Aspen Nursing And Rehab Center
411 1/2 W Mahoning Street, Punxsutawney, PA 15767 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (814) 938-6020 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,042 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.2%CMS range 27.0–56.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 2.7–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.68 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 53.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.92 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, clinical records, and written safety and resident information, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible by ensuring that mechanical lifts used to transfer residents were equipped with hanger bar latches as required on one of two lifts in use (Invacare 450 Full Body Mechanical Lift), placing the safety of the residents in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. The facility also failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards for residents who were at risk for falls by failing to follow care-planned interventions for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 47). Findings include: The manufacturer's instructions for the use of the Invacare Reliant 450 mechanical lift (a device that uses hydraulic power to lift and transfer residents between surfaces), dated 2016, revealed a diagram of the lift showing a swivel bar attached to the hydraulic arm of the lift. Each side of the swivel bar had three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer care/prevention treatments were provided as ordered for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated September 19, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had medical diagnoses that included left hip fracture. A nursing note dated October 13, 2025, at 6:36 p.m. revealed that Resident 3 was admitted back to the nursing home from the hospital and that the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his left heel. A review of the October 13, 2025, Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 3 revealed that there was no documented evidence that the facility obtained an order for treatment of the pressure ulcer on his left heel until he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable.Findings include: Observations of the lunch meal on September 25, 2025 at 11:41 a.m. revealed that dietary staff began to prepare the north hall cart. At 11:55 a.m. the north hall cart was complete and left the kitchen at 11:58 a.m. The cart arrived on north hall at 11:59 a.m. and staff began to pass the trays at 12:00 p.m. At 12:05 p.m. all lunch trays were passed. A test tray was completed on September 25, 2025 at 12:16 p.m. revealing the turkey was 120.4 degrees Fahrenheit and tasted cold and was not palatable, and the capri blend vegetables were 120 degrees Fahrenheit and tasted cold and was not palatable. Interview with the Dietary Manager on September 25, 2025 at 12:16 p.m. revealed that the turkey and vegetables were cold and not palatable.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions.Findings include:Observations in the main kitchen on September 22, 2025 at 9:10 a.m. revealed that there was a crate of grape juice cartons that expired on September 3, 2025. There was a puddle of spilled milk and a puddle of an unidentified substance laying on the floor inside the cooler. There was a tray of hamburger patties open and exposed to air in the freezer.Interview with Dietary Aide 3 on September 22, 2025 at 9:10 a.m. revealed that the grape juice should have been discarded when it expired and that it was used for the breakfast meal that morning. She further stated the spills in the cooler should be cleaned up and that the hamburger patties should have been covered and sealed.Interview with the Dietary Manager on September 23, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. confirmed that the grape juice had expired and should have been thrown out, the spills should have been cleaned up and the hamburger patties should not have been exposed. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for one of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 19).The facility's policy regarding antipsychotic medication use, dated May 15, 2025, indicated that residents will not receive as needed doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. The need to continue as needed orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the as needed order will be indicated in the order. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19 dated August 5, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were positioned appropriately while eating for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 36).Findings include: Findings include:The facility's policy regarding preparing the resident for a meal, dated May 15, 2025, indicated that residents should be positioned so his or her head and upper body are as upright as possible and with the head tipped slightly forward. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 36, dated June 5, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired and dependent on two staff for daily care needs including eating. The resident's care plan, dated April 15, 2025, indicated that the resident required supervision to limited assistance with meals.Observations of Resident 36 on September 22, 2025 at 12:08 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her specialized chair with the rear end tilted back for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, facility investigation documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding wheelchair leg rests, dated May 15, 2025, revealed that footrests serve valuable purposes. They support the weight of the legs for those in the wheelchair, who often lack the strength to keep their legs from otherwise dragging. They also serve a valuable safety purpose by keeping the person's feet out of the way of the wheels and inadvertently getting caught under the wheelchair when it is pushed (which could cause the person from being thrown from the wheelchair).A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 50, dated August 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, as well as observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess the potential entrapment risks from the use of bed rails for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 36).Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 36, dated September 4, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively). Physician's orders for Resident 36, dated May 2, 2025, included for the resident to have bilateral bed enabler bars to assist with repositioning, comfort, and bed mobility.Observations of Resident 36 on September 22, 2025, at 10:58 a.m. revealed that the resident was resting in bed and the resident's bed was equipped with bilateral enabler bars. There was no documented evidence that Resident 36 was assessed for potential safety hazards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending October 18, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September 25, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies regarding safety/accidents, palatable food, food procurement and storage, and infection control. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding safety/accidents, cited during the survey ending October 18, 2024, revealed that safety/accidents would be monitored by QAPI. The results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination related to an Multi-Drug resistant organism (MDRO bacteria that may make them resistant to some antibiotics) infection in the urine for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control policy, dated May 15, 2025, revealed that contact precautions are intended to prevent the transmission of infectious agents which are spread through direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Contact precautions also apply where the presence of excessive wound drainage, urine or fecal incontinence, or other discharges from the body suggest an increased potential for environmental contamination and risk of transmission. Enhanced barrier protections are intended to prevent transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO's-bacteria that have become resistant to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Medication Administration, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that staff are required as policy to document the administration of medication in the resident's medical record. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that include high blood pressure and cerebral palsy (medical condition that affects muscle tone, movement and posture). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated December 31, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 325 milligrams (mg) Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (a controlled narcotic pain medication) orally every 12 hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated April 18, 2024, indicated that residents were not to be exposed to abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation. Neglect was defined as failure of the facility, its employees so service providers to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, emotional distress, or mental illness. Neglect was the unwillful act to neglect goods and services to a patient. Examples include failure to follow the care plan, failure to make accessible goods for resident, failure to reposition patient, medication errors, and call light response times. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, resident interviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food temperatures, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that all hot items should be 135 Fahrenheit (F) or above. Cold products shall be 41 F or below. Foods failing to register these temperatures must be reheated/chilled until acceptable temperatures are reached. Observations of the lunch meal service on October 16, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed that the last cart containing a test tray left the kitchen at 12:05 p.m. and arrived on the short hall at 12:07 p.m. Trays were passed to the residents and the last resident was served at 12:19 p.m. The test tray was removed from the cart at 12:20 p.m. and the temperature of the coffee was 110 F, the meat balls were 122 F, the pasta was 133 F, and the green beans were 80 F. The coffee, meatballs, pasta and green beans were lukewarm and not palatable. Interview with the Dietary Manager at the time of the observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions, failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, and failure to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings in the kitchen. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Food Preparation, Service and Sanitation, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that food and nutrition service employees were to prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practice by cleaning and sanitizing work surfaces and food-contact equipment between uses, following food code guidelines. Recommended storge practices include keeping all shelving and floors clean and dry at all times, wrap all food well to prevent freezer burn, and all opened and partially used foods shall be dated, labeled and sealed before being returned to a storage area. Food and nutrition services staff are to wear hair restraints so that hair does not contact food. Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if residents were safe to self-administer medications for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated July 19, 2024, indicated that residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated August 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated August 23, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 20 grams(gm)/30 milliliter (ml) of Lactulose Encephalopathy Oral Solution (a medication used to treat constipation) 30 ml by mouth one time a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment related to residents' wheelchairs for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 33, 53). Findings include: The facility's policy for Homelike Environment, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Observations of Resident 6's wheelchair on October 17, 2024, at 10:26 a.m. revealed that the vinyl material on both arm rests was torn. Observations of Resident 33's wheelchair on October 17, 2024, at 3:01 p.m. revealed that the vinyl material on both arm rests was cracked and torn. Observations of Resident 53's wheelchair on October 17, 2024, at 2:57 p.m. revealed that the vinyl material on the left arm rest was cracked and torn. Interview with the Maintenance Director on October 17, 2024, at 3:03 p.m. revealed that the wheelchair armrests for Residents 6, 33, and 53 were cracked and torn and peeling and that they should be replaced. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident Rights. 28 Pa.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the state ombudsman and/or the resident and resident's responsible party in writing regarding the reason for transfers/discharge to the hospital for five of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 30, 36, 55, 102). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 8, dated July 23, 2024, at 7:19 p.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with kidney failure. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 8's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's responsible party regarding the reason for transfer. An annual MDS assessment for Resident 30, dated September 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included heart failure, high blood pressure, and morbid obesity. A nursing note for Resident 30, dated May 31, 2024, at 8:40 p.m., revealed that the resident had a change in condition and was transferred to the local emergency room. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of a transfer for five of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 30, 36, 55, 102). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 8, dated July 23, 2024, at 7:19 p.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with kidney failure. There was no documented evidence that the resident and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of the above transfer to the hospital for Resident 8. An annual (MDS) assessment for Resident 30, dated September 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included heart failure, high blood pressure, and morbid obesity. A nursing note for Resident 30, dated May 31, 2024, at 8:40 p.m., revealed that the resident had a change in condition and was transferred to the local emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 8, 27, 46, 47). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven days of the assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0415F Antibiotic Medications and Section N0415I Antiplatelet Medications (medication used to prevent blood from clotting) was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated August 12, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as family and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated September 10, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance from staff for personal care needs. Resident 19's care plan, dated September 6, 2024, revealed that the resident preferred showering two times per week on Wednesday and Sunday evening shift. Review of Resident 19's bathing records for September and October 2024 revealed that the resident received a bed bath on September 18, 2024, and a shower on October 9, 2024. There was no documented evidence to indicate that Resident 19 received a shower on the other scheduled days for September and October 2024. Interview with Resident 19's daughter on October 15, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 37, 47). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated August 28, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated August 23, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 1 gram (gm) of Sucralfate (a medication used to treat conditions of the digestive tract) one table by mouth before meals and at bedtime for gastric protection. Observations during medication administration on October 16, 2024, at 8:25 a.m. revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 28, 30). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Medication Administration, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that staff are required to document the administration of medication in the resident's medical record. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated August 14, 2024, revealed that the resident is cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that include high blood pressure, dementia, and pain in left lower leg. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated April 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 5/325 milligram (mg) tablet of Oxycodone/Acetaminophen (a controlled narcotic pain medication) orally every eight hours for pain. A review of the controlled drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations related to drug irregularities were acted upon by a physician for two of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 37). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy regarding the Role of the Consultant Pharmacist, dated May 16, 2024, revealed that the pharmacist will review the resident's medications and notify the physician of any irregularities. The physician will then make any necessary adjustments to the resident's medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated August 13, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. A progress note for Resident 7, dated April 19, 2024, revealed that a Medication Record Review (MRR) was completed by the pharmacist with medication changes recommended. There was no documented evidence in the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate that was less than five percent. Findings include: Observations during medication administration on October 16, 2024, revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 35 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 5.71 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated August 23, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 1 gram (gm) of Sucralfate (a medication used to treat conditions of the digestive tract) by mouth before meals and at bedtime for gastric protection. Observations during medication administration on October 16, 2024, at 8:25 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 prepared Resident 10's medications, which included 1 gm Sucralfate. Licensed Practical Nurse 5 administered 1 gm Sucralfate to Resident 10 at 8:30 a.m. after she had consumed her breakfast meal. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 on October 16, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled in one of two medication carts reviewed, and failed to label a multi-dose vial with the date it was opened in one of one medication room reviewed. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding storage and dating of medications and biologicals, dated May 16, 2024, indicated that the facility stores all medications and biologics in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Medications dispensed by the pharmacy shall be labeled with the resident's name, medication name, dose, instructions and route of administration. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. The manufacturer's instructions for Aplisol (an injectable medication used to detect exposure to the bacteria that causes tuberculosis), dated March, 2016, indicated that opened and in-use vials of Aplisol were to be discarded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job descriptions and the deficiencies cited during the current survey, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to assume responsibility for effective management of the facility to ensure that the facility operated in compliance with state regulations and codes by not ensuring that mechanical lifts used to transfer residents were equipped with hanger bar latches without which the resident's health and safety are jeopardized for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: The job description for the NHA, dated May 16, 2024, indicated that they must be knowledgeable of and demonstrate the ability to provide quality care by fostering a safe environment for residents and staff, providing emotional and psychological support for the residents within the facility, direct the day-to-day operation of the facility to ensure the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times in accordance with current state and federal standards, and implement and enforce company policies and procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 102). Findings include: A quarterly MDS for Resident 102, dated July 31, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, had a feeding tube (a tube surgically inserted into the stomach), and had pressure ulcers. A physician's order, dated October 9, 2024, included an order to empty and record drainage from Penrose drain (a tube surgically inserted to drain fluid from a wound) in the right hip every shift. A review of Resident 102's Medication Administration Review (MAR), dated October 2024, revealed that staff emptied the Penrose drain. A surgical note for Resident 102, dated October 8, 2024, revealed that the resident had surgery to clean out a pressure ulcer and the Penrose drain was sewn into the resident's pressure ulcer in the right hip and through the right buttock in order to create a tract for the wounds to heal. The Penrose drain would not be emptied,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending December 7, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending October 18, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies regarding accurate completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs); quality of care; accidents and hazards; pharmacy services; medication storage; food procurement-storing, preparing and serving food under sanitary conditions; complete and accurate medical records; and following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing medications for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated May 16, 2024, indicated that only persons licensed or permitted by the state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so and that staff will follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g. handwashing, aseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated September 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was alert, could understand, and required assistance from staff for her daily care needs. Observations on October 16, 2024, at 8:15 a.m. during medication pass revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 was preparing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow recommendations from the optometrist for follow-up appointments for five of seven residents (Residents 2, 3, 4, 6, 7). Findings include: An optometrist (a healthcare provider who specializes in caring for your eyes) note for Resident 2, dated March 27, 2023, revealed that the resident presented for a diabetic eye exam, and the patient was receiving care pursuant to an order from the primary care physician. Upon the primary care physician's review of the most current consult note and plan of care, should the primary care physician not agree with the medical necessity of both the care and plan of care, the optometrist was to be notified immediately, and that the resident was to return in six to nine months for a dilated fundus exam (a diagnostic procedure that uses eye drops to dilate or enlarge the pupil in order to obtain a better view of the fundus, the inside, back surface of the eye). There was no documented evidence that the optometrist's recommendation for Resident 2 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to support and accommodate a resident's choices and preferences for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 2, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury. Interview with Resident 3 on January 24, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed that he fights with the Nursing Home Administrator often because she does not permit him to make his own decisions. He stated that she encourages his sister-in-law to make his decisions and that he does not always agree with the decisions. He stated he just wants to be able to make his own decisions without his sister-in-law having a say. He confirmed that his sister-in-law is his power of attorney, but he does not feel she needs to make decisions for him as he is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified of a resident's change in condition for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy for refusal of care, dated September 28, 2023, indicated that the attending physician must be notified of refusal of treatment in a time frame determined by the resident's condition and potential serious consequences of the refusal. The facility's bowel protocol includes for the daylight nurse to administer Milk of Magnesia after nine shifts of no bowel movement, and if ineffective, the evening shift nurse is to administer a suppository. If the suppository is ineffective, the nurse the next morning is to administer a Fleets enema. If the Fleets enema and all other interventions are ineffective, the registered nurse is to assess the resident and call the physician. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 11, 40). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, revealed that Section B0700 (make self understood) should be coded with either usually understood, sometimes understood, or rarely/never understood, and Section B0800 (ability to understand other) should be coded with either usually understands, sometimes understands, or rarely/never understands. Section C0100 (should brief interview for mental status be conducted) should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method. Section D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 35). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated September 1, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, needed limited assistance with transfers and ambulation, and had no fall history. A nurses note, dated September 24, 2023, at 4:45 a.m. revealed that Resident 2's alarm was sounding, and the licensed practical nurse found the resident on the floor in front of the recliner. The intervention for the fall was for anti-skid tape to be placed on the floor in front of the resident's recliner. Observations on December 6, 2023, at 12:28 p.m. revealed that there was anti-skid tape on the floor bedside Resident 2's bed. There was no anti-skid tape observed in front of resident's recliner. An administrator's note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing assessments were completed, and the physician was notified of a resident's change in condition for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated October 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for personal hygiene needs, had an indwelling catheter, had a pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure), and had diagnosis that included paraplegia (paralysis of legs and lower body). The facility's bowel protocol includes for the daylight nurse to administer Milk of Magnesia after nine shifts of no bowel movement, and if ineffective, the evening shift nurse is to administer a suppository. If the suppository is ineffective, the nurse the next morning is to administer a Fleets enema. If the Fleets enema and all other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 22). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dressing and wound documentation, dated September 28, 2023, indicated that wound care/dressings and refusals should be documented on the resident's medical record, treatment sheet or designated wound form. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated October 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for personal hygiene needs, had an indwelling catheter, had a pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure), and had diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralysis of legs and lower body). Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated September 22, 2023; October 23, 2023; and October 24, 2023, included an order for the resident's right gluteal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered contracture management services were provided as care planned for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that the resident was usually able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Current physician's orders for Resident 11 included an order for the resident to have bilateral (both sides) PRAFO (provides support to keep the ankle aligned to treat muscle weakness) foot/ankle boots applied when getting out of bed and removed when returning to bed, leaving on for six to eight hours or to the resident's tolerance. A care plan for Resident 11, dated September 30, 2022, revealed that the resident had a self-care deficit caused by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 34). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 20, dated October 23, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs including transfers and locomotion, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Observations of Resident 20 on December 4, 2023, at 12:20 p.m. revealed that the resident was pulled in her wheelchair from the hallway to the dining area by the speech therapist. The wheelchair had no footrests on it to prevent the resident from dragging her feet. An interview with the speech therapist at that time revealed that the resident should have had footrests on her chair but did not, so she pulled the resident so she could observe her feet. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 34, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated September 29, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, required extensive assistance for personal hygiene needs, was taking pain medication as needed, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated April 28, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 5/325 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (a controlled pain medication) every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of the controlled drug record (a form that accounts for each tablet/pill/dose of a controlled drug) for Resident 5 for September, October, and November 2023 indicated that a dose of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly secured in the medication cart. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the security of the medication cart, dated September 28, 2023, indicated that the nurse was to secure the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry and the medication cart was to be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. Observations on December 4, 2023, at 3:56 p.m. revealed that a medication cart (east cart) in the hallway was unattended by staff members and was unlocked. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 3 on December 4, 2023, at 3:58 p.m. confirmed that her medication cart was unsecured and should have been locked. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 4, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. confirmed that the medication cart should have been locked when unattended. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to properly label and date refrigerated and frozen foods. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated September 28, 2023, revealed that leftover food was to be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item was to be clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated or frozen. Observations in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator on December 4, 2023, at 10:02 a.m. revealed an unopened package of cheese that was not in the original container and not dated, and an opened bag of cheese that was not sealed, opened to air, and not dated. Observations in the kitchen's walk-in freezer on December 4, 2023, at 10:04 a.m. revealed a bag of frozen chicken opened to air and not sealed. Observations in the reach-in freezer on December 4, 2023, at 10:07 a.m. revealed unopened packages of frozen pancakes and French toast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 42). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated September 22, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance of staff for personal hygiene needs, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube placed and held in the bladder to drain urine), and had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder (problem in which a person lacks bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition). Physician's orders for Resident 18, dated August 10, 2022, included an order for the resident's urinary catheter to be changed once a month with an 18 French/10 cc balloon (size of indwelling catheter). Review of the October and November 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 18 revealed that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending March, 10, 2023; December 29, 2022; and December 12, 2022, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 7, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to physician notification; quality of care; proper storage and labeling of medications; food procurement, storing, preparing and serving food under sanitary conditions; and resident records. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing catheter care for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding catheter care, dated September 28, 2023, indicated that the catheter tubing and drainage bag were to be kept off the floor to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 22, dated November 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was alert and oriented, and had diagnoses that included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition that results in the bladder not filling or emptying correctly). The resident's care plan, dated September 19, 2023, indicated the use of an indwelling catheter. Physician's orders for Resident 22, dated November 16, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive Keflex (an antibiotic) for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — widespreadProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care for two of 22 residents reviewed who had an indwelling urinary catheter (Residents 4, 18). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated October 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for personal hygiene needs, had an indwelling catheter (a tube placed and held in the bladder to drain urine), and had diagnosis that included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) and neurogenic bladder (problem in which a person lacks bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition). Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated February 3, 2023, included an order for the resident's foley (type of indwelling catheter) catheter to be changed every 28 days. A nursing note for Resident 4, dated October 13, 2023, at 5:08 a.m. revealed that the resident refused to have his foley catheter changed. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required nursing staffing information was posted daily. Findings include: Observations on December 6, 2023, at 9:27 a.m. revealed that the posted nursing staffing information was dated for Monday, December 4, 2023. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 2 on December 6, 2023, at 9:27 a.m. confirmed that the staffing information posted at the main entrance was the staffing information for December 4, 2023. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrative on December 6, 2023, at 3:58 p.m. confirmed the posting was old and that staffing hours were to be posted daily. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,042 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $24,042 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIDELE, YESHAYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 06/28/2022 |
| ZIDELE, MORDECHAI | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2022 |
| BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/27/2025 |
| DEET, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2022 |
| ROSCOE, BRANDON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395618. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.