Crestview Healthcare Residence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 91.1 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 101 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY These failures could place residents at risk for unassessed changes in conditions that could lead to permanent impairment, including decreased quality of life. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatments and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.Resident #1 had an appointment on or around 4/28/2025, for an MRI (a medical imaging technique that uses a magnetic field and computer-generated radio waves to create detailed images of the organs and tissues in your body) for his prostate, and the facility failed to schedule the appointment and failed to place the necessary preop instructions needed for the procedure in PCC; subsequently Resident #1 missed his appointment twice. There were no adverse reactions from him not attending his appointment. These failures could place residents at risk for unassessed changes in conditions that could lead to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote the resident's right to a dignified existence and self-determination for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to maintain her smoking privileges. This failure could place residents at risk of feelings of poor self-esteem, anxiety, decreased quality of life and loss of dignity.The findings were: Review of resident #1's face sheet dated 7/24/2025 revealed she is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type (mental health conditions involving mood disorders), Epilepsy (seizure disorder) Ulna Fracture (broken bone in forearm), Intellectual Disabilities (limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior), Type 2 Diabetes (blood sugar disorder). Dementia with other behavioral disturbance (loss of memory) and Major Depressive Disorder. Face sheet further revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchen and 3 (nourishment room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, and 3) of 3 nourishment rooms reviewed for food safety and sanitation. 1. The facility failed to conduct temperature checks and/or complete the temperature check logs for refrigerators and freezers in the facility's kitchen and nourishment rooms. 2. The facility failed to conduct temperature checks and/or complete the temperature check log form for the 3-compartment sink in the facility's kitchen. 3. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerators and freezers in the facility's nourishment rooms were cleaned, sanitized, and in proper working condition. 4. The facility failed to ensure food items stored in the nourishment room refrigerators/freezers were labeled and dated. 5. The facility failed to ensure items stored in the nourishment room refrigerators/freezers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure all controlled medications were accurately reconciled at the start and end of each shift. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversion and could result in diminished health and well-being. Findings include: Record review of the Change of Shift Narcotic Count Sheets for Cart #1 revealed missing documentation for 06/01/2025, 6:00 AM on-coming and 6:00 PM off -going shifts and the 06/04/2025 6:00 PM on-coming and 6:00 AM off-going shifts. Record Review for Cart #2 revealed missing documentation for 06/02/2025 6:00 PM off-going shift, 06/03/2025 6:00 AM on-coming shift, 6:00 PM on-coming, and 6:00 AM off-going shifts, 06/06/2025 6:00 PM on-coming and 6:00 AM off-going, and 06/11/2025 6:00 PM off-going shifts. During an interview with CMA A on 06/18/2025 at 11:37 AM, she stated it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #88) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was implemented appropriately when CNA-A provided perineal and catheter care for Resident #19. 2. The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was implemented appropriately when LVN-B provided wound care to Resident #88. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk of the spread of infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 01/06/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #19's primary diagnosis included Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region (a condition where the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's safety and well-being when RN D and CNA E left her in the Shower Room in soiled undergarments unattended for approximately 30 minutes. This failure could result in residents receiving injuries and possible skin breakdown. Noncompliance existed from 02/13/2025 to 02/18/2025, but the facility corrected the noncompliance through inservicing, one on one inservicing and the QAPI process. Therefore, the findings are of past noncompliance. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Generalized Atherosclerosis (a widespread buildup of plaque in the arteries throughout the body, which can lead to narrowing and blockage of blood vessels), Unspecified Dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision, in that: On 01/23/2025 Resident #13 was transferred by CNA C using standing pivot transfer x 1 staff instead of a mechanical lift. During transfer Resident #13 pivoted into the chair, her leg did not pivot well, and the knee twisted and popped which later caused swelling and pain to the left knee. This failure could lead to injury or death to residents. Findings include: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 02/11/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system-brain and spinal cord, Muscle Weakness (a lack of muscle strength or the inability to control voluntary muscle force), and Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services within the facility with reasonable accommodation of the residents' needs and preferences for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #23, Resident # 57, Resident #83, and Resident #45) reviewed, in that: The facility failed to: 1) Ensure a call light was within reach for Resident #23 2) Ensure a call light was within reach for Resident #57 3) Ensure a call light was within reach for Resident #83 4) Ensure a call light was within reach for Resident #45 This deficient practice placed residents at risk for delayed care and a decreased quality of life. Findings Include: 1) Review of Resident # 23's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section A (Identification Information) reflected a 74- year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Section C (Cognitive Patterns) Reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Section GG (Functional Abilities) reflected he was dependent on staff for personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment for three of six residents (Resident #57, Resident #23, and Resident #66). The facility failed to ensure a safe/clean/comfortable/ homelike environment for Resident #57, Resident #23 and Resident #66. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment and placing residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings Include: 1) Review of Resident # 57's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Section C (Cognitive Patterns) Reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Hypothyroidism (a condition that causes decreased thyroid hormones), Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder that causes tremors or stiffness), Other Idiopathic Peripheral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, under proper temperature control and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 (medication cart #1) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage that. Medication cart # 1 was left unattended and unlocked. An undated, opened and accessed, vial was stored in the medication room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator. The medication room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator temperature was not monitored daily. This failure could allow residents unsupervised access to prescription and over the counter medication and can result in the resident receiving ineffective medication due to lack of temperature management or proper labeling. Findings included: Observation on 4/29/2024 at 11:53 am revealed Medication cart # 1 was unlocked and unattended at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$56,550 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $56,550 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX