Anchor Lodge Nursing Home INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of the incident log, review of facility in-services records, review of a personnel file, review of the safety inspection bus checklist, review of witness statements and the facility ' s internal investigation, review of policies, review of the emergency medical transportation report, review of hospital records, review of the monthly maintenance logs, interview with the medical director, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident dependent on staff, was safely secured in the wheelchair with a seat belt during transportation in a facility bus when coming back from a physician visit. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when one resident (#91) was placed at potential risk for serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries, when Transport Driver #300 abruptly stopped the facility bus, causing Resident #91 to come out of her wheelchair and was propelled over two rows of seats and landing on floor, towards the front of the bus,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-11-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained per physician order, and ongoing monitoring was provided for residents identified at nutritional risk and sustaining weight loss. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #66 experienced a severe weight loss of 10.8 % from 07/26/22 to 10/17/22. There was no evidence weekly weights were obtained per physician order or that subsequent monitoring or interventions were considered or implemented during this time. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's weekly weights were obtained per physician orders, which placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm that did not result in actual harm to the resident. This affected two (#66 and #51) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/01/22, with diagnoses including amyotrophic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) when the resident had diagnoses of a serious mental illness (SMI), and was prescribed psychotropic medication. This affected one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review. The facility census was 91.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #6's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 01/13/2022, indicated the resident had diagnoses of panic or other severe anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression and had not been prescribed any psychotropic medications within the last six months. Per the screen, Resident #6 did not have indications of SMI. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent. There were 31 observed medication opportunities with three medication errors, resulting in a calculated medication error rate of 9.68 percent. This affected two (Resident #32 and Resident #11) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 91.Findings Included:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included asthma, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #32's Order Recap Report revealed an order dated 12/01/2025 for Keppra (antiseizure medication) 500 milligrams (mg), one table by mouth every morning and at bedtime, ordered 09/17/2025 and dated 12/01/2025 for vitamin C 500 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth every morning.During medication administration observation on 12/03/2025 at 8:16 A.M., Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the medical record. This affected one (Resident #32) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 91.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included asthma, major depressive disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), gastrostomy status (a surgical opening into the stomach to place a feeding tube), and epilepsy.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/30/2025, revealed Resident #32 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) that indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated the resident had a feeding tube during the seven-day assessment look-back period.Review of Resident #32's Care Plan Report included a focus area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care. This affected one (Resident #32) of one resident reviewed for feeding tubes, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The facility census was 91. Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) and gastrostomy status (a surgical opening into the stomach to place a feeding tube).Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/30/2025, revealed Resident #32 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) that indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated the resident had a feeding tube and had received 51 percent or more of their total calories and 501 cubic centimeters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, resident council minutes review, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable related to temperature and taste. This had the potential to affect 86 of 86 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/29/23 and diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's Disease with early onset. Review of Resident #16's physician orders dated 06/30/23 revealed liberalized consistent carbohydrate diet, regular texture. 2. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/23 and diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood), and hypotension. Review of Resident #16's physician orders dated 04/21/23 revealed regular diet, regular texture. 3. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/21/17 and diagnoses included hemiplegia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, hospital staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written discharge notice with the provisions of the discharge was provided to a resident who went to the hospital. This affected one (#37) out of three residents reviewed for transfer, discharge from the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/23, with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Resident #37 was discharged from the facility on 09/12/23, to the hospital where the resident remains. Review of Resident #37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37's Brief Interview For Mental Status and mood were not assessed. Resident #37 received antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. Review of Resident #37's nursing progress notes dated 09/10/23 at 7:30 A.M., written by Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0626 — isolated
  Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, hospital staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who went to the hospital and was not provided a discharge from the facility, was allowed to return to the facility. This affected one (#37) of three residents reviewed for transfer, discharge from the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/23, with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Resident #37 was discharged from the facility on 09/12/23 to the hospital where the resident remains. Review of Resident #37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37's Brief Interview For Mental Status and mood were not assessed. Resident #37 received antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. Review of Resident #37's nursing progress notes dated 09/10/23 at 7:30 A.M., written by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, hospice interview, medical record review and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was dependent on staff for incontinence care, was not being dressed in multiple incontinence products at one time, when staff place multiple incontinence liners inside the incontinence brief. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/13/22, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #27 was admitted to hospice services on 11/02/22. Review of Resident #27's physician orders dated 11/03/22 revealed check and change every two hours every shift. Review of Resident #27's hospice notes dated 03/28/23 through 06/20/23 revealed multiple notes stating Resident #27 was wearing an incontinence brief and two to three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder was provided scheduled psychotropic medication to maintain stable mental health. This affected one (#37) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/23, with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Resident #37 was discharged from the facility on 09/12/23. Review of Resident #37's physician orders dated 09/02/23 revealed clonazepam oral tablet one milligram (mg), give one tablet by mouth three times a day for PTSD. Review of Resident #37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37's Brief Interview For Mental Status and mood were not assessed. Resident #37 received antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. Review of Resident #37's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospice interview and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication administration was accurately documented and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administration of an antianxiety medication. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/13/22, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #27 was admitted to hospice services on 11/02/22. Review of Resident #27's physician orders dated 03/28/23 revealed Ativan oral tablet 0.5 mg (lorazepam), give one tablet by mouth every two hours as needed for anxiety until 09/28/23. Review of Resident #27's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #27 received Ativan 0.5 mg tablet by mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,678 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $20,678 — penalty dated 2024-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH