Transitions Healthcare Shook Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, hospital record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided after a change in condition for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in continued decline, which required hospitalization for hypovolemic shock (emergency condition in which severe blood or other fluid loss makes the heart unable to pump enough blood to the body), low blood pressure, and cardiac arrest for Resident 1. This failure placed an additional six out of six residents reviewed who were identified as having a change in condition in an immediate jeopardy situation (Residents 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16). The facility also failed to monitor blood glucose levels for residents with Diabetes Mellitus for two of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 1 and 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Change of Condition, with a last revision date of February 22, 2024, revealed the following: It is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, hospital record review, and resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician after a change in a resident's condition and failed to notify a resident's representative of a change in treatment for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Immediate Jeopardy was identified because the failure to notify the physician resulted in a lack of physician oversight. This caused a delay in treatment, which resulted in transfer to the hospital for hypovolemic shock (emergency condition in which severe blood or other fluid loss makes the heart unable to pump enough blood to the body), hypotension (low blood pressure), hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar), and cardiac arrest for Resident 1. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Change of Condition, with a last revision date of February 22, 2024, revealed the following: It is the policy of the Facility to inform residents, physicians/CRNP's (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioners), and resident representatives…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, hospital record review, facility investigation report, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to prevent a significant medication error, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a hospital transfer for low blood pressure, low heart rate and altered consciousness for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled CLIN-080 Medication Pass, revealed the following, in part, 2. The MAR [Medication Administration Record] is reviewed for the right resident, right drug, right time, right route, and right dose. 3. As the medications are being poured, the licensed nurse compares the label with the MAR three times: a. When removing medication from the drawer, b. When removing the medication from the container, c. when returning the container to the drawer. 5. The resident is properly identified by 2 forms of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 11).Findings include: Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 11's current physician orders revealed an order for losartan potassium 50 milligram tablet give one tablet by mouth one time a day hold for systolic blood pressure less than 100 or blood pressure less than 100/60, dated October 15, 2025. Review of Resident 11's Medication Administration Records from October 15, 2025, through March 4, 2026, revealed the following:1) There was no documentation of Resident 11's blood pressure documented with each medication administration.2) The losartan was coded as 5=Hold See Progress Notes on November 2 and 7, 2025, and December…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen, in two of two kitchenettes, and a resident unit refrigerator (second floor upper-level unit).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage, dated 2021, revealed, in part, All stock must be rotated with each new order received. Rotating stock is essential to assure freshness and highest quality of all foods. Old stock is always used first. Food should be dated as it is placed on shelves if required by state regulation. All containers or storage bags must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. All refrigerator units should be kept clean and in good working condition at all times. Every refrigerator must be equipped with a thermometer. Refrigerators/freezers on nursing units should be supplied with thermometers. All [refrigerated] foods should be covered, labeled, and dated and routinely monitored.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that enhances each resident's dignity for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 56).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS-331 Resident Rights, dated February 6, 2025, revealed, in part, The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. Review of facility provided information from their employee handbook, dated November 1, 2203, revealed, in part, F. Dress Code Policy: Since the appearance of the staff is a reflection of the employee, the resident, and the Company, the dress code provides for a consistent professional appearance in the dress of the staff. Should an employee report to work improperly dressed or groomed, his/her supervisor may instruct the employee to return home to change. Employees will not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated September 28, 2022, revealed, in part, Each resident will have a comprehensive care plan that is individualized, includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident, and reflects the resident's cultural references, values, and practices. Each resident's care plan is designed to: d. reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included muscle weakness and depression. During a resident interview with Resident 3 on March 2, 2026, at 1:40 PM, he indicated that he does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 56, and 60).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, last reviewed April 7, 2025, stated Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs when the heart does not relax properly between beats, causing the heart to be unable to pump an adequate amount of blood to the body). Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed that he was treated for the flu from January 30, 2026 -February 6, 2026. Review of Resident 4's care plan revealed an active care plan focus for influenza, dated January 30, 2026. During a staff interview with the Director of Nursing on March 5, 2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired medications for one of one medication storage rooms observed (2nd floor), and failed to place opened dates on medications in one of two medication carts (2nd floor) and one of one medication storage rooms (2nd floor) observed. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, last revised April 7, 2025, read, in part, III. Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use Dating) 3. Certain medications or package types, such as IV solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics, nitroglycerin tablets, and blood sugar testing solutions and strips require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date once opened to ensure medication purity and potency. Observation of the second floor medication storage room on March 4, 2026 at 10:00 AM, revealed one open multidose vial of tuberculin solution with no open date label. Further observation of the second floor medication storage room on March 4, 2026 at 10:00 AM, revealed one box of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implement infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection for one of 19 residents observed on contact precautions (Resident 5).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled IC-Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised April 1, 2024, revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions apply when: A resident is NOT known to be infected or colonized with any MDRO, has a wound or indwelling medical devices, and does not have secretions or excretions that are unable to be covered or contained; and contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 3 (a severe, full-thickness wound where the true depth [Stage III or IV]) and diabetes (a chronic condition when the body cannot properly control blood glucose levels). [[NAME]] I feel the ulcer piece isn't finished…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, other resources, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility antibiotic stewardship program allows for lapsed doses of antibiotic usage as determined by one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 60).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Antibiotic Stewardship- Order for Antibiotics, reviewed April 7, 2025, When a culture and sensitivity (C&S) is ordered, it will be completed, and; lab results and the current clinical situation will be communicated to the prescriber as soon as available to determine if antibiotic therapy should be started, continued, modified, or discontinued. Based on National Institute of Health Resource, dated December 11, 2025, lapsed or missed doses particularly early in treatment are critical issues that reduce treatment efficacy, allow for the development of drug resistance, and may necessitate dose increases or adjustments. Based on current Food and Drug Administration recommendations the treatment for Proteus mirabilis (Gram negative rod bacteria capable of causing symptomatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the most recent Federal or State survey results for one of one survey books observed (located in main entrance lobby). Findings Include: Observation of the survey binder located in the main entrance lobby on April 1, 2025, at 11:27 AM, revealed the most recent survey results present were dated August 2023. Review of the facility's survey history revealed the most recent survey result that could have been posted was conducted on March 19, 2025. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 2, 2025, at 1:02 PM, he revealed the expectation that the survey books should be up to date and confirmed that they had been updated. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 Responsibility of licensee

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer that included the required information for three of four resident records reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 47, 50, and 58). Findings include: Review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular and rapid heartbeats on the upper chamber of the heart) and acute kidney failure (a sudden and significant decrease in kidney function). Further review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed that she had been transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of facility provided document, titled Notice of Proposed Involuntary Discharge or Transfer, revealed the notice did not contain the location of transfer, statement of the Resident's appeal rights, the mailing address of the entity which receives request for appeals; mailing address of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$205,694 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $205,694 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA