Milford Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
264 Route 6 & 209, Milford, PA 18337 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (570) 491-4121 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $61,593 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-03)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 39.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 44.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.17 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.0%CMS range 34.4–53.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.8–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.3–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select incident reports, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement effective fall prevention interventions for a resident with known unsafe behaviors to prevent a fall resulting in serious injury, a fractured clavicle, for one out 11 sampled residents (Resident 3). Findings include: A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a history of a fracture of the left femoral neck [is a type of hip fracture of the thigh bone (femur) which is just below the ball of the ball-and-socket hip joint], difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit [difficulty with any aspect of communication that is affected by disruption of cognition]. Upon admission the resident had a noted surgical site to her left hip that measured 15.5 cm in length by 2.0 cm in width by 0.0 cm in depth. A review of the resident's baseline plan of care dated November 13, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to address dementia-related behaviors and cognitive decline for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 36).Findings include:A review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), cerebral infarction (a stroke), and communication deficit disorder.A review of Resident 36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 11, 2026, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired.A review of the resident's current care plan, initially dated March 24, 2026, revealed the resident had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement infection prevention practices and adhere to the facility policy for identifying, treating and preventing the transmission of scabies for two of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 16 and Resident 72) and for implementing enhanced barrier precautions for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 16). Findings include:According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Public Health Strategies for Scabies Outbreaks in Institutional Settings (updated December 18, 2025), residents with confirmed or suspected scabies (a skin condition caused by microscopic mites that burrow into the skin and lay eggs, resulting in intense itching, often worse at night, and a pimple-like rash) should be placed on contact precautions, including the use of gowns and gloves and avoidance of direct skin-to-skin contact. The guidance further stated that roommates or close…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the individualized needs of two residents of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 13 and Resident 16)Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, adopted February 9, 2026, showed that a comprehensive, person centered care plan must be developed and implemented for each resident. The policy stated that the care plan describes the services necessary to help the residents attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being and must reflect currently recognized standards of practice for identified problems and conditions. The policy also specified that resident assessments are ongoing and that care plans must be revised as new information becomes available or as the resident's condition changes.Clinical record review revealed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive plan of care in response to a fall for one resident out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 11).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, adopted February 9, 2026, the policy indicated that the care plan describes the services necessary to help the residents attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being and must reflect currently recognized standards of practice for identified problems and conditions. The policy also specified that resident assessments are ongoing and that care plans must be revised as new information becomes available or as the residents' condition changes. A clinical review revealed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of primary generalized osteoarthritis (wear and tear in several joints throughout the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services in accordance with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure prompt clinical evaluation and timely treatment of an injury for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 13).Findings include:A clinical record review revealed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of fracture of the unspecified part of the neck of the left femur (a break in the neck of the left femur located just below the ball of the hip joint).A review of Resident 13's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to assist in planning resident care), dated February 26, 2026, revealed Resident 13 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5. (The BIMS is a screening tool within the Cognitive Patterns section of the MDS used to assess attention, orientation, and the ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical records, facility-provided investigations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective fall prevention interventions to prevent recurrent falls for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, adopted by the facility on February 9, 2026, indicated based on previous evaluations and current data, staff were to identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to attempt to prevent falls and minimize complications related to falls. The policy further indicated that staff, with input from the attending physician, were to implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce specific fall risk factors for each resident identified as at risk for falls or with a history of falls. If falls recurred despite initial interventions, staff were to implement additional or different…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to monitor and manage hydration status in accordance with a physician ordered fluid restriction to ensure proper fluid balance for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 72).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Restricting Fluids, adopted on February 9, 2026, indicated that the facility is required to provide an appropriate amount of fluids to support an optimal level of health. The policy states that when a resident is placed on a fluid restriction (a specific daily limit on how much liquid a person can consume, including all drinks and high fluid foods such as soups, ice cream, gelatin, and ice), free water (available water at the bedside) is not to be provided unless specifically included in the resident's total daily fluid allowance. The policy required documentation of the resident's fluid intake and adherence to the prescribed allowance to determine whether…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the attending physician failed to act upon pharmacist identified irregularities in the medication regimen for one resident out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 3).Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive and persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily functioning and is difficult to control). A review of a consultant pharmacist report dated December 7, 2025, revealed Resident 3 was prescribed the following psychoactive medications:Lexapro 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet daily, an antidepressant classified as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) used to treat depression and anxiety disorders.Klonopin 0.5 mg one tablet daily, a benzodiazepine medication used to relieve symptoms of anxiety. The consultant pharmacist documented that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement and adhere to established procedures to ensure appropriate storage and compliance with use-by dates for multi-dose medications in one of two medication rooms (first-floor medication room)Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, adopted on February 9, 2026, indicated that medications and biologicals (treatments derived from living organisms or their products) are required to be stored in locked compartments under appropriate temperature, humidity, and light controls. The policy further stated that expired medications and/or biologicals are to be managed by contacting the dispensing pharmacy for return or destruction instructions. Additionally, the policy required that multi-dose vials be dated upon opening and discarded within 28 days unless otherwise specified. An observation of the first-floor medication room on May 13, 2026, at 10:24 AM, in the presence of Employee 1, Registered Nurse (RN), revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality in accordance with 42 CFR S483.35 and Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, S21.11(c), by permitting registered nurses to access and administer intravenous (IV) medication through an implanted venous port (a surgically placed device located completely beneath the skin that connects directly to a large vein for long-term intravenous therapy) without documented evidence of specialized training and demonstrated clinical competency. This deficient practice occurred for one of six residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (c) The registered nurse may not engage in areas of highly specialized practice without adequate knowledge of and skills in the practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the dietary department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review a facility policy entitled Food Receiving and Storage last reviewed by the facility on April 23, 2025, indicated that opened food items would include a use by date and all dry foods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of prescribed medications for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 15). Findings include: A review of facility policy labeled Administering Medications last reviewed April 23, 2025, revealed medication are administered in accordance with prescriber orders including any required time frame. A review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). A review of physician's orders dated May 13, 2024, revealed the physician prescribed Lactaid Fast oral Tablet 9000 units (an enzyme used to help break down lactose the natural sugar in milk and dairy products). Give one by mouth with meals for lactose intolerance (inability of the body to digest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist conducted medication regimen reviews at least monthly for two residents out of five sampled.(Resident 48 and 42). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Medication Regime Reviews last reviewed by the facility on April 23, 2025, indicated the facility's consultant pharmacist conducts monthly medication regime reviews (MRR) for each resident at least monthly. The MRR involves a thorough review of the resident's medical record to prevent, identify, report and re-solve medication related problems, medication errors and other irregularities, for example medications ordered in excessive doses or without clinical indication, medication regimens that appear inconsistent with the resident's stated preferences, duplicative therapies or omissions of ordered medications, inadequate monitoring for adverse consequences, potentially significant drug-drug or drug-food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications by failing to discontinue an unnecessary antibiotic for one resident (Resident 22); failing to provide clinical justification for the use of duplicate antidepressant medications for one resident (Resident 42); and failing to ensure that one resident's (Resident 48) medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychoactive medication, including administering an as-needed antianxiety medication beyond 14 days without adequate clinical justification and without documentation of attempted non-pharmacological interventions, for three of eighteen sampled residents. Findings include: A review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis to include dementia (a decline in memory, thinking, and other cognitive abilities, significantly impacting daily life) and chronic kidney disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of grievances, select facility policy and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to demonstrate timely and adequate efforts to resolve resident grievances for one resident out of 5 sampled. (Resident 1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Grievances/Complaints, dated as reviewed April 29, 2024, revealed, residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. Any resident, family or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Findings include: Observation on August 13, 2024, at 10:20 AM in the presence of the food service director revealed that the facility's dumpster, containing bags of garbage, was not covered. One of the two lids on the dumpster was observed open. There were food containers and debris scattered on the ground surrounding the dumpster. Interview with the food service director at this time confirmed that the dumpster lid was to be kept closed and that the area surrounding the dumpster should be maintained in a sanitary manner. 28 Pa Code 201.8 (e)(2.1) Management
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 51). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. Review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 6, 2023, with diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). Review of an incident report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely notify the physician and the resident's representative of an incident with the potential to require physician intervention for one resident out of 16 sampled (Resident 115). Findings include: A review of the facility Change in Resident's Condition or Status Policy last reviewed, June 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 115 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on July 27, 2024, and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a urinary tract infection, cerebral infarction (stroke), and seizures. A Midline catheter (a long, thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm to safely administer medication or fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to address a resident's skin condition on the comprehensive care plan for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 23). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident (CVA- stroke, interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), and rheumatoid arthritis. A physician order dated June 27, 2024, noted an order to apply Zinc to buttocks every shift for skin protectant/moisture barrier. A wound progress note dated August 1, 2024, indicated the resident's sacrum (large, triangle-shaped bone in the lower spine that forms part of the pelvis) was assessed and was noted to have MASD (Moisture-associated skin damage caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool, or perspiration) of the epidermis resulting from prolonged exposure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, select facility reports, observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide care and services to to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure sores and promote healing for one resident out of 16 residents sampled (Resident 6). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed at alleviating the conditions contributing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, staff and resident interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a physician ordered intravenous (IV- medication is administered through needle or tube inserted into a vein) medication, an antibiotic, was timely administered as prescribed for one resident out of 16 sampled (Resident 115). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on June 24, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. It indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee to inform process changes and/or the need for additional staffing. Prescribed medications are to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency supplies for a resident receiving hemodialysis for one of 16 residents sampled. (Resident 6) Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation patients receiving hemodialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) should keep emergency care supplies on hand. A review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility was on June 10, 2022, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a chronic kidney disease that occurs when the kidneys can no longer function properly) and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the resident's current plan of care, dated June 11, 2022, and last revised May 22, 2024, revealed that the resident required dialysis related to end stage renal failure along with a care planned approach to have emergency clamp kept at bedside for access site,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of 15 residents sampled (Resident 59). Findings include: A review of Resident 59's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a loss of cognitive functioning that can make it difficult for someone to perform daily activities). Further review of Resident 59's clinical record revealed that the resident exhibited behaviors, including making statements regarding suicidal ideations. Review of Resident 59's care plan, initiated by the facility on May 18, 2024, did not indicate that the resident had a behavioral problem. The resident's care plan did not address the resident's specific behavioral problems or symptoms that were noted in the nursing documentation. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to assure timely receiving of a prescribed antibiotic medication for one resident out of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 115). Findings include: Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 115, was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection and sepsis (extreme immune response to infection that can lead to tissue damage, organ failure, or death if not treated right away). A physician order dated August 8, 2024, at 12:44 PM was noted for Ceftazidime (an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) 1000 MG intravenously (a method of administering a substance, such as medicine or fluid, into a vein through a needle or tube) two times per day for urinary tract infection for three days. Review of a Scheduling Detail Report dated August 8, 2024, noted that the first dose was to be administered on August 8, 2024, at 10:00 PM. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-26 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the results of facility water testing for safe drinking water and interviews with laboratory staff and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to comply with requirements from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture and Pennsylvania Drinking Water Information System (PADWIS) in conjunction with the Title 25 Pa. Code Chapter 109 Subchapter C Monitoring Requirements relating to Title 40, Code of Federal regulations 40 CFR. Findings included: According to the PADWIS the facility received violations regarding the failure to monitor/report routine samples for specific contaminates for 30 types of contaminates resulting in a violation for each contaminant on July 23, 2024. Interview with the Certified Water Systems Operator/Laboratory Director on July 26, 2024, at 10:30 AM revealed that the facility was required to have SOC (synthetic organic chemical) testing of their drinking water. The SOC samples were to be performed once every three years during the second quarter of the year. The Lab Director stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to store food items under sanitary conditions in the facility's kitchen and two of two resident pantry areas (first and second floors). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Receiving and Storage, policy and procedure review date of January 29, 2024, included the following but not limited to: Food items and snacks kept on the nursing units must be maintained as indicated below: a. All food items to be kept below 41 degrees F must be placed in the refrigerator located at the nurses' station and labeled with a use by date. b. All foods belonging to residents must be labeled with the resident's name, the item and the ''use by' date. c. Refrigerators must have working thermometers and be monitored for temperature according to state-specific guidelines. d. Beverages must be dated when opened and discarded after twenty-four (24) hours. e. Other opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage. f. Partially eaten food may not be kept in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide physician ordered nutritional supplementation as prescribed to promote adequate nutritional status and paramaters of three out of 11 sampled residents sampled (Residents A4, A5, and A6 ). Findings include: A review of Resident A4 clinical record revealed a physician's order dated February 13, 2024 for Ensure, a nutritional supplement, scheduled for administration to the resident at 2:00 PM daily. It was noted that the supplement will be labeled in the medication room and Boost, another nutritional supplement product, was allowed as a substitution. During an observation of the first floor medication room on March 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM revealed three nutritional supplements, two Boost supplements and one Ensure supplement labeled with Resident A4's name and dated for administration to the resident on March 15, March 16, and March 17, 2024. However, a review of Resident A4's MAR (medication administration record) revealed that staff documented that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to store and maintain oxygen equipment in a safe, functional and sanitary manner on the second floor nursing unit and in the general storge area. Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy, provided during the survey ending March 26, 2024, entitled Oxygen Storage Policy revealed oxygen tanks are to be stored in an area that is well ventilated, dry and away from sources of heat, open flames or flammable materials. Empty tanks can be stored in a secured medication room and or treatment room until maintenance and or designee is notified to collect and take the designated to the storage location. An observation on March 26, 2024, at 9:30 AM revealed four oxygen cylinders located in the medication/panty area on the second floor. Two of the cylinders had white plastic caps on the valve posts of the metal oxygen cylinder to indicate the cylinder was not used or full. The other two cylinders had regulators (device attached to oxygen tank post used to deliver the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adherence to use by/expiration dates of pharmaceutical products in the facility's central supply room. Findings include: Observations of the facility's central supply room on [DATE], at approximately 10:00 AM revealed 35 bottles of Hydrogen Peroxide that expired [DATE]. There were 10 IV starter kits that expired [DATE]. An interview with DON (director of nursing) on [DATE], at the time of the observation confirmed the pharmacy supplies expired and should have been discarded. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on [DATE] at approximately 3:30 PM confirmed expired pharmacy products should have been removed from the storage room and discarded. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify a resident's representative of a significant change in condition and the need to potentially commence a new form of treatment for one resident out of 17 sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated October 9, 2023, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A nursing note dated December 28, 2023, at 7:38 PM revealed that the resident was seen by the physician and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medications to one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 4). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understanding and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. 21.148 Standards of nursing conduct (a) A licensed practical nurse shall: (5) Document and maintain accurate records. A review of the clinical record of Resident 4 revealed admission to the facility on February 6, 2024, with diagnoses, which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and information provided by the facility it was determined the facility failed to ensure that essential heating equipment was maintained in safe and functional operating condition affecting at least five resident rooms out of 40 resident rooms in the facility (room [ROOM NUMBER], 105, 107, 108 and 210) and failed to maintain resident care equipment, tubs and showers, in operating condition on one of two floors (first floor). Findings include: A review of weather temperatures for the facility's locality revealed that the outdoor temperatures were at a high of 14 degrees Fahrenheit on January 20, 2024. Interview with the facility's Maintenance Director during the survey of January 24, 2024, revealed that the facility's boiler went down on January 20, 2024, resulting in a lack of heat in five resident rooms in the building. The Maintenance Director stated the boiler has an automatic water feed that malfunctioned on that date. He stated when he arrived at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently maintain a safe environment for staff, residents and the public by failing to implement safe interim measures during a boiler malfunction resulting in the loss of heat in six resident rooms out of 40 resident rooms in the facility (Rooms 101,104, 105, 107, 108, and 210) Findings include: During interview conducted on January 24, 2024, at approximately 10 AM, the facility Maintenance Director stated during a boiler malfunction on Saturday Janaury 20, 2024, which resulted in the loss of heat to select resident rooms portable space heaters were used in resident rooms on January 20, 2024, and again on January 23, 2024, due to an issue with a heater in one resident's room. According to interview with the Maintenance Director on January 24, 2024, the facility's facility boiler system malfunctioned on January 20, 2024, which resulted in the failure to provide heat via PTAC systems (PTAC self-contained heating and air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and select facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility to consistently provide maintenance services to assure a clean, safe, orderly, and comfortable interior, including comfortable room temperatures, on two of two resident units (first and second floor) affecting six out of 40 resident rooms in the facility (Rooms 101,104, 105, 107, 108, and 210) Findings included: During a tour of the facility conducted on January 24, 2024, random interviews were conducted with residents residing on both the second between 9 AM and 11 AM. Multiple residents reported that during the past weekend, Saturday January 20, 2024, and Sunday Janaury 21, 2024, the heat was not working in the facility and that it was very cold inside the building. A review of the weather forecast for the facility's locality on January 20, 204, revealed that the temperature was approximately 14 degrees Farenheit with a lower wind chill temperature. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select facility incident reports, and information submitted by the facility, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 8 resident sampled was free from physical abuse (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of facility's abuse policy Policy Interpretation and Implementation last revised by the facility August 2022, revealed that the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. With abuse being defined as Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's dietary services department failed to maintain acceptable sanitary practices when handling and preparing food and handling clean dishware/cookware to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During a tour of the dietary department, in the presence of the dietary manager, conducted on January 3, 2024, at 10:25 AM, revealed that there were two bearded dietary employees without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in resident areas on two of two resident units (First floor and Second floor nursing units) Findings include: Observations on the First Floor Nursing Unit on September 12, 2023, at approximately 11:00 AM, revealed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the molding next to the heating and cooling unit was peeling off. The plaster on the wall next to the heating and cooling unit was crumbling. The vinyl floor was worn through, and black marks were showing and several of the vinyl floor planks were lifting from the flooring beneath. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the baseboard heater covers were dented scratched and falling off the units. There was a hole in the vinyl flooring. There was a black mold-like substance in the corner on the ceiling and wall by the window. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the molding was peeling away from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan to address the behavioral health needs of two of 15 sampled residents (Residents 34, and 30). Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 34 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including alzheimer's disease. Further review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed that the resident exhibited multiple behaviors, including exit seeking, physically aggressive with staff, and hypersexual behaviors. Resident 34 was noted to have an increase in these behaviors beginning July 2023, according to a review of progress notes, culminating in multiple incidents including August 26, 2023, resident was the perpetrator in a sexual incident with a resident in which he grabbed a female resident's breasts, and on September 2, 2023, the resident eloped from facility. Review of Resident 34's nursing progress notes in the resident's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store patient care equipment in an orderly and sanitary manner to maintain the equipment in safe operating condition. Findings include: A tour of the facility's resident storage area on September 12, 2023, at approximately 9:00 AM revealed a 2 bay garage the facility used to store resident equipment. Inside the storage area revealed multiple resident mattresses and wheelchairs that were covered in dirt and debris. The mattresses were lying directly on the dirty concrete floor. some of the mattresses and wheelchairs were coated with a fuzzy mold-like film. The storage area felt very damp and had a strong mildew smell. Outside of the garage area there was resident bedside and overbed tables, a bed alarm pad, and an air mattress and air pump covered in water and debris. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on September 12, 2023, at 9:30 AM revealed NHA was unable to explain why the resident care equipment was stored in this manner and that it should be properly stored and maintained to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment on the facility grounds. Findings include: Observations of the facility grounds by the double garage that the facility calls the boat house on September 12, 2023, at approximately 9:00 AM revealed broken tile, broken pieces of wood, water saturated sheet rock, a medical basin filled with water and algae, multiple pieces of construction material strewn throughout the ground, disposable medical gloves, a headboard to an electric bed, bags and boxes of garbage, broken pallets, plastic pieces, large plastic bins, broken metal folding chairs, a rusty pickaxe, a tub of chlorine tablets, garbage strewn through out the ground, clumps of wet paper, plastic bags, a broken garage door, a large wire rack, and multiple five gallon buckets. During an interview on September 12, 2023, at approximately 9:30 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator stated she was unaware of the condition of the facility grounds and confirmed the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, information submitted by the facility and the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from sexual abuse as evidenced by one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41) Findings include: Review of facility abuse policy titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation last revised in August 2022, revealed that the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Sexual abuse is defined as, but not limited to, non-consensual sexual harassment, sexual coercion, contact or sexual assault. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life) According to the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of clinical records, select facility policy, resident incident/accident reports and information submitted by the facility and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision and effective safety measures to prevent a resident's elopement one resident (Resident 34) and failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards resulting in a fall for one resident (Resident 14) out of 15 reviewed. Findings included: A review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on October 7, 2022, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of resident 34's clinical record revealed an elopement assessment completed on July 11, 2023, due to an increase in exit seeking behavior displayed by the resident. The resident was assessed to be at high risk for elopement. A wanderguard bracelet was applied to the resident's left ankle on July 10, 2023. Review of resident's clinical record revealed that the resident displayed consistent behaviors of attempting to leave the second floor of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prevention policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement written and procedures for screening prospective residents to ensure the facility is aware of the necessary services required to care for one out of 10 residents sampled. (Resident 1). Findings include: Federal regulatory intent under CFR 483.12 (b) indicates that a facility must develop and implement policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent both abuse and neglect. This would include screening prospective residents to determine whether the facility has the capability and capacity to provide the necessary care and services for each resident admitted to the facility. Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, diabetes, and acquired absence of right leg above the knee. Resident 1 had resided out of state prior to admission. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the care plan of one resident out of 10 reviewed included planned interventions for staff implementation to maintain the desired outcome of the safety of others (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included congestive heart failure, diabetes, and acquired absence of right leg above the knee. Further review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was a convicted sex offender, involving a child. An interdisciplinary team care plan note dated April 18, 2023, at 10:10 a.m. revealed that during discharge planning discussion, Resident 1's wife stated that she will not have her husband home with her because, there is a small problem. The landlord doesn't want him. According to the documentation, it was brought to the facility's attention that Resident 1 was on the convicted sex offender…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and incident reports, observations and staff and interview it was determined that the facility failed to timely and consistently provide services necessary to prevent pressure sore development and promote healing for one out of 10 residents sampled with pressure injuries (Resident CR1). Findings included: Review of Resident CR1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified dementia [a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life], unspecified psychosis [is the term for a collection of symptoms that happen when a person has a disconnection from reality and can occur due to different mental and physical conditions], and kidney disease. A review of the resident's initial admission/readmission assessment section 8 - skin evaluation dated May 8, 2023, at 12:22 PM, indicated that the resident was at high risk for the development of pressure ulcers due to occasional moisture with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the clinical necessity of an indwelling urinary catheter for of one out of 10 sampled (Resident CR1). Findings included: Review of a facility entitled Urinary Continence and Incontinence - Assessment and Management indicated that the staff and practitioner will appropriately screen for and manage individuals with urinary incontinence and that management of incontinence will follow relevant clinical guidelines. The physician and staff will provide appropriate services and treatment. Indwelling urinary catheters will be used sparingly, for appropriate indications only. As part of the initial and ongoing assessments, the nursing staff and physician will screen for information related to urinary continence. Examples of sources of such information may include the resident, family, or a hospital discharge summary describing placement of an indwelling catheter during a recent hospitalization. As…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and transfer notices and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notices of facility initiated transfers to the resident and the residents' representative that were written in a language that was easily understood for three out of 11 residents reviewed (Residents CR1, A7, and A8). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident CR1 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on March 22, 2024, and did not return to the facility. A review of the resident's Notice of Transfer or Discharge letter revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital due to respiratory distress. A review of the clinical record of Resident A7 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on March 25, 2024, and returned to the facility on March 25, 2024. A review of the resident's Notice of Transfer or Discharge letter revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital due to tachycardia and hypotension. A review of the clinical record of Resident A8 revealed the resident was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and written notices of facilit initiated transfers and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficiently detailed written notices of facility initiated transfers to the resident and the residents' representative for three out of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3) by failing to identify the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 1 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on January 30, 2024, and returned to the facility on January 30, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 2 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on February 7, 2024, and returned to the facility on February 11, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 3 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on February 5, 2024, and returned to the facility on February 9, 2024. Further review of these residents' clinical records revealed that the written transfer notices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$61,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $61,593 — penalty dated 2024-01-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-03 for 22 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AKIKO IKE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONNERY, DONNA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 02/15/2022 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.