No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aurora Nursing And Rehab Center

900 Porter Avenue, Scottdale, PA 15683 · For profit - Corporation · 35 certified beds · (724) 887-0100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 887-0100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609) — most recent Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
308 Bessemer Rd · (724) 542-4321 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.4 mi
15 Centennial Way · (724) 887-4727 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
819 Cross Roads Plz · (724) 547-5960 · Call to confirm hours
Park
700 Mt Pleasant Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury13.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers19.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%9.5%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.80U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.37hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.1%CMS range 37.9–60.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.3–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge23.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.75
RN hoursweekends
47.6%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 26.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.60 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-17)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 26 and 40).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medication use, dated September 24, 2025, indicated that non-pharmacological approaches would be used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26 dated October 1, 2025, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for most daily care needs and had diagnoses that included cancer and dementia.Physician's orders for Resident 26 dated November 15, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an implanted venous port (a medical device placed under the skin in your chest, arm or belly that allows for easy access to a vein for administering fluids or medications) was flushed according to facility policy for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 9) and failed to ensure that a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm for long term access) was flushed according to facility policy for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 41). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding flushing and locking an implanted venous port dated September 24, 2025, indicated that the purpose of the procedure was to maintain patency of the implanted port, to prevent mixing of incompatible medications and solutions, and to ensure the entire dose of a solution or medication is administered into the venous system. When the port is used intermittently for medication administration, flush…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 6, 14).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated September 24, 2025, indicated that staff are to document the administration of controlled substances in accordance with applicable law. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6 dated December 1, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and high blood pressure Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated October 6, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 0 .5 milliliters (ml) of Morphine (a controlled narcotic pain medication) orally every 4 hours for moderate pain or shortness of breath. A review of Resident 6's-controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 32).Findings include: A review of the facility policy for resident call system dated August 24, 2025, indicated that each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. Clinical record review for Resident 32 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for hospice respite (temporary, short-term inpatient care in a facility like a nursing home, for patients with a terminal illness) care. Nurse's note for Resident 32 dated December 12, 2025, at 7:47 p.m. revealed that the resident's admission assessment was completed and that staff reviewed verbally with the resident the use of the call bell system and using it for a need. The resident did show that he was able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 6).Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated October, 2025 revealed that the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. The RAI Manual revealed that staff should complete a significant change MDS when a resident has a decline that will not normally resolve itself without interventions by staff, impacts more than one area of the resident's health status, and requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 14, and 15).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, dated October 2025, indicated that Section N0415E1 (Anticoagulant-medications that prevent blood clots from forming or growing), was to be checked if the resident was taking an anticoagulant medication during the seven day look back period, Section N0415F1 (Antibiotic) was to be checked if the resident was taking an antibiotic medication during the seven day look back period, Section N0415H1 (Opioid-medicines that helps reduce moderate to severe pain) was to be checked if the resident was taking an opioid medication during the seven day look back period, and Section N0415I1 (Antiplatelet-medication that prevents platelets from clumping together and forming blood clots) was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to anxiety and the use of antibiotics for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 40). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated September 24, 2025, revealed that to complete a care plan, you were to conduct a thorough resident assessment, identify relevant health problems, set measurable goals, choose appropriate interventions, and regularly monitor progress to adjust the plan as needed. Care plans were to be reviewed/revised as needed based on the resident's changing condition, and at least quarterly.A nursing note for Resident 40, dated December 8, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on this date, was receiving hospice services, and had diagnoses that included dementiaPhysician's orders for Resident 40, dated December 9, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milliliters (ml) of Ativan concentrate every two hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 6, and 27).Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Care Planning, dated September 24, 2025, included that the facility would review and revise the care plan as needed based on the patient's changing condition and at least quarterly with completion of a Minimum Data Set assessment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), for Resident 4, dated November 12, 2025, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance with daily care needs, and had active diagnosis that included diabetes and heart disease. Care plan for Resident 4, dated September 12, 2025, indicated that the resident was receiving oxygen therapy. A review of Resident 4's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer care/prevention treatments were provided as ordered for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 6, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, was at risk for pressure ulcer (skin impairment caused by pressure) development, and had one Stage 4 (deep wounds that may impact muscle, tendons, ligaments, and bone) pressure ulcer present on admission. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated February 19, 2025, included an order for the resident to have her coccyx cleansed with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen powder and triad paste onto rolled gauze and gently pack the wound. Apply silver sulfadiazine, zinc, hydrocortisone and nystatin 1% cream to the peri wound and apply bordered foam daily and as needed. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by failing to ensure that fall/injury prevention interventions were in place for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 26).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated October 1, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for most daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of dementia. The care plan for Resident 26 dated April 7, 2025, indicated that the resident had a history of falling and included an intervention dated May 1, 2025, that the resident was to have bilateral fall mats in place. Physician's orders for Resident 26 dated April 30, 2025, included an order for the resident to have fall mats to bilateral sides of his bed and staff were to check placement of the fall mats every shift. Observations of Resident 26 on December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: Review of a facility policy for administering medications dated September 24, 2025, included that the individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method of administration before giving the medication, and the individual administering the medication initials the resident's medication administration record on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next one. Observations made during medication administration on December 15 and 16, 2025, revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 26 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 7.69 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated November 12, 2025, included for the resident to have one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending November 19, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 17, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), the development of individualized care plans, care plan timing and revision, and preventing issues with the accountability of controlled medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Older Adults Protective Services Act, facility policies, information provided by the facility and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report timely allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health) and to other state agencies in accordance with state law for three of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 131, 132, 133). Findings include: The Older Adults Protective Services Act, 1997-13, Section 701 (a)(1)(2), indicated that it was mandatory to report to the Protective Services agency. An employee or an administrator who has reasonable cause to suspect that a recipient is a victim of abuse shall immediately make an oral report to the agency. If applicable, the agency shall advise the employee or administrator of additional reporting requirements that may pertain under subsection (b). An employee shall notify the administrator immediately following the report to the agency. Within 48 hours of making the oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative in writing of the transfer and reason for hospitalization for seven of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 9, 14, 22, 23, 24.). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 1, dated February 5, 2024, at 1:39 p.m., revealed that Resident 1 was being admitted to the hospital for osteomyelitis. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 1's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's representative and state ombudsman regarding the reason for transfer. Nursing notes for Resident 5, dated September 26, 2024, at 3:06 a.m. and 5:36 a.m., revealed that the resident had a change in mental status with increased confusion, garbled speech, and bad chest pain. The physician was notified and the resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation. She was admitted to the hospital with chest pain, fever, abdominal pain, altered mental status, and leukocytosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications and obtain weights as ordered by the physician for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 17). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated October 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included heart failure. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated October 7, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Midodrine (a medication that treats low blood pressure) three times a day for hypotension (low blood pressure) and was to be held if the systolic blood pressure (the top number in a blood pressure reading) was greater than 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A review of Resident 5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October and November 2024 revealed that staff administered the 5 mg of Midodrine when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 22, 26). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the administration of oral medications, dated December 7, 2023, indicated that the nurse was to document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated September 19, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and could understand others, required assistance with daily care needs, received antianxiety and opioid medications, was receiving oxygen therapy and hospice services, and had a diagnosis of congestive heart (the heart cannot pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs). Physician's orders for Resident 12, dated September 11, 2024, included an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required timeframe for four of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 181, 182, 183, 184). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days (admission date + 13 calendar days) following admission. A comprehensive admission MDS assessment for Resident 181, dated July 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on August 7, 2024, which was 16 days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for four of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 10, 11, 18, 29). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 10 had an ARD of August 9, 2024, which was 93 days after the previous quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of May 8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 22, 23). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0415J1 Hypoglycemic Medications was to be coded if the resident took hypoglycemic medication during the seven-day look-back period and Section N0415K1 was to be coded if the resident took anticonvulsant medication during the seven-day look-back period Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated October 3, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of Metformin (medication used to lower blood sugars) one time a day for diabetes. There was no physician's order for the resident to receive an anticonvulsant medication. Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated December 7, 2023, included that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and resident's condition change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated October 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, was always incontinent of urine, and received an antibiotic. Physician's orders, dated July 24, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 100 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility polices and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 16). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated December 7, 2023, indicated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and resident's condition change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 16, dated September 10, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, received dialysis (treatment to remove extra fluid and waste from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 15) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), dated December 7, 2023, revealed that indwelling urinary catheters would be used sparingly, for appropriate indications only. If an indwelling urinary catheter was needed, staff would monitor for and report complications such as evidence of symptomatic infection. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 15, dated October 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A diagnosis record, dated November 2024, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of urinary retention. Physician's orders for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order to receive dialysis for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 16) who required dialysis. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 16, dated September 10, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, received dialysis (treatment to remove extra fluid and waste from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), and had a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD - kidneys no longer work as they should, requiring dialysis or kidney transplant). A review of Resident 16's clinical record and dialysis communication records revealed that the resident received dialysis treatment every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A care plan for Resident 16, dated December 21, 2023, indicated that the resident received dialysis services; however, there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) behavioral interventions (individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care), were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medications (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), dated December 7, 2023, indicated that non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated September 19, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 15). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 15, dated October 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received an anticoagulant (blood thinner), and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm). Physician's orders for Resident 15, dated October 25, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 3 milligrams (mg) of warfarin (blood thinning medication) daily for atrial fibrillation. However, the resident's Medication Administration Record for October 25, 2024, revealed that staff did not administer 3 mg of warfarin daily as ordered. Physician's orders, dated October 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 6 mg of warfarin at bedtime then 3 mg of warfarin on Tuesday October 29, 2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending December 20, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending November 14, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to develop comprehensive care plans, to update resident care plans, to follow physician's orders, to account for controlled medications, and following proper infection control practices. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 14). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective preventative maintenance program for the walk-in-freezer. Findings include: Observations of the walk-in-freezer on November 12, 2024, at 9:26 a.m. and November 13, 2024, at 12:18 p.m. revealed that there was an accumulation of ice on the ceiling extending out from the condenser to the other side of the walk-in-freezer, as well as from the ceiling and extending down the four side walls, and multiple areas on the floor with an accumulation of ice. Interview with the Dietary Manager on November 13, 2024, at 12:18 p.m. confirmed that there was an accumulation of ice on the ceiling extending out from the condenser to the other side of the walk-in-freezer, as well as from the ceiling and extending the down the four side walls, and multiple areas on the floor with an accumulation of ice. Interview with the Director of Maintenance on November 13, 2024, at 12:25 p.m. revealed that he has been there six months and does not recall having the walk-in freezer worked on.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0941 — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication to nursing and other direct care staff for four of four employee files reviewed (Nurse Aide 5, Nurse Aide 6, Licensed Practical Nurse 7, Registered Nurse 8). Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment (an assessment completed by the facility to thoroughly assess the needs of its resident population and the required resources to provide the care and services the residents need), dated July 17, 2024, revealed that the facility's training program includes an orientation process and ongoing training for all new and existing staff including managers, nursing, and other direct care staff, individuals providing services under contractual arrangement, and volunteers consistent with their expected roles. The content at a minimum included effective communication. Review of the education record for Nurse Aide 5 revealed a hire date of September 25, 2023. However, there was no documented evidence that she received the facility's education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed by a professional (registered) nurse for a change in condition for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 1, dated April 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a professional licensure check prior to hire for one licensed practical nurse reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) and failed to complete a nurse aide registry check for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 2). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated December 7, 2023, indicated that the facility will conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has had a finding entered into the nurse aide registry concerning abuse or neglect, or any individual that has a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse or neglect. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse 1 revealed that she was hired on October 11, 2023, and the Pennsylvania Professional Licensure check was not conducted until December 19, 2023, two months after she was hired. Review of the personnel file for Nurse Aide 2 revealed that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A nurse's note for Resident 3, dated August 16, 2023, at 4:01 p.m. revealed that the resident developed left facial drop and slurred speech and was transferred to the hospital. A nurse's note, dated August 17, 2023, at 6:41 a.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital. A nurse's note for Resident 3, dated September 24, 2023, at 8:32 a.m. revealed that the resident had a change in condition and had requested to be transferred to the hospital. A nurse's note, dated September 25, 2023, at 10:08 a.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital. There was no documented evidence that Resident 3 and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of the above transfers to the hospital. Interview with the Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans for individualized resident care needs for four of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 17, 18, 22). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated October 10, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, was continent of bowel and urine, and had a significant weight gain. A review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed that the resident had a history of urinary tract infections. A physician's order for Resident 6, dated December 15, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive Cephalexin (an antibiotic) two times a day for a urinary tract infection until December 22, 2023. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address Resident 6's urinary tract infection with antibiotic treatment. An interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for four of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 9, 22, 40). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated October 10, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, was continent of bowel and urine, and had a significant weight gain. Observations of Resident 6 on December 18, 2023, at 11:15 a.m. revealed the resident was lying in bed. The resident stated she had not been out of bed for the last three to four weeks because staff had stated that the mechanical lift would not support her weight. Interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) on December 19, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. revealed that Resident 6 was not able to get out of bed due to her weight exceeding the maximum weight limit of 450…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 8) and failed to notify the physician about a medication allergy for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 40). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated November 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required supervision with care needs, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, had venous ulcers (ulcers caused by poor blood flow in leg veins), and had a diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (a disease causing poor blood circulation to lower limbs). A care plan for Resident 8, revised on November 30, 2023, revealed that the resident had skin breakdown related to venous stasis ulcers of right ankle, right medial foot, right dorsal foot, and left dorsal foot. Interventions included to report evidence of infection such as purulent drainage, swelling, localized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility assessment reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 17, 40) who used an air mattress. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated August 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assist to total dependence with care needs, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Observations on December 18, 2023, at 10:35 a.m. revealed that Resident 9 was lying in bed and the bed was equipped with an air mattress; however, there was no documented evidence that the use of an air mattress was assessed for potential safety hazards prior to being placed on the resident's bed. Interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) on December 20, 2023, at 11:21 a.m. confirmed that there was no assessment for potential safety hazards prior to the air mattress being placed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 11, 15, 17). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the administration of oral medications, dated December 7, 2023, indicated that the nurse will document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) with their initials, at the appropriate date and time for the medication administered, after witnessing the ingestion of the medication. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated November 16, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included arthritis, high blood pressure, and chronic pain syndrome. Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated November 10, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 10-325 milligrams (mg) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and manufacturer's instructions, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure and store medications in the medication carts and failed to properly label medications in the medication room. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding administering medications, dated December 7, 2023, indicated that the medication cart was to be kept closed and locked when out of site of the medication nurse, no medications were to be kept on top of the cart, and when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened was to be recorded on the container. Observations of a medication pass on December 19, 2023, at 7:40 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 4 left a card of Naproxen 500 milligram (mg) tablets and a card of Allopurinol 100 mg tablets on top of the medication cart unsupervised while he entered a resident's room to administer medication. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 4 at that time confirmed that he should not have left the medication on top of the cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not dating opened food items and not storing food under sanitary conditions. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated December 7, 2023, revealed that leftover food was to be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item was to be clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated or frozen. All stock must be rotated with each new order received; new items were to be placed behind the supply in stock so that the oldest stock is always used first. Observations in the kitchen refrigerator on December 18, 2023, at 9:43 a.m. revealed an opened and undated package of lunch meat. Observations in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator at 9:46 a.m. revealed a block of opened swiss cheese that was dated November 24, 2023, and three unopened containers of orange juice with a best by date of October 19, 2023. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of one hospice residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: An agreement between the facility and a hospice provider (provider of end-of-life services) indicated that the hospice provider would provide information to the facility to facilitate coordination of care that included the most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient and a hospice benefit of elections form (a form signed to indicate that the individual waives all rights to traditional Medicare Part A payments for treatment related to the terminal illness). Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated August 31, 2023, revealed that the resident was to receive hospice services from the facility's contracted hospice provider. As of December 20, 2023, there was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record, or in the hospice provider's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 1, 2023; complaint investigation surveys ending June 13, 2023, and September 20, 2023; and revisit surveys ending July 24, 2023, and October 30, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 20, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to care plan timing and revision, the failure to provide quality of care, safe environment free from accident hazards, storage and labeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination related to an Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL- Beta-lactamases are enzymes produced by some bacteria that may make them resistant to some antibiotics) infection in the urine for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 15). Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control policy, dated December 7, 2023, revealed that contact precautions are intended to prevent the transmission of infectious agents which are spread through direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Contact precautions also apply where the presence of excessive wound drainage, urine or fecal incontinence, or other discharges from the body suggest an increased potential for environmental contamination and risk of transmission. Enhanced barrier protections are intended to prevent transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified about medications not being available for administration on multiple days for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated September 24, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required limited to extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, was incontinent of bladder, and had diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection within the past 30 days and end-stage renal (kidney) disease. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated September 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of cefuroxime axetil (antibiotic) twice a day for five days for a urinary tract infection. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 6, dated September 2023, indicated that the resident did not receive cefuroxime axetil on September 14, 2023, at 8:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated regarding fall precaution interventions for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 8) Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated August 2, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with bed mobility and transfers, and had a history of falls. A nursing note, dated August 12, 2023, at 3:41 p.m. revealed that Resident 3 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the bathroom. Blood was noted on the floor next to his bed, on his bed sheets, and on his clothing. A laceration was observed on the resident's forehead that measured 9.0 x 0.5 centimeters (cm) as well as a skin tear on his right forearm. When asked what happened, the resident stated he was sitting on his bed and leaned over to reach for something and fell off the bed and hit his head on the floor. He then got himself up into his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated September 24, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required limited to extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, was incontinent of bladder, and had diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection within the past 30 days and end-stage renal (kidney) disease. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated September 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of cefuroxime axetil (antibiotic) twice a day for five days for a urinary tract infection. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 6, dated September 2023, indicated that the resident did not receive cefuroxime axetil on September 14, 2023, at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and September 18, 2023, at 8:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt new interventions for fall prevention for one of the 10 residents reviewed (Resident 3) and failed to ensure that fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated August 2, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with bed mobility and transfers, and had a history of falls. A nursing note, dated June 24, 2023, at 4:45 a.m. revealed that Resident 3 was found on the floor with both legs bent at the knees. He said that he was getting out of bed and slid down to his knees. He had an abrasion on the left knee measuring 4.0 x 3.0 centimeters (cm) and two abrasions noted on the right knee measuring 1.0 x 1.0 cm and 4.0 x 2.5 cm. There was no documented evidence that any new interventions were put into place to prevent falls for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's clinical record was complete and accurately documented for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated September 24, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required limited to extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, did not receive bathing during the review period, and received dialysis. Physician's orders, dated July 12, 2023, revealed that the resident received dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. A shower/bathing record, dated December 21, 2022, revealed that Resident 6 was to receive a bath/shower during the evening on non-dialysis days. Nurse aide documentation for August and September 2023 revealed no documented evidence that Resident 6 received a shower from August 1 through 14 and September 1 through September 7, 2023. Interview with Resident 6 on September 20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use proper infection control practices during care for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: The facility policy for handwashing/hygiene, dated November 17, 2022, indicated that the use of gloves do not replace handwashing/hygiene. Hand hygiene is the final step after removing and disposing of personal protective equipment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated June 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of two for hygiene. Physician's orders for Resident 8, dated September 6, 2023, indicated that she had a pressure ulcer on her right and left buttocks and the wounds were to be cleaned with soap and water, apply zinc, and then apply a foam dressing three times a day and as needed. Observations of Resident 8 during hygiene and wound care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ZIDELE, YESHAYAHUIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE50%since 06/28/2022
ZIDELE, MORDECHAIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/28/2022
BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$225K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 9%Other / private 31%

This home reported $225K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$437per resident / day
operating cost
$13,272per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$379per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396035. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next