24th Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 73.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide oxygen as ordered by the physician. Resident #77 was found unresponsive and without oxygen on [DATE]. The resident expired in the facility. Resident #77 had a physician order for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula. On [DATE] at 3:01 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 3:12 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ and provided the IJ template. On [DATE] at 12:33 p.m., an amended plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,Immediate Plan Of RemovalFacility revied [sic] all patients with oxygen orders on 9-29-2025 by 5:00 p.m. to ensure appropriate physician orders are in place, pulse ox, oxygen saturation, and liters ordered per patients is monitored Q shift per policy, and documentation is completed in each resident Emar Q shift. All patients…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-12-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for enteral feeding for 1 (#1) of 1 resident sampled for enteral feeding.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 12/01/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #1 was observed resting in bed with their eyes open.A facility policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Syringe (Bolus), dated November 2018, read in part, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Report complications promptly to the supervisor and the Attending Physician.An undated medical diagnoses list showed Resident #1 had diagnoses which included esophagitis, dysphagia, and traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum.An untitled document showed RN #1 completed their training on tube feeding on 07/10/25.Resident #1's treatment administration record, dated 10/01/25 to 10/31/25, showed Resident #1 had an order for Osomolite 1.5 cal oral liquid (nutritional supplement), give 237 ml via peg tube every four hours. RN #1 initialed the 8:00 a.m. dose as being provided as ordered.A physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-12-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN was competent and possessed the necessary skills to provide care for 1 (#1) of 1 resident sampled for peg tubes.The DON identified one resident with a peg tube. Findings:A facility policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding via Syringe (Bolus), dated November 2018, read in part, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure.An undated medical diagnoses list showed Resident #1 had diagnoses which included esophagitis, dysphagia, and traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum.An untitled document showed RN #1 completed their training on tube feeding on 07/10/25.Resident #1's treatment administration record, dated 10/01/25 to 10/31/25, showed Resident #1 had an order for Osomolite 1.5 cal oral liquid (nutritional supplement), give 237 ml via peg tube every four hours. RN #1 initialed the 8:00 a.m. dose as being provided as ordered.A physician's order, dated 10/10/25, showed Osmolite (enteral nutrition) 1.5 Cal oral liquid, give 237 ml via peg tube every four hours for nutrient, flush peg tube with 60 ml of water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were initiated to prevent reoccurring falls for 1 (#10) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for falls.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A review of March 2025 incidents showed Resident #10 had a non-injury fall on 03/07/25 and 03/17/25.Resident #10's fall risk assessment, dated 03/17/25, showed the resident had moderate risk for falls with a score of 9.An incident report, dated 03/19/25 at 9:00 p.m., read in part, Notified by staff that resident had a fall. Nursing assessment completed and observed with 5cmx5cm scalp hematoma. Neurological checks initiated and resident was assisted to bed. Resident states [gender withheld] was trying to close the curtain and lost [gender withheld] balance.Resident #10's fall risk assessment, dated 03/19/25, showed the resident had moderate risk for falls with a score of 13.There were no documented interventions to prevent falls or injuries related to the fall on 03/19/25.Resident #10's annual resident assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0574 — widespread
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure contact information for filing a complaint with the State agency was available to the residents.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 09/26/25 at 4:08 p.m., the administrator and surveyor observed the information board. On 09/26/25 at 2:38 p.m., the resident council group stated the contact information for filing a complaint with the State agency was covered and not visible. They stated they wanted to contact the State agency a month ago, but could not. On 09/26/25 at 4:06 p.m., the administrator stated the information for filing a complaint with the State agency was posted at the information board by the facility entrance. On 09/26/25 at 4:08 p.m., the administrator stated the contact information on the form was not visible to residents.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent state survey results were readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of the residents.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/26/25 at 1:39 p.m., the information board observed at the facility entrance showed the current survey and past three years of state survey were available at the screening desk.The surveyor was unable to locate the past survey results at the screening desk.On 09/26/25 at 2:34 p.m., the resident council group stated the past survey results were located at the nurses' station.On 09/26/25 at 4:13 p.m., the administrator provided the past survey results binder from inside the nurses station. They stated residents were not allowed to enter the nurses station. The administrator stated the results should be on the nurses station counter for resident access.On 09/26/25 at 4:23 p.m., the administrator stated the binder did not contain results of the 2024 annual recertification survey.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives were invited to care plan meetings for 2 (#4 and #31) of 18 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised 03/2022, read in part, The resident is informed of his or her right to participate in his or her treatment, and provided advanced notice of care planning conferences .If the participation of the resident and his/her resident representative in developing the resident's care plan is determined to not be practicable, an explanation is documented in the resident's medical record. The explanation should include what steps were taken to include the resident or representative in the process.1. On 09/26/25 at 3:24 p.m., the resident council group stated the facility did not invite residents or their representatives to care plan meetings.2. Resident #31's annual resident assessment, dated 08/28/25, showed the resident's cognition was intact with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered per physician's orders for 1 (#6) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An Insulin Administration policy, revised 2014, read in part, To provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes.Document the resident's blood glucose before intervention.Note blood sugar after each administration An undated Diagnosis Report, showed Resident #6 had diagnosis which included type II diabetes mellitus.Physician orders, dated 01/23/25, showed to administer insulin glargine 69 units one time a day and insulin glargine 72 units one time a day.An August 2025 MAR showed missed doses for:a. insulin glargine 69 units on 08/09/25, 08/10/25, and 08/13/25 andb. insulin glargine 72 units on 08/19/25.A September 2025 MAR showed missed doses for: a. insulin glargine 69 units on 09/02/25 and 09/05/25 andb. insulin glargine 72 units on 09/20/25.On 10/02/25 at 11:41 a.m., LPN #4 stated if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for mechanical soft portion size for 1 of 1 meal service observed.A Diet Type Report, dated 09/29/25, showed six residents received a mechanical soft diet. Findings:On 09/29/25 at 11:54 a.m., a #16 scoop (equivalent to 2 ounces) was observed on the grounded mechanical soft chicken pan.On 09/29/25 at 12:04 p.m., one #16 scoop of grounded chicken was put on a resident's plate.On 09/29/25 at 12:06 p.m., one #16 scoop of grounded chicken was put on a resident's plate.The PREPARATION OF FOODS policy, dated 07/2020, read in part, measured utensils are used to serve proportions as described on the menu.A 2025 Week 3 Day 16 menu showed to use a #8 scoop (equivalent to 4 ounces) to serve the grounded crunchy chicken ranch.On 09/26/25 at 3:26 p.m., a resident council group stated the meal portion sizes were either too large or too small.On 09/29/25 at 12:16 p.m., cook #1 stated they reviewed the serving sizes in the extended menu book prior to meal services.On 09/29/25 at 12:18 p.m., cook #1 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure EBP and appropriate use of gloves was followed during catheter and perineal care for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter use.The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/01/25 at 3:51 p.m., EBP sign was observed by Resident #7's door and had instructions to wear a gown and gloves. Personal protective equipment supplies were in a storage drawer by the door. The supplies included gowns. On 10/01/25 at 3:53 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to don gloves, told the Resident #7 they would be performing catheter care, and adjusted the resident's bed.On 10/01/25 at 3:55 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to don new gloves and clean Resident #7's catheter. CNA #1 proceeded to clean the resident's groin.On 10/01/25 at 4:01 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to wash their hands, don new gloves, and retrieve a new brief and pad. CNA #1 rolled Resident #7 to their left side.On 10/01/25 at 4:04 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to clean Resident #7's anal area. There was a fecal smear on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for the residents for 1 of 3 common areas observed. The administrator identified 78 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 08/13/25 at 1:00 p.m., the following observations were made at the North end of hall one in the common area where residents participated in therapy, access to vending machines, and puzzle activities:a. a puzzle with a lamp was in progress on a table;b. two bags of dry sack concrete were stored on the floor blocking the pathway to the puzzle creating a trip hazard;c. a hospital bed with no sheets was stored and obscured the pathway to the resident puzzle activity;d. a broken recliner was stored and obscured the path to the resident puzzle;e. a wheelchair with an empty bucket and a bed grab bar around 4 feet in length was balanced across the arms of the wheelchair that was obscuring the path to the resident puzzle activity;f. a walking cane with 4 legs unattended in the pathway to the puzzle activity; andg. a red walker unattended in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined the facilty ensured residents were free of abuse for two (#1 and #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised April 2021, read in part, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse. neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to .verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse . Resident #1 interview questions forms, dated 11/27/24, read in part, .Question 1 have you been abused .by any staff working at the facility .[Certified Nurse Aide #5] said I couldn't keep my urinal because my arm was weak and I spilled it on my bed. He said I would have to go to the bathroom in the bed because I couldn't get up to go to the bathroom . an undated handwritten note, by the social service director, attached to Resident #1 interview questions form, read in part, [Resident #1] stated that [CNA #5] and a black aid who worked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's property was not misappropriated for one (#4) of four sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 08/12/22, documented the facility would investigate all allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation and analyze all occurrences of abuse during the next scheduled QA committee meeting. Res #4 had diagnoses which included MS. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #4 was cognitively intact. A facility incident report, dated 09/13/24, documented Res #4's purse containing their wallet had been stolen from their safe while they were in the shower. An In-Service Training Report, dated 09/16/24 at 2:00 p.m., documented the facility provided training to staff over the facility abuse, neglect, and misappropriation policy. A final incident report, dated 09/19/24, documented the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner and frequency for four meal services and, for one of one Resident #3. The [NAME] identified 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A undated Meal times documented, read in part .Breakfast 07:00-09:00 .Lunch 11:30-1:30p.m Dinner 5:00p.m.-7:00p.m . A Meal Times and Frequency policy, dated 02/27/21, read in part .1. in nursing facilities, there will be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day However, the individuals in the group must agree to this meal span and a nourishing snack must be served . a. Resident meals were not served in the 14 hour window. b. Resident #3 meal was not served according to posted meal times. On 05/05/24 at 9:30a.m., the cook stated we are working short staffed in the kitchen and meals are late. On 05/05/24 at 9:32a.m., a breakfast tray was served in the dining hall. On 05/05/24 at 1:41p.m., a lunch tray was served in the dining hall. On 05/05/24 at 1:27p.m., a lunch tray was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,179 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-12-02
• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-10-02
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-11 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IHS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $912K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK