Wexford House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 123.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of facility investigation and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revealed .it is the policy of this facility to provide .procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse .Abuse .includes .mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology .The facility will designate an Abuse Coordinator in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse .to the state survey agency .The facility Abuse Coordinator will be the Administrator . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Lumbar Spina Bifida, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, and Artificial Opening of Urinary Tract, the resident discharged to a hospital on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and interview, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies to maintain and ensure manufacturers guidelines were followed for testing of chemical sanitation for dishwasher use. The findings include: Review of the facility's Dishmachine Temperature Record (Low Temperature Machine) for the month of 6/2025, revealed chlorine rinse recordings of 50 were documented each day, 6/1/2025 - 6/13/2025 for the breakfast, lunch and dinner meals. During an observation on 6/16/2025 at 10:43 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), was observed having difficulty reading the strips. The CDM asked this surveyor how to read the strip, then asked .what is it supposed to read .? The CDM asked Dietary Aide A, to test the chemical results in the rinse cycle and instructed Dietary Aide A to place on water spots on the pan. During an observation on 6/16/2025 at 10:44 AM of the QT-10 Hydrion container guide for testing strips for the parts per million (ppm), revealed 0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 however, a reading of 50 was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen cooking equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions which had the potential to affect 80 of 81 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pots and Pans-Sanitizing, revealed .scrape food particles form [from] pots and pans .scrub pots and pans .rinse pots and pans free .store in proper storage area . Review of the facility's work order for ice machine maintenance revealed the ice machine was cleaned 2 times per year. During an observation of the ice machine on 6/16/2025 at 9:56 AM, revealed a black substance on the rim of a white panel above and touching the ice contained in the ice machine. During an observation of the hand washing area on 6/16/2025 at 9:58 AM, revealed no paper towels in the dispenser. During an observation and tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 6/16/2025 at 10:00 AM, revealed the following: 1. Large barrel trash can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident personal refrigerator logs were kept up to date and temperatures were within facility policy recommendations, and failed to ensure expired foods were not available for resident use for 5 residents (Resident #17, #39, #51, #58, and #64) of 11 resident refrigerators observe. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Refrigerators, revealed .refrigerators are allowed in a resident's room under the following conditions: refrigerator maintains proper temperatures .facility staff shall record refrigerator temperatures daily on a temperature log .temperatures will be below 41 [degrees] [Fahrenheit] [(F)] .foods with use-by dates shall be discarded accordingly . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Hemiplegia, Muscle Weakness, Diabetes, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of an annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 resident (Resident #19) of 81 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia, Dysphagia, and Intracranial injury. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 was severely impaired of cognitively skills of daily decision making. During an observation on 6/16/2025 at 11:28 AM, in Resident #19's room, revealed a large piece of wallpaper was missing from the wall beside Resident #19's bed. Further observation revealed a large area of missing paint from the wall beside the head of the resident's bed. Continued observation revealed the wallpaper was peeling away from the baseboard on the wall by the window. During an observation and interview in Resident #19's room on 6/18/2025 at 10:37…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to tobacco use for 1 resident (Resident #14) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan/ Comprehensive Assessment, dated 4/4/2025, revealed .residents will have a comprehensive assessment that determines their functional status, strengths, weaknesses, needs/ preferences .care plan must .includes .initial goals .any services and treatments to be administered . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to facility on 5/9/2023 with diagnoses including Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Hypertension. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #14 used tobacco products.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, review of the facility's Narcotic (a category of perception-altering or sensory-dulling drugs that are regulated in schedules according to their abuse risk with schedule 1 being the highest abuse risk and 5 being the lowest abuse risk) Destruction Logs (form containing the name of a resident and the name of a controlled medication with the number of tablets remaining), and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility policy regarding the disposition and destruction of narcotics. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Destruction of Unused Drugs, undated, revealed .The actual destruction of drugs conducted by our facility must be witnessed by the consultant pharmacist and one of the following individuals: a. An agent of the State Board of Pharmacy; b. The facility administrator; or c. The director of nursing services . Review of Narcotic Destruction Logs dated [DATE] to [DATE], revealed the Narcotic Destruction Log provided a listing of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices related to hand hygiene were followed during meal service when the staff failed to offer hand hygiene assistance to 3 residents (Resident #178, Resident #34, and Resident #16) of 10 residents observed during meal tray distribution on 1 of 4 hallways. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revealed .all staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection .hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in .the attached hand hygiene table .[hand hygiene table] condition .before and after eating . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pelvis Fracture, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Anemia. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #178 revised 5/26/2025, revealed .self-care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen cooking equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition which had the potential to affect 82 of 86 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pots and Pans-Sanitizing, showed .scrape food particles form [from] pots and pans .scrub pots and pans .rinse pots and pans free .store in proper storage area . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Sanitization of Equipment, showed .wipe up spills .using clean sanitizing solution .wash .inside and outside and front .scrub interior and exterior .door frames .hinge areas . During an observation of the clean dish storage area on 3/18/2024 at 10:15 AM, with the Food Service Manager (FSM), showed one large sheet pan with crusty, greenish-brown food debris present to outer edge of the pan. During an observation of the cooking area on 3/18/2024 at 10:25 AM, with the FSM, showed the following: -Hot food holding cabinet had dried, black, greasy food debris present around the door handle and on the bottom,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained residents' dignity when residents were served milk products in disposable cartons for 9 residents (Residents #20, #84, #6, #18, #19, #23, #33, #43, and #85) on 3 of 5 hallways observed for meal tray distribution and failed to maintain resident's dignity during feeding for 1 resident (Resident #29) of 3 residents observed for feeding. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, PATIENT/RESIDENT RIGHTS, revised on 7/14/2023, showed .All persons involved in the care of a patient/resident shall respect and support the patient/resident's right to competent, considerate, and courteous treatment or service within our capacity . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dining, revised on 12/2023, showed .The dining experience will be safe and satisfying for the resident .Seating promotes sociable, friendly dining .Residents are assisted in a dignified and timely manner . Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AHAVA HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN