Pleasant Lake Villa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 209 beds and averages 176.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-11-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program for Resident #243 to treat the resident's gout. Actual harm occurred when Resident #243 experienced extreme pain, moaning and yelling out due to pain in toes related to a medical diagnosis of gout with a lack of intervention and/or administration of effective pain medication between 11/18/19 at 8:30 A.M. and 11/19/19 at 8:00 P.M. This affected one resident (#243) of three residents reviewed for pain. Findings include: Resident #243 was admitted to this facility on 10/31/19. On 11/06/19 the resident was sent out to the hospital for mental status change. He was readmitted to this facility on 11/13/19. His admitting diagnoses included pneumonia, chronic gout, chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes and enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile. On 11/18/19 at 8:30 A.M. the resident's significant other approached this surveyor stating that she needed to get the doctor to come and look at her husband. She stated he was in terrible pain and no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the food committee minutes, observation, interviews, and review of the ServSafe guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that residents received food at palatable temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents except those who received nothing by mouth, residents (#69, #110, and #207). The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of the Food Committee Minutes for April 2026, residents (not identified) stated the food was not served as hot as the residents would like. Resident interviews conducted on 05/26/26 from 10:54 A.M. to 11:06 A.M. revealed that Residents #97 and #178 reported the food was cold.Review of the lunch menu for 05/28/26 showed items including honey baked ham, baked potato, key west vegetable blend, biscuit, sherbet, coffee or tea, and 2% milk.During an observation on 05/28/26 at 1:26 P.M., a sample test tray evaluated with the Dietary Manager (DM) #431 and Regional Director of Food Services (RFSD) #805 showed the following temperatures: baked potato at 146 degrees Fahrenheit (F), key west vegetable blend…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary resident environment affecting 44 residents (#4, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #18, #19, #26, #29, #32, #33, #41, #45, #48, #50, #57, #58, #65, #76, #79, #102, #104, #109, #110, #114, #127, #133, #136, #141, #146, #147, #155, #158, #160, #171, #175, #178, #182, #188, #190, #192, #201, and #205) of 44 residents that resided on the Rosewood unit and had the potential to affect all 170 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 05/26/26 at 10:32 A.M., Resident #32 reported that housekeeping did not routinely pick up trash or sweep and mop the floors. Observation at that time revealed crumbs and stains between, under, and behind both beds; under the heater; along the wall under the window; and between the dressers and the television. Dried stains were also noted on the heater. On 05/28/26 at 2:40 P.M., the Housekeeping Supervisor (HSKS #416) stated residents' rooms and common areas were to be cleaned daily. At that time, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #233's medications were administered as ordered by the physician. This finding affected one resident (#233) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 170. Findings include:Review of Resident #233's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE] with diagnoses including type one diabetes, anxiety disorder and depression.Review of Resident #233's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/31/26 (discontinued 05/09/26) for amitriptyline (used to treat depression, nerve pain, prevent migraines and an off-label used to treat insomnia, anxiety and other conditions) 100 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression (due at 9:00 P.M.).Review of Resident #233's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #233's Psychotropic Medications Care Plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that indwelling urinary catheter care was completed every shift as ordered and as required by facility policy, resulting in significant accumulation of smegma (body secretion made of oils, sweat, and dead skin cells) and increased risk of infection for one resident (#56) of three reviewed for catheter use. The facility census was 170.Findings include:Review of Resident #56 medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/26 with multiple orthopedic injuries and a diagnosis of neuromuscular bladder dysfunction.Review of care plan for Resident #56 dated 04/20/26 revealed goals and interventions for risk of infection related to indwelling urinary catheter. Interventions included: assessing the resident for pain/discomfort; checking catheter for patency; enhanced barrier precautions; flushing catheter as needed; use catheter securement device; monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection; use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #217's controlled medications were appropriately monitored and tracked by the facility. This finding affected one resident (#217) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 170. Findings include:Review of Resident #217's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/13/25 with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #217's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #217's progress note dated 06/07/25 at 9:58 P.M. revealed two nurses placed calls to the pharmacy regarding the lacosamide anti-seizure (controlled medication) and narcotic pain medication (controlled medication). The pharmacist stated the medications were shipped at 7:00 P.M. and would be in. The family supplied the medications since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained per order. This affected two residents (#176, #207) out of four residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The facility census was 170.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #207 revealed an admission date of 08/15/19 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contracture of hand, history of falling, hyperlipidemia and hypertension, presence of gastrostomy tube.Review of the physician's orders initiated on 03/26/26, revealed an order for EBP for high contact resident care including dressing, bathing, showering, transfers, hygiene care, changing linens, assisting with toileting, dressing changes, and care of any device (central line, tube feeding, and catheter) to reduce chance of spreading infection.Review of the care plan revised on 05/12/26 revealed interventions for EBP related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's Coronavirus (COVID-19) policy, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned correctly for Resident #193, who was on droplet precautions to potentially prevent the spread of COVID-19 infections. This had the potential to affect 29 residents (Residents #165, #166, #167, #168, #169, #170, #171, #172, #173, #174, #175, #176, #177, #178, #179, #180, #181, #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, #187, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, and #193) who resided on the Sandalwood unit. The facility census was 189. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #193 revealed an admission date of 10/09/24 with diagnoses including kidney transplant, type one diabetes mellitus with chronic diabetic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of the left heel, pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history of urinary tract infections. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #135's nails were clean, and her chin was free of hair. This affected one resident (Resident #135) out of three residents (Residents #51, #135, and #187) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 158. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 07/30/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Care Plan dated 04/14/22 revealed Resident #135 had a self-care deficit related to cognition and generalized weakness. Interventions included nail care as needed. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/06/24, revealed Resident #135 had moderately impaired cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance with ADLs. Observation and interview on 09/14/24 at 9:40 A.M. with Resident #135 revealed she was lying in bed; her fingernails were long and dirty and she had hairs growing on her chin. Resident #135 stated that she liked the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure multiple dose medications were dated when opened. This affected five residents (#39, #54, #81, #88 and #285) of 15 residents reviewed with insulin pens and two medication carts (Rosewood back and Oakwood front) of five medication carts reviewed. The facility census was 181. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #285 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type II diabetes. Review of the physician orders for June 2024 revealed an order for Insulin Glargine (long-acting insulin)100 unit/milliliter (ml) solution pen-injector. Observation on 06/06/24 at 10:01 A.M. of Oakwood front medication cart revealed Resident #285's insulin Glargine pen was dispensed on 04/25/24 and not dated to indicate when it was opened. Interview on 06/06/24 at 10:05 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #995 verified Resident #285's insulin was dated when it was opened, and the dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure recommended guidelines were followed for changing disposable respiratory equipment for Residents #12, #15, and #83. This affected three residents (#12, #15, and #83) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 181. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, epilepsy, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had short-term and long-term memory problems and used oxygen daily. Review of Resident #12's physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/14/24 to change the oxygen tubing and clean the filter weekly per facility policy and change the aerosol tubing and setup and clean the filter weekly per facility policy. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for May 2024 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH