Rose Lane Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 160.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2021-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the unprecedented global pandemic that resulted in the Presidential declaration of a State of National Emergency dated 03/13/20, review of Nursing Home Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Safety and Oversight (QSO) Memo, review of the facility COVID-19 policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement effective and recommended infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 08/30/21 when the facility did not implement appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) including disposable gowns, gloves, N95 respirator masks and goggles/face shields while caring for residents, did not ensure a resident who tested positive for COVID 19 (Resident #47) did not reside in a room with a resident who tested negative (Resident #126) without the guardian's knowledge. The facility failed to properly disinfect high touch areas including staff break rooms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Resident #49 adequate assistance when transferring resulting in a fall with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 01/13/24 when Resident #49, who required assistance of two people for transfers, was transferred from the toilet to a shower chair by one person, resulting in a fall and non displaced fracture on left metacarpal and closed fracture of radius and ulna in left forearm, requiring orthopedic surgery. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 159. Findings Include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the facility policy and review of the resident handbook, the facility failed ensure a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. This affected 12 residents (#32, #37, #40, #70, #77, #109, #110, #129, #131, #148, #149 and #159) out of 30 residents residing on the 300-hall (memory care). The facility census was 167.Findings include: Observation on 03/27/26 from 10:08 A.M. to 10:28 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #303 revealed the following areas of concern:- In Resident #149's room, there was feces on the toilet leading down the bowl of the toilet, and the toilet looked like it had not been cleaned in a while.- In Resident #110's room, there was feces on the floor in front of the toilet.- In Resident #109's room, there was feces over the toilet and an open soiled brief filled with feces in the corner of the bathroom.- In Resident #32 and Resident #37's bathroom, there was feces on and in the toilet, and the toilet was visibly dirty.- In Resident #70, Resident #131 and Resident #159's bathroom, there was urine puddled on the riser over…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy, and self-reported incident (SRI) review, the facility failed to timely report an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (Resident #175) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 151. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #175 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 with diagnosis including but not limited to abscess of bursa right hip, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, and Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #175 was discharged to hospital of 06/15/25. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #175 was rarely/never understood. Resident #175 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL'S) and always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the care plan dated 06/06/25 revealed Resident #175 had a ADL/self-care deficit due to weakness, dementia, bacteremia, and status post incision and drainage (I/D) right hip.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, policy review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to maintain or improve a resident's range of motion. This affected four (Residents #58, #91, #125 and #127) of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed a diagnoses of right side weakness and paralysis following a stroke and right hand contracture. Review of a care plan initiated 08/28/20 revealed Resident #58 had a self care deficit due to post stroke and right sided weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An intervention dated 10/13/20 indicated a right resting hand splint was to be donned six to eight hours as tolerated. Check skin integrity before applying and after removing. A care plan initiated 12/02/20 revealed Resident #58 was at risk for decline in active and passive range of motion. An intervention dated 10/28/22 indicated an intervention for Restorative Nursing Services (RNS) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of schedules and time punches, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to consistently provide restorative programs and to respond to call lights in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #58, #127) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living and two (Residents #58 and #127) of five residents reviewed for range of motion and one additional resident (Resident #140) who was identified as not having the call light responded to timely. This had the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: 1. During a resident council meeting with Residents #4, #10, #19, #28, #31, #33, #57, #64, #117 and #126 the residents had a majority consensus that the facility did not have sufficient staff with multiple residents reporting it could take up to an hour to get assistance with some residents reporting they were incontinent as a result. Residents reported there had been restorative programs that were not provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 11/14/23 at 12:10 P.M., observation of the medication room in the 400 hall revealed one box of Multistix urinalysis dip sticks to test for urinary tract infections with an expiration date of 08/31/23. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #410 verified the urinalysis test strips were expired. Observation of the medication cart in the 400 hall revealed a bottle of Biotene mouth wash, labeled for Resident #46, had an expiration date of 08/03/22. At the time of observation, LPN #410 verified the Biotene was expired. 3. On 11/14/23 at 2:55 P.M., observation of the medication room in the 100 hall revealed an open one milliliter vial of Tubersol (a multi-dose solution used for tuberculosis testing) in the refrigerator. The vial of tubersol was not labeled as to when it was opened. At the time of observation, Registered Nurse (RN) #404 verified the vial was open and was not labeled as to when it was opened. 4. On 11/15/23 at 9:55 A.M., observation of the medication storage room in the 200 hall revealed a bottle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary environment This had the potential to affect eight residents (Resident #7, #29, #36, #84, #87, #100, #103, #125) for environment and all 18 residents (Resident #1, #2, #13, #20, #25, #42, #70, #74, #75 #78, #89, #99, #112, #122, #123, #126, #134, #143) on the 200 unit who used the shower room. The facility census was 155. Findings Included: 1. Observations on 11/13/23 at 9:05 A.M., 1:46 P.M., and 3:00 P.M. revealed there was fecal matter on the toilet seat and the floor in front of the toilet in the shared bathroom of Resident #29 and #103. On 11/13/23 at 3:00 P.M. an interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #406 verified the fecal matter on the toilet seat and the floor in front of the toilet in the shared bathroom of Resident #29 and #103. She stated the 100 and 200 units did not have a housekeeper today so it was the aides' responsibility to clean up any messes. On 11/15/23 at 10:45 A.M. an interview with Housekeeping Director #317 revealed all the units should have at least one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview with staff the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's call light was within reach. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of 36 residents observed for call lights. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was had an admission date of 06/11/14. Diagnoses included heart failure, borderline personality disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, asthma, post-traumatic stress disorder, and auditory hallucinations. Review of the plan of care dated 05/29/14 revealed Resident #36 received psychotropic medication with potential for falls, injury potential for harmful side effects relate to schizophrenia, depression and anxiety. Intervention included to keep (the) call light within reach. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition and she had no upper extremity impairment. Observations on 11/13/23 at 9:44 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed timely upon resident discharge from the facility. This affected two residents (Resident #410 and #411) of two residents reviewed for funds conveyance. The facility census was 155. Findings Include: 1. Resident #410 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Resident #410 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the business records for Resident #410 revealed a check in the amount of $50.13 was dispersed to the State of Ohio Treasurer on [DATE]. 2. Resident #411 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus. Resident #411 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the business records for Resident #411 revealed a check in the amount of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure restorative programs for ambulation and/or transfers were consistently implemented and evaluated for two (Residents #58 and #127) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified nine residents on restorative ambulation or transfer programs. The census was 155. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed diagnoses including right sided weakness and paralysis following a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, polyneuropathy, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and osteoarthritis. Review of a physical therapy (PT) Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated interventions provided during PT included activities to promote safe ambulation. Resident #58 had demonstrated improved tolerance to transfers and mobility with a hemi-walker (designed for individuals with the use of only one hand or arm. Lighter than a walker and more stable than a cane) with minimal episodes of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #134 was transported to a non-emergent emergency room visit for evaluation after a fall and wound dressings were applied as ordered for Resident #46. This affected one resident (Resident #134) of eight residents reviewed for accidents and one resident (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 155. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #134 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lumbar fracture, diabetes, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis bilateral knees, respiratory failure, and kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #134 had intact cognition. Review of the progress note dated 08/25/23 at 2:30 A.M. revealed the nurse was informed by the nursing assistant after answering his call light Resident #134 stated he had fallen out of bed. Upon entering his room he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH