Amaryllis Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of vendor invoices, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to operate in compliance with state regulations and codes. The facility's failure created a situation which placed all residents in immediate jeopardy of the likelihood of serious bodily injury, harm, or death. Findings include: 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations, subsection 201.14(g), dated July 24, 1999, revealed that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the resident's health and safety are jeopardized. Information provided by the facility revealed that the facility's vendor C.L. McKeirnan, Inc. a transportation company has a past due balance of $10,253.79 as of February 27, 2024. The last payment was made on May 22, 2023, in the amount of $575.20. The vendor notified the facility in writing that services would be unavailable until full payment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for five of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R5, R7, R25, R26, and R33).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Resident Participation - Assessment/Care Plans dated 5/02/25, revealed the resident and his or her representative are encouraged to participate in the resident's assessment and in the development and implementation of the resident's care plan. Facility staff supports and encourages resident/representative participation in the care planning process by ensuring that residents, representative and families understand the care planning process, holding care planning meetings at times of day when the resident, representative and family members can attend and are functioning at their best, providing sufficient notice in advance of the meeting, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for three of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R3, R5, and R6). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 5/02/25, revealed a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: a. The stated goals and objectives of the resident; b. A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; c. Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; and d. Any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Provision of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner during tray line in the main kitchen.Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Food Preparation and Service dated 5/2/25, revealed Food and Nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; cross-contamination can occur when harmful substances, chemical or disease-causing microorganisms are transferred to food by hands (including gloved hands); food and nutrition service staff wash their hands before serving food to residents; gloves are worn when handling food directly and changed between tasks. Observations during tray line on 4/29/26, at 11:18 a.m. revealed Employee E1 picked up tongs from the floor, placed the dropped tongs on another counter and continued to plate food without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene which was witnessed by the Dietary Manager. During an interview on 4/29/26, at 11:20 a.m. the Dietary Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity during a dressing change for one of two residents with pressure ulcers requiring wound care reviewed (Resident R31). Findings include: Review of Resident R31's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/22/25, with diagnoses that included fractured right femur, heart failure, dementia and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R31's physician's orders dated 5/08/25, included an order to cleanse the coccyx wound and apply silvercell to the wound and cover with border foam. Observation of wound care on 5/28/25, at 9:05 a.m. revealed that the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 placed the new dressing on Resident R31 and then proceeded to date the dressing while on Resident R31. During an interview on 5/28/25, at 9:20 a.m. LPN Employee E1 confirmed he/she dated the dressing while on Resident R31 and should have dated the dressing prior to placing it on the resident. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the status of one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings include: MDS instructions for section P0200 Alarms subsection E Wander / Elopement Alarm indicated to identify all alarms that were used at any time (day or night) during the seven-day look-back period and to code the frequency of use as not used, used less than daily, or used daily. The MDS instructions further indicated that a wander / elopement alarm includes devices such as bracelets, pins/buttons worn on the resident's clothing, sensors in shoes, or building/unit exits sensors worn by/attached to the resident that activates an alarm and/or alert staff when the resident nears or exits a specific area of the building. This includes devices that are attached to the resident's assistive device (e.g., walker, wheelchair, cane) or other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one of one residents reviewed regarding respiratory care (Resident R15). Findings include: A facility policy dated 5/2/25, entitled Oxygen Administration revealed to turn on the oxygen flow to 2 to 3 liters per minute, unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Resident R15's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/12/23, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing), diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and high blood pressure. Resident R15's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/26/25, for oxygen at 1 liter per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (a thin tube with two prongs that fit into the resident's nostrils to deliver oxygen) PRN (as needed) for SOB (shortness of breath) or comfort. Observation on 5/27/25, at 2:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination during a dressing change for one of two residents with pressure ulcers requiring wound care reviewed (Resident R31). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Dressings, Dry/Clean, dated 5/02/25, indicated to remove the soiled dressing, remove soiled gloves and then wash hands. Review of Resident R31's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/22/25, with diagnoses that included fractured right femur, heart failure, dementia and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R31's physician's orders dated 5/08/25, included an order to cleanse the coccyx wound and apply silvercell to the wound and cover with border foam. Observation of wound care on 5/28/25, at 9:05 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 removed the soiled dressing without removing gloves or washing hands and then continued to cleanse the wound without removing gloves or washing hands. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to residents and/or the resident's representative for five of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R9, R23, R26, R79, and R80). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 5/2/24, indicated the resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident / representative can understand) that includes goals an objectives, summary of resident's medications and dietary instructions, and any services and treatments to be administered. The policy further stated that the provision of the summary to the resident and/or resident representative is documented in the medical record. Resident R9's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/10/23, with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, osteoporosis (condition affecting the bones putting you at higher risk for fractures), and depression. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for two of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R9 and R16). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Resident Participation - Assessments / Care Plans dated 5/2/24, indicated that a seven day advance notice of the care planning conference is provided to the resident and his or her representative and that such notice is made by mail and/or telephone. The policy also indicated that the social services director or designee is responsible for notifying the resident/representative and for maintaining records of such notices. The notices include the name of each person contacted and the date he or she was contacted, the method of contact, refusal of participation if applicable, and the date and signature of the individual making the contact. Review of a facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered dated 5/2/24, indicated Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the residents' condition change. and The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/5/23, with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a condition when there is restricted blood flow to the limb, usually legs), heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot supply the body with enough blood) and hypokalemia (low potassium level). Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed a progress note dated 4/25/24, that indicated the- resident was found lying on the floor with a large laceration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$6,631 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $6,631 — penalty dated 2023-11-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-22 for 50 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BONAMOUR HEALTH GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $398K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA