Transitions Healthcare Allens Cove
25 Cove Road, Duncannon, PA 17020 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (717) 834-4887 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.2% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.0% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.6%CMS range 45.3–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 2.8–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for five of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 15, 26, 30, and 52). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Resident Rights last revised February 6, 2025, read, in part, The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. To ensure the respect and dignity of each resident during dining and to promote a home-like environment. The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Observation during lunch meal service on March 17, 2026, at 12:47 PM, revealed a cart of beverages with two sleeves of soft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received a transfer notice with the required included information upon transfer/discharge for two of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 5 and 30). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Discharge/Transfer from Facility, with an effective date of January 21, 2025, read, in part, Upon a transfer or discharge of a Resident, the facility must: Notify the Resident and the Resident representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to the resident/resident representative. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (disease process that results in the decreased ability of the heart to pump blood through the body effectively) and chronic kidney disease (disease of the kidneys that affects kidney function). Review of Resident 5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel training record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide was provided required in-service training, consisting of no less than 12 hours per year, which included dementia management and resident abuse prevention for four of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employees 1, 2, 3, and 5). Findings Include: Review of personnel information revealed Employee 1's hire date was January 5, 2024; Employee 2's hire date was November 13, 2023; Employee 3's hire date was October 12, 2024; and Employee 5's hire date was March 3, 2025. Review of facility training records failed to reveal that the aforementioned Employees completed 12 hours of required annual training in the past 12 months. Further review of facility training records failed to reveal evidence that dementia management training was completed by Employees 1, 2, and 5 within the past 12 months, or that abuse prevention training was completed by Employee 3 within the past 12 months. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 19, 2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 8). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Use of Psychotropic medications, with a revision date of January 21, 2025, revealed It is the policy of the Facility to assess the interventional necessity of psychotropic medication prior to delivery when related to the escalation of Resident behaviors Attempt to meet needs by the care plan and/or the behavior modification program, if appropriate. Use calm, friendly approach and try to redirect thoughts. Attempt to reassure and console. Document behavior, interventions tried and effectiveness on the 'Behavioral/Interventions' Sheet. Offer PO [by mouth] PRN [as needed] medications if above steps ineffective. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included stroke, dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, select facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and report the results of all investigations to officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Exploitation, and Misappropriation of Resident Property last revised June 14, 2023, read, in part, Facility staff will be trained to report any oral or written reports of alleged neglect, abuse, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident's property. Facility staff must also report injuries of unknown etiology. Proper reporting procedures are as follows: Any report or suspicion of an incident is to be reported immediately to the charge nurse/supervisor. The administrator or his designated person will notify the Licensing and Regulatory Agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident and failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 68).Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys are damaged and can't do their important jobs). Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed their care plan was initiated on February 17, 2026, and was completed on March 16, 2026. Further review of the Resident's care plan revealed their activities, dietary, nursing, social services, and therapy focus areas and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed ensure that resident and resident representative were involved in developing the comprehensive care plan and making decisions about his or her care for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 68). Findings include: Review of Resident 68's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle is unable to pump enough to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 68's clinical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 68's clinical record revealed all of their care plan focus areas and interventions were initiated on either December 17 or 30, 2025. Review of Resident 68's clinical record failed to reveal that a care plan meeting was held with an interdisciplinary team and failed to reveal any evidence or documentation that the Resident and their Representative were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings Include: Review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included colon cancer and bladder cancer. Review of Resident 48's physician progress note dated March 13, 2026, revealed Resident 48 was being seen due to excessive blood draining into Resident's urostomy bag (a surgically created opening in the abdominal wall that allows urine to bypass a diseased or dysfunctional bladder. It is commonly used when the bladder is removed due to cancer, birth defects, or nerve damage, allowing urine to flow continuously into an external pouching system). The note further stated that the physician spoke to Resident 48's responsible party (RP), who stated she was also going to call and speak with Resident's urologist. Further review of Resident 48's physician note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications under proper temperature controls in one of one medication rooms reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications with a last revised date of August 2020, and a last review date of May 2024, revealed the following: II. Temperature 1. All medications are maintained within the temperature ranges noticed in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC); c. Refrigerated: 36°F to 46°F (2°C to 8°C) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring; 2. Medications and biologicals are stored at their appropriate temperatures and humidity according to the USP guidelines for temperature ranges; 4. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 36°F (2°C) and 46°F (8°C) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring; and 6. The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize kitchen equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage last reviewed May 31, 2024, read, in part, All stock must be rotated with each new order received. Rotating stock is essential to assure the freshness and highest quality of all foods. All containers or storage bags must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated and routinely monitored to assure that foods will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable), or discarded. Observation in the dry storage area on April 21, 2025, at 10:03 AM, revealed four bags of white bread with a use by date of March 22, 2024, and six packs of English muffins not dated. Observation of the dish machine in the main kitchen on April 21, 2025, at 10:07 AM, revealed it was heavily soiled with a brown substance on the top; further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for one of three residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 45). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Bed Holds and Returns and Therapeutic Leave of Absence, last dated January 3, 2024, revealed The Facility is required to provide a bed hold under certain circumstances and make the Resident aware of the Facility's bed hold and return policy as related to hospitalization and therapeutic leave. The facility will provide information on bed hold requirements to all residents upon admission and again at time of transfer from the Facility. Bed Hold requirements will be included in the Facility admission packet to be reviewed during the admission process and will be considered the first notice of the Facility Bed Holds and Returns policy .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 9 and 32). Findings Include: Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (MS - a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves; can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes, and other symptoms) and neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by nervous system conditions). Review of Resident 9's physician orders revealed an order dated June 28, 2024, for a Foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine; also known as an indwelling catheter). Review of Resident 9's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs) dated February 16, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of two residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident 23). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living last reviewed May 31, 2024, read, in part, Residents will gain and/or maintain as much independence as possible in ADLs which are essential to the individual's lifestyle. This refers to activities an individual performs on a regular basis, such as eating, dressing, hygiene (make-up, shaving, washing), transfers, reading, writing, housework, smoking, walking, and even driving. The resident's performance may vary depending on the time of day, how the resident feels, setting, and the person with him/her. Review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a condition that narrows the space in the spine, putting pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: Review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), atrioventricular heart block (a type of heart block that occurs when the electrical signal traveling from the atria, or the upper chambers of the heart, to ventricles, or the lower chambers of the heart, is impaired), and presence of a cardiac pacemaker. Observation of Resident 24 on April 21, 2025, at 10:02 AM, revealed the presence of a [NAME] at Home (a remote telephonic pacemaker check device) on her bedside stand. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing care for range of motion exercises for one of three residents reviewed for position and mobility (Resident 29). Findings include: Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed a Restorative Program Progress Note written on February 24, 2025, at 12: 17 PM, that read, in part, restorative nursing programs from passive range of motion (PROM) of right upper extremity (RUE) and right lower extremity (RLE) and active range of motion (AROM) of left lower extremity (LLE) continue. Resident 29 has a diagnosis of flaccid hemiplegia to right side; she is able to tolerate both PROM programs to right upper and lower extremities and continues to participate and complete three sets of ten reps for each of the exercises listed within the AROM LLE programs. Review of Resident 29's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the preparation and administration of medications for three of three residents observed (Residents 9, 27, and 155). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration with a last revised date of August 2020, and a last review date of May 2024, revealed the following, The person administering medications adheres to good hand hygiene, which includes washing hands thoroughly: i. Before beginning a medication pass; ii. Prior to handling any medication; iii. After coming into direct contact with a resident and Hand sanitization is done with a facility approved sanitizer ii. At regular intervals during the medication pass such as after each room, again assuming handwashing is not indicated. Review of facility policy, titled Transitions Healthcare Allen's Cove IC-Infection Control Plan 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment in common areas and one of three resident rooms observed (South and East Hallways, Nurses Station, and Resident 1's room). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Cleaning & Disinfecting Environmental Surfaces last revised October 1, 2017, read, in part, Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g., daily, three times per week) and when surfaces are visibly soiled. Observation in the South Hallway on March 31, 2025, at 10:41 AM, revealed three ceiling tiles with ring circle stains on them. Observation at the Nurse's Station on March 31, 2025, at 10:44 AM, revealed a large ceiling tile to the left of the station with a large brown ring circle stain. Observation in the East Hallway on March 31, 2025, at 10:46 AM, revealed one ceiling tile with a large brown ring circle stain on it, and a brown liquid stain that was dripping down the side of the wall. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee handbook review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least once every 12 months for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 2, 3, and 4). Findings include: Based on facility document, titled Employee Handbook effective July 1, 2022, read, in part, All employees will be subject to a written annual rating and evaluation by the department supervisor based on his/her employment anniversary date to ensure that strengths, areas for improvement, and job goals for the next review period have been clearly communicated. An employee's evaluation will be reviewed with the employee by the supervisor at the time of presentation for the employee's signature. Review of select facility documentation revealed a list of nurse aide's that had worked at the facility for greater than a year. Employee 2 had a hire date of January 5, 2024; Employee 3 had a hire date of April 15, 2023; and Employee 4 had a hire date of July 1, 2022. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and store food and equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen area. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage, dated 2021, revealed All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated and routinely monitored to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable), or discarded. Review of facility policy, titled General Food Preparation and Handling, dated 2021, revealed The kitchen will be kept neat and orderly. The kitchen surfaces and equipment will be cleaned and sanitized as appropriate. Upon entering the kitchen on September 4, 2024, at 9:29 AM, with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Employee 1 (Food Service Director), Employees 2 (Cook) and 3 (Dietary Aide) were observed working in the kitchen without hairnets. Employee 1 immediately provided hairnets to Employees 2 and 3. Observation of the dry storage area in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice of transfer to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, after a transfer out of the facility, for four of four residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 10, 14, 26 and 57). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should be) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed that she was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on May 9, 2024, at 10:10 AM, he stated that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was not notified of Resident 10's transfer to the hospital. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living was provided care and services in regard to hygiene and bathing (Resident 32). Finding include: Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body) and hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood). During an interview with Resident 32 on May 6, 2024, at 10:35 AM, she revealed that she didn't get washed up the previous morning (May 5, 2024). Review of Resident 32's clinical record tasks revealed a restorative nursing program for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 15 minutes twice daily, that includes the resident washing and drying her face, hands, and upper body with mid-mod assist from staff and perform her grooming with set-up assist. Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed a Restorative Program Note written on March 8, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program designed to meet the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for five out of five residents who attended group for Resident Council (Resident 2, 13, 39, 51, and 260). Findings include: An interview with Employee 3 on May 7, 2024, at 11:30 AM, revealed that the facility only has one activity staff member who works Monday through Friday, and that they do not hold activities for residents on weekends. Interviews with resident's during a group interview on May 8, 2024, at 9:00 AM, revealed the facility does not have any activities held on weekends for the residents, that scheduled activities sometimes get cancelled, and that the resident's feel the activity director needs help. Review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes from March 2024 revealed the following comments regarding activities: Activities have gone downhill. The activities director has not been here, residents are left alone in dayroom. Aides are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the dietary extension sheets (guidelines as to what foods should or should not be served for specific therapeutic diets), the Diet Type facility report and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet per physician's order, for four residents on a Renal/ low potassium diet (a diet aimed at keeping levels of fluids, electrolytes, and minerals balance in the body in individuals who's kidneys don't function as they should or who receive treatments to remove excess water, solutes and toxins from the blood due to kidney failure) and 18 residents on a Consistent Carbohydrate diet (CCD- meals are planned to provide a consistent amount of carbohydrates day to day.) out of 22 residents reviewed on a therapeutic diets. Findings include: On May 8, 2024, review of facility report Diet Type, printed May 8, 2024; documented the following therapeutic diet were prescribed: eighteen residents were ordered consistent carbohydrate diet, and four residents were ordered a renal/low potassium. The in house census on May 8, 2024, was 55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for four of four residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 14, 31, 32 and 111). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Aerosol Therapy, with a revision date of Mach 21, 2016, revealed, in part, to wash and air dry the nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) after use. When nebulizer equipment is dry, place it back in labeled plastic bag. Plastic bag will have the date that the equipment was opened on the outside of the bag Change aerosol unit, mouth piece, tubing and plastic bag on a weekly basis and label with date. Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrators, with a revision date of January 26, 2017, revealed DO NOT keep distilled water in a resident's room. Always date an opened bottle. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen area and one of one nourishment pantry. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Storage, dated 2021, read, in part, all stock must be rotated with each new order received, old stock will be utilized first. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. All storage containers or storage [NAME] must be accurately labeled and dated. Leftover food must be used within seven days or discarded as per the 2017 Federal Food Code. Observation in the dry store room on May 6, 2024, at 9:25 AM one half package of pasta was open and not securely closed. During an interview with Employee 5, Food Service Director, on May 6, 2024, at 9:25 AM it was revealed that the past should've been securely closed. Observation in the walk-in refrigerator on May 6, 2024, at 9:30 AM one container of thirty hard boiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to a dignified existence during meal service for one of one dining rooms observed. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Resident Rights, with a revision date of May 5, 2023, revealed Provide meals to all Residents at each table at the same time. Observation in the dining room during lunch on May 6, 2024, at 12:59 PM, revealed Residents 6, 10, 17, 30 and 50 all sitting at a table. Resident 50 was observed to be eating her lunch, while Residents 6, 10, 17 and 30 had not yet been served their lunch. Additional observations revealed the following: At 1:04 PM, Resident 30 was served her lunch. At 1:08 PM, Resident 6 was served her lunch. At 1:12 PM, Resident 17 was served her lunch. At 1:25 PM, Resident 10 was served her lunch. Further observations in the dining room during lunch on May 6, 2024, revealed there were 19 residents total eating in the dining room. Observations revealed all 19 residents were eating their lunch served on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with a copy of the facility's bed-hold policy as a result of a transfer out of the facility for three of four residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 10, 14 and 26). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Bed Holds and Returns and Therapeutic Leave of Absence, revised September 28, 2022, revealed The Facility will provide information on bed hold requirements to all residents upon admission and again at time of transfer from the Facility. Bed Hold requirements will be included in the Facility admission packet to be reviewed during the admission process and will be considered the first notice of the Facility Bed Holds and Returns policy .The second notice, which details the duration of the bed hold policy, will be issued at the time of transfer. In cases of emergency transfer, notice 'at the time of transfer' means that the family, surrogate, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 21 and 32). Finding include: Review of Resident 21's clinical record contained diagnosis that included: dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking), Parkinson's disease (disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), moderate protein calorie malnutrition (moderately-malnourished, protein and energy intake doesn't meet nutritional needs), and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality). Further review of Resident 21's clinical record on May 6, 2024, at 12:46 PM documented that Resident 21 had been on Hospice services since November 15, 2023. Review of Resident 21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 261) Findings include: During an interview with Resident 261 on May 7, 2024, at 9:00 AM it was revealed that she resided in Personal Care prior to hospitalization and then admission into skilled nursing care on May 3, 2024. It was also revealed she had been on hemodialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer preform these functions naturally) for some time, and received hemodialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday outside of the nursing facility. Review of resident 261's clinical record documented diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (moderately-malnourished, protein and energy intake doesn't meet nutritional needs), dependence on hemodialysis, and diabetes mellitus (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine drugs to its residents and ensure procedures to assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 111). Findings Include: Review of Resident 111's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep). During an interview with Resident 111 on May 6, 2024, at 10:20 AM, she stated that she wants her nicotine patch but is still waiting for it. She said she was told that the facility has not yet received it. Review of Resident 111's clinical record revealed an order for a Nicotine patch, with a start date of May 1, 2024, apply one patch once a day for smoking cessation. Review of Resident 111's medication administration record (MAR), dated May 2024, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverage that are at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one meal observed on the South unit. Findings include: Review of facility policy Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points and Food Safety, dated 2021, read, in part, staff will recognize potentially hazardous foods such as milk, and milk products, poultry, shell eggs, and meat and handle them carefully. The Director of Food Service and Registered Dietitian should determine the appropriate temperature ranges for the food service operation. The United States Department of Health and Human Services Food Code uses 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold foods and 135 degrees for hot foods. Review of resident council meeting minutes for February 8, 2024, and March27, 2024, documented resident concern with cold food. Resident interviews during the initial pool process revealed concerns with the temperature of the food and beverages during meal service. Test tray completed on May 6, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment in one of one dining room. Findings Include: Observation of the dining room on November 13, 2023, at 10:45 AM, 11:36 AM, 12:30 PM, and 1:35 PM, revealed eight sets of windows with windowsills. Observations of all of the windowsills in the dining room revealed numerous tiny dead black bugs. Further observations revealed additional tiny dead black bugs located on the registers below the windowsills, as well as on the floor below the windows. On November 13, 2023, at 1:45 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was shown the dead bugs in the dining room. At that time, he stated that the bugs appeared within the last week when the weather went from cold to warm. The NHA immediately notified housekeeping to clean the area. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2.1) Management
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, service line temperature log, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverage that are palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for five of 13 meals reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food: Quality and Palatability with a last revised date of September 2017, revealed Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Review of the facility's Service Line Checklist revealed that Hot Food Temperatures should be equal to or greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit, and Cold food temperatures should be less than or equal to 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of these checklists from July 28, 2023, through August 9, 2023, revealed the following concerns: July 28, 2023, dinner meal: the grilled cheese temperature was documented as 130 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature; July 29, 2023, lunch meal: the french fries temperature was documented as 134 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature; July 30, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to note or update menu changes and notify Residents of a change to the posted menu for one of one meals observed (August 10, 2023, lunch meal). Findings include: During an interview with Resident 1 on August 10, 2023, at 11:05 AM, they indicated that they do not always get their preferences, and that they have not been getting dinner rolls as listed on the menu. During an interview with Resident 3 on August 10, 2023, at 12:10 PM, they indicated that they do not always get what is listed on the menu. Observation of Resident 3's lunch tray on August 10, 2023, at 12:15 PM, revealed that they had not received their roll or margarine as indicated on their tray ticket. Observation of Resident 4's lunch tray on August 10, 2023, at 12:25 PM, revealed that they had not received their dinner roll or unsweetened tea as indicated on their tray ticket. In addition, the tray ticket stated Send 2 butter cups with all meals. There were no butter cups noted on the tray. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FELDMAN, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 01/01/2023 |
| WILLIAMS, KEVIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MAURANO, MATTHEW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MEMBERS FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| JONES, CARL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| MENON, MADHU | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $289K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395915. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.