Acadia Nursing And Rehab Center
616 Golf Course Road, Aliquippa, PA 15001 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 67 certified beds · (724) 375-0345 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.9% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.4% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.2% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-03-05 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, interviews with residents, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to pay staff in a timely manner as scheduled. This resulted in kitchen staff and multiple nurse aides not reporting to work, which created a situation that placed 50 out of 50 residents in immediate jeopardy in which health and safety were impacted due to a potential interruption of proper food, supplies and services. Findings include: 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations, subsection 201.14(g), dated July 1, 2023, indicated that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the residents' health and safety are jeopardized. Review of facility staffing schedules revealed the following: Friday 2/23/24, two out of five Nurse Aides (NA) called off on daylight shift, and three out of five NA called off on evening shift. Saturday 2/24/24, one out of four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for one of 50 residents (Resident R48). Findings include: The facility Wandering and elopements policy last reviewed 9/28/23, indicated that the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment. If an employee observes a resident leaving the premises, staff should attempt to prevent the resident from leaving, get help from other staff, and instruct another staff to inform the charge nurse. When the resident returns to the facility, the charge nurse shall examine the resident for injuries, contact the physician and report findings, notify the resident's legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on manufacturer's instructions, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care for a resident with a Life Vest (a wearable defibrillator designed to protect residents from sudden cardiac death), and placed one resident (Resident R37) in immediate jeopardy in which health and safety were impacted. Findings include: Review of the [NAME] Life Vest Patient Manual updated 2023, indicated the following: · Wear all day and all night · Life Vest slides on and off like a backpack. · If the garment fits loosely, call [NAME] (manufacturer). The garment should be snug against the skin. · Remove Life Vest to bathe, shower, or change the garment, · Turn on Life Vest by inserting the battery. Always have the garment on before inserting the battery. · Every 24 hours, change and recharge the batteries. · There are two batteries. Always charge one while using the other. · Place the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date food products, failed to properly maintain the dishwater temperature logs, failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition, failed to properly store chemicals, and failed to properly restrain hair creating the potential for cross contamination in the Main Kitchen of the facility and the facility failed to ensure food was stored and maintained in accordance with professional standards for food safety for one of two resident refrigerators (Conference Room - Resident Refrigerator).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Food Receiving and Storage last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Dry foods and goods are handled and stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the packaging until they are ready to use. Refrigerated foods are labeled dated and monitored. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, staff interview, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of five residents (R5, R17, and R45). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) Prevention of Infection dated 4/30/26, indicated that the oxygen cannula (thin flexible tubing used to deliver oxygen) and tubing are changed every seven days. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/20/26, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), high blood pressure, and diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). Review of Resident R5's physician order dated 3/26/26, indicated Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution (delivers medicine directly into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility provider failed to notify a resident of planned changes to resident's medications and failed to allow the resident to be able to participate in the decision-making process regarding resident's care for one of three residents (Resident R68).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated [DATE], indicated employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include resident's right to: be notified of his or her medical condition and of any changes in his or her condition. Be informed of, and participate in his or her care planning and treatment. Choose an attending physician and participate in decision-making regarding his or her care. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, seizure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a confidential personal medical record for one of two residents (Resident R20).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated that federal and state law guarantee certain basic rights to all residents in the facility these include but not inclusive to:A dignified experienceBe treated with respect, kindness, and dignityBe supported by the facility in exercising his/her rights Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R20's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/9/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high fat in the blood), and anxiety. During an observation on 6/7/26, at 10:58 a.m. two signs were observed above Resident R20's bed that read: Please see nurse prior to giving water cup and needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of four sampled residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (reference used to complete an MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the significant change status assessment (SCSA) is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. An SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The assessment reference date must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for two of three residents (Resident R8, and R58). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Items and Equipment last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to the current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard. Review of the facility policy Infection Control last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated the facility adopted infection prevention and control policies to help maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of two residents (Resident R11).Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated to address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. Triggers are highly individualized. Develop individualized care plans that address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of care needs), dated 3/18/26, indicated diagnosis of anxiety, depression, and bi-polar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). Review of Resident R11's current care plan revealed survivor of trauma related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that current and accurate nurse staffing information was posted in the facility at the beginning of each shift for one of three observed days (6/7/26).Findings include: Observation conducted on 6/7/26, at 9:00 a.m., indicated that nurse staffing information was posted on the wall of the nurses' station nearest to the dining room. At that time, the nurse staffing information had the date of (6/4/26), resident census, and the staffing hours did not accurately reflect the current total number of hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for the current date. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E1 5/26/26, at 9:00 a.m., confirmed the facility failed to post the required current facility information for staffing hours and the facility census. 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in one of two medication storage rooms (Front Hall Medication Room) and two of three medication carts (Zone 2 Medication Cart and Zone 3 Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, rooms, refrigerators and carts. Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room. Medications are stored separately from food and are labeled accordingly. Medications for external use are stored separately from other medications. Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging in which they are received. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. During an observation completed on 6/7/26, at 11:23 a.m. the Front Hall Med Room Contained the following: A pair of black athletic shoes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility menu, resident interviews, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow the displayed menu for one of three observed meals (lunch meal 6/7/26) and failed to have the registered dietitian review and approve the menu and nutritional substitutes prior to implementation for one out three meals served (lunch meal 6/7/26). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dietician last reviewed 4/30/26, a qualified, competent, and skilled dietician will help oversee the food and nutrition services in the facility. The dietician is responsible for, but not limited to: . Assessing the nutritional needs of residents. . Developing and evaluating regular and therapeutic diets. Review of the facility policy Menus last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. The dietician reviews and approves all menus. The posted 4-week menu cycle for 6/7/26, was observed and indicated the following: fried chicken, gravy, mashed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage into the dumpster properly for one dumpster observed outside of the building.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal last reviewed 4/30/26, indicated garbage and refuse containing food waste will be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to pest. Outside dumpsters will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. During an observation completed on 6/7/26, at 9:22 a.m. the outside dumpster lid was open with debris scattered on the ground. During an interview completed on 6/7/26, at 9:22 a.m. Dietary [NAME] Employee E13 confirmed the dumpster lid was open and there was debris scattered on the ground and stated, I haven't gotten to it yet, we usually clean it up in the morning and confirmed that the facility failed to dispose of garbage into the dumpster properly for one dumpster observed outside of the building. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one of three residents (Resident R58) with enteral feeding tubes (G- Tube, a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen), and failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for two of 12 months (July 2025, and April 2026).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 4/30/26, indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBP employ targeted gown and glove us in addition to standard precautions during high-contact resident care activity. An example of high-contact resident care activity includes device care or use (central line, urinary catheter,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for two of twelve months (July 2025, and April 2026) and failed to provide a complete antibiotic order for one of four residents (Resident R33). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated 4/30/26, indicated as part of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection preventionist or designee. If an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the following: drug name, dose, frequency of administration, duration of treatment, route of administration, and indications for use. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for June 2025, through May 2026, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for July 2025, and April 2026.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections for two periods during the time frame from June 2025, through May 2026 (11/12/25 - 11/24/25, and 4/26/26 - 5/20/26).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Infection Preventionist dated 4/30/26, indicated the infection preventionist (IP) coordinates the development and monitoring of the infection prevention and control program. The IP is employed on site and at least part time. Review of the facility provided document IP Timeline on 6/8/26, indicated the following IPs were responsible during the following time frames for the period of June 2025 - May 2026:-RN Employee E5 was responsible 5/1/24 - 11/12/25.-IP Employee E19 was responsible 11/13/25 - 3/5/26. -IP Employee E18 was responsible 3/5/26 - present. Review of IP Employee E19's certificate for qualifying education required was dated 11/24/25; therefore, there was not a qualified IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain resident funds were accessible on holidays and weekends for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R2).Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Trust Account Withdrawals when the Business Office is Closed indicated residents must be able to access their funds, even when the business office is closed. If a resident needs to withdraw money from their trust account outside of regular business hours, the following procedures must be followed that include but not inclusive to: A bank bag containing cash is kept locked in the Registered Nurse (RN) office. RNs may only issue the amount of cash available in the bag. If additional funds are requested, contact the Administrator immediately During an interview completed on 9/29/25, at 10:04 a.m. upon asking Resident R1 concerning access to her funds stated I asked one time during the weekend, and I could not get any it was on a Saturday a few weeks ago, they were going to set something…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility menu, resident interviews, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow the displayed menu for one of three observed meals on 5/27/25, (Dinner Meal). Findings include: The facility policy Menus reviewed 3/10/25, indicated menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural, and ethnic needs while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. The dietician reviews and approves all menus. During a dining observation on 5/27/25, at 5:07 p.m. the resident's dinner meals failed to match the approved facility menu for dinner on this date. On 5/27/25, the facility menu was approved by the Registered Dietician (RD) as follow: - Minestrone Soup - Whole wheat crackers - Tuna salad plate - Carrot raisin salad - Mandarin oranges - Coffee, tea, milk On 5/27/25, the facility served residents the following: - Beef vegetable or chicken noodle soup - Whole wheat crackers - Tuna salad plate - 3 bean salad - Mandarin oranges - Coffee, tea, milk During an interview on 5/27/25, at 5:47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor food expiration dates in the Main Kitchen, failed to maintain food equipment in a clean, sanitary condition, failed to properly restrain beards, failed to maintain sanitary conditions during tray line which created the potential for cross contamination, and failed to verify the sanitizing temperature of the dish machine in the Main Kitchen (Main Kitchen), which created the potential for food borne illness. Findings include: Review of facility policy Date Marking for Food Safety, dated 3/10/25, indicated the facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for date marking the food the time the food is opened or prepared. The head cook or designee shall be responsible for checking the refrigerator daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for 12 of 12 months (April 2024, - April 2025). Findings include: Review of facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Plan dated 3/10/25, indicated an infection prevention and control program is established to maintain and provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Surveillance tools are used for identifying the occurrence of infections, recording their numbers and frequency, detecting outbreaks and epidemics, monitoring employee infection, monitoring adherence to infection prevention and control practices, and detecting unusual pathogens with infection control implications. Review of the facility's monthly tracking of surveillance on 5/28/25, failed to include floor mapping for twelve of twelve months April 2024, -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, pest control log, observations, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program related to gnats in the kitchen (Main Kitchen). Findings include: Review of the facility Pest Control policy dated 3/10/25, indicated that the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. During a kitchen tour on 5/27/25, at 1:00 p.m. an observation of the storage room where dry foods are stored had an abundance number of gnats on the boxes/cans of goods or were flying around in the area. During an observation on 5/27/25, at 1:10 p.m. gnats were observed flying around the main kitchen area above the prep table and around the dish machine. During an observation on 5/27/25, at 1:30 p.m. mounted bug lights were observed hanging on the wall by the door and in the back storage area where the ice machine is kept. During an interview on 5/27/25, at 1:33 p.m. Dietary Manager Employee E1 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident records, admission documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain timely documentation of the admission agreement for four of four residents (Resident R2, Resident R12, R33, and R56) and failed to ensure residents had the capacity to understand the terms of the admission agreement for three of four residents (Residents R12, R33, and R56). Findings include: Review of the facility policy admission Agreement dated 3/10/25, indicated all residents have a signed and dated admission agreement on file. At the time of admission, the resident (or their representative) must sign an admission agreement (contract). Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for three out of three nurse aide personnel records (Nurse Aides (NA) Employee E10, NA Employee E11, and NA Employee E12). Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training, Nurse Aide dated 3/10/25, indicated the facility completes a performance review of nurse aides at least every 12 months. Review of NA Employee E10's personnel record indicated a hire date of 4/11/18. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record indicated a hire date of 8/27/89. Review of NA Employee E12's personnel record indicated a hire date of 9/17/17. Review of personnel records did not include annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for NA Employee E10, NA Employee E11, and NA Employee E12. Interview on 5/28/25, at 3:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations based on date of hire for NA Employee E10, NA Employee E11, and NA Employee E12. 28 Pa…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (A binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.) for three of five residents (Resident R12, R33, and R56). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Binding Arbitration Agreements dated 3/10/25, indicated the terms and conditions of a binding arbitration agreement are explained to the resident (or representative) in a way that ensures his or her understanding of the agreement, including that the resident may be giving up his or her right to have a dispute decided in a court proceeding (i.e. litigation). Review of Resident R12's admission record indicated and admission date of 9/16/24. Review of Resident R12's MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for two of two crash carts (Front and Back hallways). Findings include: Review of facility policy Emergency Crash Cart and Automated External Defibrillators (AED's) dated [DATE], indicated it is the policy of the facility to ensure that the facility will maintain at least one emergency cart per nursing care floor in case of the need for basic life support. To ensure that all supplies critical to basic life support are readily available on the emergency cart. The emergency crash cart is checked every 24-hours and after every use. Missing or expired items are replaced, when applicable. During an observation of the Back hallway crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) on [DATE], at 2:15 p.m. revealed a binder Crash Cart Checklist. Review of the binder failed to include a checklist for [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) for four of five employees (Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E10, E11, E12, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E8). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 3/10/25, indicated staff training/education and competencies will be completed during general orientation upon hire, annually, and as needed. Educations listed included: -Communication, resident rights and facility responsibilities, abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents, quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI), infection control, compliance and ethics, and behavioral health. NA Employee E10 had a hire date of 4/11/18, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 3/15/24, and 3/15/25. NA Employee E11 had a hire date of 8/27/1989, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 2/8/24, and 2/8/25. NA Employee E12 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 2/8/24, and 2/8/25. LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide compliance and ethics training for four of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E10, E11, E12, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E8). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 3/10/25, indicated facility staff will complete annual mandatory training on compliance and ethics. Review of the policy In-service Training, Nurse Aide dated 3/10/25, indicated all personnel are required to participate in regular in-service education. Required training topics for all staff (including Nurse aides) include: Communication, resident rights and facility responsibilities, abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents, quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI), infection control, compliance and ethics, and behavioral health. NA Employee E10 had a hire date of 4/11/18, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 3/15/24, and 3/15/25. NA Employee E11 had a hire date of 8/27/1989, failed to have compliance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Code of Federal Regulations, facility provided documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were free from mental abuse, including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R13 and R21). Findings include: Review of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.5 abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic (substances that act on the brain to alter cognition, perception, and mood) medication for two of four residents (Resident R17, and R45). Findings include: Review of facility Psychotropic Medication Use dated 3/10/25, indicated that residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medication and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements: Anti-psychotics, Anti-depressants, Anti-anxiety, and Hypnotics. Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN (as needed) basis unless medication is necessary. PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Code of Federal Regulations, personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a criminal background check prior to working on the nursing unit for one out of five personnel records (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E7). Findings include: Review of the Code of Federal Regulations §483.12(b) the facility must develop and implement policies and procedures that include the following component: Screening: The facility must have written procedures for screening potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property in order to prohibit abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident property, and consistent with the applicable requirements at §483.12(a)(3). This includes attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. §483.12(b)(3) Include training as required. Review of NA Employee E7 personnel record on 5/29/25, indicated a start date of 3/17/25. The record indicated NA Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of three residents (Resident R3 and R42). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration last reviewed 3/10/25, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Steps include but not inclusive to: Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc., to be sure they are in good working order. Periodically re-check water in humidifying jar. Review of facility policy Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) Prevention of Infection last reviewed, 3/10/25, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment. Infection control considerations related to oxygen administration include but not inclusive to: Check water level of any prefilled reservoir every forty-eight hours. Change pre-filled humidifier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were completed and documented by the consultant pharmacist for one of four residents (Resident R44). Findings include: The facility policy Consultant Pharmacist Provider Requirements reviewed 3/10/25, indicated the consultant pharmacist will establish a system whereby observations and recommendations regarding resident drug therapy are communicated to those with authority to implement or respond to the recommendations in an appropriate and timely fashion. Reviewing the medication drug regimen of each resident at least monthly and documenting the review and findings in the resident ' s medical record. Review of Resident R44's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R44's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/9/25, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for one of two medication rooms (back hall medication room). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed 3/10/25, indicated medications and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical practices. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. The medication label includes, at a minimum: the medication name, prescribed dose, strength, expiration date, residents name, route of administration and appropriate instructions and precautions. If medications containers have missing, incomplete, improper or incorrect labels, contact the dispensing pharmacy for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. During an observation on 05/27/25, at 5:46 p.m. the back hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services and failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services (supportive services for end stage terminal illness) with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for two of four residents (Resident R22, and R31). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hospice Program dated 3/10/25, indicated that hospice services are available to residents at the end of life. Upon admission and periodically during their stay, residents are informed of hospice services. The facility collaborates with hospice in care planning process for residents receiving services. Ensures the facility communicates with the resident ' s attending physician. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R22's MDS (Minimum Data Set- periodic assessment of resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for two of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employees NA E11, and NA E12). Findings include: Review of the policy In-service Training, Nurse Aide dated 3/10/25, indicated all personnel are required to participate in regular in-service education. Required training topics for all staff (including Nurse aides) include communication, resident rights and facility responsibilities, abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents, quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI), infection control, compliance and ethics, and behavioral health. Review of facility provided documents and training records for NA Employees E11 and NA Employee E12, revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on effective communication. NA Employee E11 had a hire date of 8/27/1989, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 2/8/24, and 2/8/25. NA Employee E12 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health training as determined by the Facility Assessment for two of five staff members (Employees E8, and E10). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 3/10/25, indicated facility staff will complete annual mandatory training on behavioral health. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E8 had a hire date of 6/7/06, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 2/6/24, and 2/6/25. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E10 had a hire date of 4/11/18, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 3/15/24, and 3/15/25. Interview on 5/30/25, at approximately 11:30 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for two of five employees (Employees E8, and E10). 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(6)(d) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders and failed to care plan interventions for medication self-administration for one of three residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 8/19/24, indicates residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of diabetes (high sugar in the blood), atrial fibrillation (heart does not pump as it should) and high blood pressure. During an observation completed on 3/26/25, at 10:35 a.m. Resident R1 was sitting in her chair she was holding a medication cup that contained one pink pill, one yellow pill, one white pill, and one salmon colored pill. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control monitoring policies for COVID-19 for ten out of ten residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9 and Resident R10), and failed to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately, which created the potential for the cross-contamination and the spread of diseases and infections on 3 out of 10 COVID-19 positive rooms. Finding include: Review of facility policy Covid-19 Testing and Exposure Management dated 4/15/24, indicated the facility is dedicated to detecting and preventing the transmission of COVID-19. Review of facility policy Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Using Personal Protective Equipment dated 4/15/24, indicated all staff will follow standard precautions and transmission-based precautions if required based on resident ' s condition. When caring for a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete influenza vaccination consent for one of five residents (Resident R4), failed to make certain that influenza vaccination was administered in a timely fashion for one of five residents (Resident R5), and failed to complete pneumococcal vaccine consent for two of five residents (Resident R4 and R5). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 4/15/24, indicated all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia-pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series. The resident receives information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine. Residents have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused, appropriate information is documented in the resident ' s medical record. Review of facility policy Influenza Vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccine and providing education for two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident R1 and R5), and failed to offer staff COVID-19 vaccines for 7 of 7 employees interviewed. (E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9, and E10) Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines dated 7/3/24, indicated the CDC recommends the 2023-2024 updated COVID-19 vaccines-Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Novavax-to protect against serious illness from COVID-19. People aged 65 years and older who received 1 dose of any updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna or Novavax) should receive 1 additional dose of an updated COVID-19 vaccine at least 4 months after the previous updated dose. Review of facility policy Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)- Vaccination of Residents dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, closed resident records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to acquire and document a physician's discharge order and acquire and document physician orders for medications for one out of two closed resident records (Closed Resident Record CR1). Finding include: The facility Discharge Medications policy dated 5/28/24, indicated that a physician must be contacted for an order to discharge a resident with medications before they will be dispensed, the charge nurse shall verify that the medications are labeled consistent with current physician orders. Review of Closed Resident Record CR1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included nondisplaced fracture of ankle left leg, hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). Review of Closed Resident Record CR1's clinical nurse note dated 7/22/24, indicated that resident and daughter requested discharge to home today. Review of Closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice, including reason for the change, prior to moving a resident to another room, for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R1, and R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Transfer, Room to Room , last reviewed 5/28/24, indicated that the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: · The date and time the room transfer was made. · The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted with the move. · All assessment data obtained during the move. · How the resident tolerated the move. · If the resident refused the move, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. · The signature and title of the person recording the data. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/12/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident records, admissions documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comprehensive review of resident admission rights and maintain admission documentation for one of four sampled records (Resident R3). Finding include: The facility policy Admissions Orientation last reviewed 5/28/24, indicated that the facility shall provide each resident with a facility tour and an orientation of the facility's policies, programs, and services which includes but is not limited to residents rights and responsibilities. Review of Resident R3 admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/12/24, indicated diagnoses of anorexia nervosa (an eating disorder causing patients to obsess about weight and what they eat), low potassium, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R3's admission packet (no date) did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of three of ten residents (Resident R35, R46, and R104). Findings Include: Review of a resident grievance dated 10/25/23, Resident R 35 stated concern over response time to call bells being answered. During an interview on 2/28/24, at 12:01 p.m. MDS (minimum data set- periodic assessment of resident care needs) Coordinator Employee E13 stated Lately we've had no agency (nursing staff). I think it ' s because they weren't being paid. We were pretty good there for a while until we didn ' t get paid the second time. During a group interview on 2/28/24 at 1:31 p.m. the following was stated: 11 out of 11 residents stated that there is not enough staff 2 out of 11 residents clarified that evening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for five months for five out of five sampled residents (Resident R3, R8, R11, R17, and R49). Findings include: The facility Medication utilization and prescribing-clinical protocol policy dated 9/28/23, indicated that the consultant pharmacist should us the monthly and interim drug regimen review to help identify potentially problematic medications, including medication regimens that are not supported based on clinical signs or symptoms. The staff and practitioners in collaboration with the consultant pharmacist will take into account medication related issues and drug interactions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/3/24, indicated diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the main kitchen and dining room creating the potential for unsafe condition and cross contamination. Findings include: During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 2/27/24 at 9:15 a.m., the following was observed: -ice machine in the main kitchen contained a brown like substance. Cleaning chart hanging beside the ice machine noted that last cleaning was November 2023 -chemicals were directly on the floor: grease cutter, pot sheen, kex-plus, booster and eco-rinse -bases and lids for the resident trays were being stores right side up inside of upside down -6 packages of hot dog buns not dated -1 bag of sugar was open and not dated -chemicals in a spray bottle on the prep table in the main kitchen while food was being prepared During an observation of tray line in the designated main dining room on 2/27/24 at 11:59 a.m., it was revealed [NAME] Employee E28's coat was covering the clean plates and serving utensils for lunch service. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident council documents, resident council group interview, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to respond to concerns from resident council and failed to respond to concerns in a timely manner for three out of nine months (December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024). Findings include: The facility Resident council policy dated 9/28/23, indicated that the facility supports resident rights' to organize and participate in a resident council. The purpose of the resident council is for residents to have input in the operation of the facility, discussion of concerns for improvement, and communication between residents and facility staff. Review of Resident council minutes dated December 2023 and February 2024 identified a request from council to obtain a new beautician. The documentation did not indicate follow-up actions or communication from nursing home administration to obtain a new professional beautician. During an interview on 2/27/24, at 11:27 a.m. Resident R46 stated: I need a haircut!…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, tour of the facility, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a posted grievance policy and procedure was met federal guidelines for two out of two nursing units (Front hall nursing unit and back hall nursing unit). Findings include: The facility Grievance procedure policy dated 9/28/23, indicated that the facility encourages residents and their family members to make known to the facility any concerns. The facility has developed grievance procedure that will address all such concerns. The grievance official will be responsible for overseeing the grievance process. During a tour on 2/27/24, at 9:25 a.m. observations of the facility did not find a posted grievance policy, grievance official e-mail and business address. During a tour on 2/28/24, at 9:13 a.m. observations of the facility did not find a posted grievance policy, grievance official e-mail and business address. During a tour on 2/28/24, at 11:45 a.m. observations with Assistant Nursing Home Administrator/Director of Social Services Employee E1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for four out of five nurse aides (NA Employee E4, E19, E20, and E21). Findings include: Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E4 start date was 9/4/18, last performance evaluation was completed 8/14/19. Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E19 start date was 8/8/13, last performance evaluation was completed 10/30/19. Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E20 start date was 6/2/11, last performance evaluation was completed 5/15/20. Review of personnel files reviewed that Nurse Aide Employee E21 start date was 10/21/20, last performance evaluation was completed 10/21/21. During an interview on 2/28/24, at 12:30 p.m. the Human Resource Employee E18 confirmed that the facility does not have up to date performance reviews completed on NA Employee E4, E19, E10 and E21. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian since October 2023. Findings include: During a kitchen tour on 2/27/24 at 9:30 a.m. Dietary Manager Employee E5 stated that he started his position October 2023 and he is not a CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) and he has catering experience. Review of personnel file revealed Employee E5 hire date 10/23. Personnel file confirmed no certification. Interview on 2/29/24 at 1:30 p.m. Director of Nursing confirmed Dietary Manager was not qualified as required. During an interview 3/2/24, 11:30 a.m. Registered Dietitian Employee E17 confirmed there hasn't been an Registered Dietitian at the facility since October 2023. She has been PRN (per resident needs) and she has since resigned from the company effective 3/11/24. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1)(6)Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(c) Dietary services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on menu, resident council group interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the menu for two of two meals (Breakfast and Lunch meal Saturday 2/24/24). Findings include: A review of the menu indicated that the menu for breakfast was as follows: Cereal of Choice Pancakes Banana Coffee Milk of Choice, 8 oz Syrup/Margarine A review of the menu indicated that the menu for lunch was as follows: Chicken Sweet & Sour Fluffy Steamed Rice Broccoli Cuts Pears Beverage of Choice Pepper During a resident council group interview on 2/28/24, at 1:31 p.m. three out of 11 residents stated they were not served the correct breakfast and lunch on 2/24/24. During an interview on 2/28/24, at 2:30 p.m. Dietary Manager Employee E5 confirmed that on 2/24/24 the posted menu was not served because of dietary staff call off's. During an interview on 3/1/24, at 11:40 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility served donuts and oatmeal for breakfast, pizza and salad for lunch on 2/24/24. 28 Pa. Code: 211.6(a)(b) Dietary services.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all required staff persons were in attendance at quarterly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for two of three quarters reviewed (second quarter April-June 2023, and third quarter July-September 2023). Findings include: Review of the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) §483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. §483.75(g)(1) A facility must maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum of: (i) The director of nursing services; (ii) The Medical Director or his/her designee; (iii) At least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member or other individual in a leadership role; and (iv) The infection Preventionist. (i) Meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program, such as identifying issues with respect to which quality assessment and assurance activities, including performance improvement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential for cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R10) and the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for three of nine months (October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023). Findings include: Review of facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 9/28/23, indicated an infection prevention and control program is established to maintain and provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Surveillance tools are used for recognizing the occurrence of infections, recording their numbers and frequency, detecting outbreaks and epidemics, monitoring employee infection, monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for three of nine months (October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes dated 9/28/23, indicated as part of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection preventionist or designee. All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for June 2023 through February 2024, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023. During an interview on 2/29/24, at 10:42 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility was unable to locate and provide documentation to indicate that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, resident interview and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide goods and services resulting in neglect for one of two residents (Resident R104). Findings include: The facility Identifying types of abuse policy last reviewed 9/28/23, indicated neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services that a resident requires, but the facility fails to provide them. And this results in physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of Resident R104's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Polycythemia vera (an increase in blood cells creating the potential of blood clotting and blood that is thicker than normal), hypothyroidism (decrease in production of thyroid hormone), and major depressive disorder (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident R104's MDS assessment (Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, reports submitted to the State, resident interview and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect within 24 hours to the local state field office for one of two residents (Resident R104). Findings include: The facility Identifying types of abuse policy last reviewed 9/28/23, indicated neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services that a resident requires, but the facility fails to provide them. And this results in physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The facility Abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation--reporting and investigating policy last reviewed 9/28/23, indicated that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies. The administrator immediately reports his or her suspicion to the state licensing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive resident care plan was implemented to meet resident care needs for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R37) to address care needs related to a Life Vest (a wearable defibrillator designed to protect residents from sudden cardiac death). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/31/24, indicated diagnoses of dilated cardiomyopathy (a condition in which the heart's main pumping chamber is enlarged. And becomes weaker as it grows larger), Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that affects the central nervous system), and acute respiratory failure (occurs suddenly and interferes with the ability of the lungs to deliver oxygen). Review of Resident R37's Nursing admission evaluation dated 1/24/24, stated Life Vest noted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of practice related to participation in interdisciplinary meetings and monitoring of Food Service operations Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards: Responsibilities of the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist Section 21.711 Professional Conduct indicated that the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist shall provide information which will enable patients to make their own informed decisions regarding nutrition and dietetic therapy, including the reasonable expectations of the professional relationship. Review of Facility assessment dated [DATE] states that the facility will have a full time Dietitian on staff. During an interview on 2/27/24 at 12:33 p.m. Dietary Manager Employee E5 stated he does not talk to resident's regarding their food preferences. During an interview on 3/2/24 at 11:30 a.m. Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy and clinical record review and resident, family, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that showers and assistance for activities of daily living were consistently provided for one of five residents (Resident R46). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting last reviewed 9/28/23, indicated that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Supervision is defined as oversight, encouragement or cueing provided three or more times during the last seven days. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R46's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/29/23, indicated diagnoses of stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and unsteadiness on feet. Section GG0130…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and services for one of three residents (Resident R37) to address care needs related to Life Vest (wearable defibrillator designed to protect residents from sudden cardiac death). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/31/24, indicated diagnoses of dilated cardiomyopathy (condition in which the heart's main pumping chamber is enlarged. And becomes weaker as it grows larger), Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that affects the central nervous system), and acute respiratory failure (occurs suddenly and interferes with the ability of the lungs to deliver oxygen). Review of Resident R37's Nursing admission Evaluation dated 1/24/24, stated Life Vest noted. Review of Resident R37's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were monitored, assessed, and received the necessary services to prevent pressure ulcers from developing or worsening for one of three residents (Resident R10). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol dated 9/28/23, indicated the staff and practitioner will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure ulcers or other skin conditions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of resident R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/27/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body). Review of a physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with necessary behavioral non-pharmacological interventions to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one out of four sampled resident records (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 9/28/23, indicated that a psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic medication management includes indications for use, dose, duration, adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences and preventing, identifying, and responding to adverse consequences. Review of Resident R3's admission record indicated Resident R3 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set Assessment: A periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/3/24, indicated she was admitted with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain resident medication regimens were free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of four residents (Resident R3 and R8). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 9/28/23, indicated antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. Residents who are admitted from the community or transferred from a hospital who are already receiving antipsychotic medications will be evaluated for the appropriateness and indications for use. The interdisciplinary team will re-evaluate the use of the antipsychotic medication at the time of admissions and/or within two weeks (at the initial MDS assessment) to consider whether or not the medication can be reduced, tapered, or discontinued. PRN (as needed) orders for antipsychotic medications will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly and safely store medications under appropriate temperatures in one of two medication rooms (Front medication room). Finding include: The facility Medication: labeling and storage policy last reviewed on 9/28/23, indicated that the facility stores all medications and biologicals under proper temperature, humidity, and light controls. During observations on 2/27/24, at 10:24 a.m. observations of medication room/ front medication room with MDS coordinator RN Employee E13 found the following: medication room refrigerator observed with a temperature reading 50°F The Refrigerator temperature log indicated that refrigerator temperatures must fall between 36°F and 46°F. During an interview, on 2/27/24, at 10:27 a.m. MDS coordinator RN Employee E13 confirmed that the facility failed to properly and safely store medications under appropriate temperatures 28 Pa. Code: 211.9(a)(1)(h)(k)(l)(1) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa. Code:211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and a review of the facility's assessment it was determined that the facility failed to implement and document a complete facility wide assessment, which identified the specific resources necessary to care for its specific resident population. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/31/24, indicated diagnoses of dilated cardiomyopathy (a condition in which the heart's main pumping chamber is enlarged. And becomes weaker as it grows larger), Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that affects the central nervous system), and acute respiratory failure (occurs suddenly and interferes with the ability of the lungs to deliver oxygen). Review of Resident R37's Nursing admission evaluation dated 1/24/24, stated Life Vest noted. Review of Resident R37's physician orders revealed an order written on 1/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of two food service areas (Main Kitchen.) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Food Storage last reviewed on 9/28/23, informed food is stored, prepared, and transported at an appropriate temperature and by methods designed to prevent cross contamination. Procedures include to re-wrap packages of frozen food which have been opened. This prevents freezer burns and spoilage. During an observation on 1/24/24 at 1:45 p.m. the freezer in the main kitchen contained the following: - 14 pre-made omelets were not sealed after opening. - 35 pre-made egg patties were not sealed when open, and were not dated when opened. During an interview on 1/24/24, at 1:50 p.m. the Dietary Manager Employee E3 confirmed the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 28 Pa. Code: 211.6(c) Dietary services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, date and store medications in two of three medication carts. (Med Cart 1-9, and Med Cart Long Hall) Findings include: A review of facility policy Labeling of Medication Containers dated 9/28/23, indicated that all medication maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with state and federal guidelines and regulations. A review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 9/28/23, indicated that drugs and biologicals are stored in a safe, secure and orderly manner. During an observation on 10/17/23, at 10:30 am it was revealed that in medication cart 1-9 the top drawer contained an unlabeled and undated plastic cup of orange pills and in medication cart long hall the top drawer contained three unlabeled and undated cups of a white pills. During an interview on 10/17/23, at 10:55 am Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed that Medication Cart long hall contained improperly stored containers of medication or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIDELE, MORDECHAI | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/28/2022 |
| ZIDELE, YESHAYAHU | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/28/2022 |
| BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/14/2024 |
| PRICE, TARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/05/2025 |
| ROSCOE, BRANDON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/28/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $430K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395109. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.