No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Austin Wellness & Rehabilitation

11406 Rustic Rock Drive, Austin, TX 78750 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (512) 335-5028 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$166,205 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $166,205 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13435 N Highway 183 · (512) 250-5300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12860 Research Blvd · (512) 506-9060 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
12860 RESEARCH BLVD
Park
11409 Rustic Rock Dr · (512) 974-6700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.1%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.5%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication10.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission5.7%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.9%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.882.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.462.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 5.6–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
61.3%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 88.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to: - Address or put in place new interventions when Residents #1 and #2 had a change-in-condition and began experiencing more frequent falls in a short time-frame. - Implement the new intervention of a helmet that was documented in a nursing noted for Resident #2 after a fall on 07/27/24. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 09/18/24 at 9:15 AM. While the IJ was removed on 09/19/24 at 3:55 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of harm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents' rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) experiencing falls. The facility failed to include frequent falls as a focus area to provide possible preventive interventions despite the resident having serious injuries from falls in his recent history, prior to admission and multiple falls since his admission. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 06/01/24 at 6:03PM and the facility was notified and given an IJ template. While the IJ was removed on 06/04/24 at 4:00 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have repeated falls without attempts to decrease the severity and frequency of falls that continued to occur despite the same two interventions used each time a fall occurred. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 06/01/24 at 6:03PM and the facility was notified and given an IJ template. While the IJ was removed on 06/04/24 at 4:00 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for falls possibly resulting in injuries including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement. Resident #1 walked out of the facility unattended on 03/15/2024 at about 9:00PM until the police found him at about 10:00 PM from a place approximately 1.5 miles away from the facility. EMS organized by the police to take him to the hospital and at the hospital it was confirmed that resident had hairline fracture above the left eye and cheek with lacerations on left eye lid, left wrist, and lower and upper lips, and abrasions on hands. The facility staff was not aware the resident was missing until the family called the facility. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 03/25/24 at 4:55 PM. The Administrator and DON were notified. The Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 03/25/24 at 6:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 03/27/24, the facility remained out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated, labeled, and sealed appropriately.The failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illnesses and food contamination.Findings included:Observations of the facility's kitchen refrigerator on 05/05/2026 at 9:23 a.m., revealed there was 1 sealed plastic container with cheese, it was not labeled or dated.Observation on 05/05/2026 at 9:36 a.m., revealed the ADS removing a cell phone from her pocket, she then placed it directly on the food preparation counter. Neither the cell phone nor the counter was sanitized before or after the cell phone was placed on the counter. Observation of the kitchen refrigerator on 05/07/2026 at 8:31 a.m., revealed there were 2 sealed plastic containers with cheese, they were not labeled or dated.Interview with the DS on 05/05/2026 at 9:18 a.m., revealed staff have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0839 — widespread
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 1 of 4 (ADON ) staff reviewed for staff qualifications. The facility failed to ensure ADON had a valid nursing license to practice and was not expired on [DATE].This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by a licensed nurse.The findings included:Record review of the staff roster for the facility indicated ADON had been employed at the facility since [DATE].Record review of the TBON license verification dated [DATE] indicated ADON was originally issued an LVN/LPN license on [DATE] and current expiration date was [DATE]. Record review of the license renewal application receipt issued by TBON indicated that the application for renewal was submitted by ADON with the required late fee, on [DATE]During an interview on [DATE] at 3:45pm the ADON stated she was notified by the facility on [DATE] that her license had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 4 of 34 residents (Residents # 3, # 36, #46 and # 56) reviewed for call lights.The facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible to Residents # 3, # 36, #46 and #56.These failures could place residents at risk of not being able to call for staff assistance to meet care needs or at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.Record review of a face sheet dated 05/07/2026 indicated that R #3 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy, (a neurological movement disorder characterized by high muscle tone (spasticity) causing severe stiffness and tightness, primarily affecting the legs more than the arms.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 8 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that shower curtains did not contain brown, unidentifiable substances and that the shelf in the shower room did not contain a yellow unidentifiable substance. These findings could place residents at risk for living in an environment that is not homelike. Findings included:A record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 5/07/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (manic depression), peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow), schizophrenia (mental health condition), generalized anxiety, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and mild cognitive impairment. A record review of Resident #13's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated minimally impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 5 of 8 residents (Resident #12, Resident #45 , Resident #86 , Resident #95 and Resident#57, ) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that :The oxygen cannula, nebulizer masks and tubing of Resident #36 and Resident #95 were stored safely in protective bags. 'oxygen in use sign board displayed in the rooms of Resident #12, Resident #57, and Resident #86These failures placed residents at risk for fire safety and respiratory infections through contamination.Findings included:Resident #36Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 05/06/26, reflected Resident #36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old female, diagnosed with acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 4 medication (Med) carts (Med cart 2100 and Med cart 2400) reviewed for storage.The facility failed to ensure MA B did not store his personal belongings in the Med cart 2100 and Med cart 2400on 05/06/26.These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving cross-contaminated medications.Findings included:During an observation and Interview on 05/06/26 at 11:35 AM MA B facilitated the surveyor in reviewing medication labelling and storage in the medication carts. During the inspection, it was revealed that a one-dollar currency notes and a pair of sunglasses belonging to MA B were stored in one of the drawers of Med Cart 2400. Observation of Med Cart 2100, a black backpack belonging to MA B was found stored in the bottom drawer. The backpack contained assorted personal belongings, including a personal medication organizer box. MA B stated it was a blunder on his part and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #30, #56 and #90) reviewed for hydration, in that: The facility failed to ensure R #30, R# 56, R #90 had access to water and/or beverages in their rooms between meals. These deficient practices could affect resident's hydration and lead to discomfort, dehydration, and/or a diminished quality of life. Record review of R# 30's face sheet dated 05/07/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/02/2025 with diagnoses which included: Hypertension (High pressure in the arteries (vessels that carry blood from the heart to the rest of the body). Symptoms vary from person to person and generally include unexplained fatigue and headache.) VASCULAR DEMENTIA, (A condition caused by the lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrients to a part of the brain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 3of 4 residents (Resident #45 Resident # 28 and Resident #56) reviewed for incontinence care and infection control.The facility failed to ensure that :CNA G and CNA H handling personal care items with clean gloves while providing incontinent care for Resident #45. MA I sanitized the blood pressure monitor before and in-between use on Resident #56and Resident #28, while obtaining blood pressure.This failure could place the residents at the facility at risk of transmission of disease and infection.Findings included:Resident #45Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 05/07/26, reflected Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 was an [AGE] year-old female, diagnosed with cerebrovascular disease, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and dementia. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to manage their financial affairs and to know in advance what charges a facility may impose against a resident's personal funds for 1 of 8 (Resident #70) residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to distribute Resident #70's personal needs allowance in full. This failure placed residents at risk of not having access to their funds and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: A record review of Resident #70's face sheet dated 5/07/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (neurocognitive disorder), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (progressive lung disease), major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic kidney disease. A record review of Resident #70's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 6, which indicated moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for privacy.The facility failed to ensure CNA G and CNA H provided privacy by closing the door and drawing the privacy curtain during incontinent care for Resident #45.This failure could place residents at risk of lack of privacy and not having residents' rights acknowledged.The findings include:Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 05/07/26, reflected Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 was an [AGE] year-old female, diagnosed with cerebrovascular disease (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and dementia.Record review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed BIMS 10 indicating her cognition was moderately impaired.Record review of Resident #45's care plan revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and the intervention was providing required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 of 8 (Resident #9 and Resident #34) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and Resident #34's nails were trimmed and clean. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and decreased quality of life.Findings included: A record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 5/07/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (neurocognitive disorder), cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, other reduced mobility, other lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. A record review of Resident #9's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that he was not assessed for a BIMS score.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #97) reviewed for skin assessments. The facility failed to assess Resident #97's skin weekly, as required by the facility's policy, from December 2025 to May 2026 This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified skin issues.Findings included: A record review of Resident #97's face sheet dated 5/07/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis), morbid (severe) obesity, and rhabdomyolysis (rapid breakdown of skeletal muscle). A record review of Resident #97's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 6, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. A record review of Resident #97's care plan dated 5/07/2026 reflected that she had potential for pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plan revisions.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's care plan was comprehensive and complete, reflecting his complex active medical conditions.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/20/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Coronary Artery Disease (Limited blood flow in the arteries of the heart) , End-Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Heart Failure, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus , Peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was completed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment, completed on 02/05/26.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/20/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Coronary Artery Disease (Limited blood flow in the arteries of the heart) , End-Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Heart Failure, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus , Peripheral Vascular Disease( blood circulation issues), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(acid reflux), Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete care plan that meets all of a resident's needs, with timeframes and actions that can be measured for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to develop Resident #1's care plan to reflect refusals of showers and interventions which included skin assessment and reduction of risk for skin breakdown. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.Findings include: During an interview with the DON on 01/10/2026 at 10:48 a.m., she said she was trained on completing care plans. She said the residents' participation in ADLs and if they refused care, this information should go on the care plan. She said the care plan should be updated and she did not know why Resident #1's care plan was not updated. She said if something was not on the care plan it could affect the quality of care for the residents. She said the DON, ADON and the social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed make sure that drugs are stored properly and only authorized persons have access for 1 of 3 medication carts (MC #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure MC #1 was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included: During an Observation of the nurses station on 01/10/2026 at 07:39a.m., revealed MC#1 was unlocked and unattended. RN A was sitting inside the nurses station out of view of the medication cart. Another RN walked past MC #1 and went into the nurses station and did not lock MC #1. Residents were walking by the unlocked medication cart. MC #1 contained residents prescribed creams, residents prescribed drugs, over the counter medication, narcotics, and injectable antibiotics. During an interview with RN A on 01/10/2026 at 07:43a.m., revealed that she had been trained on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and report the results of all investigations to the state survey agency within five working days of the incident for one (1) (Resident #1) of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged abuse incident reported by Resident #1 on 09/15/2025. The facility did not notify law enforcement.This deficient practice placed all residents at risk of harm from abuse due to not having a thorough investigation done for an alleged abuse.Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/16/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder ( is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the preferences and goals of each resident and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to develop Resident #1's comprehensive care plan to address all Resident #1's care needs. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan did not address the need for pain medication / management, risks for pressure ulcer development, assistance needed for ADL care, incontinence to bowel and bladder, medications Resident #1 was taking to manage disease processes, Hospice care, reason for oxygen therapy, DNR status, fall risk, elopement risks. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]and readmission of [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 3 or 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA A failed to change gloves when providing incontinent care to Resident #1 on 08/07/25.2. CNA B failed to conduct hand hygiene between glove changes and wiped from back to front while providing incontinent care to Resident #2 on 08/07/25.3. LVN C failed to change gloves after touching a soiled brief and before applying a clean brief to Resident #3 on 08/07/25.Thes failures could place incontinent residents at risk for infection.The findings included:1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/07/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 05/14/24. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure the environment was clean, sanitary and homelike for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for environment, in that:. 1. There was a strong smell of urine throughout the facility. These failures could place residents at risk for not living in a comfortable and homelike environment, affecting their rights. Findings include: On 05/05/2025 beginning at 10:00AM an observation was conducted of the facility that revealed a strong urine odor in the front of the building and throughout the halls of the facility. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet indicated that Resident #3 is a [AGE] year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 has a diagnosis of Hepatitis A without Hepatic Coma (viral hepatitis that does not result in a coma) ,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for 7 of 12 (Resident # 4, Resident #27, Resident #41, Resident # 48, Resident # 66, Resident # 76 and Resident #186) residents reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to promote Resident # 4, Resident #27, Resident #41, Resident # 48, Resident # 66, and Resident # 76's dignity while dining when staff did not complete serving meals to one table at a time before moving to the next table to serve meals without finishing serving meals at the prior table. 2. The facility failed to promote Resident # 186's dignity when staff delivered her lunch meal and left the meal on the tray without setting it up or removing delivery tray. These failures put residents at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 5 of 30 residents (Residents #22, #81, #235, and #40) reviewed for advanced directives. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 22's admission face sheet included an accurate advanced directive, as it listed both Full Code and a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) on file. Resident # 22's care plan included documentation of the DNR on file. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 81 had documentation on file in their records concerning their wishes on their advance directive status. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 235 had documentation of their advanced directive on the admission face sheet, although the care plan included documentation wishing to be a Full Code. No Full Code documentation in Resident # 235 records. 4. The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents who consumed foods orally for 3 (Resident # 10, Resident # 35, and Resident # 42) of 10 residents reviewed for food preferences and for 1(Lunch on 3/4/25) of 5 meals observed in that: 1. The test tray of the lunch meal on 03/04/25 was unappetizing in appearance (no seasoning observed, and the pureed food items had all run together) a. the rolled silverware for the regular texture tray napkin was wet and soggy b. the pureed carrots for the pureed texture tray tasted only of very tart orange juice c. the pureed dinner roll tasted very doughy and underdone. 2. The facility failed to obtain food preferences for 3 residents (Resident # 10, Resident # 35, and Resident # 42). This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure DS J properly used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. 2. The facility failed to ensure DS L and DS H wore a beard guard while in kitchen. 3. The facility failed to ensure all foods were labeled and dated in the kitchen. 4. The facility failed to ensure all items were covered and stored properly in the kitchen. 5. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (cleaning the ice machine, cleaning the inside of the microwave, ensuring staff utilize hair restraints while in kitchen, ensuring trash receptacles in kitchen had lids secured covering contents, proper storage of ice scoop, ensuring cleaning schedules and logs were being utilized, ensuring hand sinks had paper towels, These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 3/3/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 8 staff reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A conducted hand hygiene when passing resident lunch trays . 2. The facility failed to ensure MA L sanitized the blood pressure cuff after checking a resident's blood pressure . 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA D, LVN B, and the AD conducted hand hygiene between residents during lunch tray pass . These failures could place residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #49's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included epilepsy (a group of non-communicable neurological disorders characterized by recurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #38) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #38 had a call device within reach from 3/3/25-3/6/25. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 38's admission face sheet dated 3/4/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident # 38 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertension(elevated blood pressure), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), quadriplegia(paralysis that affects all 4 limbs), dysphagia(swallowing disorder), cognitive communication disorder (difficulties in communicating), type 2 diabetes (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care within 48 hours of admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #185, and Resident #135) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed for Resident #185 and Resident #135. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that reflected the need for Resident #185's wandering and agitation for Resident #185 The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that reflected the individuals needs of Resident #135. This failure puts all residents at risk of not getting their needs met. Findings included: 1. review of Resident #185's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of depression, unspecified dementia (degenerative brain disease causing memory loss), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #31, and #38) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Residents #31 and #38 with individual or group activities. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet, dated 10/01/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31 had diagnoses which included Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy (both of the legs have abnormal stiffness), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Aneurysm (abnormal bulge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for one of eight residents (Resident #37) reviewed for nutrition status maintenance. 1. The facility failed to obtain consistent weights for Resident #37. These failures could place residents at risk of further weight loss, malnutrition, and a decreased quality of life. Record review of the dietitian's orders, dated 01/22/25, stated resident was on house supplement with meals. Recommended 1:1 assistance with meals. Record review of physician's notes from a visit, dated 12/31/24, reflected Resident #37 was on a mechanical soft with chopped meat texture, thin liquids. Refer to RD for evaluation and treat for weight loss recommendations. Observation and interview with Resident #37 on 03/03/25 at 2:45 PM revealed the resident in bed watching TV. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #186 and Resident #32) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to document controlled medications from the medication cart on the narcotic count sheets for Resident #186 and Resident #32. This failure could place residents at risk to medication errors . Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #186's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (weakness and loss of strength in upper and lower limbs), diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (memory problem), hyperlipidemia (elevated lipids circulating in the blood), bipolar disorder (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to wear PPE when providing high contact resident care (dressing, bathing, transfers, wound care, device) to Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4. The facility failed to have signage on resident doors that reflected PPE was required for high contact care for Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4. The facility failed to educate staff on infection control procedures related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). These failures could place residents at risk for infection, hospitalization, or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed on 01/30/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-01 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist that was qualified by education, training, experience, or certification, and who completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, for one of one facility. The facility did not designate a qualified Infection Control Preventionist. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: During an interview on 01/30/25 at 1:38 PM the ADON stated she was in charge of infection control but did not have the certificate to be the infection control preventionist. The ADON stated the Administrator and the DON had certification for infection control preventionist. The ADON stated she was working on her certification of being the Infection Control Preventionist . During an interview on 01/30/25 at 2:27 pm, the ADM stated the ADON was the designated staff as Infection Control Preventionist. The Administrator stated he had certification to be infection control preventionist but has never done anything in the facility regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for one of seven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care in that: The facility failed to provide residents with care and services related to activities of daily living, Resident #1 had long and dirty fingernails. This deficient practice could affect residents who were dependent on assistance with ADL's and could result in poor care and risk for skin breakdown and feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/15/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Myalgia (pain or tenderness in one or more muscles which con involve any area of the body) unspecified site, pain in right knee, pain in left knee. Review of Resident #1's care plan initiated 05/30/2024 reflected Resident #1 had an ADLs self-care performance deficit had impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for three (Residents #1, #2 and #3) of seven residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop baseline care plans for Resident #1, #2, and #3. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having individualized needs met, a delay in services, sustaining injuries, and not receiving adequate care. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 09/27/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system has an extreme response to an infection or injury), cocaine abuse with cocaine-induced anxiety disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was administered her prescribed Ertapenem Sodium Injection Solution (used to treat certain serious infections). This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided their routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to meet their needs, infection, or having medical conditions worsen or be exacerbated. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 09/27/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system has an extreme response to an infection or injury). Review of Resident #1's BIMS assessment, dated 09/25/24, reflected she had an 8 BIMS score, which indicated she had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to conduct a fall/skin assessment or conduct neuros consistently after unwitnessed falls for Residents #1 and #2. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of harm, injuries, or hospitalization. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD (a chronic lung disease), morbid obesity, TBI, and a risk of falling. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/17/24, reflected a BIMS of 8, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Section J (Health Conditions) reflected she had not experienced any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's medical chart contained any documented nursing progress notes. This deficient practice could result in errors in care and treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes memory loss), hypertension (high blood pressure), seizures, and type II diabetes. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/15/24, reflected a BIMS of 6, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's quarterly care plan, dated 05/30/24, reflected she had an ADL self-care performance deficit with an intervention of requiring staff supervision with transfers and bed mobility. It further reflected she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY TX00507691 Census of 100 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was referred for Specialized ST, OT and PT evaluations and services after these were agreed upon during his IDT by the due date of 05/10/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of decline in functional ADLs. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures (seizure disorder affecting vision and movements), quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), chronic kidney disease, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, cerebral palsy (A congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture) and other specified sepsis (A life-threatening complication of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four (Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of thirteen residents in that: The facility failed to ensure the main dining room and resident community television area by nurses' station 2 maintained a temperature range of 71 to 81°F for Residents #2, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6. The failure could place residents at risk of illness due to heat and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Weather Underground (www.wunderground.com) revealed temperatures in [NAME], Texas for 06/24/2024 revealed a low temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit, a high temperature of 95 degrees Fahrenheit, and an average temperature of 84.67 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation 06/24/2024 at 11:32 am revealed two rented cooling units located in the facility main dining room that both displayed temperature screens that revealed temperatures of 87 degrees Fahrenheit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of three (Resident #1 and Resident #2, and Resident #3) of ten residents reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to label multi-dose, insulin medications according to recommendations and professional standards of practice in one of four medication carts reviewed for medication storage for Residents #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for administration of expired medications and decreased therapeutic effects of administered medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, undated, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (occurs because of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, for 5 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans, in that: Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's comprehensive care plans were not reviewed and revised after their quarterly MDS assessments were completed. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of current needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/21/24, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses, which included: unspecified atherosclerosis (The build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls), unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, dementia (A group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was referred for Specialized OT and PT evaluations and services after these were agreed upon during his IDT meeting on 12/11/23. This failure placed Resident #1 at risk of decline in functional ADLs. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included spina bifida (birth defect that occurs when the spine and the spinal cord do not develop completely), abnormal posture, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, malaise (feeling uncomfortable, ill or lack of energy but you cannot explain the cause), need for assistance with personal care, muscle, weakness, mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to conduct activities of daily living independently, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of life (Resident #3 and Resident #4). 1. The facility failed to provide scheduled bath/showers for Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to provide scheduled bath/showers for Resident #4. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADL's at risk of poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/07/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted on [DATE] with re-admission date of 2/15/24 after a three-day hospitalization, diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), epilepsy (brain disorder causing seizures).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet individual needs for 1 of 4 (Resident #5) residents observed for dietary needs. The facility failed to provide a mechanical soft diet with pureed meats for Resident #5 and served her chopped meat during lunch and an entire pureed meal for dinner. This failure could contribute to causing a resident to choke and poor food intake. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 04/06/2024, revealed Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 07/28/2021 with diagnoses that included: dementia (disorder that causes impairments in thinking, memory and behavior), major depressive disorder, dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing), and pneumonitis (inflammation of lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit. Review of Resident #5's MDS Assessment updated 11/03/2023, revealed a BIMS score of eight indicating moderately impaired cognitive function. Resident #5 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (Resident #1, 2 and 3) of 4 residents and 1 of 1 hallway observed for a clean environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, #2, and #3's bedroom floor was clean. 2. The facility failed to ensure the hallway floor was clean and had no foul odors. This deficient practices could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 02/21/24 at 8:40 a.m., the ADM revealed housekeepers followed the deep clean schedule. The ADM explained housekeepers deep cleaned twice a week and spot checked and cleaned residents' rooms and commonly shared areas daily. The ADM also revealed there were two housekeepers for each shift. An observation on 02/21/24 at 10:38 a.m. revealed Resident #1's bedroom floor was sticky. During an interview on 02/21/24 at 10:47 a.m., Resident #1 revealed she cleaned her own room. Resident #1 explained the floor was sticky because housekeeping did not mop it. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for 13 of 16 employees (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, and LVN S.) The facility failed to provided CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, and LVN S with effective communications as mandatory training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of CNA F's personnel record had a hire date of 08/23/21, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of effective communications as mandatory training. Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of effective communications as mandatory training. Review of CNA H's personnel record had a hire date of 03/19/20, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 6 of 16 employees (CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q and LVN S) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was provided to CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q and LVN S. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. Review of CNA J's personnel record had a hire date of 08/20/21, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on the rights of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 16 of 21 employees (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, LVN N, LVN O, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, LVN N, LVN O, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving safe and appropriate care by adequately trained staff and could result in a decline in health and well-being. The findings were: Review of CNA F's personnel record had a hire date of 08/23/21 revealed no evidence of QAPI topics within the previous 12 months. Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20 revealed no evidence of QAPI topics within the previous 12 months. Review of CNA H's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 7 of 16 staff (CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R and LVN S) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control training was provided to CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R and LVN S. This failure could place residents at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. The findings were: Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20, revealed no evidence of infection control topics within the previous 12 months. Review of CNA J's personnel record had a hire date of 08/20/21, revealed no evidence of infection control topics within the previous 12 months. Review of LVN N's personnel record had a hire date of 12/07/98 revealed no evidence of infection control topics within the previous 12 months. Review of RN P's personnel record had a hire date of 12/22/22, revealed no evidence of infection control topics within the previous 12 months.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to communicate the compliance and ethics program's standards, policies and procedures through a training program or other practical manner which explains the requirements for for 16 of 21 employees (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, LVN N, LVN O, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that compliance and ethics training was provided to CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, LVN N, LVN O, FSS, Act Dir, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or improper care due to a lack of training. The findings were: Review of CNA F's personnel record had a hire date of 08/23/21 did not include evidence of communication related to the compliance and ethics program's standards. Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20 did not include evidence of communication related to the compliance and ethics program's standards. Review of CNA H's personnel record had a hire date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 8 of 16 employees (CNA F, CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided to CNA F, CNA G, CNA J, LVN N, RN P, LVN Q, LVN R, and LVN S. This failure could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of CNA F's personnel record had a hire date of 08/23/21 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of CNA G's personnel record had a hire date of 02/12/20 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of CNA J's personnel record had a hire date of 08/20/21, revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of LVN N's personnel record had a hire date of 12/07/98 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of RN P's personnel record had a hire date of 12/22/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 13 (Resident #81) residents reviewed for call lights on the 2100 hall in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #81's call light was within reach and placed for easy access. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care or attention needed and risk of falling. The Findings Included: Record review of Resident #81's face sheet, dated 9/6/23 revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (mood disorder), cerebral vascular disease (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply blood), bilateral occlusion and stenosis of carotid arteries (blockage of arteries that are on both sides of the next that carry blood to the brain), contractures of left shoulder, left wrist and left hand (a condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Resident #81's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's Hospice services. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #81's face sheet, dated 9/6/23 revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (mood disorder), cerebral vascular disease (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 residents (Resident # 249) reviewed for oxygen in that: Resident #249's oxygen tubing were not changed as ordered. This deficient practice could affect residents in the facility ordered to receive oxygen therapy as needed and could result in residents receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and could result in a decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #249 's face sheet, dated 01/12/024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate (cancer or the prostate), chronic pain, major depressive disorder (more often than not persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities-interferes with daily life), and Dyspnea (shortness of breath, difficult or labored breathing).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides can demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for 1 of 3 residents (#82) in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A cleaned Resident #82's penis by changing wet wipes or folding the wet wipe to change surfaces. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA T cleaned Resident #82's using 1 wipe and moving the wet wipe back and forth at the coccyx area without changing surfaces. These deficient practices affect residents who require peri care and could result in infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #82's face sheet dated 01/12/2024 revealed the [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted initially 03/01/2023. Resident #82's diagnoses included unstable angina, pressure ulcer on sacral region, stage 2 (skin is broken, leaves an open wound, or looks like a pus-filled blister),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 2 of 3 medication carts observed, in that: 1. The Middle Medication Cart 2200 hall contained eighteen loose medication pills. 2. The Hall Back Medication Cart 2200 hall contained eight loose medication pills. These practices could place residents who receive medications at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of medications. The findings included: 1. Observation on 01/10/2024 at 9:10 a.m. of the 2200 Hall Middle Medication Cart revealed there were eighteen loose medication pills inside one of the drawers of the cart. During an interview with Nurse T on 01/10/2024 at 9:12 a.m., Nurse T confirmed there were eighteen loose medication pills inside a drawer of the Middle Medication Cart. 2. Observation on 01/10/2024 at 9:34 a.m. of the 2200 Hall Back Medication Cart revealed there were eight loose medication pills inside one of the drawers of the cart. During an interview with Nurse U on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: 1. A metal pan covered with white wax style paper covering approximately 6 chicken breasts was placed on a shelf in the bottom of the walk-in cooler, the chicken was removed from the manufacturer's box and was not completely covered or in an enclosed container. 2. Six loaves of raisin bread with no dates or labeling of any type on the individual loaves and when the raisin bread was removed from the original manufacturer's box, placed on a metal tray with the date it was taken out of the freezer by the Food Service Supervisor. These failures could place residents at risk for food-born illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation on 05/09/2023 at 8:45 a.m. in the dry storage room revealed: 1. Approximately 6 partially chicken breasts in a metal pan partially covered, allowing air to reach the chicken breasts. 2. Six loaves of raisin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly, for 2 of 2 facility dumpsters in that: 1. Dumpster #1 had the side door open making trash placed in the dumpster visible for 3 of 3 observations. 2. Dumpster #2 had the top lid open making trash placed in the dumpster visible. These deficient practices could place residents who reside at the facility at risk of unsanitary conditions that could result in the attraction of vermin and rodents, and expose them to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: Observation on 01/10/2024 beginning at 1:14 p.m. revealed dumpster #1 with the side door open making the trash placed in the dumpster visible. Observation revealed dumpster #2 with one side of the top lid open making trash placed in the dumpster visible. Observation on 1/10/24 beginning at 5:25 p.m. revealed dumpster #1 with the side door open making the trash placed in the dumpster visible. Observation revealed dumpster #2 with both sides of the top lid open making trash placed in the dumpster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 7) reviewed for hospice services in that: The facility failed to maintain required hospice forms and documentation to ensure residents received adequate end-of-life care. This failure could place the residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 01/22/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old resident originally admitted on [DATE] and initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 3 of 3 staff (CNA A, CNA T and LVN S) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. CNA A, while providing peri-care to a male resident, did not change her gloves during the whole procedure. 2. CNA T, while providing peri-care to a male resident, did not sanitize her hands between glove changes. 3. LVN S, while looking at a catheter bag that was hanging from the bed side bottom bed frame and partially touching the floor, did not use gloves while handling the catheter bag and touched the tubing on Resident #7's bed without practicing hand hygiene. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infections. The findings included: 1. and 2. During an observation on 01/11/2024 at 11:27 a.m. with CNA A and CNA T providing incontinent/peri care to Resident #82. CNA T asked CNA A if she felt comfortable providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident abuse prevention training to 2 of 21 staff reviewed including CNA G and LVN Q. The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 21 staff reviewed had completed their mandatory abuse annual training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Record review of the annual training information provided by the HR Personnel revealed that CNA G (hired-02/12/20) and LVN Q (hired-03/15/21) had not completed their mandatory abuse annual training. During an interview with the Administrator on 01/12/24 at 5:30 pm, the Administrator stated they provided abuse prevention training as required but she was not aware that the identified staff members had not completed the training.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$166,205 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $131,055 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
  • $20,415 — penalty dated 2024-05-20
  • $14,735 — penalty dated 2024-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/16/2018
BYROM, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/2018
AUSTIN WELLNESS OPERATING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/12/2024
PELEG, NANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2024
DELAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2024
CHUDLEIGH, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2024
HERZOG, HELMUTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2024
MARQUEZ, JOHNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 3%Other / private 35%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$247per resident / day
operating cost
$7,515per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$221per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455799. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next