Hico Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation; the facility failed to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress for two (Resident #1, Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to: 1. ensure Resident #1's pain in her arm and hip was addressed after a fall on [DATE] by providing her prescribed tramadol which had run out and hospice nurse reported constant pain in left forearm 2. ensure Resident #1's neuro checks were completed and documented after a fall [DATE] in which she hit her head and displayed an increase in confusion 3. ensure Resident #1's x-rays were performed in a timely manner after a fall on [DATE] after which she complained of pain and x-rays were not performed until [DATE] 4. ensure Resident #2's pain was addressed by providing his prescribed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it developed and implemented written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for two (Resident #1, Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to implement its policies and procedures that were designed to prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation by failing to: 1. ensure Resident #1's pain in her arm and hip was addressed after a fall on [DATE] by providing her prescribed tramadol which had run out and hospice nurse reported constant pain in left forearm 2. ensure Resident #1's neuro checks were completed and documented after a fall [DATE] in which she hit her head and displayed an increase in confusion 3. ensure Resident #1's x-rays were performed in a timely manner after a fall on [DATE] after which she complained of pain and x-rays were not performed until [DATE] 4. ensure Resident #2's pain was addressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #1, Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to: 1. ensure Resident #1's prescribed tramadol was in the facility and provided to Resident #1 for her pain after Resident #1 suffered a fall on [DATE] around 5:47 am and reported constant pain in her left arm and had a visible hematoma (swollen knot) on her right forehead. 2. ensure Resident #2's prescribed hydrocodone was in the facility and available to Resident #2 for 3 days which led to pain that went as high as a 9, especially at night, which caused sleep loss, and pain that averaged a 6 for the duration of the time his medication was unavailable An immediate jeopardy situation was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of Resident #2 plate in the room, interviews with staff, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for Resident #2 (1 of 1 Resident reviewed). The facility failed to follow the care plan and provide Resident #2 with a mechanically soft diet that he could eat. This could cause the resident to experience unplanned weight loss due to inability to eat properly. The facility failed to prepare a textured diet to the consistency required for Resident #2. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 05/14/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's Medical Diagnosis EMR tab, accessed on 05/14/2025, reflected Resident #2 had diagnoses which include ; type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Record review of Resident #2's care plan undated and accessed 05/14/2025, reflected the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for changes in condition. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's mental health primary care provider (MHNP) when there was a change of condition in behaviors after an incident with Resident #1 having unsolicited sexual advances/behaviors toward another resident on 01/08/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their physicians notified of changes resulting in a delay in decision making for medical interventions. Findings: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/18/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adrenocortical insufficiency (a condition in which the adrenal glands do not produce enough hormones such as cortisol and aldosterone), unspecified psychosis (mental health condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to include Resident #2's fall history/fall risks in her baseline care plan. This failure could result in residents not receiving needed care and treatment. Findings Included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 02/18/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain (progressive decline in cognitive function that occurs with aging), anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by repeated episodes of sudden feelings of intense anxiety, fear, or terror), restlessness (feeling of unease, agitation, or inability to sit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's newly identified sexual behaviors were documented in his care plan with interventions after an incident with Resident #1 having unsolicited sexual advances/behaviors toward another resident on 01/08/25. The facility's failure placed residents requiring care at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and not having continuity of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/18/25 reflected a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 90 days (FY Quarter 3 2024 - April 1 - June 30) reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had an RN on duty on for 2 days: 06/08/24 and 06/09/24. This failure placed residents at risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, care, and treatment. Findings included: Review of the daily staffing for 06/08/24 reflected zero hours worked by an RN on 06/08/24. Review of the daily staffing for 06/09/24 reflected zero hours worked by an RN on 06/09/24. In an interview on 09/12/24 at 11:38 AM, the DON stated there was one weekend when she did not have RN coverage for 8 hours a day in the facility. She stated she had not had an RN that she could have hired at the time and there were not any RN's available through agency. She stated she worked many hours and a lot of days herself to cover the RN position when she was supposed to be off on the weekends. She stated she also used agency when they had an RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen: 1. The facility failed to label and date food and dry goods in a manner that identified the product and/or its use-by or discard date. 2. The facility failed to clean and sanitize the internal components of the ice machine. 3. The facility failed to properly discard food products which were expired or contaminated with mold. 4. The facility failed to store food in a manner that would prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including growth from microorganisms. 5. The facility failed to store food in a manner that would maintain the look, taste, and integrity of the food. 6. The facility failed to clean and maintain kitchen equipment in a manner to prevent contamination. This failure placed residents at risk of food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on September 10, 2024, at 9:17 AM, revealed a Monthly Ice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) residents reviewed for dignity, in that:. Resident # 35 was left alone in her room with the door shut with food covering the front of her blouse. This failure placed residents at risk of not being treated with dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #35's undated admission record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction Affecting the Right Dominant Side (paralysis of the right extremities after a stroke), Aphasia (difficulty with communication or speaking), Anxiety, and Conversion Disorder (a psychiatric condition) with seizures. Record review of Resident #35's care plan dated 08/15/2023 revised on 09/05/2024 reflected resident #35 had impaired cognitive function, impaired thought processes, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) who were reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Residents #35's call light was placed within their reach. This failure could place dependent residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #35's undated admission record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction Affecting the Right Dominant Side (paralysis of the right extremities after a stroke), Aphasia (difficulty with communication or speaking), Anxiety, and Conversion Disorder (a psychiatric condition) with seizures. Record review of Resident #35's care plan dated 08/15/2023 revised on 09/05/2024 reflected resident #35 had impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #14 and Resident #35 ) reviewed for ADL abilities, in that:. 1) Resident #14 appeared disheveled, had ground meat covering the front of her blouse after her meal covered up with her blanket in her wheelchair 2 hours after lunch. 2) Resident #35 was lying in a soiled bed with a brown smear approximately 12 inches by 3 inches on bed sheet. This deficient practice could place residents who required assistance at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs and avoid ADL decline. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #14's undated admission record reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of occlusion and Stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries (a clogging of the arteries),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for infection control . CNA C failed to wash or sanitize his hands while going from a dirty to clean surface while performing incontinent care for Resident #35. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 09/12/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 08/12/23. Resident #35 had diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), anxiety (an emotion which is characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil and includes feelings of dread over anticipated events), pneumonia (an inflammatory condition of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,552 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $31,552 — penalty dated 2024-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX