No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harmony Care at Giddings

1181 N Williamson St, Giddings, TX 78942 · For profit - Partnership · 84 certified beds · (979) 542-3611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse7 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$193,468 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $193,468 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
219 W Railroad Row · (979) 542-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
233 S Manse Ave · (979) 542-3164 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
513 E Austin St · (979) 542-7425 · Call to confirm hours
Park
730 W Independence St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
697 W Boundary St · (979) 542-3498

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.0%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.9%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.2%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.1%88.0%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.962.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.132.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 66% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 5.7–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.621.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 37.5 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-17)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. CNA B failed to check the surroundings and notify LVN A when she heard the door alarm on the secured unit on 02/23/2026 at about 2:00 am. Resident #1 eloped from the facility and was found by local PD on a highway about 0.9 miles away from the facility with in the dark on 02/23/26 at 2:25 am. Resident #1 left the facility's secured unit through the door in the lobby area.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 02/23/26 and ended on 02/25/26. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unsafe elopements, falls, injuries, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of property of resident property, establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations, and ensure reporting of crimes for 2 of 6 residents (R#1 and R#2).1. The facility failed to ensure R#1 was safe after alleging the ADM harassed, bullied, and picked on him on 12/06/25.2. The facility failed to ensure R#2 was safe after alleging R#1 threatened to choke her with his genitals on 12/06/25.3. The facility failed to ensure an AP was removed upon being notified of abuse and neglect allegations on 12/06/25. 4. The facility failed to report and investigate R#1's and R#2's allegations on 12/06/25. An IJ was identified on 12/15/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:41 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 12/17/25 at 5:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-17 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility and not discharge the resident when the resident exercises his or her right to appeal a discharge notice for 1 of 6 residents (R#1). 1. The facility failed to discharge R#1 to a safe environment on [DATE]. R#1 had nowhere to go from [DATE] through [DATE] and was hospitalized on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to allow R#1 to remain in the facility when he exercised his right to appeal the discharge notice staff served him on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:17 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems.This failure could place residents at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice as soon as practicable before discharge and include the location to which the resident is discharged for 1 of 6 residents (R#1). 1. The facility failed to notify R#1 of his discharge before [DATE].2. The facility failed to include the address where R#1 would be discharged to on the discharge notice he was served on [DATE]. R#1 had nowhere to go from [DATE] through [DATE] and was hospitalized on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:41 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems.This failure could place residents at risk of worsening medical conditions, injury, hospitalization or death.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (R#1). 1. The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed in regard to the validity of witness statements alleged against R#1 on [DATE]. R#1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE] had nowhere to go from [DATE] through [DATE] and was hospitalized on [DATE].2. The facility failed to take immediate action to ensure the safety of all residents when there is a credible threat to the health and safety of residents alleged against R#1 on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:41 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents review for catheter care. The facility failed to change Resident #1's foley catheter (a medical device used to drain urine from the bladder.) as ordered monthly on 04/09/2025 and 5/9/2025. Resident #1 was sent to the local ER on [DATE] due to fever and lethargy and was diagnosed with possible sepsis (is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body has extreme response to infection). This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 05/19/2025 at 4:19 pm and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 05/20/2025 at 7:01 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm, that was not immediate jeopardy at a scope of pattern, due to the facility's need to evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents review for pharmacy services. The facility failed to carry out Resident #1's orders from the hospital for insulin to control his blood glucose. Resident #1 was sent to the local ER on [DATE] due to fever and lethargy and was diagnosed with Diabetes Ketone Acidosis (DKA-Diabetes Ketone Acidosis is serious and can be life threatening. DKA is when your body doesn't have enough insulin to allow blood sugar into your cells for use as energy (with a blood serum level of 478. Normal blood serum glucose levels: Fasting blood glucose 70 to 99 mg/dL. Random blood glucose: generally, it should be 125 mg/dL.) . This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 05/19/2025 at 4:19 pm and an IJ template was given.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident# 25) reviewed for elopement and failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 shower rooms reviewed for quality of care. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 was monitored for wandering and elopement. Resident #25 eloped from the facility on 05/14/2024 without facility knowledge and was found at the convenience store 0.4 miles away. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 05/29/2024 at 1:22 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/31/2024 at 1:00 PM, the facility remained out of compliance because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of its corrective systems. This failure places residents at risk for elopement, accidents, and heat exhaustion due to lake of supervision. B) The facility failed to ensure two spray bottles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, in that:On 12/25/25 the facility failed to ensure that Resident #5 was not hit multiple times over the head with a plastic trashcan by Resident #4. Resident #5 suffered a laceration, received three staples to his head and required a less than 24-hour hospitalization. This failure could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury and hospitalization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 01/05/26 revealed a seventy-year-old man who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included dementia (severe cognitive decline (memory, thinking, reasoning) impacting daily life, caused by damaged brain cells), schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder causing hallucinations (like hearing voices), delusions (false beliefs), disorganized thinking, and unusual behaviors), and Parkinson's Disease (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for quality of life.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 received regular showers.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, infections, rashes and decreased self-esteem.1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/23/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), atherosclerotic heart disease (clogged or harden arteries), congestive heart failure (fluid back up and heart can't pump properly), and peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of life.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received regular showers.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, infections, rashes and decreased self-esteem. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 06/24/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included rhabdomyolysis (rare muscle injury where you muscle break down), other malaise (discomfort), diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic neuropathy (body does not produce enough insulin), metabolic encephalopathy (diffuse brain dysfunction), and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for reviewed for administration in that:1. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator followed the internal drug and alcohol policy.2. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator had his own residence and did not reside in the facility.3. The facility failed to ensure Area ADMIN followed up on reported concerns of the Administrator being drunk, drinking alcohol at the facility, and smoking in areas that were not designated for smoking.These failures placed residents at risk of inadequate supervision, physical, verbal, and/or psychosocial harm.Findings included: Observation on 5/20/2026 at 9:19 AM, outside the facility revealed a man in a blue hairnet, with a walker smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report allegations that the Administrator, who was living at the facility, was drinking alcohol and intoxicated while at the facility.The facility failed to report concerns that the Administrator was entering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services.1.The facility failed to label and date all food items located in the kitchen prep area, walk-in refrigerator and freezers observed on 5/20/2026, and 5/21/2026. 2.The facility failed to have closed fitting lids on the trash containers on observed on 5/20/2026, and 5/21/2026. These failures could place residents who receive meals from the kitchen and dine in the facility's dining room at risk for foodborne illnesses.The findings included:An observation conducted in the kitchen on 05/20/2026 beginning at 12:05 PM, revealed the following:Kitchen prep area: 1 large gray trash container with no lid that contained trash inside 1 large clear container, labeled white sugar 12/11 with no year or expiration date on top. Walk in refrigerator: 2 large storage bags of macaroni and cheese labeled 5/17/26, no discard date. 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transported back to the facility utilizing contracted transportation services after an appointment on [DATE]. Resident #1 was transported back to facility by the MTD in the MTD's personal car rather than by the arranged contracted transportation. During the transport, the personal vehicle was involved in a motor vehicle accident.This failure could place residents at risk of mental distress, serious injuries, and hospitalization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side (paralysis and partial weakness, resulting from stroke), muscle wasting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for two(2) of four(4) kitchen staff (DTA C, [NAME] B) reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure DTA C met the requirements for food handling by maintaining a valid Food Handler's Certificate. 2. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] B met the requirements for food handling by obtaining a current and valid Food Handler's Certificate before preparing and serving meals out of the facility kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and foodborne illnesses.Findings included: Record Review of the dietary food handler certificates provided on 05/21/2026 at 4:35 PM revealed DTA C's food handler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 5 of 9 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged neglect incident reported by Resident #1 on 12/14/2025 when Resident #1 alleged staff were not performing peri-care appropriately.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged neglect incident reported by Resident #2's family member on 12/21/2025 when Resident #2 fell and was allegedly left on the floor for over an hour.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged abuse incident reported by Resident #3 on 12/23/2025 in which Resident #3 stated a pillow was placed over his face by staff around the time of his admission in April 2025.The facility failed to investigate an alleged resident-to-resident abuse incident between Resident #4 and Resident #5 that was documented in Resident #4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for two of eight residents (Resident #4 and Resident #5) in thatThe facility failed to report to Health and Human Services alleged abuse that occurred on 12/13/25 when Resident #4 allegedly kicked and punched Resident #5. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including the category of work for each person on direct care, including, but not limited to, whether the individual was a registered, nurse, licensed practical nurse, licensed vocational nurse, certified nursing assistant, therapist, or other type of medical personnel as specified by CMS for one of one facility reviewed for administration. The facility failed to submit PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) staffing information to CMS for October 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Record review of the CMS PBJ report for CMS FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024) indicated the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. Interview on 07/17/2025 at 7:45 AM the Corporate Nurse stated that she was aware the Payroll Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen.1. The facility failed to label and date all food items located in the walk-in refrigerator, freezers and in the dry food pantry area on 7/15/2025, and 7/16/2025. 2. The facility failed to clean and sanitize its food storage areas, to include the shelves and 1freezer in storage room. on 7/15/2025, and 7/16/2025.3. The facility failed to clean and sanitize its dining area on 7/15/2025, 7/16/2025, and 7/17/2025. These failures could place residents who receive meals from the kitchen and dine in the facility's dining room at risk for foodborne illnesses.Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/15/2025 beginning at 09:30 AM, the following was observed:Dry Food Pantry area: 18 cans of diced red peppers, not labeled and dated 6 cans of Thick it, not labeled and dated 2 gallons…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 (Resident #5, Resident #8, Resident #22, Resident #27, Resident #15, Resident #39, and Resident #42 of 11 residents reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to:1. Ensure CNA B and Medication Aide A practiced proper hand hygiene while serving and assisting residents #22, #27, and #42 during the lunch meal on [DATE].2. Ensure CNA C changed dirty gloves when handling clean items while providing peri care to Resident #8.3. Ensure Medication Aide A sanitized blood pressure monitors in between Resident #15 and Resident #39 while obtaining blood pressures. 4. Ensure LVN F washed his hands before and after the wound care on Resident #5 and changed dirty gloves when handling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for one of five residents (Resident #14) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to speak to Resident #14 in a way that promoted her dignity and self-worth. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth.Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a condition where a person exhibits symptoms of dementia, but the specific type of dementia was not identified, and the severity had not been specified. Dementia- a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident# 12 and Resident #16) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12, and Resident # 16's nails were cleaned, and did not have rough edges. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a disorder where the body either does not produce enough insulin or cannot properly use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar levels), lack of coordination (the inability to smoothly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two of five residents ( Resident # 15 and Resident #25) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Resident #15 and Resident #25 in room activities on the dates of 07/01/2025 thru 7/17/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for boredom, depression, and diminished quality of life. Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage properly in 1 of 1 kitchen.On 07/15/2025 at 9:30 AM, 1 of 2 facility garbage containers were observed with no lids attached or on them and they had waste inside. This failure has the potential to affect residents in the facility, staff, and visitors by placing them at risk of infection for exposure to germs and diseases carried by pests and rodents. In an interview with Dietary Supervisor on 07/16/2025 at 3:15 PM, Dietary Supervisor stated that trash cans should always have lids and should remain closed when not in use. Dietary Supervisor stated not keeping the lids closed could lead to cross contamination, placing residents at risk of illness.In an interview 07/17/2025 at 9:51 AM with Dietary Aide D, she stated that she has been employed at the facility for six years and has worked in the kitchen for the past four years. She reported that she has been trained on all kitchen policies. Dietary Aide D stated that trash cans should be kept always closed with a lid. She explained that if a trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for one of one kitchen reviewed for effective pest control.The facility had presence of mouse droppings on a shelf in the food storage room.This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life.Observation on 07/15/2025 at 9:22 AM, in the facility's kitchen food storage room revealed several mouse droppings on the bottom shelf.In an interview with Dietary Supervisor on 07/16/2025 at 3:15 PM, she stated it looked like mouse droppings to her as well on the shelf. Dietary Supervisor stated the maintenance department was responsible for pest control. She stated the shelf would be cleaned that day.In an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 7/17/2025 at 9:44 AM, he stated that he began working at the facility on June 2, 2025. He reported that he has not personally seen any pests in the facility; however, some staff members have informed him that they have seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #1) out of four residents reviewed for the development of the comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a comprehensive person-centered care plan completed to reflect Resident #1's care needs for Catheter, Diabetes, Oxygen therapy, medications (antibiotics , anti-hypertensive, anticoagulant), and Cognition. This deficient practice places the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary and appropriate care. Findings included: Review of Resident # 1's face sheet dated 05/18/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was placed on Isolation after she tested COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019) positive in the hospital on [DATE]. The facility failed to have signage on Resident #1's door that reflected PPE was required for infection control. The facility failed to removed Resident #2 from a COVID-19 positive room even though she tested negative for COVID. These failures could place residents at risk for infection, or hospitalization. Findings included: According to the intakes received by HHSC, The facility is not practicing infection control. They are not quarantining the covid positive Residents. [Resident #3] is next door to [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #5) of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor Resident #5's request of being assisted out of bed on 02/09/25. This failure could place resident at risk for depression, diminished quality of life and isolation. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 02/09/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that occurs when the right side of the brain is damaged, resulting in physical disabilities on the left side of the body), depression, unspecified (disorder than can impact your mood, thoughts and feelings, weight, sleeping habits, etc.) and pain. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and psychosocial status for one (Resident #4) of seven residents reviewed for changes in condition. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #4's RP of Resident #4 being hit by a peer on 2/3/25. 2. The facility failed to notify Resident #4's RP of a visit to the ER after Resident #4 had a fall on 2/7/25 with an onset of increased confusion. These failures could put residents at risk of not having their care needs and health changes communicated and addressed with their responsible party. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with early onset (a progressive disease that destroys memory, thinking and behavior, interfering with daily functioning), cognitive communication deficit (reduced ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for two (Residents #4 and #7) of seven residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse when Resident #7 hit Resident #4 on her face on 2/3/25. This failure placed residents at risk of further abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with early onset (a progressive disease that destroys memory, thinking and behavior, interfering with daily functioning), cognitive communication deficit (reduced ability to communicate needs), and dementia (brain impairment of at least two brain functions). Responsible Parties are listed as Resident #4 and RP E. Review of Resident #4's MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #5 and #7) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for Resident #5 included the need for a mechanical lift transfer with the assistance of 2 staff. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's comprehensive care plan included aggressive behaviors. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate physical and psychosocial care. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 2/9/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for one (secure hall) of three halls reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure an exit door on the secured unit contained an alarm to alert staff if a resident exited the door. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of injury or harm. Findings included: Review of the facility Midnight Census report dated 2/9/25 revealed there were 7 residents listed as residing on the secure unit. Review of the facility IRs from 10/1/2025 through 2/9/25 revealed there were none related to unauthorized departure. During an observation and interview on 2/8/25 at 12:48 pm with CNA F revealed he believed that the exit door contained an alarm that went off when it was opened. CNA F was not certain how to turn the alarm off. He stated he would normally ask the Administrator, who was not at the facility on that day. CNA F stated he had not observed any residents trying to go out the door.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor Resident #1's request of being assisted out of bed between 8:30 and 9:00 AM on 09/12/2024. This failure could place resident at risk for depression, diminished quality of life and isolation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/12/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that occurs when the right side of the brain is damaged, resulting in physical disabilities on the left side of the body), depression, unspecified (disorder than can impact your mood, thoughts and feelings, weight, sleeping habits,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #1 included ADLs, behaviors, and diagnosis of mental illness on 07/25/2024. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate physical and psychosocial care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet , dated 09/12/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that occurs when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory electronic submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. The facility failed to submit direct care staffing information on the schedule specified by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), but no less frequently than quarterly for 1 of 4 quarters reviewed for payroll data information (Quarter 1 2024). The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 1st quarter ([DATE] to March 30) of fiscal year 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings included: Review of the facility's Civil Rights Survey Report dated 05/28/2024 (Form 3761) indicated the following: 3 RNs 7 LVNs 9 Direct Care Staff 6 Dietary 4 Housekeeping & Laundry 7 All Others Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 5 of 15 of Residents (Residents #27, #5, #13, #1 and #19), 1 of 1 outside facility grounds, and 1 of 1 shower rooms reviewed for homelike environment. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's bathroom soap dispenser was attached to the wall on 05/28/2024 at 09:38 AM. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5's remote control cord for her bed was intact and functional on 05/28/2024 at 09:40 AM. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's window blinds were intact and not missing slats on 05/28/2024 at 09:40 AM. D) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's window blinds were attached to the top of her window; the windowsill was attached securely to the window and the baseboard next to the window was attached to the wall on 05/29/2024 at 9:49 AM. E) The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's windowsill was attached securely to the wall and her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents goals and preferences for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #88, #22, #19 and #24) reviewed for respiratory care. A. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80's CPAP mask was covered with a dated plastic bag on 05/28/2024 at 9:52 AM B. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's nebulizer mask was covered with a dated plastic bag on 05/29/2024 at 2:33 PM. C. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's oxygen tubing was dated on 05/28/2024 at 11:02 AM and failed to ensure her nasal cannula was covered with a dated plastic bag when not in use. D. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's nebulizer mask was covered with a dated plastic bag on 05/29/2024 at 2:33 PM when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infections.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all expired drugs and biologicals were removed and destroyed for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medications and failed to ensure 1 of 1 medication storage room refrigerators was free of contaminants. The facility failed to remove 7 bottles of expired medication from the medication storage room and 1 container of expired protective skin applicators when it was observed on 05/28/2024 at 3:45 PM. The facility failed to ensure the medication room refrigerator was free of contaminants including staff food and drinks when it was observed on on 05/28/2024 at 3:45 PM. This failure could place all residents at an increased risk of receiving expired and/or contaminated medications/supplements resulting in adverse health consequences. Findings included: Observation on 05/28/2024 at 3:45 PM in the medication storage room revealed one bottle of Aspirin 81 mg expiration date 08/2023, four bottles of Docusate Sodium expiration date 04/2024, one bottle of natural tear eye drops expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 1 of 1 dining rooms and 1 of 1 shower room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the dining room was free of flies during the resident meal service on 05/28/2024 at 12:15 PM. The facility failed to ensure the shower room was free of roaches and water bugs on 05/29/2024 at 1:15 PM. These failures could place residents at risk for insect borne illness, not having a home free of pests and a comfortable environment in which to live. Findings included: Observation on 05/28/2024 at 12:15 PM revealed one resident swatting a fly off of her food. The fly landed in her dessert cup and was stuck on the inside. Another resident had a fly land on her drink cup several times. Observation on 05/29/2024 at 1:15 PM in the shower room of a small brown roach crawling toward the commode and a water bug (a large insect that can bite and prefers very wet environments) approximately one-inch-long crawling on the wall above the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately to the state survey agency, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident# 25) reviewed for elopement. The facility did not report to the state survey agency when Resident #25 eloped from the facility on 05/14/2024 without facility knowledge and was found at the convenience store 0.4 miles away. This failure places residents at risk for elopement, accidents, and heat exhaustion due to lake of supervision. Findings included: Review of Resident #25's Face sheet dated 05/28/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Vertigo (A sense of spinning experienced even when someone is perfectly still.), anxiety disorder, (Fear characterized by behavioral disturbances.) and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #25 Annual MDS dated [DATE] reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had orders and followed physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 15 Residents (Resident #80) reviewed for admission orders. The facility failed to provide physician's orders for fingerstick blood sugar checks for Resident #80 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility failed to check Resident #80's blood pressure per Physician's orders. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and services upon admission that could result in a deterioration of her condition. Findings included: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #80 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) and Morbid Obesity (severely overweight). Record review of the Discharge Medications list dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80's baseline care plan dated 05/28/2024 included instructions to address her admission diagnosis, Type 2 Diabetes (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) and physician orders within 48 hours of admission. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services. Findings included: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #80 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 5 out of 8 residents reviewed for comfortable and safe temperature levels. The facility failed to ensure the dining area was within 71-81 degrees Fahrenheit . This failure could place residents susceptible to loss of body heat and an uncomfortable setting. Findings included: Observation on 01/17/2024 at 10:50 a.m., revealed a personal use thermometer on top of a piano in the dining room, the temperature observed was at 67 degrees Fahrenheit. Further observations revealed no residents in the dining room. Observation on 01/17/2024 at 10:53 a.m., revealed dining room thermostat set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit, and temperature at 67 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation on 01/17/2024 at 12:01 p.m., revealed dining room thermostat set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit, and temperature at 68 degrees Fahrenheit while residents were eating lunch. Interview on 01/17/2024 at 10:43 a.m., Resident #1 stated that the dining room. Can be really cold, and that, it (dining room)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accidents and hazards for one (1) (Resident #1) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to properly supervise Resident #1 and as a result she had a cigarette lighter stored in her room. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for accidents resulting in injuries or hospitalization related to burns or fire. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/3/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Personal History of Lung Cancer, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Dementia (age related memory loss) and Paraplegia (partial paralysis). Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Section G, Functional status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents for two (Nurse medication cart and Nurse treatment cart) of four (4) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to prevent the Nurse's medication cart and Nurse's treatment cart from being unattended and unlocked. This failure could place residents, unauthorized staff and visitors access to medications that could cause physical harm and decreased quality of life . Findings include: An observation on 10/14/2023 at 11:07 am revealed the Nurse's medication cart and Nurse's treatment cart were unlocked and unattended at the nurse's station. There were three residents, one agency staff and 2 family members in the immediate vicinity of the two unlocked carts. There were no facility staff observed to be in the area. An observation on 10/14/2023 at 11:09 am revealed a nurse returning to the Nurse's station and sitting behind the station, out of the line of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan after each assessment, including comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for care plan timing, in that: 1. Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 08/08/23 and her most recent comprehensive person-centered care plan was revised and completed on 01/06/2023. 2. Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 07/20/23 and his most recent comprehensive person-centered care plan was revised and completed on 02/03/2023. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their current preferences, goals, and needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/29/2023, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, personal history of COVID-19, unspecified muscle wasting and atrophy (a decrease in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for four of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had an RN on duty on 03/05/23, 03/12/23, 03/19/23, and 03/25/23. This failure placed residents at risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, care, and treatment. Findings included: Review of RN staffing hours for March 2023 reflected zero hours worked by an RN on 03/05/23, 03/12/23, 03/19/23, and 03/25/23. During an interview on 03/30/23 at 12:27 PM, the DON stated the facility census has been between 32 and 35 for over a year, and she has worked as the facility RN either Sunday or Saturday since she started. She stated she thought the rules about RN coverage were that if the census was low enough, they did not need an RN on duty every day. She stated she lived only a few minutes away from the facility and was on call 24/7 if there was an issue or a need for RN assessment or presence. The DON stated there was not an RN on duty the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (Resident #25 and Resident #2) of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The DON failed to ensure Resident #25's GI consult was scheduled in a timely manner. 2. Resident #2 was not wearing compression bandages as ordered on 3/29/2023 and 03/30/23 and did not receive monitoring for edema as ordered. These failures placed residents at risk of delayed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 3/30/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder), type 2 diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar), Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified convulsions (irregular muscle movements), epileptic seizures (neurological disorder), major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for two of four residents (Residents #11 and #12 and 1 of 1 LVN (LVN A) reviewed for fingerstick blood sugar checks. LVN A failed to sanitize the common glucometer, which is used during blood testing between resident blood sugar checks for Resident #11 and #12. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to blood-borne diseases. Findings Included: Observation on 03/28/2023 at 10:59 AM, revealed LVN B preparing to perform a finger stick blook sugar (FSBS) test on Resident #12. LVN B removed the glucometer from the cart and placed the glucometer on the cart without cleaning the cart. LVN B without cleaning the glucometer took the glucometer into Resident #12's room along with her insulin pen and placed both items on her night stand without cleaning the night stand or putting down a barrier. LVN B then performed the FSBS test on Resident #12. After the FSBS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$193,468 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $12,428 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
  • $23,238 — penalty dated 2026-01-07
  • $58,380 — penalty dated 2025-12-17
  • $91,250 — penalty dated 2025-05-20
  • $8,172 — penalty dated 2024-05-31
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-21 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARMONY CARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2024
ELITE HC INVESTORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
GIDDINGS HOLDINGS BH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BODANSKY, HERSHELIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
WEISS, CHAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2024
ELITE HC HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/15/2024
GIDDINGS OPERATING BH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
HOUSE, JANELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
NORMAN, KELLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 11%Other / private 25%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,580per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$251per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675564. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next