Henderson Health And Rehabilitation Center
412 Juanita Drive Po Box 223, Henderson, TN 38340 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (731) 989-7598 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $81,328 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.7% | 14.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 6.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 13.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.8% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 42.6% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.4% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.1% | 16.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 79.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 22.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 1.67 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 1.56 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.1%CMS range 31.4–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.1–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.0–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident environment that was safe, clean and sanitary to prevent the spread of disease-causing organisms and infections when Resident #5 who had wounds infected with maggots, was observed handling linens and propelling throughout the facility with the drainage/maggots leaking onto the floor from his wheelchair and when 3 of 70 sample residents (Resident #12, #13 and #14) reviewed for infection control. The facility had a census of 70. A partial extended survey was conducted 11/1/2023 through 11/2/2023. Immediate Jeopardy (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) was identified related to Resident #5, whose wounds were infected with maggots and had drainage, was observed propelling in his wheel chair and draining fluids and maggots onto the facility floor, when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, timeanddate.com, medical record review, fall investigation review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired resident at risk of elopement, and ensure a safe environment for 2 of 7 (Resident #16 and #11) sampled residents reviewed for accidents, and supervision. On 10/31/2023 Resident # 16 exited the facility through the front exit door, by a visitor who entered the door code, opened the door, and let Resident #16 outside into the courtyard, an unsafe environment. Resident #16 was observed knocking on the 300/400 Hall exit door approximately 174.1 feet from the front door. The temperature outside was 46 degrees. The facility failed to conduct appropriate elopement assessments and elopement drills on all shifts with the elopement on 10/31/2023. The facility's failure to prevent a resident with known exit seeking behaviors from eloping to an unsafe environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #16. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Job Description, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention program to prevent the development and transmission of infection when Resident #5, whose wounds were infected, with maggots, and draining, was observed propelling in his wheel chair and draining onto the facility floor and when Resident #5 was observed to be scratching and touching his wounds with his hands, and then touching towels/linens on the clean linen cart. The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control practice for 3 of 3 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2 and #3) CNAs observed to perform personal hygiene care. The facility had a census of 70. The facility's failure to prevent the development and transmission of potential infection when Resident #5, who had wounds infected with maggots, was observed propelling himself throughout the facility, and large amount of drainage/maggots was noted to leak on the floor placed residents at risk,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 (Resident #13) sampled residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed .Medications are administered by licensed nurses.as ordered by the physician.verify dose.administer medication as ordered.Sign Mar [Medication Administration Record] after administered [medications]. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Uropathy, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/31/2025, revealed .Gentamicin Sulfate Solution [an antibiotic used to treat an infection] Inject 80 mg [milligrams] intramuscularly [IM] one time a day for UTI [Urinary Tract Infection] for 3 Days. Review of the Medication Administration Record for July 2025, revealed Gentamicin Sulfate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess nutritional status of residents, failed to follow the facility's policy for monitoring weights and failed to have a nutritional intervention provided timely for 2 of 4 (Resident #8 and #9) residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight System, revised 7/9/2025, revealed .Weekly weights are completed for.Significant weight change of 5% [percent] or more in 1 month or less, 7.5% in 3 months or 10% in 6 months.All weight changes are considered unplanned unless the MD [medical doctor] has documented a plan for desired weight change and the facility has care planned PRIOR to the weight change occurring.DON [Director of Nursing] or designee.will review monthly and weekly weights.Request reweights on a resident's weekly weight if a change greater than 2% change and on a resident's monthly weight if greater than 5%, 7.5% or 10% change is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders, provide care and services regarding oxygen therapy, and failed to assess residents for the use of oxygen for 2 of 3 (Resident #42 and #75) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revealed .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences.Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessments. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed .Medications are administered by licensed nurses.as ordered by the physician.verify dose.administer medication as ordered.Sign Mar [Medication Administration Record] after administered [medications]. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, manufacturer's guidelines review, maintenance history report review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to label and date food stored in the cooler and dry storage, and failed to ensure food stored for resident consumption was not expired. The facility had a census of 92 residents with 91 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Sanitation Inspection, revealed, .policy of this facility . conduct inspections to ensure food service areas are clean, sanitary and in compliance .All food service areas shall be kept clean, sanitary .inspections to be conducted .Dry storage .Freezer .Refrigerator .Food preparation area .General dietary observations . The facility was unable to provide a dietary policy for food storage. 2. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for the facility's ice machine dated 2018, revealed, .Cleaning/Sanitizing Procedure .This procedure must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance residents' dignity and respect during dining when 7 of 15 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) I,K,M,N,S, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H, and Registered Nurse (RN) E) failed to knock and/or announce self when entering resident rooms and failed to use courtesy titles when addressing residents during dining. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Courtesy Titles Policy, revealed .employees should be constantly cautious to avoid using first names when addressing residents regardless of how familiar they may become .Always use Mr. and Mrs. and do not use first names or nicknames .exceptions made .if the resident makes a special request .shall be documented in the medical record . 2. Observation during dining on 7/29/2024 at 11:58 AM, revealed CNA I placed the tray on Resident #71's bedside table and said, .Here darling . Observation during dining on 7/29/2024 at 12:00 PM, revealed CNA S placed the tray on Resident #53's over bed table and said,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 nurses (Registered Nurse (RN) F and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C) observed for tracheostomy care, and failed to obtain a physician's order for 1 of 3 (Resident #36) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, TRACHEOSTOMY CARE, dated 10/21/2022, revealed The facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy [a surgically created opening into the trachea that allows the person to breathe through a tube inserted into the opening] care .is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice .The facility will provide necessary respiratory care and services, such as oxygen therapy . tracheostomy care .Tracheostomy care will be provided according to physicians orders .Maintain .an Ambu…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medication records were in order and that an account of all controlled medications were maintained and reconciled for 3 of 6 Medication (Med) Storage Areas (501-506 Hall Cart, 507-514 Hall Cart, and 400 Hall Cart) and for 8 of 8 (Resident #14, #28, #30, #39, #67, #227, #277 and #376) random medication observations. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Controlled Substance Accountability, revealed It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure .In all cases, the dose noted on the usage form or entered into the automated dispensing system must match the dose recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), Controlled Drug Record, or other facility specified form and placed in the patient's medical record .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, C, and Registered Nurse (RN) E) nurses administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). A total of 10 errors were observed out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 34.48%. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in manner to prevent contamination or infection .Administer medication as ordered .Wash hands using facility protocol and product .If medication is a controlled substance, sign narcotic book . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration via Enteral Tube, revealed It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of medications via enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 3 of 15 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L, N, and O) observed during dining failed to perform hand hygiene, and when 1 of 6 staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C) failed to observe Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 6 (Resident #326) sampled residents and 2 of 4 (LPN B and C) nurses failed to clean reusable equipment during medication administration. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revealed .All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to .residents .This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility .Conditions [for performing hand hygiene] .Between resident contacts .After handling contaminated objects . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly and securely stored when 2 of 4 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B and C) left medications unattended and unsecured on the 400 Hall and 600 Hall Medication Carts. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Storage revealed .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e. [that is], medication carts .During medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medications storage area/cart . 2. Observation outside of Resident #327's room on 7/30/2024 at 12:33 PM, revealed LPN C left the medication cup with crushed Baclofen (treatment of muscle pain) on the 600 Hall Medication Cart unattended and unsecured while donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Observation in Resident #327's room on 7/30/2024 at 12:42 PM, revealed LPN C went to wash hands in the bathroom while the medications were on the overbed tray outside the bathroom at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly when there were unlabeled, undated, and expired items in 2 of 2 resident nourishment refrigerators. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated policy titled, Use or storage of food brought in by family or visitors, revealed .All food items .by the family or visitor brought in must be labeled . and dated .The facility may refrigerate labeled and dated .items in the nourishment refrigerator .If not consumed within 3 days, food will be thrown away by the facility staff . 2. Observation in the 500/600 Hall Nutrition Room on 7/29/2024 at 3:46 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G revealed the following in the residents' nourishment refrigerator: A cup of (named brand) ice cream unlabeled and undated. Three (3) tubs of (named brand) ice cream unlabeled and undated. A gallon of orange juice unlabeled and undated. 3. Observation in the 300/400 Nutrition Room on 7/30/2024 at 3:59 PM, with LPN H, revealed the following in the residents' nourishment refrigerator: A box of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in 6 of 70 (Resident #2, #3, #5, #6, #9, and #15) resident reviewed for flies in their rooms, the failure to prevent parasites or possible maggots for 1 of 70 (Resident #5) resident reviewed for maggots in the wound, and 3 of 4 (300-Hall, 400-Hall and 500-Hall) halls on 4 of 8 ( 10/24/2023, 10/25/2023, 10/30,2923 and 11/1/2023) days of onsite observations. The findings include: 1. Review of the Named Pest Control Contract dated 1/1/2023, revealed . [Name Pest Control Company] proposes to provide structural pest management services for the control of cockroaches, ants, rodents, silverfish and other structural pest infestations (with the exception of flies, fleas, bed bugs, mosquitoes and wood destroying organisms) by periodic treatment using products according to approved label procedures . 2. Review of medical record, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter was secured for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #6) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that indwelling urinary catheters that are inserted or remain in place are anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter, which can lead to urethral tears or dislodgement of the catheter . 2. Review of medical record, revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dysphagia, Alzheimer's, Heart Failure, Defibrillator, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder and Gastrostomy. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 6/12/2023, revealed Resident #6 had an indwelling urinary catheter (small tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Observation in the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$81,328 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $81,328 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AHAVA HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCE ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 04/28/2017 |
| LABIN, SHIYA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 04/28/2017 |
| NEUMAN, BENJAMIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 04/28/2017 |
| NIEDERMAN, ANSHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 04/28/2017 |
| JONES, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| KING, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| EISEN, MENASHE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| PHILIPSON, BENT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| PHILIPSON, GABRIELLE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| PHILIPSON, RAQUEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445471. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.