Rose Lane Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 34% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 160.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2021-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the unprecedented global pandemic that resulted in the Presidential declaration of a State of National Emergency dated 03/13/20, review of Nursing Home Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Safety and Oversight (QSO) Memo, review of the facility COVID-19 policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement effective and recommended infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 08/30/21 when the facility did not implement appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) including disposable gowns, gloves, N95 respirator masks and goggles/face shields while caring for residents, did not ensure a resident who tested positive for COVID 19 (Resident #47) did not reside in a room with a resident who tested negative (Resident #126) without the guardian's knowledge. The facility failed to properly disinfect high touch areas including staff break rooms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Resident #49 adequate assistance when transferring resulting in a fall with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 01/13/24 when Resident #49, who required assistance of two people for transfers, was transferred from the toilet to a shower chair by one person, resulting in a fall and non displaced fracture on left metacarpal and closed fracture of radius and ulna in left forearm, requiring orthopedic surgery. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 159. Findings Include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the facility policy and review of the resident handbook, the facility failed ensure a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. This affected 12 residents (#32, #37, #40, #70, #77, #109, #110, #129, #131, #148, #149 and #159) out of 30 residents residing on the 300-hall (memory care). The facility census was 167.Findings include: Observation on 03/27/26 from 10:08 A.M. to 10:28 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #303 revealed the following areas of concern:- In Resident #149's room, there was feces on the toilet leading down the bowl of the toilet, and the toilet looked like it had not been cleaned in a while.- In Resident #110's room, there was feces on the floor in front of the toilet.- In Resident #109's room, there was feces over the toilet and an open soiled brief filled with feces in the corner of the bathroom.- In Resident #32 and Resident #37's bathroom, there was feces on and in the toilet, and the toilet was visibly dirty.- In Resident #70, Resident #131 and Resident #159's bathroom, there was urine puddled on the riser over…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 160 residents who ate meals prepared by the facility's kitchen, as two residents (Resident #3 and #23) were ordered nothing by mouth and did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 162. Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 01/28/26 from 2:18 P.M. to 3:16 P.M. revealed the following: at 2:32 P.M. the sanitizing level of a bucket of quaternary cleaner (QUAT) (a disinfectant that uses ammonium compounds) on the three compartment sink was checked with QUAT paper (testing papers made of litmus paper used to measure the concentration level) and was below the required 150-200 parts per million (ppm), at 2:33 P.M. the bucket of QUAT located near the dishwashing station was below the required 150-200ppm, at 2:34 P.M. the bucked of QUAT located in the main food preparation area was below the required 150-200ppm, a layer of dust and grime on the top and side of the juice dispenser, a bulk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience on the Memory Care Unit (MCU), and failed to ensure Resident #9 was provided dignity and respect at all times This affected ten residents (#10, #18, #32, #49, #69, #83, #105, #125, #139 and #142) out of 22 residents observed in the dining room, and one (Resident #9) of one resident reviewed for abuse.Findings include:1.Observation on 01/28/26 at 12:04 P.M. of the MCU dining room revealed 22 residents sitting at seven different tables. Two certified nursing assistants (CNAs), CNA #912 and CNA #937, were passing the trays from the cart in the nearby hallway. Also assisting in the dining room were Activity Director (AD) #817 and Human Resources (HR) #819. Observations on 01/28/26 at 12:05 P.M. of table one revealed Resident #18, Resident #69 and Resident #138 were all seated. Resident #138's family had walked in and took him to another dining area. Resident #69 was eating his meal while Resident #18 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews with families and staff and observations on the Memory Care Unit (MCU) the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to Resident #18. This affected Resident #18 and had the potential to affect all 27 residents on the MCU. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 03/22/18. Diagnoses included intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, dementia, dysphagia, aphasia and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/13/26 revealed Resident #18 had cognitive impairment. He was independent with walking. Review of preferences for routine revealed snacks were very important, reading and animals were not important and music was somewhat important. Review of the Activity assessment dated [DATE] completed by Resident #18's wife revealed his participation in activities was none. Resident #18 enjoyed motorcycle riding. He watched TV. He would be interested in pet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observation and resident handbook the facility failed ensure a clean homelike environment. This affected three residents (Resident #51, #172, and #178) out of five residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 162. Findings Include:1. On 01/27/26 at 10:44 AM Resident #178 room revealed the bedside commode (BSC) had a small amount of urine and bowel movement (BM) in it dried and when the bathroom door was opened there was BM all around the toilet riser, toilet base and on the floor by the toilet. Resident #178 was not in the room at that time. At 10:53A.M. Resident #178 came back from getting her hair done At10:55 A.M. with Register Nurse #821unit manager and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #902 stated Resident #178 takes herself to bathroom. Resident #178 stated yes, she does take herself to the bathroom and it has been a few days ago that she used her BSC. At 10:59 A.M. RN #821 cleaned up the bathroom. Observation at 1:50 P.M. of the BSC in Resident #178's room revealed it still had not been cleaned. No housekeeping has been seen on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and observations the facility failed to assist Resident #32 with his meal per his care plan. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of one residents reviewed for meal assistance. The census was 162.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 09/12/24. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively impaired. He required set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. He was dependent for all other activities of daily living. Review of the medical nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 weighed 169.8 pounds. He ate 50-100% of meals. He was ordered a house supplement BID. Review of January 2026 orders revealed Resident #32 had an order for regular diet and thin liquids and a 4 ounce house supplement twice a day. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident's received timely assistance to meet their needs. This affected two of two residents (Resident #180 and Resident #181) observed for call lights. The facility census was 162. Findings Include:Observation on 01/28/26 at 11:25 A.M. of the call light monitor on the 500-hall nurse's station revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #909 was seating at the desk charting on the computer right next to the call light monitor. CNA #909 then got up and stated she had to answer the call lights. Call lights for room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #181) had been on for 34:54 minutes and room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #180) call light had been on for 43 minutes. This was verified with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #971.Interview with Register Nurse (RN) #821 on 01/28/26 at11:29 A.M. revealed CNA #884 was on the hall and should have answered the call light. RN #821 verified 35 minutes was too long. RN #821 revealed Resident #181 used the call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #110 was assessed properly after they returned to the facility from the dialysis center. This affected one resident sampled for dialysis care. The facility census was 162.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, diabetes type two, kidney disease, nephritic syndrome (inflammation of the filtering units of the kidneys), and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 10/02/25 that Resident #110 received dialysis at an outside dialysis center every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday and the absence of an order to assess the resident on return from the dialysis center.Review of the care plan revealed a revision dated 10/03/25 that Resident #110 received dialysis with the goal of being free from complications related to dialysis and an intervention dated 09/12/25 to monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed while providing Resident #181 catheter care. This affected one resident (Resident #181) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #181 revealed an diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. Orders for indwelling catheter, and on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.Observation of Resident #181's door revealed Resident #181 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and gown and gloves were to be worn while providing urinary catheter care.Observation on 01/28/2026 3:34 P.M. of Resident #181 indwelling catheter care with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #884 revealed Resident #181 had a sign outside the door stating she was on EBP and a gown and gloves were to be worn while providing catheter care. Observation of CNA #884 revealed she did not wear proper Personal Protection Equipment while providing indwelling catheter care. Interview on 01/28/2026 at 3:42 P.M. with Resident #181 stated staff never wear a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy, and self-reported incident (SRI) review, the facility failed to timely report an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (Resident #175) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 151. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #175 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 with diagnosis including but not limited to abscess of bursa right hip, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, and Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #175 was discharged to hospital of 06/15/25. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #175 was rarely/never understood. Resident #175 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL'S) and always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the care plan dated 06/06/25 revealed Resident #175 had a ADL/self-care deficit due to weakness, dementia, bacteremia, and status post incision and drainage (I/D) right hip.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH