No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harmony Care at Brookshire

710 Hwy 359 S, Brookshire, TX 77423 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (281) 375-5272 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$25,797 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,797 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1713 Spring Green Blvd · (832) 658-3010 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3523 Front St · (281) 934-2462 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3523 South St · (281) 934-8441 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1412 FM359 · (281) 375-5050 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.3%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.2%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.9%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.1%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.562.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.032.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.1–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.7–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
70.9%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 83.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate administration of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 7 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that Resident # 1 received her prescribed medication, Midodrine, according to physician's orders on 2/9/2025. Resident #1 was administered 10 tablets of Midodrine (medicationused to treat low blood pressure) instead of the ordered one tablet. Resident # 1's blood pressure was 189/96 before being transported to the hospital for an overdose of Midodrine An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 2/13/2025. While the IJ was removed on 2/14/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place all residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 (Resident #29) residents reviewed for pain management. C.NA A failed to stop performing incontinent care while Resident #29 was in pain. C.NA A failed to notify the LVN B of Resident #29's pain in a timely manner after incontinent care in AM. This failure could place resident at risk for increased pain causing undo suffering. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 12/05/2024, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, , pain, and unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site ( a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time),. Record review of Resident #29's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA B properly cleaned Resident #2 during incontinent care on 06/17/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 6/17/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE], with the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke), cognitive communication deficit, essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high fat in the blood), major depression disorder ( causes ongoing sadness, hopelessness and loss of interest that lasts at least two weeks, it can affect sleep, energy and relationships) and anxiety (a feeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) and 1 of 2 staff (CNA B) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B washed or sanitized her hands and performed glove changes appropriately while providing incontinence care to Resident #2 on 06/17/26. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included:Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6/17/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction( ischemic stroke), cognitive communication deficit, essential primary hypertension, ( high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia ( high fat in the blood), major depression disorder ( causes ongoing sadness, hopelessness and loss of interest that lasts at least two weeks, it can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) out of 7 residents observed for resident rights. LVN B failed to sit at eye level when feeding Resident #1 their lunch in the dining room, LVN B stood while feeding Resident #1.CNA A failed to sit at eye level when feeding Resident #2 their lunch in the dining room. CNA A stood while feeding Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk for choking and compromising their dignity and respect. Findings: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/04/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 08/22/24. Resident #1's diagnoses included the following: dementia (a decline in memory, thinking, behavior, and daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement.1. The facility failed to ensure leftover food to be used later with a temperature in the danger zone was discarded which pan of mechanical soft sausage in the steamtable 131.1 degrees Fahrenheit2. The facility failed to ensure that food past the used by date were discarded which included a pan of cooked rice in the refrigerator use by date 2/7/26, a pan of mashed potato use by date 2-3-26, a pan of Salisbury steak use by date 1-7-26, a package of shredded cheddar cheese use by date 1-12-26, a package of deli meat turkey use by date 1-29-26,a package of shredded swiss cheese use by date 12-15-25.3. The facility failed to ensure food was stored 6 inches off the floor. 1 case of frozen ground beef in the freezer. 2 fruit cocktail cases on the storeroom floor These failures could place residents who consumed food from the kitchen at risk of food borne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During a confidential group meeting, residents stated that staff had not knocked on their doors and announced themselves before entering their room. One of 10 confidential group residents stated that she had been in the middle of dressing when staff walked into her room. She stated that the staff had no regard in providing her with privacy and freedom of feeling exposed. During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 09:27 a.m. the Administrator (ADM) stated that he had been made aware that knocking on residents' doors before entering their rooms had been an issue. He stated that the staff received in-service training on customer service once a month which included - no expectations knock on resident's doors before entering a resident's room. He stated staff were to knock, wait and give the residents the ability to welcome the staff in, and then enter, and announce the goal of the visit. He stated during the visit with the residents, staff were to communicate with the residents what care service they were provided the entire visit. He stated staff received in-service training on abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to privacy for 1 of 10 confidential residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility failed to ensure facility staff knocked on residents' doors prior to entering their rooms.This failure could allow residents' protected HIPAA information to be shared with individuals who did not have a need or right to know and could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and a diminished quality of life. During a confidential group meeting, residents stated that staff had not knocked on their doors and announced themselves before entering their room. One of 10 confidential group residents stated that she had been in the middle of dressing when staff walked into her room. She stated that the staff had no regard in providing her with privacy and freedom of feeling exposed.During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 09:27 a.m. the Administrator (ADM) stated that he had been made aware that knocking on residents' doors before entering their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the preferences of each resident, activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 10 of 10 confidential residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities to meet the residents' interests on Saturdays and Sundays for 10 confidential residents. These failures placed residents at risk for decline in quality of life, social and mental psychosocial wellbeing. During a confidential group interview on 02/11/2026 at 02:10 p.m., with 10 confidential residents, all residents stated that there were no weekend activities and nothing to do around the facility on those days. Four of the 10 residents stated it was boring, and it was nonsense that the facility could not provide them with activities on the weekends. Four of the 10 residents stated the morale was down in the facility because there were no activities on the weekends. One of the 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 14% based on 5 errors out of 34 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #35, and Resident #83) reviewed for medication errors.The facility failed to ensure MA P administered the correct dose of Vitamin B-12 (use to make and support healthy) to Resident #35 on 2/10/26.LVN G failed to administer Timolol Maleate (used to lower high fluid pressure inside the eye) Ophthalmic Solution 0.5 % eyedrops ophthalmic drops, on 2/11/25, initialed as given to Resident #83, when it was not given.LVN G failed to administer Brimonidine Tartrate (used to lower pressure of the eye) 0.2 % Solution eyedrops ophthalmic drops, on 2/11/25, initialed as given to Resident #83, when it was not given.LVN G failed to administer Dorzolamide HCl Solution(commonly used to lower high fluid pressure inside the eye) 2 % Solution eyedrops…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 5 of 28 residents ( Resident #96, Resident #2, Resident # 65, Resident #83 and Resident #32) and 3 of 3 staffs (CNA H, LVN S,LVN G ) reviewed for infection control. -The facility failed to ensure CNA H performed hand hygiene during incontinent care on Resident #32. During incontinent care for Resident #32 CNA used wet wipes to clean in-between the buttocks, cleaning the buttocks from the top of the buttockstoward the vaginal area.- LVN S failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene before opening the medication cart twice and did not wear PPE while performing Accu-Chek for Resident #83 on EBP.- LVN G failed to wear PPE and gloves while checking Resident #83's blood pressure on 2/11/26. -The facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #32) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: CNA H did not clean Resident #32's open labia during indwelling Foley Catheter incontinent care. During incontinent care for Resident#32 CNA used wet wipes to clean in-between the buttocks, cleaning the buttocks from the top of the buttockstoward the vaginal area. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. Record review of Resident #32's face sheet, dated 2/11/2026, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses diagnosis of other venous thrombosis and embolism (blood clot that forms in a vein), hypokalemia(low potassium in the blood), tracheostomy status( surgically created hole in the front of the neck that leads directly into the windpipe (…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #96) of 4 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to properly label Resident #96's enteral feeding formula to identify what date, time and by which staff administered and hung the feeding. This failure could place residents who had gastrostomy tube at risk receiving expired fluids. Findings included: Record review Resident #96's Facesheet reflected the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleed in the brain due to trauma) with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, gastrostomy status. Record review Resident #96's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #83) reviewed for significant medication errors. LVN G failed to administer a substantial amount of potassium CL via GT ( medication used for essential mineral and electrolyte that keep the heart beating regularly, muscles contracting and nerves communicating) to Resident # 83 after dissolving potassium CL in water in the medication cup, on 2/11/26 This failure could place residents at risk of abnormal heart rhythms, and potential hospitalizationRecord review of Resident #83's face sheet dated 2/11/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted [DATE]. Resident #83 had diagnoses included: other cerebral infarction ( a type of ischemic stroke where blood flow to part of the brain id blocked usually by a clot due to occlusion or stenosis (narrowing) of small artery, essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (secured unit). -The secured unit nurse medication cart A contained opened undated medication. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving expired medication and improperly stored medications which could result in delayed healing.During an observation on [DATE] at 9:58 AM of the nurse medication cart A for the locked unit, the following opened medications were not dated when they were opened:Azelastine HCL Nasal spray 0.1% Fluticasone Propionate Nasal spray 50 mcg In an interview with LVN K, on [DATE] at 9:58AM, she said the medication should be dated when opened and it was good for 30 days and it would not be effective after 30 days. LVN K said she was not aware when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective administration to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident. The facility operated without an administrator from 08/20/25 to 09/13/25, in the 1 of 1 facility reviewed for administration.Record review of personnel records revealed the Former Administrator was terminated on 08/19/2025, there was no record of a licensed interim or permanent replacement appointed from the period of 08/20/2025 - 09/13/2025. During an interview on 09/13/2025 @ 10:30am with the nurse supervisor, she stated that the facility had not had a facility administrator, since 08/2025. She stated that DON, who was not a state-licensed nursing home administrator, was informally made responsible for the Administrator's tasks. During interview on 09/13/2025 @ 1:00pm with DON, stated that the prior facility administrator was terminated 08/19/2025. She stated she was not aware if Human Resources staff had documentation of a designated full-time acting Administrator since the prior Administrator was terminated. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-13 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all staff were trained in the procedures for reporting abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property for 6 of 6 facility employees reviewed for training. The facility failed to provide training on the identity of the Abuse Coordinator and the procedures for reporting abuse. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents by placing them at risk for unrecognized or unreported abuse due to staff being unaware of who to report to and how to initiate the facility's abuse reporting process. Observation 09/13/2025 @ 2:40pm, during the onsite visit, revealed the facility had not update the signage and posting of the facility's Abuse Coordinator. The posting reflected the Former Abuse Coordinator, who was terminated on 08/19/2025, contact information.During interview on 09/13/2025 @ 1:00pm with DON, stated that the Former Abuse Coordinator was terminated 08/19/2025. She stated the in - service was usually provided by the administrator. She stated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 out of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for environment. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room was clean and a homelike environment. There was sheetrock debris and dust on the resident's floor and on her windowsill. - The facility failed to relocate Resident #3 to another room while sheetrock repair work was actively being performed in her room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of environmental hazards such as airborne dust, construction debris, noise and physical risk which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Electronic Health Record revealed a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including Dementia, Protein Calorie Malnutrition and Paralytic Syndrome (loss of muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 2 of 5 hallways, (Hall 100 and Hall 400) and the conference room. The facility had live gnats in areas of the facility including Halls 100 and 400, and in the conference room. This failure could place residents at risk for resident health, safety and quality of life. Findings included: In an observation on 07/18/25 at 08:15am approximately 10 gnats were flying around the conference room. In an observation on 07/18/25 at 10:11am, approximately 12 gnats were observed near the dining area in Hall 100. In an observation on 07/18/25 at 12:58pm, approximately 5 gnats were observed flying throughout Hall 400. On 07/18/2025 at 1:11pm, the Pest control log for the last 90 days was requested from the Administrator. The pest control log was not provided. In an interview on 07/18/25 at 2:11pm, the ADON stated they recently had a problem with gnats but reported things had gotten better; it used to be worse. She also reported she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 3 of 5 halls (100-hall, 400-hall and 500-hall). - The facility failed to address discoloration on ceiling tiles throughout the facility. - The facility failed to address missing floor and wall tiles. - The facility failed to address exposed sheetrock in the halls and resident rooms. - The facility failed to address chipped wall paint in the halls and resident rooms. - The facility failed to address damaged exit door handles. - The facility failed to address damaged door frame and door handle to storage room. - The facility failed to address damaged handrails. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. The findings include: An observation on 12/02/2024 between 08:45 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen (Kitchen #1) reviewed for food procurement. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods were dated as opened/prepared and discarded after 72 Hours (3 days) per facility policy in Kitchen #1 2. Discolored and debris covered kitchen ceiling vents 3. Discolored shelves in refrigerators This failure could place residents at risk of food borne illness and disease. Findings Include: Observation of the facility kitchen on 12/02/24 at 8:04 AM revealed the following. 1. A large rectangular pan with gelatin and fruit in the refrigerator/cooler uncovered and undated/labeled. 2. A square pan of pureed carrots that were not dated. 3. [NAME] residue and dust particles over serving table and food preparation areas in the kitchen. 4 The ice machine was observed to have stains and appearance of rust on the inside and outside of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-06 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS a complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS reviewed for administration (Fiscal year 2024 for the first quarter March 1, 2024 to November 30, 2024). The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2024. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings included: Review of the CMS PBJ report for FY Quarter 1 2024 (March 1- November 30) indicated the facility did not have licensed nursing/staff coverage 24 hours/day . In an interview with the Administrator on 12/06/24 at 1:17 PM he said he knows the PBJ was submitted and he was not sure if the BOM (Business office manager)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were accurately acquired, received, dispensed, and administered in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and failed to remove medications for disposition from current medication supply that were discontinued or the residents had been discharged for 3 of 6 medication carts (100 and 200 hall MA medication cart C, 500 hall nurse cart A, and 400 hall nurse cart B) reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure 100 and 200 hall MA medication cart C did not contain discharged residents' medications. 2. The facility failed to ensure 500 hall nurse medication cart A did not have expired medications, discharged resident medication, and discontinued medications. 3. The facility failed to ensure 400 hall nurse medication cart B did not have expired medications, discharged resident medication and discontinued medications. These failures placed all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of medications and expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 6 medication carts (500 hall nurse cart A and 400 hall nurse cart B), and failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (400 hall nurse medication B) reviewed for medication storage -The 500-hall nurse medication cart A contained opened undated medication and medication not stored in the original packaging delivered from the pharmacy. -The 400 hall nurses medication cart B contained opened and undated medication, medication not stored in the original delivered packet from the pharmacy, and handwritten resident's name on medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to privacy for 2 (Resident #168, and Resident 29) of 6 residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility failed to ensure LVN A locked the computer screen, displaying the name of Resident #168's name and medications, while LVN A was in resident's room administering finger stick and insulin. -The facility failed to provide Resident #29 privacy when providing incontinent care. These failures could place residents' protected HIPAA information at risk of being shared place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and a diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 12/03/24 at 7:45 a.m., LVN A went into Resident 168's room, and performed a finger stick. LVN A left the computer screen open with Resident 168's medication information showing LVN A came out of the resident's room, prepared the insulin pen, returned to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #7) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: Resident #7 MDS and care plan were in accurate in that was indentified as being on anti-coagulants/antiplatelets when she was not. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care and services due to inaccurate records. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's admission record dated 12/3/24 revealed a she was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 1/11/23 and a re-admission date of 8/22/24 with diagnoses of unspecified fracture of left femur unspecified fracture of left femur (broken left thigh bone, where the exact location of the fracture on the femur is not specified) and Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia (Dyskinesias are involuntary, erratic, writhing movements of the face, arms, legs or trunk). Record review of Resident #7's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #65) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's comprehensive care plan addressed hospice. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65's comprehensive care plan addressed residing on the memory care unit. This deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Record review of the facility admission Record dated 12/5/24 revealed that Resident #22 was a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 1/13/2023 and a re-admission date of 6/20/24. Resident #22 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #55 and Resident #28) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55, and Resident #28 was provided personal grooming(shaving) by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, and dignity issues. Findings included: Resident #55 Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 12/03/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on 10//01/24. Resident #55 had diagnoses included: dementia (decline in thinking, remembering and reasoning), psychosis (lose touch with reality, heart failure(heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and anxiety disorder (experiences excessive feelings of fear, worry). Record review of Resident #55's admission MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 10 residents (Residents #29) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: CNA A did not clean Resident #29's groin, buttocks, or open labia to clean during incontinent care. CNA A used cleaning cloth wipe as the resident had bowel movement, and CNA A put the new brief under the resident's buttock without changing gloves, but the resident's buttock had residual of stool. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 12/05/2024, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses diagnosis of anxiety disorder ( a condition that causes excessive worry and fear that interferes with daily life), history of falling, need for assistance with personal care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 9 residents (Residents #39) reviewed for significant medication errors. - RN C failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident # 39 by attempting to administer crushed potassium CL micro 20meq ER, which had the instruction, do not crush as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of abnormal heart rhythms, and potential hospitalization. The findings were: Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's face sheet dated 12/05/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 had diagnoses included: heart failure (when the heart cannot pump enough oxygen - rich blood to meet the body's needs), hypokalemia (lower than normal potassium level in the bloodstream), dementia (decline in thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and gastrostomy (a small opening into the abdomen and inserted a tube directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 Staff (CNA A) reviewed for infection control. - The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed proper hand hygiene during incontinent care. These deficient practices could affect residents and place them at risk for infection, and reinfection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 12/05/2024, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a condition that causes excessive worry and fear that interferes with daily life),) gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (gastric reflux), history of falling, need for assistance with personal care, constipation, unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to conduct regular inspections and maintenance of resident bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, leading to potential entrapment hazards for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for safety in rooms. The facility failed to conduct regular inspections of resident bed frames and mattresses to identify risks and problems. Resident #3's bed had a significant gap between the mattress and bedframe. These failures could place residents at risk of injury resultant from equipment malfunction, entrapment, or falls. The finding included: Record review on 12/04/24 at 9:00 am of Resident #3's admission face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features ( a serious mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, along with changes in energy, thinking, behavior, and sleep) type 2 diabetes mellitus with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public on three of five halls observed (hall 100, 400 & 500). Floors on Secured unit (hall 100) were dirty and stained. Resident bathrooms on halls 100 were unkept, unclean, had strong urine odor and unsanitary. Window blinds on halls 100, 500 were bent and torn and Hall 400 vertical blinds had missing slats. Windows on hall 100 has an accumulation of spider webs and green stuff on the outside. The toilet bowls on hall 100 had brown and black stains in them. The tiles in rooms on 100 hall was broken, based boards not affixed to the wall, broken sheet racks and peeling paint on the wall. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation of Hall 100 on 07/10/2024 between 11:10-11:40 AM reveal the following: *room [ROOM NUMBER] had broken floor tiles at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for one (Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. Resident #3 was taken in the personal vehicle of Driver A to a dialysis appointment. Her wheelchair could not be accommodated, and she was asked to use her walker for mobility. 2. Resident #3 expressed being tired after dialysis and was left to wheel herself without assistance back to her room. This failure could decrease the resident's quality of life, increase anxiety, and put other residents at risk for not having their needs and preferences met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed a seventy-year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of ten residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. Resident #1 had not had a shower since 05/11/24. 2. Resident #2 did not receive his scheduled shower on 05/28/24. These failures could place residents at risk for skin break downs, odor, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a sixty-eight-year-old woman who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system), cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertensive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease). Her face sheet also indicated that she had a C bed with an even room number. Record review of Resident #1's care plan revealed that she had the potential for impairment to skin integrity, fragile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodates resident preferences for one (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for food preferences. 1. Resident #4 required total assistance during feedings and was served cold food during mealtimes. This failure could place resident who require assistance from staff during mealtimes at risk of not enjoying meals that meet their preferences. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet revealed an eighty-one-year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were hemiplegia (total paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), encounter for attention to gastronomy (attention to how food is prepared), and cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of Resident #4's care plan revealed that she had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #2) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #2 in relation to tube feeding. This failure could place 8 residents who receive tube feeding services at risk for not having their needs identified and addressed. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed an eighty-three-year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses was dementia (memory loss), cerebral infraction, cerebral atherosclerosis (arteries in the brain become hard, thick, and narrow, due to buildup of plaque in artery walls), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hyperlipidemia (abnormally high level of fats (lipids). Record review of Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for transfers. CNA A failed to lock Resident #1's wheelchair during a transfer. This failure could place residents who require assistance during transfers at risk for falls and injuries. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a sixty-nine-year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses Type 2 Diabetes (the body does not produce enough glucose to energize the cells), heart failure, unspecified dementia (memory loss), unsteadiness on feet, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident#1's care plan revised 01/21/23 focus area revealed an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions detailed that Resident #1 was dependent on staff to move from sit to lying, lying to sitting, sit to stand, chair/bed to chair transfer, and tub/shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist with residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for ADL's. -Resident #1 fingernails were observed with black debris underneath the nails. -Resident #2 was observed with a moderate amount of facial hair growing on her chin. These failures could place residents at risk for low self-esteem and decrease in dignity. Findings: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an 60year old female admitted to the facility on originally 03/01/2021 and again on 09/29/2023 with the diagnoses that included the following; malignant otitis externa (severe infection that affects the outer ear canal, skull base, and temporal {temple region of the head}) of left ear, end stage renal disease (pertaining to the kidney), type two diabetes mellitus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection. -Resident #1s bedpan was laying on the floor in room over in a corner with no name on bedpan nor was the bedpan bagged. This failure placed resident at risk for unwanted infections. Findings: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an 60year old female admitted to the facility on originally 03/01/2021 and again on 09/29/2023 with the diagnoses that included the following; malignant otitis externa (severe infection that affects the outer ear canal, skull base, and temporal {temple region of the head}) of left ear, end stage renal disease (pertaining to the kidney), type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), dependence of renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed properly. -The facility failed to ensure the dumpster lids and doors were secured. This failure could place residents at risk of infection from improperly disposed garbage. Findings include: Observation on 11-01-23 at 8:55 am, with the Dietary Food Service Manager revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the lot behind the dietary department had a commercial -size dumpster and the lid and door were opened. Interview on 11-01-23 at 9:00 am, the Dietary Food Service Manager stated the dumpster lids always must be closed to keep vermin, pests, and insects out of the dumpster and from entering the facility. Interview with the Administrator on 11/03/23 at 3:30 PM revealed the facility did not have a copy of their Policy and Procedure for Food Related and Rubbish Disposal.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #164) reviewed for respect and dignity. -The facility failed to provide Resident #164 privacy when providing incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment and lower self-esteem. Findings include: Record review of Resident #164's face sheet revealed reflected an 70-year- old female who was originally admitted to the NF facility originally on 02/09/2018 and again readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #164 had with diagnoses that consistedwhich included of the following: cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (one-sided with paralysis)(and hemiparesis (muscle weakness affecting one side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia (brain damage caused multiple strokes), muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size of an organ or tissue), and legal blindness. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #40) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's Foley catheter was secured as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 heels were off loaded as ordered by the physician . These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and treatments. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 40's face sheet, dated 11/02/2023, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #40 had diagnoses which included: elevated white blood cell count, sleep disorder, alcohol dependence, in remission, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech therapy-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for mental illness and intellectual disability or services of lesser intensity as required in the resident's comprehensive plan of care for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #164) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #164 received her hand device (cone) to her right contracted hand to prevent further contracture. This failure could place residents at risk for further contractures , skin breakdown, and a decrease in physical capabilities. Findings include: Record review of Resident #164's face sheet reflected a 70-year- old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #164 had diagnoses included: cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to extent possible for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #164) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility did not provide timely, thorough, or proper incontinent care for Resident #164 to prevent UTI's. This failure could place residents at risk for skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, sepsis, and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #164's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the NF on 02/09/2018 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size of an organ or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #164) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA ZZ did not touch Resident #164 personal items with soiled gloves after incontinent care was performed. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA ZZ and CNA TT washed or sanitized their hands after performing incontinent prior to leaving Resident #164's room. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, spread of infections, and decrease in quality of life. Findings: Record review of Resident #164's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #164 had diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (disrupted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,797 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $15,570 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $10,227 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARMONY CARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/25/2024
BROOKSHIRE HOLDINGS BH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
ELITE HC INVESTORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/2025
BODANSKY, HERSHELIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/2025
WEISS, CHAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/25/2024
BROOKSHIRE OPERATING BH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
ELITE HC HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/07/2025
HELLER, YESHAYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/06/2025
LLOYD, MATTHEWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/25/2024
NGUYEN, CHARLESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/25/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 9%Other / private 32%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$283per resident / day
operating cost
$8,615per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$253per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675700. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next