuce, and a large pan of sliced tomatoes. [NAME] #555 tore open a loaf of white bread while wearing gloved hands, grabbed slices of bread, grabbed two slices of deli meat, folded it over onto the bread and proceeded to grab lettuce and tomato slices and place onto one slice of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,171 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,171 — penalty dated 2024-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH