Hillcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
100 Little Drive, Lower Burrell, PA 15068 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 103 certified beds · (724) 339-1071 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 32.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.7% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.4% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.9% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.9%CMS range 30.5–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.0–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.67 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
81 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide goods and services resulting in neglect that resulted in the actual harm of a left hip fracture for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Identifying Types of Abuse dated 2/20/25, indicated that residents have the right to be free of neglect. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of Libre Texts Medicine procedure 12.8.5: Procedure- Turning and Positioning the Patient in Bed, indicated to position yourself on the side of the bed that the patient will be turned to. Review of admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility 10/31/18, with most recent re-admission on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/4/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents which resulted in actual harm of a left hip fracture for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting dated 2/20/25, indicated all accidents occurring on our premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living dated 2/20/25, indicated appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs (activities of daily living) independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); c. Elimination (toileting); d. Dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition creating the potential for cross contamination in the main kitchen of the facility, and failed to properly monitor refrigerator temperatures for two of two nursing units (East and Northwest) which created the potential for food borne illness.Findings include: During an observation with Food Services Director (FSD) Employee E12 in the Main Kitchen on 4/13/26, at 10:20 a.m. revealed that the cold air condenser unit, (2) fan covers, and the area immediately surrounding in the main walk-in cooler had a build-up of dust, grime, and dark colored debris. During an interview on 4/13/26, at 10:21 a.m. the FSD Employee E12 confirmed that the facility failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition in the Main kitchen walk-in cooler. During an observation on 4/16/26, at 9:10 a.m. with FSD Employee E12 revealed the East Nursing Unit refrigerator was found with an incomplete temperature log for April 2026. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain resident medication regimens were free from potentially unnecessary psychotropic (substances that act on the brain to alter cognition, perception, and mood) medications without adequate indications for use for three of six residents (Resident R2, R19, and R90). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated 1/15/26, indicated: Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a residents behavior, mood, function, medical condition specific symptoms and risks to the residents and others. Residents will not receive PRN doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility policy, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess the nutritional status as required, failed to properly monitor weight and nutrition status by failing to obtain weights or act upon weight changes for four of six residents (Resident R5, R30, R40, and R50), and failed to update an individualized care plan to address the resident's specific nutritional concerns for two of six resident (Resident R40 and R50) records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Nutritional assessment dated [DATE], previously dated 2/20/25, indicated that as part of the comprehensive assessment, a nutrition assessment, including current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, shall be conducted for each resident. The dietitian will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission and as indicated by a change in condition that places the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. As part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for five of six residents (Residents R1, R4, R47, R54, and R61).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications through a Small Volume (handheld) Nebulizer last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. When treatment is completed rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment. When equipment is completely dry, store it in a plastic bag with the resident's name and date on it. Review of the facility policy CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure)/BiPAP (bilevel positive pressure) Support last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated to improve oxygenation in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease. To promote resident comfort and safety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two of three medication carts (North Hall Medication Cart and [NAME] Hall Medication Cart) and one of two medication storage rooms (East Medication Room) and failed to properly secure a medication cart while not in use for one of three medication carts (East Hall Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked. Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, Medication storage areas are kept clean, well-lit and free of clutter and extreme temperatures. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a diagnosis for hospice services for one of four residents (Resident R60) and failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end of life care for three of four residents (Residents R9, R60, and R61). Finding include: Review of facility policy Hospice Program dated 1/15/26, indicated in general, it is the responsibility of the facility to meet the resident's personal and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs. This includes communicating with the hospice provider (and documenting such communication) to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day. The coordinated care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a COVID-19 vaccination was offered to five of five residents (Residents R6, R8, R34, R37, and R65).Findings include: Review of facility policy SARS-CoV-2 Management dated 1/15/26, indicated the facility will encourage everyone to remain up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) document Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines dated 11/19/25, indicated the CDC recommends a 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine for people ages 6 months and older based on individual-based decision-making. The COVID-19 vaccine helps protect you from severe illness, hospitalization, and death. It is especially important to get your 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine if you are ages 65 and older, are at high risk for severe COVID-19, or have never received a COVID-19 vaccine. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R6 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Effective Communication for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include credible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include credible annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include credible annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include credible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Dementia Management and Resident Abuse Prevention for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8) and failed to ensure that three of three sampled Nurse Aides received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year (NA Employee E4, NA Employee E5, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Annual in-services are no less than 12 hours per employment year. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Behavioral Health for five of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7, and NA Employee E8).Findings include: Review of facility policy In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide dated 1/15/26, indicated all nurse aide personnel participate in regularly scheduled in-service training classes. Insofar as practical, notice of in-service training classes, their time, place, date, etc., are posted on the employee bulletin board at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled class. All training classes attended by the employee are entered on the respective employee's Record of In-Service by the department supervisor or other person(s) as designated by the supervisor. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/20/24. Review of NA Employee E4's personnel file did not include credible annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician and ensure the physician was appropriately notified of missed medication doses for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R21).Findings include: Review of the facility Medication Ordering and Receiving Pharmacy last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated emergency pharmacy service is available on a 24-hour basis. Emergency needs for medications are met by using the facility's approved emergency supply or by special order from the provider pharmacy. The provider pharmacy supplies emergency medications including emergency drugs, antibiotics, controlled substances and products for infusion in limited quantities in sealed containers or automatic dispensing system (ADS). The ordered medication is obtained either from the emergency box or ADS, from the provider pharmacy or a back up pharmacy that is determined by the provider pharmacy. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of five residents (Residents R5).Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated the following instructions:O0110K1, Hospice care: code residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of three residents (Residents R47).Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident R47's clinical record indicated an admission date of 6/15/24. Review of R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/10/26, indicated the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- restricts breathing), and hyperlipidemia (high fats in the blood). Review of Resident R47's physician order dated 12/24/25, indicated Azithromycin Oral Tablet 250 milligram. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for Prophylaxis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders for management of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) for one of two residents (Resident R64) and failed to procure complete physician's orders for one of two residents (Resident R47).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes Mellitus last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated the purpose of this guideline is to help the resident control his/her diabetes with diet, exercise and insulin as ordered, Prevent recurrent hyperglycemia (blood sugar above target levels) and hypoglycemia (blood sugar below target levels). Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship last reviewed 1/15/26, indicated antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facilities antibiotic stewardship program. If an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for two of five residents (Residents R3 and R7).Findings include: Review of facility policy Proper use of Bed Rails dated 1/15/26, indicated the resident assessment must assess the resident's risk from using bed rails. The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself. A nurse assigned to the resident will complete reassessments in accordance with the facility's assessment schedule, but not less than quarterly, upon a significant change in status, or a change in the type of bed/mattress/rail. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence medication regimen reviews (MRRs) were reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for two of five residents (Residents R3 and R8).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report) dated 1/15/26, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. The MRR includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences to medication therapy. Findings and recommendations are reported to the director of nursing, the attending physician, the medical director and if appropriate the administrator. Physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. Review of the clinical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that an influenza immunization was offered to one of five residents (Resident R65).Findings include: Review of facility policy Influenza Vaccine dated 1/15/26, indicated all residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with the vaccinations against influenza. Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident or employee has already been immunized. For those who receive the vaccine, the date of vaccination, lot number, expiration date, person administering, and the site of vaccination will be documented in the resident's medical record. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the Informed Consent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of two crash carts (East Hall Crash Cart).Findings include: Review of a facility document Basic Crash Cart Checklist indicated licensed nurse or designee completes checklist items against contents of crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac and respiratory emergencies) weekly and submits to the Director of Nursing (DON) upon completion. Items include an ambu mask and bag (a handheld device that delivers ventilation to patients who are not breathing). During an observation on [DATE], at 12:44 p.m. of the East Hall Crash Cart reveled the following:Two (2) ambu bags and masks, expired [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE], at 12:50 p.m. the DON confirmed the above observation and that the facility failed to make certain equipment was in safe operation condition for the East Hall Crash Cart. 28 Pa. Code:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services needed for residents to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Neurological Assessment last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated the purpose of the policy is to provide guidelines for a neurological assessment following an unwitnessed fall or subsequent to a fall with a suspected head injury. It was indicated to perform neurological checks with the frequency as ordered or per falls protocol. Document the date and time the procedure was performed, the name and title of the individual(s) who performed the procedure, all assessment data obtained, and the signature and title of the person recording the data. Review of the facility's undated Neurological Check Flowsheet indicated to document the date and time of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications dated 2/20/25, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/17/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), high blood pressure, and Diabetes Mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment for a wound for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings: Review of the facility Dressings, Dry/Clean policy last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to verify that there is a physician order for wound care. Review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine the if there are special resident needs. Check the treatment record. The date and time the dressing was changed, and the name and title (or initials) of the individuals changing the dressing, and the type of dressing used and wound care given must be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (high sugar in the blood) and anxiety. During an interview and observation on 10/6/25, at 9:21 a.m. Resident R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for three of five residents (Residents R1, R2, and R3).Findings include: Based on review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated 2/20/25, indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/19/25, indicted diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy (group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of findings/conclusions regarding the resident's grievance, whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, corrective actions implemented, and the date of written decision issued for one of one resident's (Resident R1) allegation of neglect. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of facility Grievance/Complaints, Filing policy dated 2/20/25. revealed upon receiving a resident grievance or complaint the facility Grievance Officer will submit a written report of the findings of the Administrator. A review of a facility reported document dated 4/5/25, to the State Agency contained an allegation of neglect by Resident R1. The report contained evidence that Resident R1 made an allegation that facility staff allowed her to lay on the floor for an hour after a fall. A review of facility Grievance Log for the month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, documents, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an abuse/neglect policy that thoroughly investigated allegations for one of one event with allegations of neglect. (4/5/25). Findings include: A review of facility Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy dated 2/20/25, indicated all parties will be interviewed to obtain information regarding the allegation, all witness statements will be obtained in writing with signature and date of the witness, at the completion documents will be completed and reviewed with the Administrator. A review of facility documents dated 4/5/25, submitted to the State Agency revealed that Resident R1 voiced a concern that staff allowed her to remain on the floor for an hour after sustaining a fall. A review of facility witness statements failed to provide a written document of witness statements obtained of the resident and her roommate which created an incomplete investigation. A review of facility documents revealed that the facility failure to follow the guidance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, documents and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that an alleged allegation of neglect for one of one event (4/5/25), was thoroughly investigated as required. Findings include: A review of facility Abuse, Investigation, and Reporting' policy dated 2/20/25, indicated that all allegations of abuse/neglect will be thoroughly investigated by Administration. A review of facility documents dated 4/5/25, submitted to the State Agency revealed that Resident R1 voiced a concern that staff allowed her to remain on the floor for an hour after sustaining a fall. A review of the facility's investigation of Resident R1's allegation of neglect revealed the following: * The facility failed to complete documentation of the resident's grievance. * The facility failed to interview the resident and her roommate which created an incomplete and inaccurate conclusion of the facility not identifying alleged perpetrators. * The facility failed to properly investigate the resident's allegation of neglect which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly date and store food products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the main kitchen (Main Kitchen). Findings include: The facility Food Receiving and Storage policy last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated that foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. During observations on 3/3/25, at 9:12 a.m. the dry storage room was found with two opened packages of dried pasta open and not dated. During observation on 3/3/25, at 9:14 a.m. the walk-in-cooler was found with a meal cart holding a metal tray. Observed on top of the tray was cooked ground meat. Next to the cooked ground meat was an open and undated bag of raw chicken. During an interview on 3/3/25, at 1:48 p.m. Dietary Manager Employee E7 confirmed that the facility failed to properly date and store food products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the main kitchen. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct care plan conferences and failed to ensure a resident or resident representative was notified in advance of care conference meetings for four of four residents (Resident R12, R36, and R39). Findings include: The facility Resident participation-assessments and care plans policy dated 2/20/25, indicated that the resident and his or her representative are encouraged to participate in the resident's assessment and in the development of the resident's care plan. A seven day notice of the care plan conference is provided to the resident and his or her representative. The Social Services director is responsible for notifying the resident or representative and for maintaining records of such notices. Review of Resident R12's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Review of facility policy and documentation, resident and staff interviews revealed that the facility failed to to document and include followup from four of four months and resident council meeting for four of four months and failed to have/offer resident council meetings for two of four months. Findings include: Review of facility policy Grievances/Complaints, Filing dated 2/20/25, indicated: All