Ballard Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.92 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/20/25, a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent elopement. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wandering. The administrator identified 71 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy Elopement, read in part, 1. Staff shall promptly report any resident who tries to leave the premises or is suspected of being missing to the Charge nurse or Director of Nursing .2. If an employee observes a resident leaving the premises, he/she should: 1. Attempt to prevent the departure in a courteous manner; b. Get help from other staff members in the immediate vicinity, if necessary, and c. Instruct another staff member to inform the Charge Nurse or Director of Nursing Services that a resident has left the premises .4. If an employee discovers that a resident is missing from the facility, he/she shall:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-28 · tag F0887 — widespread
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered vaccines and received education related to COVID-19 immunizations, and if the vaccine was declined, the required documentation was in place for 1 (#54) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The administrator reported 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings:The admission assessment for Resident #54, dated 06/09/25, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which includes Congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The assessment showed a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.A facility vaccination consent form dated 05/29/25, read in part, COVID-19 VACCINE CONSENT, followed by I do___ do not___ want resident to receive COVID-19 vaccine or boosters.Resident #54's consent form showed a check mark to indicate they wanted the COVID-19 vaccine. In Resident #54's medical record, there was no documentation to indicate a COVID-19 vaccine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food service equipment was free from grease and grime. The dietary manager reported plate warming lids were used for residents who receive their meals in their rooms.Findings: An undated policy General Sanitation of Kitchen, read in part, Food and nutrition services staff will maintain the sanitation of the kitche. On 08/26/25 at 12:15 p.m., during a tour of the kitchen, the metal rack that held multiple plate warming lids were observed with visible buildup of grease and grime. There were no visible signs of the lids containing grease and grime. The residue on the metal rack was sticky to the touch and extended across all shelving levels where the lids were stored.On 08/26/25 at 12:17 p.m., the dietary manager stated the rack had not been cleaned and its proximity to the stove contributed to the accumulation of the grease and grime. The dietary manager stated the buildup of grease and grime on the metal rack was an oversight and needed to be cleaned.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility to ensure a food allergy was included on the comprehensive care plan for 1 (#31) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for food allergies.The administrator reported 60 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A nutritional risk assessment, dated 05/20/24, showed Resident 31's diet was regular with an allergy to fish. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/19/25, showed Resident #31 required set-up assistance with eating.On 08/27/25 at 10:01 a.m., Resident #31's dietary card showed a food allergy to fish. An incident report, dated 05/28/25, showed the resident was accidentally given a tuna sandwich and had eaten a couple of bites before the CNA could take it back. The incident report was sent to the emergency room for evaluation due to the known fish allergy. An emergency room report, dated 05/28/25, showed the resident was not in any distress. The emergency room report showed the resident reported feeling funny and was medicated for a known food allergy.A care plan, dated 05/30/25, showed the resident has a known food allergy to fish.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was kept clean and maintained in good repair. The DON identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled Homelike Environment, revised 02/2021, read in part, .Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect .homelike setting. These characteristics include .clean, sanitary . On 03/25/24 at 10:49 a.m., the womens visitor/staff restroom was observed. There was black residue on the inside area of the toilet bowl. On 03/25/24 at 10:57 a.m., the shower room on hall 200 was observed. There was black residue on the floor and the wall in the working shower stall. There was black residue on the inside area of the toilet bowl. On 03/25/24 at 10:59 a.m., the resident restroom on hall 100 was observed. There was a strong urine odor. There were floor tiles missing around the toilet. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into allegations of abuse for one (#38) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Policy, undated, read in parts, .Any allegation of abuse will be investigated by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing will as a minimum: review the resident's medical record looking for events leading up to the incident, interview the person(s) reporting the incident, interview any witnesses to the incident, interview the resident (if cognitive ability permits), interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident if necessary, interview the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors as able and necessary, interview other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services and review all events leading up to the incident .Witness reports will be reduced to writing with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident received monitoring before and after dialysis treatment and failed to ensure communication between the facility and the dialysis center for one (#13) of one sampled residents reviewed for dialysis. The DON identified one resident resided in the facility received dialysis services. Findings: Res #13 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. Physician orders, dated 12/14/23, documented to obtain a weight before and after dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. On 03/24/24 at 1:13 p.m., Res #13 was observed resting in their bed in their room. A white bordered adhesive dressing could be observed above the collar of their shirt on the right side of the chest below the collar bone. The resident stated the facility did not send any sort of communication form with them to dialysis. They stated there is not a form sent back with them when they return from dialysis. The resident stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#13) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #13 had diagnoses which included heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. A physician order, dated 02/09/24, documented to administer insulin aspart according to sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. A physician order, dated 02/09/24, documented to administer metoprolol tartrate 25 mg two times per day for hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication for a heart rate less than 65. A MAR for February 2024 documented the metoprolol was administered when the resident's heart rate was less than 65 five times. A MAR for February 2024 documented the 11:00 a.m. Insulin Aspart was administered greater than one hour after the scheduled time nine times. A physician order, dated 02/09/24, documented to administer Insulin Detemir 5 units twice per day. A MAR for February 2024 documented the 7:00 a.m. insulin detemir was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was kept clean and maintained in good repair. The DM identified 51 residents received services from the kitchen. Two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: On 03/24/24 at 9:05 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. a. there was lint on the ceiling vents and the ceiling around the vents, b. there was an accumulation of lint on the white floor fan, c. there were wall tiles missing behind the stove, d. there were holes and material was peeling off the wall below the three compartment sink, e. a baseboard tile was pulling away from wall near the back door, f. there were gaps and daylight was visible on the side and under the back door, g. baseboards were missing on the walls in the dish machine area, h. there was an accumulation of white residue on and in the dish machine, i. there was black residue inside of the ice machine, j. there was black residue on the floor under equipment, k. there was a box of foam cups stored on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed during fingerstick glucose monitoring for nine (#7, 13, 20, 24, 29, 33, 42, 52, and #207) of nine residents who were observed during fingerstick glucose monitoring. Corporate nurse consultant #1 identified 12 residents who received fingerstick glucose monitoring. Findings: An Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level policy, dated October 2010, read in parts, .Wear clean gloves .Wash the selected fingertip, especially the side of the finger, with warm water and soap .clean and disinfect reusable equipment between uses according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice .Remove gloves . Wash hands . On 03/25/24 at 11:15 a.m., LPN #2 was observed performing fingerstick glucose monitoring. The following observations were made: At 11:21 a.m., LPN #2 washed hands with soap and water, donned gloves, and cleansed the top of the medication cart with a disinfectant wipe. They removed two glucometers from the medication cart and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to educate, offer, and screen residents for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccination for one (#34) and failed to educate, offer, and screen residents for eligibility to receive the influenza vaccination for one (#37) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The DON identified 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, revised April 2012, read in parts, .Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five working days of the resident's admission in not conducted prior to admission . Before receiving the Pneumovax, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine .Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record .Pneumococcal vaccinations will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per our facility's physician approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IHS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $198K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK