No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beaver Valley Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

257 Georgetown Road, Beaver Falls, PA 15010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (724) 846-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 846-8200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
257 Georgetown Rd · (724) 846-3266 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
#100 Chippewa Town Centre · (724) 843-1800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
100 Chippewa Town Centre · (724) 421-9068 · Call to confirm hours
Park
956 State Route 168 · (724) 846-8058 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.1%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.1%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.7%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.3%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.911.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.581.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.6%CMS range 41.8–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.0–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified74.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.2–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
56.7%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-01)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) involving consistent shower or baths for two out of six residents (Resident R2 and Resident R3).Findings include: Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated 12/22/25, indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility 1/15/18. Review of Resident R2 Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/13/26, indicated diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease that makes it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy review, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for three of five sampled residents (Residents R1, R4 and Resident R5). Findings include: The facility Wound care policy last reviewed 12/22/25, indicated that the information should be recorded in the resident's medical record includes the type of wound, date and time the wound care was given, any changes in the resident's condition, any problems or complaints made by the resident, and if the resident refused the treatment with the reason. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/8/25, indicated he had diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct surveillance mapping for five of 12 months (October 2024, February 2025, April 2025, August 2025, and September 2025), failed to timely implement isolation precautions during contact tracing testing for candida auris, failed to implement universal masking and droplet precautions throughout the facility timely for one of five residents (Residents R116), report newly identified cases within 24 hours during a COVID outbreak for four residents (Resident R50, R51, R54, and R91) and two staff members (Nurse Aide, Employee E16 and NA, Employee E24)and failed to prevent cross contamination during a medication pass for one of three resident's (Resident R91).Findings: Review of the facility's Surveillance for Infections last reviewed 7/11/25, stated the Infection Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to discontinue a physician order for one of one resident (Resident R2), failed to provide appropriate care and services for a resident with a wound vac (Resident R16), failed to discontinue skin treatments (Resident R32), failed to obtain physician orders to provide parameters of when to notify the physician of increased/decreased Capillary Glucose levels (CBG) for one of three residents (Resident R89). Findings include: Review of the facility Wound Care policy last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Verify that there is a physician order for wound care. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Review of the facility policy Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated diabetes is a disorder in which there is relative or absolute lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five out of five nurse aides (NA Employee E1, E2, E3, E4, E5).Findings include: During an interview on 9/25/25, at 1:30 p.m. the Human Resource Employee E6 confirmed that the facility does not have performance reviews completed on NA Employee E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5. During an interview on 9/25/25, at 1:30 p.m. Human Resource Employee E6 the confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five of five nurse aides as required.28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development.28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence medication regimen reviews (MRR) were reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for four of six residents (Resident R6, R10, R11, R59). Finding include: The facility Consultant Pharmacist reports: monthly report of pharmaceutical services last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated that the consultant pharmacist prepares monthly written reports on the status of the facility's pharmaceutical services and nursing staff performance related to medication therapy. Monthly reports are kept on file for at least two years. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/25/25, indicated diagnoses of depression, schizophrenia (affects thinking, feeling and behaviors) and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R6's physician orders dated 10/11/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in one of two medication rooms (first floor medication room) and three of five medications carts (second floor South Hall, first floor South Hall and first floor [NAME] Hall).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed 7/11/25, indicates medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacture's recommendations or those of the supplier. The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering it. Medication storage areas are kept clean, well lit, and free of clutter Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi dose container, the date is recorded on the container. Review of the facility policy Insulin Pen Administration last reviewed 7/11/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of six residents (Residents R16).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medication last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated the facility, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care team, should access and determine whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate. The facility should ensure that orders for self-administration list the specific medication(s) the resident may self-administer. If a resident self-administers their medication the facility should routinely assess the residents cognitive, physical, and visual ability. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/2/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to the notify resident representative and/or medical provider of a change in condition/status for one of three residents (Resident R66).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents- Investigation and Reporting last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors etc., occurring on premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and /or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. The following data should be included but not inclusive to the date/time the family was notified and by whom. The time the attending physician was notified as well as the physician's response and instructions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF-ABN) for one of three sampled resident records (Closed Resident Record CR132). Findings include: The facility How to implement ABN's last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated that the purpose of a SNF-ABN is to inform the Medicare beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for particular services. If the resident will continue in the nursing facility under a different payor source to issue a current SNF-ABN letter on or before the last cover day. Review of Closed Resident Record CR132's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record CR132's MDS Assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/10/25, indicated she had diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a medical condition creating a sense of acute fear, restlessness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify a seat belt and table attached to a wheelchair and leg straps placed over a residents thighs as a possible restraint, and failed to assess the functional status of the individual residents to determine if the use of a seatbelt or table attached to a wheelchair and leg straps placed over a residents thighs is a restraint for two of four residents (Residents R15 and R58). Findings include: Review of facility policy Use of Restraints dated 7/11/25, stated restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs used without adequate indications for use for one of three residents (Resident R98).Findings include: Review of Resident R98's admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R98's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs) assessment dated [DATE], included diagnoses of depression, metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). No psychotic diagnoses were present on the MDS. Review of Section N: Medications revealed Resident R98 received antipsychotic medications in the seven days prior to the assessment. Review of the facility diagnoses list indicated, dementia in other diseases classified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge for one of three residents and failed to notify the ombudsman of the correct living arrangement for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident R131). Findings include: Review of Closed Record Resident R131 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Record Resident R131 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 3/23/25, indicated diagnosis of anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation) hyperlipidemia (excess of lipids or fats in your blood), and respiratory failure (is a condition where there is not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body). Review of facility documentation indicated that Closed Record Resident R131 on 4/2/25, was found in the parking lot with what appeared to be aluminum foil shaped into what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of four residents (Resident R8).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump the way it should), anxiety and depression. Section P0100 Physical Restraints used in bed: A-Bed rail coded as used daily. Review of the facility provided resident matrix on 9/22/25, indicated Resident R8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of three residents (Resident R4).Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plans-Baseline last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated a baseline plan of care to meets the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/6/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood), high blood pressure, and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). Review of Resident R4's admission evaluation section 9 baseline care plan/order review was checked no. During an interview completed on 9/24/25, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, review of clinical record, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care to one of six residents (Residents R15).Findings include: The facility's Foot Care dated 7/11/25, stated residents will receive appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health. Residents will be assisted in making transportation appointments to and from specialist (podiatrists) as needed. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/3/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, cerebral infarction (occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R15's physician order dated 6/3/25, indicated to consult podiatry for toenail trim. During an interview and observation on 9/23/25, at 10:37 a.m. Resident R15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart) for two of two residents (Resident R16 and R42).Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/2/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (high sugar in the blood) and encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of Resident R16's care plan dated 8/27/25, indicated to change IV site dressing per physician order and as needed if soiled or wet. Review of Resident R16's physician order dated 9/10/25, stated to change the PICC dressing and caps…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for one of two residents (Residents R89) and ensured fluid restrictions were maintained for one of two residents (Resident R89).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Encouraging and Restricting Fluids last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated to provide the resident with the amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health this may include encouraging or restricting fluids. The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record that includes but not inclusive to the amount in millimeters of fluids consumed by the resident during the shift. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R89's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis of diabetes (high sugar in the blood), hemiplegia affecting right side and dependence on renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD-a mental health condition in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event), diabetes (high sugar in the blood) and heart failure (heart doesn't pump the way it should). Review of R1's minimum data assessment (MDS- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/2/25, indicated diagnosis are current. Review of Resident R1's care plan dated 7/18/22, indicated - At risk for changes in mood related to bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder chronic, agoraphobia with panic disorder, anxiety disorder. The care plan failed to identify PTSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one of three residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident R131).Findings include: Review of Closed Record Resident R131 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 3/23/25, indicated diagnosis of anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation) hyperlipidemia (excess of lipids or fats in your blood), and respiratory failure (is a condition where there is not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body). Review of facility documentation indicated that Closed Record Resident R131 on 4/2/25, was found in the parking lot with what appeared to be aluminum foil shaped into what appeared to be pipe and a white substance. Review of clinical record follow up dated 4/11/25, indicated: Past Medical History: Active Medical Problems: Opioid dependence - Drug use history of Assessment and Plan: 1. Opioid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R89 and R91).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Administration-General Guidelines last reviewed 7/11/25, indicated that medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last review 7/11/25, indicated medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convivence. Review of the facility policy Insulin Pen Administration las reviewed 7/11/25, indicated to administer insulin subcutaneously using a pen in a safe, accurate and effective manner. Procedure steps…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of the Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all required members for one of three quarters (Quarter one of 2025). Findings include: The facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan dated 7/11/25, indicated This facility shall develop, implement and maintain an on-going, facility wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, purse methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. Review of Quality Assurance and Performance minutes sign in sheets and attendance records for Quarter One of 2025, failed to reveal the Medical Director was in attendance. During an interview 9/26/25, at 1:15 p.m. NHA (Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of three quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed resident clinical records, facility documents, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for one of five sampled residents (Closed Resident Record CR1). Findings include: The facility Abuse investigation and reporting policy last reviewed on 8/1/24, indicated that all reports of resident abuse, neglect , exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property shall be promptly reported to the local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse is reported, Administration will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. The Administrator will provide any supporting documentation, will keep the resident or resident representative informed, and will ensure any further abuse is prevented. The assigned investigator will record the results of the investigation. An alleged violation of abuse will be reported. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain allegations of abuse are thoroughly investigated for one of five sampled residents (Closed Resident Record CR1). Findings include: The facility Abuse investigation and reporting policy last reviewed on 8/1/24, indicated that all reports of resident abuse, neglect , exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property shall be promptly reported to the local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse is reported, Administration will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. The Administrator will provide any supporting documentation, will keep the resident or resident representative informed, and will ensure any further abuse is prevented. The assigned investigator will record the results of the investigation. An alleged violation of abuse will be reported. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of three residents (Residents R96). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medication dated 8/1/24, indicated residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Self-administered medications must be stored in a safe and secure place. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly can't filter waste), anemia (low iron in the blood), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observation on 9/3/24, at 10:26 a.m. Resident R96 was sitting on the edge of bed. A box of Ivizia eye drops (used for dry eyes) were noted to her bedside stand. During an interview on 9/3/24 at 10:43 a.m. Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident records and staff interview, the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two out of two residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Resident R21 and R60). Finding include: Review of the facility policy Transfer or Discharge Documentation dated 8/1/24, indicated when a resident is transferred or discharged , details of the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information will be communicated to the receiving health care facility or provided. When a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, the following information will be documented in the medical record: ·The basis for transfer or discharge ·Disposition of medication ·Summary of the resident's overall medical, physical, and mental condition ·That an appropriate notice was provided to the resident and /or legal representative ·All special instructions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) upon or within twenty-four hours of transfer for two of two residents (Residents R21 and R60). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bed Hold, dated 8/1/24, indicated that the facility is required to notify responsible party of the Bed Hold options and associated financial liability: 1) At the time of admission to ensure that the Resident/Responsible Party is aware of the procedure to be followed to guarantee a bed upon returning from a future leave. 2) Each time a resident will be absent from the facility for hospitalization or other medical or therapeutic leave so that the Resident and/or Responsible Party may make a choice to either hold the bed or discharge from the facility for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a plan of care to include a focus and interventions to maintain a resident's highest practicable physical well-being as required for one of three residents. (Resident R28) Findings include: Review of the facility Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered policy dated 8/1/24, indicates a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/23/24, indicated a re-entry to facility on 10/17/22, with diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump as well as it should), hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). Observation 9/3/24, at 10:40 a.m. resident R28 was sitting next to his bed and was noted to have bilateral skin sleeves on. A review of Resident R28's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order for treatment residents were receiving for two of five residents (Resident R28 and 260). Findings include: Review of facility policy Therapeutic Diets dated 8/1/24, indicated therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with the resident's goals and preferences. Diet order should match the terminology used by the food and nutrition services department. Review of the facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders dated 8/1/24, indicates orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Drugs and biologicals orders must be recorded on the Physicians orders sheet. Review of Resident R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/23/24, indicated a re-entry to facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatment and services were ordered and/or provided for two of three residents with a urinary catheter (Resident R37 and R260). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders dated 8/1/24, indicates orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Review of the facility policy Catheter Care, Urinary last reviewed 8/1/24, indicate check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter tubing free of kinks, the drainage bag must be held or positioned lower that the bladder at all times. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights last reviewed 8/1/24, these rights include the residents right to a dignified existence, to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. Review of Resident R37's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of respiratory equipment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R51). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 8/1/24, indicates the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Steps in procedure include but not limited to: -Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and the water level is high enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows. -Periodically re-check water in humidifying jar. Review of the facility policy Administering Medications through a Small Volume (handheld) Nebulizer dated 8/1/24, indicates the purpose of the procedure is to administer particles of medication safely and aseptically into the resident's airway. Steps in procedure include but not limited to: -When treatment is completed, turn off nebulizer and disconnect T-piece, mouthpiece, and medication cup. -Rinse and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of two residents (Resident R36, and R84). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care dated 8/1/24, indicated that trauma-informed care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of trauma. A trauma-informed approach to care delivery recognizes the widespread impact and signs and symptoms of trauma in residents, and incorporates knowledge about trauma into care plans, policies, procedures and practices to avoid re-traumatization. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/26/24, indicated diagnoses of Post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct ongoing assessments to ensure that bed rails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bed rail usage for two of five residents (Residents R51 and R79). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(n) - Bed Rails states that the facility must assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Additionally, there should be evidence in the resident's records that the facility performed ongoing assessments to assure that the bed rail is used to meet the resident's needs and that there is an ongoing evaluation of risks associated with bed rail usage. Review of the facility policy Proper Use of Side Rails dated 8/1/24, indicated the resident will be checked re-evaluated relative to side rail use quarterly, annually and with a change in condition. Review of the admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications and biologicals properly and securely in one of three medications carts (one [NAME] medication cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility last reviewed 8/1/24, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufactures recommendations or those of the supplier. During an observation on 9/4/24, at 9:18 a.m. it was revealed that the one [NAME] medication cart contained: . One vial of artificial tears, that failed to have name or date opened. . One vial fluticasone nasal spray that failed to have date opened. . One bottle lactulose solution that failed to have date opened. . One anora ellipta inhaler that failed to have date opened. . One bottle of opened pure leaf tea. . Two cans of Arizona herbal tonic energy drink. . One medicine cup labeled with the initial H that contained: . One brown capsule . Four white tablets . One beige tablet . One tan gel filled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control monitoring and management during a COVID-19 outbreak for one out of two residents (Resident R6) and failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R13). Finding include: Review of facility policy SARS-CoV-2 Management dated 8/1/24, indicated the facility follows current guidelines and recommendations for managing COVID-19 in the facility. Anyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19 (fatigue, headache, sore throat, fever, chills, etc.), regardless of vaccination status, should receive a viral test as soon as possible. It was indicated as part of the broad-based approach during an outbreak, testing should continue on affected units or facility-wide every 3-7 days until there are no new cases for 14 days. Testing should be performed for all residents and staff identified as close contacts or on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for two of three residents (Resident R1, and R9). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Transfer and discharge- 30 day last reviewed 7/9/24, indicated a resident/representative will be notified in writing the reason for the transfer or discharge using the notice of transfer or discharge form, this includes sending a copy to the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman A review of Resident R1's clinical record indicates admission date of 7/12/24, with the diagnoses of Vascular Dementia with agitation (decline in thinking skills caused by reduced blood flow), Urinary tract infection (infection in the urinary system), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/15/24, and has not returned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit the readmission of a hospitalized resident without providing evidence that the facility was not able to meet the resident's needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). A review of the facility policy Transfer and discharge- 30 day last reviewed 7/9/24, indicated a resident and/or his or her representative (sponsor), will be given a thirty-day advanced notice of an impending transfer or discharge from facility. Under the following circumstances, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge. The