The Manor Healthcare Residence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 41.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for transfers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #92 was transferred using a gait belt . This failure could place residents at risk for injuries and falls. Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #92 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of left sided weakness following a stroke, fracture of the nose, and post-traumatic stress disorder (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations). Record review of the rehabilitation hospital physician's progress note on 6/02/2023 indicated Resident #92 had impaired mobility and ADLs. The physician's progress note indicated Resident #92 was dependent and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to refer Resident #6 to the appropriate state designated MH/ID authority for evaluation. Resident #6 was diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission. This failure could affect residents with mental illness placing them at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: Record review of a Face Sheet dated 12/11/25 for Resident #6 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted initially to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a serious mental illness blending symptoms of schizophrenia (psychosis like hallucinations/delusions) major mood disorder (depression or mania);…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. Upon observation of medication pass on 12/09/2025 beginning at 9:18AM, the medication error rate was 100% based on 31 out of 31 medications being administered late for 2 of 2 residents (15 and #17) by MA #A. The medication error rate was 100% based on 31 out of 31 medications being administered late for 2 of 2 residents (#15 and #17) by MA A. The failure could place residents at risk of incomplete therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and decline in health. 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 12/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include Vitamin D Deficiency, Hypokalemia (a condition where the blood's potassium level drops too low), Hypothyroidism (abnormally low activity of the thyroid gland), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure with no single identifiable cause),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during survey for seven of seven anonymous residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in private without uninvited staff being present. Findings Included: In a Resident Council interview on 9/11/24 at 2:00 pm, the AT Director gathered several residents and brought them to the Dining Room. In the Dining Room, there were several residents watching TV and several staff in and about the area attending to their daily duties. When asked if there was a more private space, the AT Director remarked that there was no space large enough. He then suggested to move the meeting to the front lobby area where it would be a bit quieter. This space was not private and there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident right for personal privacy for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #3, Resident #17, Resident #19, Resident #21 and Resident #40) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to knock on Residents #3, #17, #19, #21 and #40's rooms when going into the residents' rooms. This failure could affect all residents right to privacy in the facility and cause the resident to feel like their privacy was being invaded or the facility was not their home. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 09/10/2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's diagnoses included lack of coordination, muscle wasting, low back pain, skin cancer, solitary pulmonary nodule (small single mass in the lungs), tinea unguium (fungal nail infection), contact with COVID 19, pressure ulcer, abnormal weight loss, vitamin B12 deficiency, vitamin D deficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for foods safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety and sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food items were sealed and not exposed to air in the freezer and in the dry storage area. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen freezer on 09/10/2024 at 9:05 am revealed that a bag of sausage patties was torn open and exposed to air, a box of cinnamon rolls was open and exposed to air, and a box of cookie dough was open and exposed to air. Observation of the dry storage area on 09/10/2024 at 9:09 am revealed that a bag of grits, a bag of corn tortillas, a bag of powder nonfat dry milk and a bag of corn muffin mix were not sealed, and all were exposed to air. An interview with the DM on 09/11/2024 at 2:34 pm revealed that the policy for storing food was all food items were to be labeled, dated, and sealed. She said that all kitchen staff were responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: *The deep roasting pan was clean *The sheet pans were clean *The muffin pans were clean *The roasting pans were clean *The skillets were clean *The stock pot was clean These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 07/10/23 at 08:25 AM, the following items had carbon buildup inside and outside: *one deep roasting pan *four large sheet pans *three muffin pans *one small sheet pan *two small roasting pans *four skillets *one stock pot One of the skillets was on top of the stove and had yellow residue stuck to the sides of it. The Dietary [NAME] M said she had cooked eggs in the skillet that morning. During an interview on 07/11/23 at 04:53, the Dietary Manager said the pans, pots and skillets with carbon buildup were not thoroughly clean. The Dietary Manager said they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 of 2 shower chairs (East shower chair) reviewed for cleanliness. The facility failed to ensure the East shower chair was free from slime like pink, brown, and black material. This failure could place the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean well-kept environment. Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #92 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of left sided weakness following a stroke, fracture of the nose, and post-traumatic stress disorder (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations). During an observation, and interview on 07/10/2023 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #92 was lying in bed when she said the shower chairs were despicable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, and misappropriation of resident property and establish policies and procedures to report and investigate such allegations, for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #92) The facility failed to follow their policy when they did not report timely to the state agency Resident #92's allegation of neglect on 06/12/2023. This failure could cause residents to have continued neglect. Findings included: Record review of an abuse policy dated 2003 with a revision date of 10/04/2022 indicated the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subparagraph. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to follow their policy when they did not report timely to the state agency Resident #92's allegation of neglect on 06/12/2023. This failure could cause residents to have continued neglect. Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #92 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of left sided weakness following a stroke, fracture of the nose, and post-traumatic stress disorder (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #34) reviewed for transmitting assessments. 1. Resident #34's Annual-5-day MDS assessment had an Assessment Reference date of 03/13/23 and was completed on 03/23/23 but was not transmitted within 14 days of completion 2. Resident #34's Quarterly MDS assessment had an Assessment Reference date of 05/26/23 and was completed on 06/05/23 but was not transmitted within 14 days of completion. This failure could put residents at risk of state and federal monitors having inadequate information about the care residents require and receive. The findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 07/12/23 indicated that resident was a 64year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure (impaired blood pumping function),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX