Parkside Villa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 566 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 156.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews. The facility failed to ensure adequate staff levels to meet the needs of the residents. This affected three (#4, #79, #104) of three residents reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 142.Findings include:1. Interview on 04/21/25 at 10:46 A.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant #CNA) #953 revealed there were not enough aides. CNA #953 revealed there were only two aides covering the secured unit and it wasn't enough for the census and acuity level. Interview on 04/21/25 at 10:51 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #939 revealed there were not enough staff to manage the census and acuity levels. LPN #939 revealed there were multiple residents that required hoyer lift, hands-on feedings, showers, and frequent check and changes and monitoring. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the facility policy and review of facility temperature monitoring logs, the facility failed to ensure unit refrigerators temperature monitoring logs were completed as required. This had the potential to affect all 115 residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. The facility identified twelve residents who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 142. Findings include: Observation and interview on 04/24/25 at 3:00 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #852 of the facility unit refrigerators used for outside foods brought in for residents revealed no temperature monitoring logs were on the facility refrigerators. RD #852 stated the temperatures are to be taken for each unit refrigerator twice daily and are kept at the nurses' stations. Upon searching each nurse's station, it was revealed the temperature monitoring log for the Cypress unit refrigerator and freezer were only completed from 04/01/25 through 04/04/25, 04/07/25 and 04/08/25. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing labeled and changed routinely. This affected six (#84, #91, #114, #118, #160, #367) of six residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility census was 142. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the physician orders dated 03/27/25 revealed Resident #114 had an order in place for oxygen at 2-4 liters per minute via nasal canula every shift to keep pulse oximetry readings equal or greater than 92 percent.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #114 was alert and oriented, required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), had shortness of breath or trouble breathing when lying flat,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe, secured and proper manner. This had the potential to affect 101 residents who were identified by the facility to be independently mobile. The census was 142. Findings include: Observation on 04/22/25 at 1:00 P.M. revealed the staff development room was full of unreturned resident prescription medications. There were seven large boxes filled with cards of medications, and a table full of prescription medication cards for residents who had discharged . Additional medications were stacked on the floor of the room. There were three large purple bags of medications that were ready to be returned. There were creams, injectables, breathing treatments, cards (blister packs) and cards of unused pills, tablets, and capsules. There were at least 200 separate medications that were unsecured in the room. On 04/22/25 at 1:00 P.M. the Maintenance Supervisor verified the room was unlocked and a whole lot of medications were stored in the Staff Development room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible. This affected one resident (#4) of one resident reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and cellulitis of the right lower limb. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was alert and oriented with cognition impairment, impaired on one side, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 03/25/25 revealed Resident #4 was at risk for falls and had impaired mobility with interventions that included, but not limited to, call light accessible when in room. Observation on 04/22/25 at 3:00 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #858, Registered Nurse (RN) #879 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative therapy as ordered. This affected one (Resident #138) of three residents reviewed for therapy. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #138 noted an admission date of 10/03/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute kidney failure, encounter for attention to tracheostomy, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of plan of care dated 10/28/24 noted Resident #138 was at risk for impaired functional range of motion related to inability to move extremities independently. The plan of care included passive range of motion to bilateral to ankles and slow gentle pace holding at end range for 10 seconds. Additional instructions included to provide 10 repetitions for two to three sets over all joints including shoulder, elbow,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, resident interview, staff interviews, dialysis staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring dialysis attended scheduled appointments. This affected one (#84) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified 13 total residents who received dialysis treatments. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy, respiratory failure, dependence on dialysis, and hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, was dependent on staff for ADLs and required dialysis. Review of the physician order dated 01/15/25 revealed an order to complete dialysis communication form before dialysis and send with patient to dialysis one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, closed medical record review and review of laboratory testing results, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered testing was completed timely as required. This affected one (Resident #147) of three reviewed for timely completion of physician orders. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #147 revealed an admission date of 11/14/24 and a discharge date of 03/27/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to anoxic brain damage, type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anemia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy. Review of Resident #147's care plan initiated on 12/06/24 indicated bowel incontinence related to impaired mobility, loss of sphincter control, and physical limitations. Interventions were to record bowel movement, note size and consistency. Report any abnormalities to the charge nurse. Resident #147 was also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to effectively implement the facility smoking policy. This affected one (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #108 noted an admission date of 06/26/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, metabolic encephalopathy, delusional disorder, and visual hallucinations. Review of Social Services smoking assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #108 exhibited knowledge of facility smoking rules and policies, does not smoke in designated areas only, does not know correct smoke time, does know where smoking materials are to be properly stored/kept. Resident #108 could use a lighter safely, could hold smoking materials safely, could extinguish smoking materials, and does not demonstrate compliance with facility smoking rules. Resident #108 was safe to smoke independently/unsupervised.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interviews with facility and hospital staff, the facility failed to ensure Resident #170 was provided a bed hold notice when discharged to the hospital. This affected one resident (Resident #170) of three residents reviewed for bed hold notices. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #170 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] then a readmission on [DATE]. He was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He expired on [DATE] at the hospital. Resident #170's diagnoses included heart transplant recipient, end stage renal disease and congestive heart failure. Review of the progress note dated [DATE] at 4:24 A.M. revealed a transfer and bed hold notice signed by the nurse. There was no evidence Resident #170 signed the notice or was given a written copy of the notice. Interview on [DATE] at 2:46 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #201 revealed she did not have Resident #170 sign the bed hold notice nor have other evidence he received a copy in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH