Manor Of Grande Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 79.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents that received meals from the facility. No residents were identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation during a tour of the kitchen on 06/30/24 from 8:10 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. with [NAME] #566 revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #601 had a full beard with no beard net on while in the kitchen. DA #601 stated on 06/30/24 at 8:10 A.M. that he should have been wearing a beard net. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed salad mix not labeled or dated, meatballs in a pan with a ripped foil cover, and a half of an undated cucumber. The door to the dining room and plate warmer had food splatter and food residue on it. The identified findings were verified at the time of observations with [NAME] #566. A revisit to the kitchen for tray line observation on 07/01/24 revealed that one food cart was dirty with food splatter on the door and inside. This was verified by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, taste test and pureed/mechanical soft guidelines review, the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This had the potential to affect four residents (#1, #22, #46, and #58) who were prescribed pureed diets of 73 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation and interview on 07/01/24 at 10:45 A.M. revealed [NAME] #566 pureed hamburgers, and they were the proper consistency. [NAME] #566 then pureed the French fries and portioned a sample into a monkey dish for the taste test. The French fries were contained lumps and were not a smooth consistency. Regional Dietary Manager #600 verified on 07/01/24 at 11:00 A.M. and stated [NAME] #566 should puree the French fries more. The French fries were pureed correctly prior to service. The facility identified four residents (#1, #22, #46, and #58) who were prescribed pureed diets. Review of the facility's pureed/mechanical soft guidelines revealed pureed foods should be pureed until smooth.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach of Residents #37 and #176. This affected two residents (#37 and #176) of 73 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/20/21 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, heart failure, dementia, depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, Parkinson's, and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had intact cognition and required moderate assistance of staff for eating, bed mobility, transfers, and hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 04/26/24 revealed Resident #37 had a history of falls related to Parkinson's, weakness, and dementia. Intervention included keeping the call light within reach. Observation on 06/30/24 at 9:45 A.M. of Resident #37 revealed she was lying in bed, and her call light was lying on the floor next to her bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29's code status was accurately reflected in both the hard medical chart and the electronic medical record. This affected one resident (#29) of 73 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 73. Findings include: A review of Resident #29's hard medical chart revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, end stage renal disease, and hypothyroidism. A document with the words, Full Code, was located on the face sheet in the electronic chart. A full code status means all emergency life saving measures will be provided in the event of respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest. Review of Resident #29's medical record dated 01/03/24 located in the hard chart revealed a code status of Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA). A DNR-CCA means a person would receive all emergency and medical care up until the time he or she experiences a cardiac or respiratory arrest, then all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Insulin KwikPens and insulin vials were dated when opened. This affected three residents (#3, #7, and #226) of twelve residents who were identified by the facility as receiving insulin. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation on 06/30/24 at 11:19 A.M. of a medication cart revealed two KwikPens not dated when opened, for Residents #3 and #7, and one used insulin vial not dated when opened for Resident #226. Interview at the time of the observation, Registered Nurse (RN) #530 stated all insulin pens should be dated when initially opened during the observation. Review of the facilities policies and procedures revealed no policy for insulin storage. This was verified by the Director of Nursing on 07/01/24 at 3:35 P.M.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of three self-reported incidents (SRIs) and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was free from physical abuse by Resident #54. This affected one resident (Resident #52) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of SRI #244843 started on 03/05/24 and timed at 6:36 P.M. and completed on 03/11/24 and timed at 3:33 P.M. revealed Resident #54 struck Resident #52 several times on the left eye and left side of face. Staff separated immediately, assessed, completed skin checks and vitals. Immediate interventions put in place were one-on-one supervision, then every 15-minute checks for two days, deep-breathing and distraction. Review of progress noted dated 03/05/24 revealed Resident #54 had a new order for Ativan as needed for 14 days. Physician assistant and psychiatry consultations were ordered. Review of progress note on 03/08/24 revealed a care conference was held with the responsible party where the abuse policy was reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of safety data sheets, review of job descriptions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure corrosive toilet cleaning products were securely stored on the memory care unit. This affected one resident (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards and had the potential to affect the 11 other residents (#1, #18, #19, #38, #40, #44, #46, #47, #54, #68, and #70) the facility identified as being independently ambulatory, cognitively impaired, and resided on the memory care unit. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 01/14/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and unspecified disorientation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedules from 04/14/22 through 04/17/22 revealed no registered nurses (RNs) were working in the facility on 04/17/22. Review of the posted nursing staff information for 04/17/22 revealed no RNs were present in the facility on this date. Interview on 04/21/22 at 6:46 P.M. with Human Resources #511 verified there were no RNs working in the facility on 04/17/22.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to date and store opened medications properly and failed to dispose of expired medications. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 04/20/22 at 9:32 A.M. on the secured nursing unit revealed one five milliliter (ml) bottle of Sanofi brand influenza vaccine opened and undated in the refrigerator and one tuberculin (TB) purified protein derivative 0.1 ml bottle opened and undated. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #659 at the time of the observation verified the influenza and TB vaccine bottles did not have an opened date. LPN #659 indicated the refrigerator was shared between the secured nursing unit and another nursing unit. Observation on 04/20/22 at 9:55 A.M. of the medication cart for the secured nursing unit revealed two one calcitonin nasal spray opened and undated, one fluticasone propionate for Resident #7 opened and undated, albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol for Resident #3 opened and undated and a bottle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (Resident #278) on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), failed to enusre reusable non-critical care equipment was disinfected after each resident use, and failed to ensure linens for residents on TBP were processed appropriately in the laundry area. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #278's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/22 and diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, Bell's Palsy and hyperlipidemia. Resident #278 was on transmission based precautions due to being an unvaccinated new admission. Observation on 04/20/22 at 7:34 A.M. revealed a plastic cart with personal protective equipment (PPE) outside of Resident #278's room, a door covering with PPE, and a sign on the door for Transmission Based Precautions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH