Harmony Care At Floresville
1811 6th St, Floresville, TX 78114 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (830) 393-2561 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $87,066 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-21)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.23 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.23 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.4%CMS range 38.3–68.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.4–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.8–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 92.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision, in that: On 01/10/2025 Resident #1 was transferred by CNA A using standing pivot transfer x 1 staff instead of a mechanical lift. During transfer Resident #1 was injured resulting in left tibia /fibula fracture. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 1/10/25 and ended on 1/13/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could lead to injury or death to residents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/30/2025, reveled an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right below the knee amputation (surgical procedure that removes the lower leg below the knee joint), Osteoporosis (a bone disease characterized by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopements for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: 1. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1. As a result, Resident #1, who had dementia, eloped from the facility on 5/7/2024 and was unaccounted for after approximately 5:45 pm. Resident #1 was discovered to be walking approximately 4 blocks from the facility near a busy street at approximately 6:10 PM. The weather for that day at around that time was in the upper 80s F and Resident #1 was purported to say she was thirsty and lost and was seen to be visibly perspiring. 2. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #2. As a result, Resident #2, who had Alzheimer's Disease, eloped from the facility on 5/3/2024 and was unaccounted for after approximately 5:15 PM. The facility was notified by law enforcement on 5/4/2024 the resident was discovered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate and complete discharge MDS was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for discharge MDS assessments. The facility failed to ensure a discharge MDS was completed and transmitted for Resident #2's within 14 days of his discharge to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet, accessed on 06/11/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood) , Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood) , Anxiety disorder (A group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), Peripheral vascular disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. Dietary Aide E had a moustache, was not wearing a moustache guard, and was preparing food. 2. The wall air conditioning unit above the dry goods storage was emitting small pieces of gray pellets onto the stored dry goods items. 3. A 22-gallon container of loose sugar also contained a cup for scooping the sugar. 4. A 16-ounce container of beef base paste labeled refrigerate after opening had been opened and was not stored in a refrigerator. 5. A 5-pound container of cottage cheese was labeled use by March 2026.6. A box of lettuce dated 04/07/2026 was withered and brown with parts covered by a wet and slimy substance. 7. A box of lettuce dated 04/30/2026 had a wet and slimy substance which was white with black spots on the plastic wrapping around the lettuce.8. A 20-pound container of frozen potatoes was labeled use by May 6, 2026.9. A 15-ounce container of mango…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #3 and #11) observed for nursing care: 1.The Facility failed to ensure resident's privacy was provided during care when LVN C did not close Resident #3's room door while providing colostomy care.2 The Facility failed to ensure resident's privacy was provided during care when CNA D did not completely close Resident #11's privacy curtain while providing catheter care for the resident. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignityThe findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/08/2026, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2025, and a readmission date of 11/26/2025, with diagnoses that included: Osteomyelitis (infection in a bone), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for oxygen : The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's nebulizer tubing was bagged. This failure could place at risk for an increase in respiratory complications. Findings included:Record review of Resident # 38's face sheet dated 5/5/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] diagnoses included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [disease is characterized by breathlessness], Asthma [is a chronic condition that causes the airways in the lungs to be inflamed and narrowed at times], and Atrial fibrillation [irregular heart rhythm with symptoms include fatigue, heart palpitations, trouble breathing and dizziness]. Record review of Resident #38's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 13, which indicated intact cognition. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items in 1 of 5 reviewed residents' refrigerators. The facility failed to date open food items in the resident's #39 personal room refrigerator. This deficient practice could put residents at risk of foodborne illness from consuming spoiled food. The findings were: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 5/05/2026, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included:Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (a non-cancerous condition in men where the prostate gland becomes enlarged as they get older), Bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), and Borderline personality disorder (a mental health condition characterized by intense emotions, unstable relationships, and a distorted self-image). Record review of Resident #39's BIMS assessment, dated 1/30/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control: The facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized her hands between change of gloves while providing colostomy care for Resident #3. This failure could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/08/2026, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2025, and a readmission date of 11/26/2025, with diagnoses that included: Osteomyelitis (infection in a bone), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood) and paraplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for staffing. The facility failed to employ sufficient staff to prepare resident meals resulting in meals not served according to the posted start times for dinner on 9/10/25 and lunch on 9/11/25. This failure could put residents at risk for altered nutritional status and/or weight loss. Findings included: Record review of facility posting Meal Times on 9/10/25, revealed: .Lunch Starts @ 11:00 am Dinner Starts @ 5:00 pm. Record review of facility's grievance logs revealed: 6/10/25 Food was cold 7/15/25 Cold Food Record review of Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed: 5/12/25 .Cold Food.Lunch, Breakfast, Dinner, Always late being served. 6/10/25 .food is cold sometimes. 7/14/25 .food is cold at breakfast. During an interview on 9/10/25 at 2:58 pm, the DM said there was one cook and two dietary aides working (one in each building). The DM further stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 7 of 21 residents (Residents #12, #35, #70, #39, #80, #190 and, #198) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA-D sanitized her hands in between feeding and assisting Residents #35, # 39 and #70 with their meal on 03/18/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN-E followed EBP when administering G-tube medication to Resident #190 on 03/19/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA-F sanitized the blood pressure cuff in between use with Residents #80 and #12 on 03/20/2025. 4. a. The facility failed to ensure CNA A washed or sanitized her hands, before touching resident #198's clean brief and after touching the soiled resident's brief. b. The facility failed to ensure EBP were implemented or used while CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #20 and #62) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: 1. Resident #20's DNR was not signed twice by the physician. 2. Resident #62's DNR was not signed twice by the physician. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: fibromyalgia (long-term condition that involves widespread body pain and tiredness), hypothyroidism (condition in which thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone), and Covid-19. Further review of Resident #20's facesheet revealed, Advance Directive: DNR. Record review of Resident #20's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #42) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment incorrectly documented the resident as not receiving an antipsychotic medication. This failure could place residents at-risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings were: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 03/19/2025, revealed an admission date of 02/15/2021 and, a readmission date of 08/09/2023 with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Bipolar disorder (Mental disorder characterized by periods of depression and periods of abnormally elevated mood) and Anxiety disorder (A group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry). Record review of Resident #42's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 (Residents #188 and #195) of 8 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. 1. The facility failed to include Resident #188's risk for falls and epilepsy in his baseline care plan. 2. The facility failed to include Resident #195's oxygen therapy and wound care in his baseline care plan This failure could result in residents not receiving needed care and treatment. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #188's face sheet dated 03/21/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man who was admitted to facility on 03/06/2025 with diagnoses which included: Epilepsy (a disorder where nerve cell activity in brain is disturbed causing seizures); alcoholic cirrhosis of liver (chronic liver damage leading the scarring and liver failure)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to a meet resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #36's indwelling catheter care requirements. This deficient practices could affect residents who require an indwelling catheter by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of being inappropriately cared for. The finding were: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and, readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Anxiety disorder (A group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), Major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #195) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #195's used oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were disposed of and not left in the resident's room. This failure could place residents on respiratory therapy at risk for respiratory compromise and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #195's face sheet dated 03/18/2025 revealed a [AGE] year old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Congestive Heart Failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should); and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstruction of airflow to the lungs with symptoms that include shortness of breath, chronic cough, wheezing and excess mucus production…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 (Resident #195) of 8 residents reviewed for Medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #195 did not have a jar of mentholated ointment (a topical analgesic and decongestant) at the bedside. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #195's face sheet dated 03/18/2025 revealed a [AGE] year old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Congestive Heart Failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should); and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstruction of airflow to the lungs with symptoms that include shortness of breath, chronic cough, wheezing and excess mucus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. Access to the handwashing sink was blocked by two rolling carts. 2. There was a sand-like substance on top of the dish sanitizing machine. These deficient practices could result in residents consuming meals and/or snacks prepared in an unsanitary manner. The findings were: Observation on 03/18/2025 at 10:25 a.m. revealed that the hand-washing sink in the kitchen was blocked by a rolling cart with plate covers in front of the sink and a rolling cart with food trays next to it. During an interview with the Dietary Manager on 03/18/2025 at 10:27 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated the rolling carts should not have been stored in a manner which blocked access to the handwashing sink. The Dietary Manager further stated that kitchen staff moved the carts prior to washing their hands, and then put the carts back in front of and beside the sink. Observation on 03/21/2025 at 10:28 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facilities reviewed for nursing services. The facility did not have RN coverage for 24 days on 10/5/24, 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 10/20/24, 10/26/24, 10/27/24, 11/16/24, 11/17/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/30/24, 12/1/24, 12/7/24, 12/8/24, 12/14/24, 12/15/24, 12/21/24, 12/22/24, 12/28/24, 12/29/24, 1/4/25, 1/5/25, 1/18/25, and 1/19/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services. The findings were: Review of the facility RN timesheets revealed there were no RN hours for Saturdays on 10/5/24, 10/12/24, 10/26/24, 11/16/24, 11/23/24, 11/30/24, 12/7/24, 12/14/24, 12/21/24, 12/28/24, 1/4/25, and 1/18/25. Review of the facility RN timesheets revealed there were no RN hours for Sundays on 10/13/24, 10/20/24, 10/27/24, 11/17/24, 11/24/24, 12/1/24, 12/8/24, 12/15/24, 12/22/24, 12/29/24, 1/5/25, and 1/19/25. In an interview on 1/31/25 at 9:58 a.m. the DON stated the facility did not currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to receive reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences that would not endanger the health or safety of the residents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's call light was within reach. This failure could place the residents at risk of failing to achieve or failing to maintain independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 1/31/2025, revealed a [AGE] year old female was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 7/25/2024 with diagnoses that included: anxiety disorder, dementia, and hypertension. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 7 which was indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #5's Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for one of five residents (Resident # 2) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure Medication aide B locked the computer, which exposed Resident #2's morning medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 01/29/25 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnosis that included: Multiple sclerosis (is a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves), Hypertension (is when the force of blood against the artery walls is persistently too high), and Depression (is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: Resident #5's call light was not within reach according to one of the resident's care plan interventions for falls. This failure could place the resident at risk of inadequate care that may cause severe injury for the resident. The findings included: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 1/31/2025, revealed a [AGE] year old female was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 7/25/2024 with diagnoses that included: anxiety disorder, dementia, and hypertension. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for gastrostomy tube management., in that: 1. LVN A failed to check the placement of Resident #3's PEG tube prior to administering flushes and medications. 2. LVN A failed to check Resident #3's gastric residual volume prior to administering flushes and medications via Resident #3's PEG tube. 3. LVN A failed to follow Resident #3's order for flushes when administering flushes and medication via Resident #3's PEG tube. 4. LVN A failed to administer medications and flushes via Resident #3's PEG tube using gravity. These failures could place residents with gastrostomy tubes at risk of aspiration, medical complications, and a decline in health due to inappropriate gastrostomy tube care and management. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for privacy and confidentiality, in that: The confidential information of various residents was left in 3 clear plastic trash bags outside of the Medical Records office, and was left on top of a printer in area accessible to all staff, residents, and visitors. The findings included: 1. Observation on 8/6/24 at 9:45 a.m. revealed there were 3 clear trash bags outside of the Medical Records office. During an interview with LVN A on 8/6/24 at 9:45 a.m., at the same time as the observation, LVN A looked inside of each clear trash bag and confirmed that each clear trash bag contained confidential resident information. 2. Observation on 8/6/24 at 9:48 a.m. revealed there was a stack of papers were observed on top of a printer located in a T.V. lounge directly across from the Medical Records office. Further observation revealed a visitor was noted sitting in the lounge. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals, in accordance with State and Federal laws, were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for storage of drugs, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's medications were secured when LVN C left Resident #5's room prior to administering medications. This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. The findings included: Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 6/22/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart can't pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs) bradycardic (week pulse), deep vein thrombosis of left upper arm (a blood clot in a deep vein), atrial fibrillation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 (Resident #s 1 and 2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, in that; 1. The facility failed to report Resident #1's 5/7/2024 elopement to HHSC. 2. The facility failed to report Resident #2's 5/2/2024 elopement to HHSC. This failure could place residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' records were complete and accurate for 3 of 32 residents (Resident #5, #73, and #82) reviewed for clinical records, in that: 1. Resident #5's clinical record included a progress note which was inaccurate and appeared to have been written about a different resident. 2. Resident #73's diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder was not included on her face sheet. 3. Resident #82's colostomy care was completed by the resident not nursing staff, but nurses were signing off on the TAR as if they were completing care. These deficient practices could result in inadequate care due to incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 02/15/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Other Developmental Disorders of Scholastic Skills, and Anxiety Disorder. Record review of Resident #5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report were included into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR services, in that: Resident #5 did not receive specialized PASRR services as agreed upon during his Interdisciplinary Team meeting. This failure could place residents with a positive PASRR evaluation at risk for the loss of opportunity to reach their highest level of functioning and could contribute to a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings were: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 02/15/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Other Developmental Disorders of Scholastic Skills, and Anxiety Disorder. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident with a mental disorder was screened prior to admission for 1 of 3 of (#2) residents reviewed for PASRR: The facility did not correctly identify Resident #2 on the PASRR Level 1 Screening Form as having Mental Illness and did not submit a request to correct their PASRR negative screening. This failure could affect residents with mental illness that was not considered to be a Positive PASRR and could result in a decrease in services. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #2's Face sheet, dated 02/14/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old, admitted on [DATE] and was diagnosed with schizoaffective [a condition where symptoms of both psychotic and mood disorders are present together during one episode], bipolar [causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows] and [Type two Diabetes] health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete the baseline care plan for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #153) reviewed for baseline care plans in that: The facility failed to complete (Resident # 153's) baseline care plan within the required time frame. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive care at the facility and could result in missed or inadequate care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #153's face sheet dated 02/15/24 with recent admission date of 2/2/24 and diagnoses which included: displaced fracture of the left femur (a left broken thighbone), type 2 diabetes (a condition in which the body has difficulty controlling blood sugar) and atherosclerotic heart disease (an illness in which the heart's arteries are damaged). Record review of Resident #153's MDS, completed on 2/10/24, revealed a BIMS score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #153's Baseline Care Plan, shows a completion date of 2/7/24 with a locked finalization date of 2/13/24. In an interview with MDS Coordinator B on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #82 and #92) reviewed for care plans, in that: 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #82's self-care for colostomy. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #92's indwelling catheter was free of kinks; a dignity bag and anchor were used. These failures could have placed residents at risk of not having their needs met. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #82's face sheet, dated 2/13/24, revealed an admission date of 10/2/23 with the diagnosis that included: [Candidiasis] a fungal infection caused by a yeast, [colostomy status] An opening into the colon from the outside of the body which provides a new path for waste material to leave the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who was licensed or registered by the state for 1 of 1 Activity Director, reviewed in that: The facility failed to ensure the AD was qualified to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. The findings were: Record review of staff roster, provided by the facility, undated, revealed the staff member was listed as Activities Director. Further review revealed the AD was hired on 09/21/23. During an interview with the Activities Director on 02/15/24 at 10:45a.m., she stated that she was hired on 9/21/23 as an Activity Director Assistant but became Director of the Activity Department on 12/1/23. She stated that she knows the position requires an Activity Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinent bladder residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #82 and #7) reviewed for indwelling catheters and perineal/incontinent care, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #82 indwelling catheter was attached to prevent pulling or tugging to the urethra. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's indwelling catheter was attached to prevent pulling or tugging to the urethra and failed to provide a dignity bag. These failures could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma (injury to the duct in which urine is transported out of the body from the bladder), and urinary tract infections due to improper care. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #82's face sheet, dated 2/13/24, revealed an admission date of 10/2/23 with the diagnosis that included: [Candidiasis]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (excessive dose and duplicative therapy) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for unnecessary medications, in that: 1. Resident #6 received Lorazepam 0.5 mg three times a day for general anxiety disorder. 2. Resident #6 received Buspirone 7.5 mg three times a day for general anxiety disorder This failure could place residents at risk for adverse drug consequences and receiving unnecessary medications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #6's Face sheet, dated 2/15/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Generalized anxiety disorder] involves a persistent feeling of anxiety or dread, which can interfere with daily life, [ Major depressive disorder] mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest, and [Heart failure] occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labled and stored in loccked compartments in 1 medication cart of 6 medication carts (Nurse's Cart 400-hallway) and one crash cart of 2, reviewed for medication storage, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the Nurse's Cart 400 hallway was left unlocked and unattended in the hallway. 2. The facility failed to ensure the irrigation solution in the crash cart for the south building was not expired. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings included: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 7:02 a.m., the nurse's treatment cart in the 400 hallway was unlocked and unattended. There were ambulatory residents in the immediate vicinity, and there were no nurses at the nurses' station. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 7:18 a.m., the treatment cart in the 400 hallway remained unlocked; RN C was notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. Dietary Aide A was not properly wearing a hair restraint. 2. A food item in the dry storage area was not properly dated and labeled. 3. A kitchen drawer had a drawer cover and a drawer surface area that were not cleaned. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals and snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness from improper infection control, from a lack of food label date monitoring, and improper sanitation in the kitchen area. The findings included: Observation on 02/13/2024 from 9:50 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. during the kitchen tour revealed the following: a. Dietary Aide A was working in the kitchen wearing a hair restraint that did not fully cover the back of her head with visible exposed hair. b. There was a package of 24 blueberry muffins with a sealed plastic cover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain spaces of at least 80 square feet per resident for 14 of 15 Resident rooms (Resident rooms #101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 408, and 409) inspected for resident room sufficient space for privacy and comfort, in that: The facility failed to ensure resident rooms #101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 408, and 409 were maintained with at least 80 square feet of space per resident. This failure could place residents at risk of restricting their resident rights for comfort and privacy. The findings were: Record review of the Bed Classification Form 3740 dated 02/13/24 which was filled out by the Administrator indicated the capacity of the facility was 144 beds. In an interview with the Administrator on 02/16/24 at 10:55 a.m., revealed she was not aware of any room waivers for the facility. Review of the measurements provided by LSC, of the bedrooms which were measured and identified by the Maintenance Director indicated as follows: Bedroom # (allocated for 2 Beds as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, for 1 of 6 halls (400 hall) reviewed for physical environment, in that: The facility failed to secure loose flooring on the 400 hall. This failure could place residents who reside in the facility at-risk of falls and further injuries due to an unsafe environment. The findings were: Observation on 02/15/2024 at 08:35 a.m. revealed the flooring on the 400 hall was loose. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 2/16/2024 at 10:15 a.m., Maintenance Director confirmed there was loose flooring on the 400 hall. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2014, revealed, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, in that: The janitorial closet on 600 hall was unlocked and accessible to residents. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of coming into contact with harmful substances. Observation on 12/07/2023 at 5:45 a.m. revealed the janitorial closet on 600 hall was unlocked and accessible to residents; stored within were a gallon container of bleach and four varied containers of cleaning fluids, each labeled with caution, keep out of reach of children and harmful if swallowed. During an interview with ADON A on 12/07/2023 at 5:45 a.m., ADON A verbally confirmed the janitorial closet on 600 hall was unlocked, accessible to residents, and stored within were hazardous materials. ADON A stated the closet should have been locked and did not know why it had not been locked. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/07/2023 at 7:00 a.m., the Administrator verbally confirmed that hazardous materials…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain spaces of at least 80 square feet per resident for 14 of 15 Resident rooms (Resident rooms #101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 408, and 409) inspected for resident room sufficient space for privacy and comfort, in that: The facility failed to ensure resident rooms #101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 408, and 409 were maintained with at least 80 square feet of space per resident. This failure could place residents at risk of restricting their resident rights for comfort and privacy. The findings were:Record review of the Bed Classification Form 3740 dated 02/13/24 which was filled out by the Administrator indicated the capacity of the facility was 144 beds. In an interview with the Administrator on 02/16/24 at 10:55 a.m., revealed she was not aware of any room waivers for the facility. Review of the measurements provided by LSC, of the bedrooms which were measured and identified by the Maintenance Director indicated as follows:Bedroom # (allocated for 2 Beds as per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 1 beauty shop reviewed, in that: The beauty shop was unlocked and contained potentially dangerous materials. This deficient practice could result in residents, staff, and visitors living, working, and visiting in a potentially dangerous environment. The findings were: Observation on 03/21/2025 at 11:28 a.m. revealed the facility beauty shop was unlocked. Further observation revealed a container of liquid labeled [Brand] Disinfectant, Fungicide, Virucide - Danger Keep Out of Reach of Children and an open tube of hair dye labeled Danger Combustible Liquid. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Causes serious eye damage on top of a counter in the beautician shop. During an interview with MA C on 03/21/2025 at 11:29 a.m., MA A confirmed the presence of the disinfectant liquid and hair dye and confirmed that materials with warning labels should not be accessible, so that residents, staff, and the public do not come…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$87,066 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $60,452 — penalty dated 2025-03-21
- $18,185 — penalty dated 2025-01-31
- $8,429 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HARMONY CARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/25/2024 |
| ELITE HC INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/07/2025 |
| FLORESVILLE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| BODANSKY, HERSHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2025 |
| WEISS, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| RUFF, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/25/2024 |
| ELITE HC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/08/2025 |
| FLORESVILLE OPERATING BH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| CURRIER, DARYL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/25/2024 |
| HELLER, YESHAYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| RUEHLE, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/25/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675469. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.