No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchard Villa

2841 Munding Drive, Oregon, OH 43616 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 136 certified beds · (419) 697-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 697-4100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 34 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1050 Isaac Streets Dr Ste 16 · (419) 693-7071 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Kroger0.8 mi
3301 Navarre Ave · (419) 691-4607 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6010 Wales Rd. · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.6%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.4%CMS range 45.8–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.6–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 4.4–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
34.8%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 122.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents protected health information was kept confidential. This affected 12 residents (#43, #52, #323, #421, #422, #423, #425, #427, #428, #429, #430, and #431) reviewed for protected health information. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/19/25 at 8:35 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #593 was at the medication cart in the hallway and she walked away from her medication cart with the computer screen open and visible. Concurrent observation revealed Resident #52's information for medication administration was displayed on the computer screen. During the observation Resident #101 was seated in her wheelchair next to the medication cart. Interview on 03/19/25 at 8:38 A.M. with RN #593 verified she left her medication cart computer open and visible. 2. Observation on 03/17/25 at 2:02 P.M. of the medication cart located at C wing nurses station revealed a paper report sheet face up with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to honor resident choice for medication to be administered with pudding. This affected one resident (#45) of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 02/09/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, and pneumonia. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed she was admitted to the rehabilitation unit and then had a room change on 03/13/25 to the long term care unit. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #45 revealed she was cognitively intact. Interview on 03/17/25 at 10:47 A.M. with Resident #45 stated she has difficulty swallowing medications and needs pudding to get her medication down. Resident #45 further stated she was originally on the rehabilitation unit and did not have any problems with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of facility documentation of Ombudsman notification revealed the facility failed to ensure required notification to the Ombudsman's office. This affected one (#119) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Former Resident #119 was admitted on [DATE] and was hospitalized on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/24, revealed the resident was discharged . Review of the census documentation, revealed Resident #119 was hospitalized and discharged on 12/17/24. Interview on 03/19/25 at approximately 3:30 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #634 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate tube feeding (liquid nutrition through a feeding tube) to maintain weight. This affected one (#16) of two residents reviewed for enteral nutrition (tube feeding). The facility identified four additional residents (#51, #98, #116, and #322) received tube feedings (TF). The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 08/11/24 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, and gastrostomy status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for nutrition. Further review revealed she received nutrition and hydration via tube feeding. Additionally, Resident #16 had a significant weight loss and was not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen. Review of the weight history for Resident #16 revealed a current weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered. This affected two (Residents #50 and #29) of four residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility identified 32 residents who were prescribed oxygen. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level) and hypercapnia (elevated carbon dioxide level), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact. Resident #50 required moderate assistance with toileting, showering, footwear, personal hygiene, transferring and the resident required supplemental oxygen via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications. This affected one resident, (#69), out of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The current census is 117. Findings include: Record review for Resident #69 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #69 include dementia, depression, myocardial infarction, pulmonary fibrosis, and syncope and collapse. Review of Resident #69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident has impaired cognition and received antibiotics during the review period. Review of Resident #69's care plans dated 06/11/21 revealed a focus for Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to infections with colonization of multi-drug resistance organisms, (MDRO). Review of Resident #69's medication orders revealed on 08/08/24 the resident was ordered to receive an antibiotic, Cephalexin 250 milligrams (mg) daily prophylactic for urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and administration carts were locked when left unattended. This affected on resident (#57) reviewed for medications storage and had the potential to affect two residents (#14 and #18) that were cognitively impaired and independently mobile residing on the A hall. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 05/19/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and depressive state schizoaffective disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Resident #57 required extensive assistance with toileting, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and was dependent for footwear, bathing and toileting. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter and one (#322) of one residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility identified five residents with an indwelling urinary catheter who utilize a wheelchair and 66 residents that required enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Based on medical record review Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/25, revealed Resdient #9 was cognitively intact and had limited range of motion on both sides of the upper and lower extremity and dependent for transfers. Resident #9 had an indwelling catheter. Review of the care plan, dated 10/30/23, verified Resident #9 was at risk for infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility wheelchair cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were clean. This affected two (Residents #9 and #58) of four residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had mild cognitive impairment. This resident had impairment to his upper and lower extremities on one side and required extensive assistance with dressing, toileting, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #58 was dependent for lower body dressing, footwear, and transfers. Resident #58 utilized an electric wheelchair for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care for two (#84 and #102) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 08/31/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, dementia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, ulcerative colitis and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was cognitively impaired. Resident #84 required moderate assistance for toilet hygiene, personal hygiene, mobility and transfers. Resident #84 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan dated 09/17/21 revealed Resident #84 had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care deficit. Interventions included: staff to provide extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of an authorization for the release of health information, review of electronic communications, and policy review, the facility failed to provide copies of the medical record to a resident representative in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #125) of five reviewed for medical record requests. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #125 had an admission date of 11/07/23 and a discharge date of 02/14/24. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage five chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy and polyneuropathy, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anemia, noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, abnormal weight loss, and acquired absence of the left foot. Review of the, Authorization for the Release of Health Information, form revealed one of Resident #125's family members requested a copy of the resident's medical record on 02/16/24. The family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to date insulin pens after initial use and failed to date a vial of opened and used sterile water. This affected two out of four medication carts observed and had the potential to affect four (#54, #72, #75, and #119) residents with insulin pens that were opened and not dated. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Observation on 12/11/23 at 9:20 A.M. of medication storage for the medication cart on A hall on the skilled unit revealed one vial of sterile water that was opened and undated, one lantus insulin pen opened and undated, and one humalog insulin pen that was opened and undated for Resident #119. At the time of the observation Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 verified the opened and undated insulin pens for Resident #119 and sterile water. Observation on 12/11/23 at 11:30 A.M. of medication cart for A hall on the long term care unit revealed one opened and undated lantus insulin pen for Resident #54, one opened and undated lantus insulin pen for Resident #72, and one opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure carpet was in good repair. This affected one (Resident #45) and had the potential to affect 23 (Residents 3, #9, #17, #18, #27, #28, #38, #39, #45, #46, #47, #53, #55, #73, #79, #81, #83, #84, #86, #89, #107, #118, and #121) who were indecently mobile and residing on the Bayshore hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bathroom was kept in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #64) of one resident observed for bathroom cleanliness. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Interview on 08/22/23 at approximately 9:30 A.M. with Resident #45 revealed the hallway carpet on Bayshore has a large snag and the resident was concerned she could trip and fall. Observation on 08/23/23 at 11:47 A.M. revealed in the walkway of the Bayshore hallway carpet, there was an indent of missing carpet and an area approximately one inch to one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program. This had the potential to affect 11 (#1, #9, #17, #40, #46, #53, #83, #86, #89, #107, and #121) residents residing on the Bayshore unit. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Observation on 08/21/23 at 4:36 P.M. of the Bayshore unit dining area revealed multiple gnats flying around the refrigerator. A gnat trap on top of the refrigerator had approximately 15 gnats sitting on the trap. Interview on 08/22/23 at 7:30 A.M. of Resident #86 revealed there were gnats everywhere, including in the halls, resident rooms, and in the dining area. Resident #86 stated she believed they were coming from the drains. Observation on 08/22/23 at 2:18 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #276 verified the gnats in the dining area on the Bayshore unit. MS #276 stated they tried to keep up with the gnats and housekeeping put out the gnat traps. MS #276 stated the gnat trap must be full and needed emptied. While the facility had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate copy of a resident's advanced directive was maintained in the resident's medical record. This affected one (Resident #383) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #383 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer sacral region stage II, hyperkalemia, hyperlipidemia, diverticulosis of large intestine without perforation or abscess without bleeding. Review of the physician order dated 08/10/23 revealed Resident #383's advanced directive was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest). Review of the care plan dated 08/13/23 revealed Resident #383 had chosen advanced directive of DNRCC-Arrest. The medical record did not include a signed copy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received nail care. This affected one (Resident #47) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 124. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #47 required extensive two person assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent upon staff for bathing. Review of the care plan revised on 04/03/23 revealed Resident #47 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and for staff to provide nail care as needed. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation showing the resident received nail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure TED hose were applied per physician order. This affected one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/19/22 and a readmission date of 07/06/22. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, congestive heart failure (CHF), and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with dressing. Review of a plan of care focus area, revised 12/08/22, revealed Resident #61 was at risk for decreased cardiac output and abnormal lab values related to CHF, hyperlipidemia, use of anticoagulant medication, and use of diuretics. Interventions included knee high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow audiology recommendations to better assist with hearing. This affected one (Resident #14) of one reviewed for hearing. The census was 124. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/26/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal failure, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #14's most recent care plan revealed she had a communication problem related to a hearing deficit and was required to wear hearing aids. Review of the Audiology Group progress note dated 07/12/23 revealed the staff and family had noticed a recent decrease in Resident #14's responsiveness and she complained of newly decreased hearing. Recommendations were for the attending physician or nursing staff to complete wax removal from both ears. The audiologist would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a hand splint was used to prevent contractures per physician order. This affected one (Resident #68) of one reviewed for contractures. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, aphasia, type II diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), major depressive disorder, asthma, atherosclerosis, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, toilet use, locomotion, and bed mobility. Review of the plan of care revised 04/13/23 revealed Resident #68 had potential for alteration in skin integrity related to immobility, incontinence, and splint usage.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two (Residents #10 and #90) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/01/22 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dementia, and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of Resident #10's current care plan revealed he was at risk for falls with a history of falls. Interventions included using a call sign to remind him to ask for assistance and having the call light accessible when in his room. Observation on 08/23/23 at 9:12 A.M. revealed Resident #10 in bed with his call light wrapped around the bottom of his enabler bar, with the call light button dangling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement tube feeding recommendations in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #62) of one reviewed for tube feedings. The facility identified three residents who received tube feedings. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/15/22 and a readmission date of 01/15/23. Diagnoses included unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, type II diabetes, spinal stenosis, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and personal history of pulmonary embolism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact, had a feeding tube, and received 51% or more of total calories through tube feeding. Review of a plan of care focus area, revised 08/09/23, revealed Resident #62 required a feeding tube to assist in maintaining or improving nutritional status related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered medication. This affected one (Resident #382) of one reviewed for availability of medications. The census was 124. Findings include: Review of Resident #382's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/23. The resident was discharged home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type II, and auditory hallucinations. Review of Resident #382's entrance Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #382's progress note dated 07/28/23 revealed the resident was admitted from home for respite care via family. The medication list provided by the family was sent to the medical doctor for review. Review of Resident #382's admission records revealed an order for magnesium citrate 1,000 milligrams (mg), which was to be taken by mouth daily. Review of Resident #382's Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly. This affected one (Resident #7) of four reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 124. Findings Included: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/01/20. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had an intact cognition. The resident required one person limited assistance for activities of daily living and supervision/set up help for eating. Review of Resident #7's most recent care plan revealed he had impaired cognition function/impaired thought process related to impaired decision making, short term memory loss, and mild confusion. The resident suffered from ineffective breathing patterns as evidenced by shortness of breath on exertion and lying flat at times, labored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #54) directly, and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. All residents residing in the facility received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 07/09/19 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54's cognition was not assessed. Further review revealed Resident #54 required supervision with setup help only for eating. Review of the current physician order for Resident #54 revealed he received a regular diet with regular textures and thin liquids. Observation on 08/21/23 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #283 preparing a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. RN #283 held the bread in her left hand while spreading peanut butter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of physician orders, review of treatment administration records (TAR), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment administration was accurately documented in the medical record. This affected two (#61 and #68) of two residents reviewed for treatments. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/19/22 and a readmission date of 07/06/22. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, congestive heart failure (CHF), and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with dressing. Review of a plan of care focus area revised 12/08/22 revealed Resident #61 was at risk for decreased cardiac output and abnormal lab values related to CHF, hyperlipidemia, use of anticoagulant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of immunization records, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccinations were offered and administered per CDC recommendations. This affected three (Residents #53, #64, and #68) of five reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/05/23. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertensive urgency, obesity, hypertension, and difficulty walking not elsewhere classified. Review of Resident #53's immunization record revealed the resident received pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar 13 (PCV13) on 10/01/19. There was no evidence Resident #53 received a dose of PCV20 or PPSV23. 2. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/26/23. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, other complications of amputation stump, type II diabetes, end stage renal disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident, resident representative and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to invite residents and their representatives to quarterly care plan conferences and did not hold quarterly care plan conferences. This affected three (#14, #16, and #91) of three residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan conferences. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/10/18. Diagnosis included dorsalgia, fibromyalgia, hyperlipidemia, polyosteoarthritis, essential (primary) hypertension, unspecified hearing loss, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, unspecified displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder recurrent, epileptic seizures related to external causes, and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to apply orthotic devices as ordered. This affected one (#81) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 01/13/21 and a readmission date of 04/05/21. Diagnoses included pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side; contracture left hand; contracture left knee; and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the Modification of Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/12/21, revealed Resident #81 was cognitively intact; required extensive two person physical assistance with dressing; and total two person physical assistance with transfers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #81 had a self care performance deficit related to limited range of motion left hand contracted and decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and medical record reviews, policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred properly to prevent a fall and failed to implement fall precautions as ordered and care planned. This affected three (#81, #55, and #6) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 01/13/21 and a readmission date of 04/05/21. Diagnoses included pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side; and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the modification and annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/12/21, revealed Resident #81 was cognitively intact, required two person physical assistance with transfers and bed mobility, had no resistance to care, and had one fall with no injury. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #81's fall interventions included mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, staffing schedule review and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding care was provided and documented as ordered. This affected one (#73) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility identified five residents with tube feeding. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/25/21. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, persistent vegetative state, dysphagia, convulsions, tracheostomy, heart failure, aphasia, and contracture. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was in a persistent vegetative state. Resident #73 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #73 had a tracheostomy care and suctioning at the time of the review. Review of Resident #73's care plan revised 04/08/21 revealed supports and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, staffing schedule review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy care was provided and documented as ordered on second shift. This affected one (#73) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility identified two residents with tracheotomies. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/25/21. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, persistent vegetative state, dysphagia, convulsions, tracheostomy, heart failure, aphasia, and contracture. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was in a persistent vegetative state. Resident #73 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #73 had a tracheostomy care and suctioning at the time of the review. Resident #73 received respiratory therapy seven days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, dialysis center staff and facility staff interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident dialysis Central Venous Catheter (CVC). This affected one (#52) of one resident reviewed for dialysis treatment. The facility identified 12 residents receiving dialysis treatment. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 04/03/21. Diagnoses included sepsis, arthritis, end stage renal disease, long term use of insulin, morbid obesity, and heart disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #52, dated 04/09/21, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Additionally, the assessment indicated the resident received dialysis treatment. Review of the hospital admission paperwork dated 04/03/21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a double lumen hemodialysis catheter in his right chest. Review of the most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacist accurately reviewed a resident's medication regimen. This affected one (#43) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an original admission date of 11/20/19 and a most recent admission date of 08/30/20. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, toxic encephalopathy, major depression, anemia, fibromyalgia, anxiety disorder, and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had short and long-term memory problems. Review of a physician's order dated 08/30/20 revealed Resident #43 was ordered the antidepressant Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) and to give one and one-half tablets to equal 75 mg daily. Review of a medication regimen review (MRR) dated 10/23/20 revealed the pharmacist reviewed Resident #43's Trazodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-24 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, review of the survey results book, and review of Certification and Licensure website, the facility failed to ensure the survey results book was up to date and available to residents. This had the potential to affect all 124 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 08/23/23 at 3:39 P.M. with resident council members revealed the survey results book was last observed on the 300 hall but was outdated by six to seven years. Resident #45 stated she requested the survey results book to be updated but to her knowledge it had not been updated yet. Observation on 08/23/23 at approximately 4:00 P.M. revealed the survey results book was unable to be located and no posting of the availability was noted. Interview on 08/24/23 at 10:59 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the survey results book was behind the welcome desk. Observation on 08/24/23 at 11:01 A.M. revealed the survey results book was located behind the welcome desk out of view and the last survey report was dated 06/08/22. Interview on 08/24/23 at 11:05 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTH SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.9≈ chain avg
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OH 10 HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/06/2022
CC OH10 OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
CHAVOS221 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
CHAVOS221 IRRV TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
LIONSVIEW OPCO NR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
LIONSVIEW SC LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
LIVING26 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
LIVING26 IRRV TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
SAPPHIRE143 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
SAPPHIRE143 IRRV TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/06/2022
STUMP, BARRYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/07/2019
SHARVIT, ELIAVIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/22/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 4%Other / private 74%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,657per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366068. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next