No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

409 Park Avenue, Adamsville, TN 38310 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (731) 632-3301 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (731) 632-3301 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
710 E Main St · (731) 632-3383 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
347 E Main St · (731) 632-0995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
223 E Main St · (731) 632-0785 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Adamsville City Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.1%14.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%6.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%13.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication63.1%31.7%18.9%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%16.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%79.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.4%22.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.781.671.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.041.561.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.4%CMS range 44.1–63.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.1–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.0–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
42.0%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-30)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen sanitation when a black slimy substance was found inside 1 of 3 (500-hall ice machine) ice machines observed. There were 8 residents on the 500-hall who had the potential to be affected. The findings include: Observation of the 500-hall ice machine on 7/29/2025 at 3:05 PM, revealed a black slimy substance noted on the right and left inside walls of the ice machine and along the length of the ice tray. Observation and interview of the 500-hall ice machine on 7/29/2025 at 3:30 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the black slimy substance was there and stated, .I see what you are talking about. That should not be there. During an interview on 7/30/2025 at 8:09 AM, the Administrator stated, . We don't have a policy or procedure for cleaning the ice machine. During an interview on 7/30/2025 at 10:19 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor was asked who is responsible for cleaning and maintaining the ice machines. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, .A company named [named company] comes every 3 months to clean and service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and to monitor the oxygen flow rate for 2 of 2 (Resident #11 and #27) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Providers Orders, revealed .This facility shall use uniformed guidelines for the ordering of medication.Medication should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe.Each medication order should be documented with the date, time, and signature of the person receiving the order. The order should be recorded on the physician order sheet, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of the undated facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revealed .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice.Oxygen is administered under order of a physician .Equipment setting for the prescribed flow rates. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 1 of 5 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A) failed to disinfect reusable resident equipment for 1 of 5 (Resident #61) residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident- Care Equipment, revealed Resident-care equipment can be a source of indirect transmission of pathogens. Reusable resident-care equipment will be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with current CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommendations in order to break the chain of infection. Cleaning is the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces and normally is accomplished manually or mechanically using water with detergents or enzymatic products. Disinfection is a process of eliminating microorganisms, except spores, from inanimate objects, usually by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Geriatric Medication Handbook, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when 1 of 6 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) failed provide a substantial snack or meal within 15 minutes of insulin administration for Resident #60. The failure to provide a substantial snack or meal within 15 minutes of insulin administration resulted in a significant medication error. The findings included: The GERIATRIC MEDICATION HANDBOOK, 13TH edition, provided by the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists, page 41 and 43, revealed .DIABETES: INJECTABLE MEDICATIONS .Novolog .Insulin aspart .Rapid-Acting Insulin Analog .Onset .15 min [minutes] .ADMINISTRATION/COMMENTS . 15 minutes prior to meals .NovoLog .Insulin Aspart .Rapid-Acting Insulin .ONSET .15 min .ADMINISTRATION/COMMENTS .5-10 minutes before meals . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #60 had diagnoses of Dementia, Diabetes, Heart Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were properly labeled and dated, external and internal medications were not stored together, and medications were not stored past their expiration date in 4 of 11 medication storage areas (100/200 Hall Medication Cart, 200/500 Hall Medication Cart, 400 Hall Medication Cart, and 400 Hall Treatment Cart). The findings include: Observation of the 400 Hall Medication Cart on 8/2/2021 at 12:01 PM, revealed the following: a. 2 open undated Lidocaine vials b. 1 open Ultratuss bottle (a medication taken by mouth) in the same drawer as Theraworx Relief cream (a topical medication) Observation of the 200/500 Hall Medication Cart on 8/2/2021 at 4:53 PM, revealed the following: a. 1 open undated Semglee Insulin b. 1 open undated Humulin N Insulin vial During an interview on 8/2/2021 at 4:53, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed when insulins are opened, the staff should record open dates on the insulin. Observation of the 100/200 Hall Medication Cart on 8/3/2021 at 4:11 PM, revealed the following: a. 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was distributed and served in a sanitary manner when 1 of 11 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 ) did not perform hand hygiene between serving residents and after touching contaminated surfaces, and placed dirty meal trays in a clean meal cart with other residents' meal trays. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand-hygiene technique, revealed .if hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub for .after contact with inanimate objects (e.g. medical equipment) in the immediate vicinity of the resident; and/or after removing gloves . Review of the facility's Inservice Education form dated 6/10/2021, revealed .Hand hygiene before & [and] after EVERY res [resident] room during meal tray pass .Hand hygiene (soap and water or alcohol gel) must be performed before passing ice or serving meal trays and in between each tray . Observation of the facility's 500 Hall new admission isolation hall during dining, revealed the following: a. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment as evidenced by strong malodorous odors on 1 of 5 halls (200 Hall). The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Housekeeping and Maintenance Department Responsibilities, revealed .It is important to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for our residents .Areas of the building will need to be cleaned at a moment's notice .If body fluids are found on floor, furniture .they will need to be cleaned immediately . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 12/2017, revealed .It is our belief that you as a resident have the right to expect certain standards of care and considerations while at our facility. You have the right to .Considerate and respectful care . Observation of 200 Hall on 8/2/2021 at 9:12 AM, 10:25 AM, 3:44 PM and 4:40 PM, revealed a strong malodorous odor present. Observation of 200 Hall on 8/3/2021 at 7:12 AM, 8:22 AM and 3:34 PM, revealed a strong malodorous odor present.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy during 1 of 1 meeting with active Resident Council members. The findings include: Observations in the Sunroom on 10/15/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the Resident Council Meeting location was not completely private. A bi-fold screen was used to block the entrance from hall 500 to the Sunroom but was accessible to anyone on the 500 Hall. During the meeting there were three interruptions: a. A resident on the 500 Hall folded the bi-fold screen, wheeled through the Sunroom to the 200 Hall, and exited through the double doors to the 200 Hall. b. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) from the 500 Hall folded the bi-fold screen, wheeled a resident through the sunroom to the 200 Hall, and exited through the double doors to the 200 Hall. c. The Activity Director entered the room during the meeting and assisted one of the residents to leave the room. Interview with Activity Assistant #2 on 10/17/19 at 9:36 AM in the 400 Hall, Activity Assistant #2 stated, The Resident Council Meeting should never be interrupted.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance resident dignity and respect when 5 of 23 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #4, #6, #7, and #9) facility staff members referred to clothing protectors as bibs, did not use courtesy titles to address residents, used a personal cell phone while assisting a resident with a meal, stood over a resident to assist with a meal, and failed to knock before entering a resident's room. The findings included: 1. The facility's Assisting with Meals policy documented, .Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs .not standing over residents while assisting them with meals .avoiding the use of labels .bibs . The facility's Quality of Life-Dignity policy revised August 2009 documented, .shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times .staff shall knock and request permission before entering residents' room .Staff shall speak respectfully to residents at all times .addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not 'labeling' .demeaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the survey results were readily accessible for all residents residing in the facility. The facility had a census of 98 residents. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated Resident Rights policy documented, .results of the most recent survey of the Center conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect to the Center. The Center must make the results available for examination in a place readily accessible to residents . 2. Observations in the Lobby on 10/14/19 at 9:05 AM and 10/15/19 at 11:42 AM, revealed a white binder labeled .Survey Results The results from surveys on 6/10/19, 7/2/19, and 8/30/19 were not available for the residents to review. Interview with the Administrator on 10/16/19 at 4:46 PM, in the Lobby, the Administrator was asked if the survey results were in the survey book from the surveys conducted (June, July, and Sept of 2019). The Administrator stated, .no they are not in there . The Administrator was asked if the survey results should be in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, 1 of 2 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 4) failed to follow facility policy for administration of medications through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted into the stomach for nutrition and medication) when medications were pushed through the enteral tube and not allowed to flow per gravity. The findings included: The facilities Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube policy revised March 2015 documented, .Administer medication by gravity flow . Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Contracture, Alzheimer's Disease, Convulsions, Anxiety Disorder, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Seizures, and Paralytic Syndrome. The Physician's Order dated 2/6/19 documented, .Thera liquid give 10 ml [milliliter] .peg .once a day .probiotic formula capsule .once daily . The Physician's Order dated 8/19/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for wound care treatments for 1 of 4 (Resident #70) sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Seizures, Morbid Obesity, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Diabetes with Diabetic Neuropathy, Anemia, Constipation, Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease, Osteoarthritis, Cerebral Infarction, Edema, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 required staff assistance for all activities of daily living, and had Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). The care plan dated 2/25/19 documented, .at risk for skin breakdown r/t [related to] decreased mobility, incontinence .Intervention .Treatments as directed . The Physician's Orders dated 10/7/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility staffing schedules and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility had a census of 98 residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Interview with Resident #31 on 10/14/19 at 3:07 PM, in Resident #31's room, Resident #31 was asked about staffing at the facility. Resident #31 stated, Not at night time especially. They say it's just 1 or 2 [staff members] at night. Resident #31 was asked if he had to wait a long time for someone to help him if he called for help. Resident #31 stated, .takes an hour or 2 and sometimes 3 or 4, takes a long time . Even sometimes in the daytime they don't come as quick as they should. 2. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE 69th EDITION, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications administered were appropriately monitored for adverse effects for 1 of 6 (Resident #16) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. The PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE 69th EDITION 2015 documented, .levothyroxine [thyroid hormone replacement medication] .INDICATIONS AND USAGE .Hypothyroidism .Pituitary TSH [Thyroid Stimulating Hormone] Suppression .PRECAUTIONS .has a narrow therapeutic index .Regardless of the indication for use, careful dosage titration is necessary to avoid the consequence of over- or under-treatment .These consequences include .effects on .cardiovascular function, bone metabolism .cognitive function, emotional state, gastrointestinal function, and on glucose and lipid metabolism .The adequacy of therapy is determined by periodic assessment of appropriate labortory tests .frequency of TSH monitoring during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of the JoVE Science Education Database Nursing Skills. Preparing and Administering Intramuscular Injections, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and #3) nurses administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). A total of 2 errors were observed out of 29 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 6.89%. The findings included: 1. The JoVE Science Education Database. Nursing Skills Preparing and Administering Intramuscular Injections documented, .The deltoid site [upper arm] .immunizations .maximum volume should never exceed 2 mL [milliliters] . The facilty's Administering Medications policy revised April 2019 documented, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .The Director of Nursing Services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions .Medications are administered in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the 2018 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. manufacturer's information, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered free from significant medication errors for 1 of 24 (Resident #70) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. The 2018 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. manufacturer's information documented, .Take TRADJENTA once a day . 2. The facility's Medication and Treatment Orders policy with a revision date of 7/2016, documented, .Orders for medications must include .Dosage and frequency of administration .Orders not specifying the number of doses, or duration of medication, shall be subject to automatic stop orders . 3. Medical record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Seizures, Morbid Obesity, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Diabetes with Diabetic Neuropathy, Anemia, Constipation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when 1 of 9 (500 Lower Hall Medication Cart) medication storage areas was unlocked and unattended. The findings included: The facility's Storage of Medications policy revised April 2019 documented .drugs and biologicals .are stored in locked compartments .unlocked medication carts are not left unattended . Observations in the 500 Hall on 10/15/19 at 8:16 PM, the 500 Lower Hall Medication Cart was left unlocked and unattended. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/17/19 at 2:41 PM, in the Conference Room, the DON was asked if medication carts are to be left unlocked. The DON stated, .no .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty hand-washing sink in the Kitchen, dishwashing racks stored on the floor in the Kitchen, opened, unlabeled and undated foods stored in the Kitchen and in 1 of 3 (100/200 Hall Nourishment Room) nourishment rooms, wet towel on the floor in the Kitchen, a dirty steam table in the Kitchen, raw chicken and frozen foods left sitting at room temperature in the Kitchen, and foods on the floor in the Kitchen. The facility had a census of 98 residents, with 91 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility's FOOD STORAGE policy with a revision date of 9/14/18, documented, .Food items should be stored, thawed, and prepared in accordance with good sanitary practice. Any expired or outdated food products should be discarded .Use use-by-dates on all food stored in refrigerators .Remember to cover, label and date .Chicken should be stored on ice to maintain an optimal temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation related to pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 (Resident #31) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and medication administration related to insulin and intravenous (IV) antibiotics for 2 of 6 (Resident #59 and #61) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. Review of the RAI Manual, 2016 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Updates, revealed that when a resident who is admitted to the nursing home without a pressure ulcer develops a pressure ulcer in the nursing home, is admitted to the hospital for acute condition changes and then readmitted to the nursing home with the same pressure ulcer, that pressure ulcer is not considered present on admission but is a facility acquired pressure ulcer. Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when isolation precautions were not followed for 1 of 2 (Resident #49) sampled residents reviewed and facility staff failed to protect resident's personal clothing from environmental contamination. The findings include: 1. The facility's Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions policy revised October 2018 revealed .when a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions, appropriate notification is placed on the room entrance door and on the front of the chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and the type of precaution .The signage informs the staff of the type of CDC [The Centers for Disease Control] (CDC) precaution(s), instructions for use of PPE [personal protective equipment], and/or instructions to see a nurse before entering the room . Medical record review revealed Resident #49 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AHAVA HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ADAMSVILLE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2019
BDV INV HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 11/26/2004
ECM HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 06/01/2019
NIEDERMAN, ANSHELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2019
HARDIN, JACKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2023
TREECE, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2025
EISEN, MENASHEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 8%Other / private 16%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$294per resident / day
operating cost
$8,939per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next