Darway Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 54.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, staff interview, and review of personnel training records, it was determined that the facility failed to implement measures to protect residents from abuse for one of nine employees reviewed (Employee 2, Resident 1).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Abuse Policy, last reviewed November 18, 2025, revealed that prevention includes training all staff and practitioners how to resolve conflicts appropriately, helping staff to deal appropriately with stress and emotions, and training staff to understand and manage a resident's verbal or physical aggression. The facility during its orientation program and through ongoing training programs provides all employees with information regarding abuse, including prevention, intervention, and detection and related reporting requirements. Steps will be taken to prevent further potential abuse that include corrective measures. The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, last reviewed November 18, 2025, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 44). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed that he had a fall on October 17, 2025, and sustained a fracture of his left eighth rib. Review of Resident 2's most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that he declined in the following areas and was dependent for personal hygiene, dependent with rolling left to right, required substantial to maximum assistance to go from sitting to lying, lying to sitting, and going from sitting to standing, he was dependent for chair to bed and bed to chair transfers, toilet transfers, and transferring to tub/shower Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed his previous quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at intervals by the facility to determine care needs of the resident) dated July…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed a pharmacy recommendation appropriately for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed that the pharmacist made a recommendation on September 5, 2025, for the physician to consider a gradual dose reduction or to discontinue Resident 8's Remeron (a medication used to treat depression) 15 mg and Risperdal (a medication used to treat mental health disorders such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder)1 mg. The physician responded to the recommendation on September 16, 2025, indicating that the family declined a gradual dose reduction. Interview with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator on December 11, 2025, at 2:20 PM confirmed the above noted findings that Resident 8's physician did not respond to the pharmacy recommendation with an appropriate response indicating why a gradual dose reduction or discontinuation of the medications was clinically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the highest practicable care regarding infection control measures for one of one resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions (Resident 10 ). Findings include: An observation of Resident 10's room on December 9, 2025, at 1:25 PM revealed signage outside the resident's door, which indicated contact precautions (a transmission based preventative measure to prevent the spread of infection) were in place for the room, and anyone entering the room must use hand hygiene. The sign also indicated that all staff and providers must wear a gown and gloves when entering the room. Concurrent observation and interview with Employee 2 (housekeeper) revealed she was in Resident 10's room with no gloves or gown on. Interview with Employee 2 revealed that she was told she did not need a gown or gloves since she was not providing care or touching the resident. Interview with Employee 3, Registered Nurse, on December 10, 2025, at 1:30 PM revealed that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select manufacturer's guidelines, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Residents 25 and 18). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 9.68 percent based on 31 medication opportunities with three medication errors. Observation of a medication administration pass on January 8, 2025, at 9:02 AM revealed Employee 3 (licensed practical nurse, LPN) preparing to administer Resident 25's Carbidopa 25 milligram (mg)/ Levodopa 100 mg (medication used to treat Parkinson disease symptoms) two tablets and Effexor (antidepressant medication) XR extended release 150 mg, one tablet. Employee 3 proceeded to crush both the Carbidopa/Levodopa and Effexor EX extended release. Review of the facilities Medications Not to Be Crushed, list by the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists, dated February 2024, revealed that both the Carbidopa/Levodopa and Effexor EX extended release should not be crushed. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's change in condition requiring interventions for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 24 revealed nursing documentation dated December 30, 2024, noting Resident 24 was found on the floor. Documentation revealed Resident 24 was checked for injury and a bruise was noted to her left knee. Resident 24's physician was notified at this time. Nursing documentation dated January 2, 2025, at 6:21 PM revealed staff were concerned with Resident 24's right hand and arm. The registered nurse assessment noted Resident 24's right hand and fingers were slightly swollen, and her right upper arm was bruised with edema (swelling). Nursing documentation dated January 3, 2025, at 9:22 PM noted Resident 24's right hand and arm continued with dependent edema. Nursing documentation dated January 4, 2025, at 5:23 AM noted during morning care nurse aides moved Resident 24's right arm to wash her and she yelled out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding bowel protocol medication administration for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 203). Findings include: A review of the policy titled, Bowel Policy and Procedure, last reviewed on October 21, 2024, revealed a purpose to promote regular bowel function and prevent complications related to constipation (difficulty having a bowel movement) by establishing clear guidelines for monitoring, documenting, and managing residents' bowel movements. The policy further noted that all residents will have their bowel movements monitored and recorded in the electronic health record (EHR) per shift. The staff will follow the facility's bowel protocol, which will be per order established by the physician. The facility will monitor and address any absence of bowel movements within a specified timeframe, adhering to physician orders or standing facility procedures. The policy noted that, If no bowel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by two of three residents reviewed (Residents 23 and 47). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 23 revealed the facility admitted her on July 31, 2018. A diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) was added on May 23, 2024. A review of Resident 23's most recent annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated April 15, 2024, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 23 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 23's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported an irregularity to the physician for one of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Resident 23). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 23 on July 31, 2018. Review of Resident 23's physician orders revealed Resident 23 was admitted on Latuda (an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia) 40 milligrams (mg), one tablet one time a day for schizophrenia. Further review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed no schizophrenia diagnosis. Review of Resident 23's current physician orders revealed Resident 23 continued to receive Latuda 40 mg, one tablet at bedtime now related to major depressive disorder. A consultant pharmacist report dated September 11, 2024, requested the physician consider a gradual dose reduction, or trial discontinuation of Resident 23's Latuda. Resident 23's physician disagreed with the recommendation on September 23, 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws for one of three staff members reviewed (Employee 4; Residents 3 and 50). Findings include: Review of facility documentation revealed that Employee 4, registered nurse, had a registered nurse license that expired [DATE]. A review of the current license for Employee 4 revealed the Status Effective Date was documented as [DATE]. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on [DATE], at 10:24 AM revealed that Employee 4's license had expired on [DATE], and was not renewed until [DATE]. Human resources had contacted Employee 4 on [DATE], to advise of the expiration date of Employee 4's license. A review of the facility document titled, Time Cards, for Employee 4 revealed that the staff member had worked seven shifts during the time period the facility reported the license was expired:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AKIKO IKE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA