No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

1200 Braun Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (412) 854-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
455 Valley Brook Rd Ste 300 · (724) 941-5588 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3400 S Park Rd · (412) 831-1333 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5821 Library Rd
Park
1100 Clifton Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.7%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.2%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.3%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%9.5%12.0%better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.3%CMS range 41.0–62.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.6–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.9–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.26
RN hoursweekends
46.5%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.41 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.47 to 1.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility provided policies and documentation, clinical records, and resident, family, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior involving non-consenting residents, which created an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of 44 residents (Resident R2). Findings include:Review of facility policy Identifying Types of Abuse reviewed 1/14/25, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee qualification and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 12 out of 12 months (April 2025 through March 2026).Findings include:During an interview on 3/4/26, at 9:40 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor stated she was not certified and that the Dietitian only works two days a week.During an interview on 3/4/26, at 10:00 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator stated that the Registered Dietitian (RD) was not employed full time she comes two times a week.The RD was not on-site full time to oversee the operation of the kitchen in the absence of a full time qualified dietary manager.During an interview on 3/4/26, at 10:12 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that Dietary Manager Employee E1 met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director.Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food products in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness in one of one deep freezer. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy Food Receiving and Storage dated 1/8/26, indicated that all food items will be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices.During an observation of the main kitchen on 3/4/26, at 9:40 a.m., revealed food being stored directly under the fans of the deep freezer with ice buildup and approximately three inches from the ceiling of the deep freezer.During an interview on 3/4/26, at 9:43 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E10 confirmed that the facility failed to properly store food products in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness.Pa. 28 Code: 211.6(c)(d)(f) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the spread of infection for five of twelve residents (Residents R1, R4, R6, R12, and R33) and failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for 12 of 12 months (April 2025 through March 2026). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated, Enhanced barrier precautions (EHBs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Gloves and gown are applied prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 12 of 12 months (April 2025 -March 2026). Findings include:Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program last reviewed 1/8/26, with a previous review date of 1/14/25, indicated the Antibiotic Stewardship will focus on monitoring the use of antibiotics, improving antibiotic use by avoiding unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotics. The antibiotic stewardship process will be overseen and managed by the Infection Preventionist who works collaboratively with the medical director, pharmacist, nursing and administrative leadership.Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for April 2025- March 2026, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed.During an interview on 4/6/26, at 12:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 12 of 12 months (April 2025-March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic (substances that act on the brain to alter cognition, perception, and mood) medication for four of seven residents (Resident R22, R4, R7, and R41).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 1/8/26, with a previous review date of 1/14/25, indicated that residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. A psychotropic drug is any medication that affects the brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days unless the physician believes it is appropriate to extend the use with documenting the rationale and evaluated the resident for appropriateness of the medication and includes the duration in the clinical record. Antipsychotic medications will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an injury obtained during care to eliminate possible neglect for one of two residents (Resident R8). Findings include:Review of facility policy Identifying Types of Abuse reviewed 1/8/26 with a previous review date of 14/25, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Neglect as defined as,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were accurate and fully completed for six of nine residents (Resident R7, R8, R16, R17, R41 and R8).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2025, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Section D: Mood, Question D0100 Should Resident Mood Interview Be Conducted? should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and or it should be coded 1, and the assessment should be completed if the resident is at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services needed for residents to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of two residents (Resident R26). Findings include:During an interview on 3/4/26, at 8:54 a.m., Resident R26 stated that she has itchiness around the abdomen due to the facility not providing latex free: incontinence pads prior to the night nurse finding her a latex free brief which does not fit properly and that she has not gotten her eye drops that the doctor ordered a couple days ago. Resident R26's daughter was on the phone with her and stated that she has a latex allergy, and the doctor told her the eye drops would help her because the resident has dry eyes. During an observation there was a tan colored brief laying on the windowsill, and a package of size large briefs had been opened and Resident R26 showed that it was too small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were provided necessary treatments and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PI - injuries to the skin and underlying tissues resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated the facility will identify pressure ulcer risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. Review of the facility policy, Dressings, Dry/Clean dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated for staff to document that date and time the dressing was changed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/9/25, included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of two residents (Resident R8). Findings include:Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents- Investigating and Reporting dared 1/8/26, with a previous review date of 1/14/25, indicated that all accidents and incidents involving residents, employees, etc., occurring on the premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. The Nurse Supervisor shall promptly initiate and document the investigation of the accident or incident. Incident/Accident reports will be reviewed by the Safety Committee for trends related to the accident and analyze any individual resident vulnerabilities.