grievances, complaints, or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facilities will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded ot in writing, including a rationale for the response. Review of resident council minutes for October and November 2024 indicated that staff went room to room instead of having a resident group. During an interview on 3/4/25, at 10:15 a.m. Residents indicated that they did not have a resident group for two months in October and November 2024. Residents indicated that they do not get feedback or response to concerns from resident group. During an interview on 3/7/25, at 11:19 a.m Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct an initial Enabler/Assist Rail/ Device Evaluation assessment for one of three residents (Resident R30), and failed to compete ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that enabler/side rail assist bars were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with enabler bar/side rail assist bar usage for three of three residents (R7, R8, and R30). Findings include: Review of the facility Proper Use of Bed Rails dated 2/20/25, indicated an assessment will be made to determine the resident ' s symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a review of the resident ' s: a. Bed mobility. b. Ability to change positions, transfer to and from bed or chair, and to stand and toilet. c. Risk of entrapment from the use of side rails; and d. That the bed ' s dimensions are appropriate for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to investigate, and report an allegation of abuse and or neglect for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R24). Findings include: Faiclity policy Identifying Types of Abuse dated 2/20/25, indicated Neglect/Deprivation of Goods and services by Staff - Neglect ids the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm,pain,mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of Resident R24 clinical record indicate the were admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R24 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 2/2/25, indicated diagnosis of atrial fibration ( irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), chf (heart failure occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) Review of Resident R24 clinical record progress notes indicated 3/1/2025, nursing note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for pain management one of three residents (Resident R223). Findings include: Review of facility policy Baseline Care Plans dated 2/20/25, indicated a baseline plan of care to meet the residents immediate needs and provide instruction needed to provide effective and person-centered care shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of fracture of shaft of right tibia and fibula, pain in right ankle and joints of right foot, and idiopathic progressive neuropathy (nerve damage that interferes with the function of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) when the cause can't be determined.) During an interview on 3/3/25, at 12:36 p.m. Resident R223 stated he has pain and receives medication for pain management. It was indicated he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of practice related to monitoring of Food Service operations, resident interviews, and participation in care plan meetings by the Registered Dietitian for six out of six months ( October 2024, November 2024, December 2024, January 2025, February 2025, and March 2025). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards: Responsibilities of the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist Section 21.711 Professional Conduct indicated that the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist shall provide information which will enable patients to make their own informed decisions regarding nutrition and dietetic therapy, including the reasonable expectations of the professional relationship. The facility Nutritional assesment policy dated 2/20/25, indicated that as a part of the comprehensive assesment, the nutritional assessment shall be conducted for each resident. The dietitian will conduct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of six residents (Resident R33). Findings include: The facility Activity of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy dated 2/20/25, indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLS. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the service necessary to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility Bed Bath, Shower/Tub policy dated 2/20/25, indicated the purpose of this policy is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident. Review of Resident R33's admission record indicated resident was admitted to facility on 4/24/24. Review of Resident R33's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/15/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received the necessary services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent infection for one of four residents (Residents R27). Findings include: Review of the admission record indicated Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R27's skin evaluation dated 12/27/24, indicated the resident had an unstageable (a type of pressure ulcer that is covered by necrotic tissue or eschar, making it hard to stage and treat) 3cm x 1.5 cm coccyx (tailbone) pressure ulcer. A 5 cm x 9 cm sacrum (a single bone located at the base of the spine)pressure ulcer that was not staged. Two left rear thigh pressure ulcers measuring 0.3cm x 1cm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of three residents (Resident R223). Findings include: Review of Resident R223's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of fracture of shaft of right tibia and fibula, pain in right ankle and joints of right foot, and idiopathic progressive neuropathy (nerve damage that interferes with the function of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) when the cause can't be determined.) Review of Resident R223's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated the resident was ordered to wear a TLSO brace (brace that limits movement in your spine from the thoracic area (mid back) to your sacrum (low back)) when upright or out of bed. Review of Resident R223's physical therapy notes dated 3/1/25, indicated the resident will 100% return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely assess the nutritional status for one of two residents (Resident R23). Findings include: The facility Nutritional assesment policy dated 2/20/25, indicated that as a part of the comprehensive assesment, the nutritional assessment shall be conducted for each resident. The dietitian will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission within current baseline assessment time frames. Review of Resident R23's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R23's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/18/24, indicated he had diagnoses that included epilepsy (a long-term disease that causes repeated seizures due to abnormal electrical signals produced by damaged brain cells), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care related to oxygen management for two of four residents (Resident R41 and R274). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Oxygen Administration last reviewed on 2/20/25, indicates to provide safe oxygen administration. A review of Resident R41's clinical record indicates an admission date of 7/27/24. A review of R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/20/24, indicate the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), respiratory failure (blood doesn't have enough oxygen), and coronary artery disease (CAD - buildup of plaque in the arteries that reduces the blood flow to the heart). During an observation completed on 3/3/25, at 10: 29 a.m. Resident R41 was in bed, her oxygen was on via nasal canula (thin flexible tube used to deliver oxygen). The oxygen tubing failed to be labeled with a date. Review of Resident 41's physician orders dated 12/15/24, indicate oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for one of two residents (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of Resident R12's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/26/24, indicated diagnoses of depression, renal insufficiency (kidneys are functioning poorly), and diabetes (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose). Review of physician orders dated 2/14/25, indicated Resident R12 attends dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday each week. Review of Resident R12's clinical record on 3/4/25, failed to include a care plan for dialysis. A review of the clinical record did not include complete communication forms for the month of February and March 2025. There were seven incomplete communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that any irregularities submitted in the medication regiment reviews (MRR) by pharmacy were reviewed by a physician for one out of four residents (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of the facility Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report) policy last review 2/20/25, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. The MRR includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and precents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy. The physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides explanation for disagreeing. Review of Resident R12's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free from significant medication errors for one of five residents (Resident R27). Findings include: Review of the facility Administering Medications last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated medications are administered in a safe manner. If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. Review of manufactures guidelines for Divalproex Sodium (also known as Depakote, medication used to treat seizures and mental/mood disorders) indicated: the maximum recommended dosage is 60 milligram/kilogram/day. It was indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications and properly store medications in one of five medication carts observed (two East Hall) and properly store/label medication in one of two medication rooms (two East) and medications found unsecured at resident's bedside for one of six residents (Residents R31). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 2/20/25, indicated the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs for external use, as well as poisons, shall be clearly marked as such, and shall be stored separately from other medications. Drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident ' s medications shall be assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area to prevent the possibility of mixing medications of several residents. Review of the facility policy Administering Medications dated 2/20/25, indicates the expiration/beyond…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify and or review a change in dietary recommendations for one of three residents (Resident R17). Findings include: Review of facility policy Therapy Evaluation dated 2/20/25, indicated An initial evaluation of a resident's past and current medical and functional status is required prior to the initiation of treatment. Information regarding a resident's level of function must be documented. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R17 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of clinical record MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 12/31/24, indicated diagnosis of COPD ( an ongoing lung condition caused by damages to the lungs) and unspecified dementia (a condition in which person loses the ability to think, remember,learn, make decisions, and solve problems). Review of Resident R17 clinical record indicated progress notes: 1/27/2025 12:03 *Nursing Note Note Text: Resident c/o…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly for one of four quarterly meeting (June 2024 thru September 2024). Findings Include: The facility Quality Assurance Performance improvement plan last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated that the facility staff practice is to schedule monthly QAPI meetings to ensure regulatory compliance for quarterly meetings. Review of Quality Assurance attendance records dated 2024, did not include quarterly sign in documents from 5/13/24 to 10/24/24. During an interview on 3/7/25, at 12:05 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members as required. 28 Pa Code: 201.18(e )(1)(2)(3)(4) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control monitoring and management during a COVID-19 outbreak for three of three residents (Resident R12, R33, and R36), and the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed during medication administration for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R274). Finding include: The facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 2/20/25, indicates staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. Review of facility policy SARS-CoV-2 Management last reviewed 2/20/25, indicated the facility follows current guidelines and recommendations for managing COVID-19 in the facility. Anyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19 (fatigue, headache, sore throat, fever, chills,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for one of three residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Rights, indicated basic rights to all residents of this facility. Resident to be notified of his or her medical condition and of any changes in his or her condition. Be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment. Review of facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders, indicated orders for treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, arthritis, and coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels). Review of Resident R1's physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to inform a resident's representative in advance of the proposed care, including the risk and benefits of the prescribed medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 9/24/24, indicated she had diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dementia (chronic condition that causes a decline in mental abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life. It's not a normal part of aging, but it's more common) and diabetes mellitus. Further review of the MDS indicated the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment was 4 indicating severe impairment. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident records, admission documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain admission documentation for one of six residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 9/24/24, indicated she had diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dementia (chronic condition that causes a decline in mental abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life. It's not a normal part of aging, but it's more common) and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of Resident R1's admission MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment MDS- a periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to employ staff with the required skills and competencies to carry out the daily functions of the Dietary Department (Food Service Director Employee E9) for six of twelve months. Findings include: A review of facility document Dietary Supervisor Job Description indicated that a qualified candidate must have successful completion of a reputable course in food service operation, or a college degree in culinary arts management. During an interview on 5/13/24, at 9:45 a.m. Food Service Director Employee E9 stated that he started at the facility in November 2023, and did not possess qualifications of a certified dietary manger or have any related degrees. During an interview on 5/13/23, at 3:00 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that Food Service Director Employee E9 failed to meet the state agency requirements for a food service director. 28Pa. Code: 211.6(c)(d) Dietary services.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly date and store food products, and maintain clean equipment in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Receiving and Storage dated 3/4/24, indicated foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Review of facility policy Sanitization, dated 3/4/24, indicated that the food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. During observation and interview in the dry storage room on 5/13/24, at 9:58 a.m. opened packages of macaroni, spaghetti, and egg noodles were noted to have not been dated. Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E9 confirmed that the facility failed to properly label and date opened food packages to prevent foodborne illness. During observation on 5/14/24, at 11:17 a.m. a fan that was pointed towards the tray line, was covered in a gray, fuzzy substance. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 11:20 a.m. FSD Employee E9 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for three out of five residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R16, R24, and, R212). The findings include: Review of Resident R16's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of COPD, (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), high blood pressure, and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath.) Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for three of four residents (Resident R16, R24, and R212). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Transfer and Discharge-30 day reviewed 3/4/24, indicated that the a copy of the transfer and discharge notice will be sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Review of Resident R16's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of COPD, (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), high blood pressure, and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath.) Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of four resident hospital transfers (Residents R16, R24, and R212). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Leave Day-Bed Hold Policy dated 3/4/24, indicated that the facility establish procedures that ensure residents and/or responsible parties are properly informed of bed hold options, potential financial obligations, and processes to be followed in order to guarantee a bed upon the resident's return to the facility should a resident need to be absent from the facility for a period of time for hospitalization or other medical or therapeutic leave. Notification of bed hold options is required each time a resident will be absent from the facility for hospitalizations. Review of Resident R16's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans to meet care needs for three of ten residents (Residents R21, R25, R34). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team dated 3/4/24, indicated the facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. The care plan is based on the resident's comprehensive assessment. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.21 - Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and must be culturally competent and trauma informed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility provided documentation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to issue an accurate Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice form (SNF ABN CMS-10055) for one of three residents (Resident R163). Findings include: Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN CMS-10055) form provides information to residents/resident representatives that skilled nursing services may not be paid by Medicare and so that the resident/resident representative can decide if they wish to continue receiving skilled nursing services and assume financial responsibility. Review of Resident R163's clinical record documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], and remained in the facility until 3/14/24. Review of the facility provided Beneficiary Notice list, which includes residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining, and remained in the facility indicated Resident R163's last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were free from neglect for one of eight residents (Resident R49). Findings include: Review of facility policy Identifying Types of Abuse dated 3/4/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary. It was indicated neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of goods and services that a resident requires, but the facility fails to provide them. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 3/4/24, stated residents will be free from neglect. Review of admission record indicated Resident R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R49's care plan initiated 10/2/22, indicated the resident is at risk for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions indicated to observe for changes in skin condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, resident record review, observation, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident medications for one of three residents (Resident R112). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 3/4/24, stated residents will be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Review of facility policy titled Controlled Substances last reviewed 3/4/24, informed the facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications (listed as Scheduled II-IV of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Program and Control Act of 1976.) Controlled substances are counted upon delivery. If the count is correct, an individual resident controlled substance record is made for each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance. This record contains the name of the resident, quantity received,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, newly hired personnel records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a current FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) background check on an employee prior to her date of hire for one out of five personnel records (Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3). Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program policy dated 3/4/24, indicated that the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The facility Background Check Procedures policy dated 3/4/24, indicated that facility conducts employment background screening checks on all applicants, to include current employees as needed, in compliance with Federal and State requirements and regulations. All offers of employment are contingent upon clear results of a thorough criminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of six residents (Resident R25). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions: -Observation (Look-Back, Assessment) Period is the time period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS assessment. Most MDS items themselves require an observation period, such as 7 or 14 days, depending on the item. Since a day begins at 12:00 a.m. and ends at 11:59 p.m., the observation period must also cover this time period. A standard 7-day look-back period counts back from and includes the Assessment Reference Date (ARD+6 previous days). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident and a resident's representative was provided a summary of their completed baseline care plan for two of six residents (Resident R21 and R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Careplans-Baseline, last reviewed 4/3/24, indicated that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan. Review of Resident R21's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/18/24, indicated diagnoses of depression, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of schizophrenia and mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of eight residents (Resident R49). Findings include: Review of admission record indicated Resident R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R49's care plan initiated 10/2/22, indicated the resident is at risk for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions indicated to observe for changes in skin condition and report abnormalities and administer treatment per physician orders. Review of Resident R49's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs), dated 4/29/24, indicated the diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), high blood pressure, and anxiety. Review of Resident R49's physician order dated 5/12/24, indicated to cleanse right hand with normal saline (wound cleanser), pat dry, apply TAO (Triple Antibiotic Ointment) and cover with bordered gauze every shift for skin tear.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to change an indwelling catheter (insertion of a tube into the bladder to drain urine) as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R14), and failed to obtain a valid medical diagnosis for an indwelling urinary catheter and develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care related to urinary catheter usage for one of three residents (Resident R52). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(e) Incontinence indicated if the facility provides care for a resident with an indwelling catheter, in collaboration with the medical director and director of nurses, and based upon current professional standards of practice, resident care policies and procedures must be developed and implemented that address catheter care and services, including but not limited to: timely and appropriate assessments related to the indication for use of an indwelling catheter; identification and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of four residents (Residents R16). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 3/4/24, indicated to check the mask, tank, and humidifying jar to be sure they are in good working order. Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and that the water level is high enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows through. Periodically re-check the water level in humidifying jar. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of COPD, (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), high blood pressure, and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath.) Review of Resident R16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of two residents (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care dated 3/4/24, indicated the facility will deliver care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally-competent and account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. Facilities should use a multi-pronged approach to identifying a resident's history of trauma, this would include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event. Facilities must identify triggers which may re-traumatize residents with a history of trauma. The facility should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia receive the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two of four residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R49). Findings include: Review of federal guidance §483.40(b)(3) a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The regulations associated with medication management include consideration of: o Indication and clinical need for medication; o Dose (including duplicate therapy); o Duration; o Adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; and o Preventing, identifying, and responding to adverse consequences. Review of the facility Dementia-Clinical Protocol reviewed 3/4/24, indicated the interdisciplinary [NAME] will identify and document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responded timely pharmacy medication recommendations for one out of five sampled residents (Resident R49). Findings include: The facility Medication Regimen Review policy dated 8/17/23, indicated the consultant pharmacist will conduct Medication Regimen Review (MRR) and will make recommendations based on the information available in the resident's health record. If an irregularity does not require urgent action, it should be addressed before the consultant pharmacist's next monthly MRR. The facility should alert the Medical Director when MRR's are not addressed by the attending physician in a timely manner. Review of admission record indicated Resident R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R49's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs), dated 4/29/24, indicated the diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for two of five residents (Resident R21 and R25). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 3/4/24, indicated residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Review of Resident R21's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set - assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 4/18/24, indicated diagnoses of depression, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms). Review of Resident R21's care plan dated 4/15/24, indicated to evaluate effectiveness and side effects of medication for possible decrease/elimination of psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications and properly store medications in one of two medication carts (West Assignment). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 3/4/24, indicated medications are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacture's recommendations or those of the supplier. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.45(g) Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals indicated if a multi-dose vial has been opened of accessed (e.g., needle-punctured), the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. During an observation on 5/15/24, at 9:16 a.m. of the [NAME] Assignment medication cart indicated the following medications stored in one compartment without individual packaging or separation from other residents medications: - Resident R10's Lantus (prefilled pen to inject long acting insulin under the skin) pen not in a box or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that emergency dental care was provided for one of two residents (Resident R19). Findings include: Review of facility policy Dental Services, dated 3/4/24, indicated that routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Social Services representatives will assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and reimbursement of dental services under the state plan, if eligible. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 19's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/8/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (neuro-cognitive disorder impacting reasoning, judgment, and memory), and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, employee education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five direct care staff members (Nurse Aide Employee E10). Findings include: Review of the Nurse Aide Job Description, indicated that nurse aide employees shall participate in required trainings and complete all related clinical competencies. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E10's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 3/9/81. Review of NA Employee E10's training record for 3/9/23, through 3/9/24, did not include training on effective communication. During an interview on 5/16/24, at 2:42 p.m. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)Employee E11 confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, employee education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) for five of five staff members (Employees E10, E12, E13, E14. E15). Findings include: Review of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) Job Description dated 9/1/23, indicated that the NHA will ensure all compliance with required trainings and in-services. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E10's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 3/9/81. Review of NA Employee E10's training record for 3/9/23, through 3/9/24, did not include training on QAPI. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E12's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 2/4/02. Review of LPN Employee E12's training record for 2/4/23, through 2/4/24, did not include training on QAPI. Review of NA Employee E13's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 5/3/17. Review of NA Employee E13's training record for 5/3/23, through 5/3/24, did not include training on QAPI.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, employee education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for one of five staff members (Nurse Aide Employee E10). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 3/4/24, indicated staff training/education and competencies will be completed during general orientation upon hire, and annually. Education listed included, but not limited to: -Alzheimer's disease and related disorders -Dementia Care Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E10's facility provided staff list indicated she was hired on 3/9/81. Review of NA Employee E10's training record for 3/9/23, through 3/9/24, did not include training on behavioral health. During an interview on 5/16/24, at 2:42 p.m. Assistant Director of Nursing Employee E11 confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for one of five staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform accurate post-fall documentation for two of five residents (Resident R2 and R3) and failed to ensure that a resident received neurological assessments after an incident involving a fall for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Assessing Falls and Their Causes dated 3/4/24, indicated if a resident has just fallen, or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities. Observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately 48 hours after an observed or suspected fall, and document findings in the medical record. When a resident falls, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: the condition in which the resident was found, assessment data, including vital signs and any obvious injuries, interventions, notification of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate post-fall care for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Assessing Falls and Their Causes dated 2/1/23, indicated that if a resident has just fallen, or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities. If there is evidence of an injury, provide appropriate first aid and/or obtain medical treatment immediately. If an assessment rules out significant injury, help the resident to a comfortable sitting, lying, or standing position, and then document relevant details. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/25/23, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent injury during bed mobility, resulting in a fall that required transfer to the hospital for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting dated 2/1/23, indicated the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. Review of facility policy Assessing Falls and Their Causes dated 2/1/23, indicated that if a resident has just fallen, or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities. If there is evidence of an injury, provide appropriate first aid and/or obtain medical treatment immediately. If an assessment rules out significant injury, help the resident to a comfortable sitting, lying, or standing position, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORE HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORE PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/13/2024 |
| EISEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2024 |
| RAINTREE CONSULTING GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/13/2024 |
| BISH, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2024 |
| ZDRALE, NIKOLAI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.