transfer is necessary for the resident ' s welfare and the resident ' s needs cannot be met in the facility. A review of Resident R1's clinical record indicates admission date of 7/12/24, with the diagnoses of Vascular Dementia with agitation (decline in thinking skills caused by reduced blood flow), Urinary tract infection (infection in the urinary system),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident need for eight of twelve residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Answering the Call Light dated 7/13/23, indicated the facility will provide timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. During an interview on 7/15/24, at 10:22 a.m. Resident R1, when asked if she felt the facility had sufficient staff stated, probably not. Observation at this time revealed Resident R1 to have unbrushed, greasy appearing hair. Review of Resident R1's shower record from 6/17/24, through 7/17/24, revealed two showers provided (7/12/24, and 7/17/24). No bed baths were documented, and no refusals of bathing were documented. Review of census information revealed Resident R1 was present in the facility during the review dates. During an interview and observation on 7/15/24, at 10:27 a.m. Resident R2 was noted to be wearing a hospital gown. When asked if she preferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition creating the potential for cross contamination in the main kitchen of the facility (Main Kitchen). Findings include: A review of facility policy Sanitization dated 7/13/23, indicated that the food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils are cleaned and sanitized using heat or chemical sanitizing solution. During an observation conducted on 9/25/23, at 10:40 a.m., of the walk-in cooler in the designated main kitchen of the facility revealed that cold air condenser fan covers and the ceiling immediately forward of these cooler fans had a build-up of dust, grime, and debris. During an interview conducted on 9/25/23, at 10:41 a.m., Food Service Manager (FSM) Employee E11 confirmed that the walk-in cooler fan covers and the ceiling immediately forward of the cooler fans had a built-up of dust, grime, and debris as observed with surveyor. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0923 — widespread
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, a resident council group interview, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper ventilation for two out of two Resident Central Shower Rooms (First and Second Floors). Findings include: The facility Resident rights policy, last reviewed on 7/13/23, indicated that the residents have the right to a comfortable environment. The resident council group interview on 9/26/23, at 11:00 a.m. indicated two of the eleven residents present stated that they can't breathe easily in the shower rooms on the first and second floor due to the lack of ventilation and air circulation. Observations on 9/26/23, at 1:00 p.m. of the second floor shower room indicated three shower stalls with three separate vents at the ceiling level. The vents were not on. Observations on 9/28/23, at 11:00 a.m. of the first floor shower room indicated three shower stalls with three separate vents at the ceiling level. The vents were not on. Interview on 9/28/23, at 11:35 a.m. Nursing Assistant (NA) Employee E6 indicated the vents haven't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of federal regulations, facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for four of four residents (Residents R4, R13, R20, and R69). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(n) - Bed Rails states that the facility must assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Additionally, there should be evidence in the resident's records that the facility performed ongoing assessments to assure that the bed rail is used to meet the resident's needs and that there is an ongoing evaluation of risks associated with bed rail usage. Review of facility policy Bed Safety dated 3/1/22, and 7/13/23, indicated side rails may be used if assessment and consultation with the Attending Physician has determined that they are needed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for three out of five nurse aide personnel records (Nurse aides (NA) Employee E2, NA Employee E3, and NA Employee E4). Findings include: The facility Performance evaluations policy last reviewed on 7/13/23, indicated that the job performance of each employee shall be reviewed and evaluated at least annually. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 7/3/06. Review of personnel records did not include an annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3, and Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4. During an interview on 9/27/23, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of four dialysis residents. (Resident R58 and R61). Findings include: Review of CMS guidelines, 483.25(1) states the facility assures that each resident receives care and services for the provision of dialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) including the ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/11/23, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), high blood pressure, and renal failure (condition where the kidneys lose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications and properly store medications in one of three medication carts observed (North Hall second floor cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications reviewed on 7/13/23, indicated resident medications are stored separately from each other to prevent the possibility of mixing medications between residents. Review of facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage reviewed on 7/13/23, indicated multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Observation on 9/27/23, at 11:07 a.m. the second floor North Hall medication cart indicated the following medications stored in one compartment without individual packaging or separation from other residents medications: -Resident R73's Basaglar Pen (prefilled pen to inject long acting insulin under the skin) and vial of NovoLog (rapid acting insulin) not in a box or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORE HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
G2 TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/24/2025
G2 PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/24/2024
BERDUGO, SHAIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/24/2025
EISEN, JOSHUAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2024
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2025
RAINTREE CONSULTING GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2025
GEHRLEIN, CHRISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025
LYLE, CALLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 1%Other / private 20%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$354per resident / day
operating cost
$10,772per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395266. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next