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review Resident R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/14/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation of medication regimen reviews (MRR) completed at least monthly for three of seven residents (Resident R7, R41 and R22). Findings include: On 3/5/26, the MRRs for Residents R7, R41 and R22 were requested, for the months of September 2025, through February 2026. During an interview on 3/6/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility was unable to locate the MRRs for Residents R7, R41 and R22. During an interview on 3/6/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide documentation of medication regimen reviews completed at least monthly for three of seven residents. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately document treatments for two of four residents (Residents R4 and R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of the facility policy, Dressings, Dry/Clean dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated for staff to document that date and time the dressing was changed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal disease vaccines in accordance with facility policy to seven of nine residents whose vaccines were reviewed. (Residents R5, R8, R14, R16, R12, R7 and R31).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 1/8/26 with a previous review date of 1/14/25, indicated that all residents are offered the pneumonia vaccine to aid in the prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia upon admission resident are assess for eligibility and when indicated will be offered the vaccine within 30 days of admission. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's immunization documentation record did not include that the Pneumococcal vaccine was offered since admission. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's immunization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective call system for two of five restrooms accessible to residents.Findings include: During an observation on 3/4/26, at approximately 9:38 a.m. the staff restroom on the Garden nursing unit was unlocked. Observation of the restroom revealed no emergency call light or call cord attached for emergency use. During an observation on 3/4/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m. the staff restroom on the Garden nursing unit was unlocked, with the key hanging off the door knob, accessible to residents. Observation of the restroom revealed no emergency call light or call cord attached for emergency use. During an observation on 3/5/26, at approximately 9:45 a.m. the staff restroom on the [NAME] nursing unit was unlocked, with the key hanging on a magnetic hook approximately waist height, inside the restroom. Observation of the restroom revealed no emergency call light or call cord attached for emergency use. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident records, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the privacy and dignity of one of six residents (Residents R3).Findings include:The facility policy Resident Rights dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated that facility residents have the right to a dignified existence. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/25/26, included Crohn's disease (chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) causing severe, long-term inflammation) and history of a stroke. Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R3 was cognitively intact.During an interview completed on 3/5/26, at 9:08 a.m. Resident R3 stated that she was uncomfortable using the shower room on her nursing unit because a male resident's room opens directly into the shower room through an unlocked door. Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for one of six residents (Resident R41).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2025, indicated that Section V: Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary instructions stated, For each triggered care area, Column B Care Planning Decision is checked to indicate that a new care plan, care plan revision, or continuation of the current care plan is necessary to address the issue(s) identified in the assessment of that care area. Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 1/8/26, previously dated 1/14/25, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure opened vials were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of one medication rooms([NAME] Medication Room) and medications obtained from the emergency machine for a resident were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for one of two medication carts ( [NAME] Medication Cart). Findings include:Review of facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 1/8/26, with a previous review date of 1/14/25, indicated multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Labeling of medications dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements.During observation of the [NAME] medication storage room on 3/4/26, at 11:08 a.m., revealed one vial of tuberculosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that included instructions to provide person centered care for the one of five residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of facility's policy Comprehensive Assessments and Care Delivery Process dated 1/4/25, indicated comprehensive assessments, care planning, and the care delivery process involve collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring results and adjusting interventions.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE].Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic review of resident needs) dated 10/26/25, included diagnoses of parkinsonism (term for neurological conditions causing movement similar to Parkinson's disease), bipolar disorder (a mental illness causing extreme shifts in moods), and anxiety disorder (a mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-01-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior engaging a non-consenting resident for one of 44 residents (Resident R2).Findings include:Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, The primary purpose of the job position is to manage the Facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities. To follow all facility policies and apply them uniformly to all employees. To ensure the highest degree of quality care is provided to our residents at all times.Review of the facility-provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description indicated, To plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of the Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions for when the individual is incapacitated) or conduct periodic review of instructions for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R2).Findings include:A review of the facility policy Advance Directives reviewed 1/14/25, indicated upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive if he or she chooses to do so. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical recordReview of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to meet the dietary needs for three of eight residents (Resident R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of Resident R2's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility diagnosis list included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R2's hospital discharge paperwork dated 7/11/25, indicated Diet Rx: Cardiac, 2 gm NA (diet that restricts sodium intake to 2000 milligrams daily, often recommended for patients with heart failure, high blood pressure, and other conditions where fluid retention is a concern). Review of the admission Assessment completed on 7/11/25, at 8:25 p.m. revealed that the box for 2 gm NA was not checked. Review of Resident R2's current physician orders on 7/22/25, failed to include a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident choice menu selections, and meal observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident selected menu items for four of nine residents (Resident R5, R6, R7, and R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Resident Food Preferences dated 1/4/25, indicated Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Review of Resident R5's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility diagnosis list included diagnoses of Salmonella sepsis (a severe, life-threatening infection where Salmonella bacteria enter the bloodstream and spread throughout the body) and a skin abscess (localized collection of pus within the skin). Review of Resident R5's hospital referral dated 7/2/25, noted 38 times that Resident R5 has a history of celiac disease (an illness caused by an immune reaction to eating gluten. Gluten is a protein found in foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart) for one of two residents (Resident R1).The facility policy Midline Dressing Changes dated 1/4/25, indicated to Change midline catheter dressing 24 hours after catheter insertion, every 5-7 days, or if it is wet, dirty, not intact, or compromised in any way. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility diagnosis list included diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and sepsis (infection in the bloodstream). Review of the nursing admission assessment completed on 7/13/25, at 11:03 p.m. indicated Resident R1 had a PICC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to the notify resident representative and/or medical provider of a change in condition or care for three of ten residents (Resident R41, R100, and R143). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment suggests the following distributions: 13 - 15: cognitively intact 8 - 12: moderately impaired 0 - 7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/16/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were accurate and fully completed for four of eight residents (Resident R2, R9. R12, and R31). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2024, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Section D: Mood, Question D0100 Should Resident Mood Interview Be Conducted? should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and or it should be coded 1, and the assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that included instructions to provide person centered care for three of eight residents (Residents R20, R27, and R96). Findings include: Review of facility's policy Comprehensive Assessments and Care Delivery Process dated 1/4/25, indicated comprehensive assessments, care planning, and the care delivery process involve collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring results and adjusting interventions. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/31/25, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, including additional training topics based on the resident population, outcome of the facility assessment, or non-common procedures for two of four Nurse Aides (NA) (Employee E1 and E2). Findings include: Review of information published by the American Cancer Society dated 11/22/19, indicated, Chemotherapy drugs are considered to be hazardous to people who handle them or come into contact with them. For patients, this means the drugs are strong enough to damage or kill cancer cells. But this also means the drugs can be a concern for others who might be exposed to them. Flush the toilet twice after you use it. Put the lid down before flushing to avoid splashing. If possible, you may want to use a separate toilet during this time. If this is not possible, wear gloves to clean the toilet seat after each use. Review of the Facility Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of four residents (Resident R27). Findings include: Review of facility's policy, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries dated 1/4/25, indicated for staff to review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident R27 was admitted with pressure ulcers on his left and right heels. Review of Resident R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of two residents (Resident R22). Findings include: Review of information published by the American Cancer Society dated 11/22/19, indicated, Chemotherapy drugs are considered to be hazardous to people who handle them or come into contact with them. For patients, this means the drugs are strong enough to damage or kill cancer cells. But this also means the drugs can be a concern for others who might be exposed to them. Flush the toilet twice after you use it. Put the lid down before flushing to avoid splashing. If possible, you may want to use a separate toilet during this time. If this is not possible, wear gloves to clean the toilet seat after each use. Review of the Facility Assessment dated 1/4/25, indicated in the previous twelve months, the facility had cared for zero residents that received chemotherapy. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R22 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for ten of ten staff members (Employees E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9 and E10). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 1/4/24, with previous review date of 3/21/23, indicated it is the policy of this facility that all staff participate in regular in-service education upon hire and annually and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. Trainings included for all existing and newly hired employees include but not limited to communication, abuse, neglect, etc, the facility QAPI program and behavioral health. Review of facility provided documents and training record for E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9 and E10 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for five of six residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R12, R20, and R35) Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Advanced Directives reviewed 3/21/23 and 1/4/2024, indicated advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, Non- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI- type of heart attack that usually happens when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment on two of two nursing units ([NAME] Lane and Garden Lane) and failed to provide a homelike environment for seven of 21 residents of the Garden Lane nursing unit (Residents R24, R4, R22, R34, R25, R16 and R17). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment, last reviewed on 1/4/24, indicated that the facility will ensure that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings. During an observation on 5/14/24, from 6:32 a.m., through 7:20 a.m., the following was identified: -The main resident lounge located on [NAME] Lane nursing unit had six wheelchairs, a Hoyer lift and a floor scale which did not allow access for resident use. -The dining room at the end of [NAME] hall had a broken baseboard heating unit allowing for sharp edges to be protruding. -The dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members (Infection Preventionist) for three of four quarterly meeting (May 2023 through July 2023, August 2023 through October 2023, and November 2023 through January 2024). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Process Improvement Committee (QAPI) reviewed 1/4/24, indicated that the facility will establish and maintain a QAPI committee that consists of the administrator, director of nursing, medical director, and infection control representative. Review of QAPI sign in sheets and attendance records from May 2023 through January 2024 failed to indicate the infection control representative was in attendance for any meetings. During an interview on 5/17/24, at 10:10 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staff interview and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for three of ten staff members reviewed (Employees E4, E5 and E8). Findings Include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 1/4/24, with previous review date of 3/21/23, indicated it is the policy of this facility that all staff participate in regular in-service education upon hire and annually and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. Trainings included for all existing and newly hired employees include but not limited to communication, abuse, neglect, etc, the facility QAPI program and behavioral health. Review of facility provided education records for three of the ten currently employed staff members that were reviewed revealed the following: Review of the facility provided current staff list indicated Housekeeping Employee E4 was hired on 12/29/23. housekeeping employee E4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of three residents (Resident R23). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS - mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions: -Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs: Check all of the following treatments, procedures, and programs that were performed during the last 14 days. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R23 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included moderate intellectual disabilities, dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent food items from being stored in a medication refrigerator in one of two medication rooms ([NAME] Nursing Unit). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage dated 3/21/23 and 1/4/24, indicated medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room at the nurses' station or other secured location. Medications are stored separately from food and are labeled accordingly. During an observation on 5/15/24, at 1:35 p.m. revealed the following two Fuji brand water bottles, one [NAME] sparking water bottle, and one small carton of whole milk stored in the medication refrigerator in the [NAME] Nursing Unit medication room. During an interview on 5/16/24, at 1:38 p.m. the Registered Nurse Employee E13 confirmed food and drinks should not be stored in the medication refrigerator. During an interview on 5/16/24, at 2:00 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nephrostomy (drain from the kidney using a catheter tube) care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents with indwelling catheters (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care of Nephrostomy Tube last reviewed 1/13/23, indicated to empty the drainage bag once per shift and as needed and record in the medical record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set- resident assessment and care screening) dated 12/14/23, indicated the diagnoses of obstructive uropathy and kidney failure. Section H indicated an indwelling catheter to include a nephrostomy was present. Observation of Resident R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-06 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to post contact information for the Medicaid Fraud Unit on two of two nursing units ([NAME] and Garden nursing units).Findings include: During observations conducted on 3/4/25, at approximately 1:30 p.m. of the [NAME] and Garden nursing units revealed the facility revealed the facility did not have the Medicaid Fraud Unit contact information posted or accessible to residents. During an interview on 3/6/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to post contact information for the Medicaid Fraud on two of two nursing units. 28 Pa. Code: S201.29(i) Resident rights.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-06 · tag F0579 — widespread
    Provide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid on two of two nursing units ([NAME] and Garden nursing units).Findings include: Observations conducted on 3/4/25, at approximately 1:30 p.m. of the [NAME] and Garden nursing units, revealed the facility failed to include information on how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid . During an interview on 3/6/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid on two of two nursing units. 28 Pa. Code: S201.29(i) Resident rights.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-06 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the most recent Federal or State survey results for one of one survey books observed (located in main entrance lobby).Findings Include: Observation of the survey binder located in the main entrance lobby on 3/4/26, at 1:30 p.m, revealed the most recent survey results present were dated 9/11/24. Review of the facility's survey history revealed surveys dated: 1/8/25, 4/30/25, 6/11/25, 7/28/25, 9/3/25, 11/4/25, 12/2/25, 1/14/26, and 2/12/26. During an interview on 3/6/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to post the most recent Federal or State survey results for one of one survey books. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 Responsibility of licensee

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-02 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide transfer notices to representatives of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for four of ten months (July 2025 through October 2025).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Transfer or Discharge, Emergency dated 1/14/25, indicated should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures:a. Notify the resident ' s attending physicianb. Notify the receiving facility that the transfer is being madec. Prepare the resident for transferd. Prepare a transfer form to send with the residente. Notify the representative or other family member f. Assist in obtaining transportation andg. Others as appropriate or necessary. Emergency transfer is defined as, When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, this type of transfer is considered to be a facility-initiated transfer.During an interview on 11/4/25, at 10:20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORE HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CORE PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/13/2024
EISEN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
RAINTREE CONSULTING GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
SWEARINGEN, DANIELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
TRAPANOTTO, VINCENTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 3%Other / private 27%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$380per resident / day
operating cost
$11,562per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395698. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next