Transitions Healthcare Gettysburg

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 204 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 126.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, facility documentation review, facility policy review, hospital records review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from neglect during provision of care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). The facility staff member failed to verify the resident and transfer status, which resulted in actual harm to Resident 1 who sustained a laceration to the right lower leg, transfer to the hospital, and received 13 sutures to the right lower leg. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Abuse Prohibition-Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Resident's Property, revised June 14, 2023, revealed that neglect is defined at 483,5 as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy review, review of facility investigation reports, hospital record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the assistance required for a safe transfer for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in actual harm as evidenced by a laceration that required transfer to the hospital and 13 sutures. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy, titled Transfer/Lift Policy, stated, all resident care will be provided in a safe, appropriate, and timely manner in accordance with the individual resident's care plan. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anorexia nervosa (an eating disorder causing people to obsess about weight and what they eat) and failure to thrive (doesn't gain weight normally). A review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic review of a resident's assessment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to file a grievance anonymously was honored on three of three resident living areas.Findings include: Review of facility, titled OPS-352 Grievance Policy, with a last review date of August 27, 2025, revealed, in part, 1. A concern/grievance may be made in person, in writing, by telephone or by mail and may be reported anonymously. The facility may not require the signature of the resident, the resident's representative or concerned party on a concern/grievance. 2. Grievance forms are located at each nursing station, the receptionists' office and outside the Social Service office. Forms may be returned to the receptionists' office, the Social Service department and/or to facility staff and management. During a Resident group meeting with Residents 30, 51, 55, 66, and 76 on September 23, 2025, at 10:30 AM, Residents 30, 51, 66, and 76, all indicated that they did not know how to file a grievance or how to do it anonymously. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled CLIN-157 CPAP/BIPAP, with a last review date of August 27, 2025, revealed, in part, orders must include pressure and hours of use and may include supplemental oxygen and mask size. The policy failed to indicate how the mask was to be stored when not in use. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting left non-dominant side, and legal blindness. Review of Resident 5's current physician orders revealed an order for CPAP (continuous positive airway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 75, 99, and 118).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled OPS Minimum Data Set Submission/Accuracy, with a last review date of August 27, 2025, stated, Each Minimum Data Set Submission (MDS) [an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs] will be completed accurately and timely and in accordance with RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) guidelines and requirements.Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 116).Findings include: Facility policy, titled Care Plan - Comprehensive, last reviewed August 27, 2025, read, in part, Each resident will have a comprehensive care plan developed that is individualized, includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident, and reflect the resident's cultural references, values, and practices. The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the MDS. Areas of concern that are triggered during the resident assessment are evaluated using specific assessment tools (including Care Area Assessments) before interventions are added to the care plan. Care plan interventions are designed after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan - Comprehensive, last reviewed August 27, 2025, read, in part, Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition changes. The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; d. At least quarterly. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (the state of inadequate food intake which leads to changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, food committee meeting minutes, grievance review, completion of one meal test tray, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverages that were at an appetizing temperature.Findings include:Review of Food Committee Meeting Minutes from July 29, 2025, revealed under complaints/concerns veggies are cold.Review of May 2025 Grievance Log revealed Resident 34 filed a grievance on May 6, 2025, that she feels she should be able to have her tea served hotter. Residents 30, 51, 66, and 76 who attended a group meeting on September 23, 2025, at 10:40 AM, revealed food temperatures are sometimes cold and they have to ask staff to reheat their food, and that coffee is often not hot enough. During an interview with Resident 4 on September 23, 2025, at 10:40 AM, he revealed his food isn't always served hot. Observation during meal tray line service on September 23, 2025, at 11:51 AM, revealed staff were placing two mugs with handles on the trays. Interview with Employee 1 (Dietary Manager) on September 23, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ensure the resident received care, consistent with professional standards, to prevent pressure ulcers for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 108). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management, revised September 13, 2019, revealed in a section Pressure relief: Elevate/float heels or obtain a device to provide pressure relief. Review of Resident 108's clinical record revealed diagnoses of muscle weakness (weakness in the muscles that makes movement difficult) and diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin). Review of Resident 108's current physician order on August 12, 2024, at 2:35 PM, revealed a physician's order for Blue off-loading boots to B/L (bilateral) heels, with an order date of July 22, 2024. Observation of Resident 108 on August 12, 2024, at 1:48 PM, revealed the Resident was not wearing blue off-loading boots to elevate her heels off of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, product label review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store drugs used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and the expiration dates for two of three medication carts observed (Annex 1 North medication cart and Annex 1 South medication cart). Findings Include: Review of facility provided policy, Storage of Medications, effective September 2018, revealed, Medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacture's recommendations or those of the supplier. Observation of the Annex 1 North medication cart on August 15, 2024, at 9:40 AM, revealed one Ozembic (a prescription injectable medication used to treat type 2 diabetes) that was currently in use and was not labeled with a date that it was opened. The observation at that time also revealed a Levemir pen (a prescription injectable medication used to treat type 2 diabetes) that was unopened, not refrigerated, and was not labeled with the date it had been removed from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0810 — pattern
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 59). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Restorative Adaptive Equipment, with a revision date of March 28, 2016, revealed, Restorative adaptive equipment and assistive devices will be used to promote individual resident functional level and to prevent decline. Review of Resident 59's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (one-sided weakness caused by brain or spinal cord problems). Review of Resident 59's care plan revealed a focus area of, [Resident 59] is on a therapeutic, mechanically altered diet, with a date initiated of May 29, 2019, and a revision date of January 5, 2022. Further review of this care plan revealed an intervention of, Dycem on side table with meals in dining room, with a revision date of April 23, 2024. Review of Resident 59's current physician's orders on August 12, 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility policy for reporting an allegation of neglect to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) immediately for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Exploitation, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last revised June 14, 2024, stated, any report or suspicion of an incident is to be reported immediately to the charge nurse/supervisor. The Administrator or the Director of Nursing who receives the report are to be notified immediately by the charge nurse/supervisor who receives the report. A review of the clinical record for Resident 5 on August 13, 2024, revealed diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (obstructive or functional impediment of urine flow and back-up of urine flow) and bullous pemphigus (a rare autoimmune skin disease that causes blisters to form between the skin's epidermal and dermal layers of the skin). A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,334 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,167 — penalty dated 2024-06-11
• $8,167 — penalty dated 2024-06-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $746K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA