Laurelwood Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 48.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Maintenance Director Job Description review, https://weather.com review, National Library of Medicine website review, invoice review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe, clean, homelike, and comfortable environment with temperatures ranging from 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 81 degrees F when resident room temperatures were measured ranging from 53 degrees F to 65 degrees F in 8 of 35 (Resident #11, #13, #14, #20, #27, #34, #40, #42, #45, #47, and #51) resident rooms observed during initial tour. The facility's failure to prevent dangerously cold room temperatures placed Residents #11, #13, #45, and #47, who were vulnerable and cognitively impaired residents, at an immediate jeopardy risk for weather induced complications. The census was 47. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), (a situation in which the facility's noncompliance has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death) related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AMENDED 6.10.24 Based on policy review, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) review, medical record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was free of accidents and hazards when the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions to prevent falls for a resident with high risk of falls, supervise a cognitively impaired Resident, failed to monitor the Resident's condition post fall, and failed to provide care and services for 1 of 10 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for falls. Resident #42 is a moderately cognitively impaired Resident who was ambulatory with a walker, fell on [DATE], and had complaints of right hip pain documented on 10/19/2023. The facility failed to obtain the Xray until 10/25/2023, and failed to assess the Resident when the Resident complained of post fall pain on 10/19/2023, 10/20/2023, and 10/24/2023. Resident #42 was transferred to the hospital's emergency department (ED) 12 days after the fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, invoice review, medical record review, a list of residents who use the 100 Hall communal bathrooms, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote and ensure dignity and quality of life was met for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #14, #29, and #34) sampled for activities of daily living.The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed .The resident has the right to a dignified existence.The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences .The resident has the right to personal privacy .Personal privacy includes accommodations .personal care .The resident has a right to a.comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living. 2. Review of an Invoice provided by the facility dated 12/3/2025, revealed an order for 4 standard overhead braced toilet partitions (dividing wall or enclosure that separates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 4 of 4 communal bathrooms (100 Hall women's, 100 Hall men's, 200 Hall women's and 200 Hall men's) were observed with unsecured personal items, and without hand hygiene supplies, and when 2 of 2 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A and LPN B) failed to use proper infection control measures during medication administration.The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, dated 1/24/2025, revealed .All reusable items and equipment.shall be cleaned in accordance with our current procedures governing the cleaning.of soiled or contaminated equipment.Reusable items potentially contaminated.shall be placed in.clear plastic bag.Label bag. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed .Medications are administered.in accordance with professional standards of practice.in a manner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for 4 of 4 (100 Hall men's and women's and 200 Hall men's and women's) communal bathrooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed, .The resident has the right to a dignified existence.The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control Plan, dated 8/2017, revealed .Ensure compliance with state and federal regulations related to infection prevention and control.Monitor risk of transmission of infection by assuring proper policies and.procedures as it related to the use of medical.equipment.Ongoing evaluation and recommendations for Hand Hygiene.The infection control program will be managed by the Administrator and Director of Nursing.The Director of Nursing or designee.delegates or performs the following.Supervises the disinfection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when carbon covered cookware was used in the kitchen, the dishwasher thermometer failed to reach 120 degrees during the wash cycle, sanitation solution did not measure appropriately, when residents were served with unsanitary plates and silverware, when expired foods were found in the dry storage area and in the Emergency Food Supply. The facility had a census of 53, with 51 of those resident's receiving a lunch tray from the kitchen on 1/23/2025, and 49 receiving a breakfast tray on 1/24/2025. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Dishwasher Temperatures, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure dishes and utensils are cleaned under sanitary conditions through adequate dishwasher temperatures .low temperature dishwashers .wash temperature shall be 120 degrees F [Fahrenheit] .sanitizing solution shall be 50ppm (parts per million) hypochlorite (chlorine) on dish surface in final rinse .Chemical solutions shall be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide information to the residents regarding their right to refuse medical or surgical treatment or to formulate an advance directive for 6 of 24 (Resident #34, #40, #41, #42, #47 and #49) residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing .the resident understands .The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment .and to formulate an advance directive . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Epilepsy, and Anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #34 was rarely/never understood and cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. Review of the facility document Advanced Directive Acknowledgement, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have physician orders and failed to provide pressure ulcer/injury treatments for 1 of 4 (Resident #258) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injuries. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, .This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure ulcers .and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury .and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries .Licensed nurses will conduct a full body skin assessment on all residents upon admission/readmission .Findings will be documented in the medical record .the attending physician will be notified of .the presence of a new pressure ulcer upon identification . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #258 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Absence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to take appropriate actions in accordance with the facility's policy when a fall occurred for 1 of 3 (Resident #5) reviewed for falls. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, revealed .When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .Assess the resident .Complete a fall assessment .Complete an incident report .Notify physician and family .Review the resident's care plan and update as indicated .Document all assessments and actions .Obtain witness statements . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes, Disorganized Schizophrenia, Anxiety, Blindness, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/7/2025 revealed Resident #5 is at risk for falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube in the bladder that drains the urine) for 1 of 1 (Resident #258) sampled residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled Catheter Care, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use .Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel .Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use .Empty drainage bags when bag is half- full or at least each shift . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Gastrostomy, Alzheimer's Disease and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy for monitoring weekly weights for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for nutritional status. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight System, dated 3/4/2022, revealed .If weight concerns are noted/weights are not stable, notify your RD [Registered Dietician] and continue the weekly weights until stable . 2. Review of medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hypertension, Diabetes, Hyponatremia, Overweight, and Abnormality of Albumin. Review of the Physician Orders dated 3/12/2024, revealed .HOUSE SUPPLEMENT three times a day for give 6oz for increased calorie intake. end date 7/10/24 . Review of the Care Plan dated 5/24/2024, revealed .resident at nutrition risk related to diagnosis of diabetes mellitus .gradual weight loss .house supplement as ordered, regular texture diet with thin liquids .set up assist with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during medication administration when 1 of 3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A nurses failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when administering PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube medications and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities .High-contact resident care activities include .Device care or use: .feeding tubes . Review of the undated facility policy titled,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$168,961 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $42,445 — penalty dated 2026-01-22
• $126,516 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-29 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AHAVA HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $692K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN