No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Palms Nursing & Rehabilitation

5607 Everhart Rd, Corpus Christi, TX 78411 · For profit - Corporation · 204 certified beds · (361) 854-4601 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation3 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$69,235 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $69,235 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-06)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5421 Everhart Rd · (361) 240-3744 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4639 Corona Dr Ste 26 · (361) 814-8983 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5405 Everhart Rd · (361) 854-9445 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4610 Bonner Dr · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.3%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.1%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.6%13.4%21.2%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication9.5%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.8%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.402.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.162.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
21.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 204 beds and averages 100.9 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 103 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-02)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of fifteen residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from being verbally abused by SA on April 29th 2024. The non-compliance for Resident #1 was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/29/2024 and ended on 04/29/2024. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure placed all residents at the facility at risk of severe psychosocial harm by being forced to interact with an employee that verbally abuses residents. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/12/2023. Pertinent diagnoses included depression unspecified (patient is primarily depressive but does not meet the full criteria for any specific depressive disorder) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect and abuse. The facility failed to report verbal abuse by the SA to local law enforcement in accordance with state law on 04/29/24 The non-compliance for Resident #1 was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/29/2024 and ended on 04/29/2024. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of continued victimization, abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the undated facility Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy stated the facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-27 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist provided for the resident's immediate care and needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for physician services. The facility failed to ensure there were orders for R#3's type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. On 12/22/23 at 3:55 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified., while the IJ was removed on 12/23/23 at 6:30pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could cause a delay in appropriate medical care and a worsening in symptoms, condition or illness up to and including death. The findings included: Record review of R#3's Face Sheet, dated 12/22/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided using proper safety techniques to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for accidents, Resident #2 (R #2) in that: The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Aide checked temperature of soup given to resident resulting in R #2 sustaining a second degree burn injuries. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 05/12/23 and ended on 05/17/23. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure could lead to the injury of residents that are served hot foods/beverages/liquids. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's (R#2) clinical file revealed a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission date of 3/21/2019. Diagnoses included, Heart Failure, lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood, Cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin), Edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (R#3) of 4 residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from an injury of unknown origin. Resident #3 suffered a dislocated shoulder and a later identified broken elbow . This failure could place residents at risk for further accidents and injuries. Findings were: Record review on Resident #3's face sheet dated 10/02/24 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: vascular dementia, primary osteoarthritis, and other specified bone density and structure, affective disorder , anxiety due to physiological condition, depression, and glaucoma. Record review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident had a BIMS score of 00 (resident unable to complete this part of the assessment). MDS also indicated the resident had moderately impaired vision, rarely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Tylenol #4 300/60mg was received and counted appropriately by LVN A, when hospice delivered medication the resident to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of pain. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/8/2026, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had medical diagnoses which included other specified renal tubal-interstitial diseases (inflammation affecting the kidney's tubules and surrounding tissues), magnesium deficiency, irritable bowel syndrome (chronic gastrointestinal disorder), muscle wasting (gradual decrease in muscle mass,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed. The facility did not develop a measurable and individualized care plan to address Resident #1's falls. This failure could place residents at risk for unmet medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and preferences. Record review of face sheet dated 12/18/2025 revealed Resident #1 was last admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's Face sheet also revealed admission and Primary Diagnosis as Unspecified Dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, language, judgement and behavior). Record review of the MDS Assessment Summary dated 11/02/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 which indicated severe mental impairment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to protect Resident #4's right to be free from verbal abuse when CNA-C made an insulting and ridiculing comment toward Resident #4 on 10/25/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for psychological harm or injury.The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 12/03/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 10/28/2013, and a current admission date of 02/05/2025. Resident #4's diagnoses included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder (commonly referred to as neurogenic bladder, occurred when nerve damage impaired bladder control), Obstructive Uropathy (a condition characterized by a blockage in the urinary system which impeded normal urine flow, potentially leading to kidney damage and other complications), Metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented within a timely manner for each resident, consistent with resident rights, to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop or implement Resident #3's comprehensive care plan when, after searching for over 3 hours, they were unable to find Resident #3's comprehensive care plan in her chart, on the electronic medical system, or in medical records. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 09/17/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 12/18/2024. Pertinent diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia (a condition which affects memory, thinking, and the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and the change of condition assessments to reflect the current conditions for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) whose care plans were reviewed for timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was revised after a significant change to accurately reflect current diagnoses and needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan had been reviewed or revised since 2024. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate, individualized care and services. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/02/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms which interfere with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Resident #36, Resident #11, Resident #88, Resident #58) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #36, Resident #11, Resident #88, and Resident #58. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving services to meet their needs.The findings included: Review of Resident #36's face sheet revealed, the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia (group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for two of six residents (Resident #66 and Resident #93) reviewed for medication errors in that: 1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 was administered glargine insulin appropriately within parameters on 08/19/25 and 08/25/25. 2) The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was administered glargine insulin appropriately by administering expired insulin on 09/16/25 and 09/17/25. These failures could place residents who receive insulin at an increased risk for complications such as hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and potential hospitalization.The findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #66's face sheet dated 09/17/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 10/09/24. Pertinent diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes (chronic disease where your body becomes resistant to insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 nutrition rooms (first floor and second floor nutrition room) reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to ensure items in the refrigerators and freezers were labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure items stored in the dry storge room were correctly dated and labeled. The facility failed to ensure refilled cereal in cereal dispensers were dated and label with correct date. The facility failed to ensure gloves were used at all times while making preparing uncooked foods. The facility failed to ensure applesauce and pudding sitting out in room temperature were labeled with current date and time. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.The findings included: Observation and Initial tour of the kitchen on 09/16/25 at 8:15 A.M., revealed multiple gnats flying in the dish room and there was a foul odor. The sink drain was dripping liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of infection, for 2 of 5 Residents (Resident #40 and Resident #63) that were reviewed for infection control in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the wound dressing on Resident #40 was dated and initialed. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA I performed proper perineal care (incontinent care) with Foley catheter for Resident #63. These deficient practices could place residents in the facility at risk for infections, healthcare associated cross contamination, and the spread of infection.Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #40's electronic face sheet, dated 09/18/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: Unspecified Dementia, Cerebral Infarction (stroke),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide Resident #5 with choices concerning her caregivers for personal care. LVN D did not leave the room when Resident #5 asked her multiple times to step out on 08/23/25. LVN D did not treat Resident #5 with respect and dignity on 09/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included:Record review of Resident #5's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent admission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paraplegia (the loss of voluntary movement and sensation in both legs), anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect, misappropriations of resident property, and exploitation for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. LVN D was verbally abusive to Resident #5 on two occasions on 08/24/25 and 09/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk for physical, mental, and/or psychosocial harm. The findings included:Record review of Resident #5's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent admission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paraplegia (the loss of voluntary movement and sensation in both legs), anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, or anxiousness which significantly interferes with daily life), metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical, or metabolic, problem in the body that can cause brain dysfunctions such as confusion, memory loss, and/or personality changes), and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #5) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The DON failed to follow the facility's policy to report an allegation of verbal abuse made by Resident #5 on or about 08/24/25 to the administrator, the ombudsman, or to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk for physical, mental, and/or psychosocial harm and lack of timely reporting of incidents.The findings included:Record review of Resident #5's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent admission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paraplegia (the loss of voluntary movement and sensation in both legs), anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by excessive and persistent worry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #5) of 6 residents reviewed for reporting. The DON did not report an allegation of verbal abuse made by Resident #5 on or about 08/24/25 to the Administrator, the ombudsman, or the state licensing/certification responsible for surveying/licensing the facility per facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk for physical, mental, and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR. (Resident #8). The facility failed to refer Resident #8 for PASRR Level II assessment when the facility had coded mental illness on his PASRR Level I assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services that would enhance their highest level of functioning. The findings included: Record review of Resident #8's Resident Face Sheet dated 09/18/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with a re-admission date of 09/04/24. Resident #8 had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complication (body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar levels), unspecified, Major Depressive disorder, recurrent (mental condition with repeated episodes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene, for one (Resident #86) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to provide Resident #86 with fingernail grooming. This failure could result in decrease in resident self-esteem, embarrassment, and infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #86's Resident Face Sheet dated 09/18/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/27/24. Resident #87 had diagnoses which included Dementia (decline in brain functions such as, memory, thinking, problem-solving & language) in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with mood disturbance, Other lack of Coordination (difficulty with voluntary movements & balance), Need for assistance with personal care, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition where body does not produce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, physicians orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 5 (Resident #47) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's oxygen tubing was changed and documented every night shift on Sunday as ordered. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of infection leading to a decline in health.The findings included: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 09/17/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 04/05/24. Pertinent diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (group of diseases that cause chronic inflammation and narrowing of the airways, making it difficult to breathe), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Record review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles reviewed for medications stored in 1 of 4 medication carts (2300/2400 Cart) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart for halls 2300/2400 was free from expired insulin pens. The failure could place residents in the facility at risk of receiving expired medications from staff. The findings included: Record review of Resident #93's face sheet dated 09/17/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 04/13/21. Pertinent diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes (chronic disease where your body becomes resistant to insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels), and long-term use of insulin. Record review of Resident #93's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score could not be obtained due to the resident rarely being understood. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 3 residents personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #114) in that: Resident #114's personal refrigerator located in her room was observed to have 2 slices of pie that were not dated or labeled. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.The findings included: Record review of Resident #114's Resident Face Sheet dated 09/17/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with a re-admission date of 08/08/25. Resident #114 had diagnoses which included Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (Primary Admission), Essential (primary) hypertension, Schizophrenia, unspecified. Record review of Resident #114's BIMS score quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 0, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. An observation on 09/16/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. The facility failed to accurately document the glucagon injection (hormone produced by the pancreas that raises blood sugar levels by signaling the liver to release stored glucose) Resident #66 received at approximately 7:45 AM on 07/08/25 in the MAR. This failure could result in residents' records not accurately reflecting the administration of medications and could result in further errors due to inappropriately administering medications twice. The findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet dated 09/17/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 10/09/24. Pertinent diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes (chronic disease where your body becomes resistant to insulin, leading…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 2 of 2 resident's bathroom sink (Resident # 43 and #88) and 2 of 5 resident rooms (Resident #76 and Resident #114) reviewed for the environment in that: The bathroom sinks in resident #43's and Resident #88's room were clogged. Resident #76's wall pad and floor mats were torn. Resident #76's nightstand was broken. Resident #114's bathroom sink cabinet door was missing. Resident #114's trim wall trim inside her bedroom was broken off. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortableA record review of Resident #43's Face Sheet 09/16/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #43's diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis(is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system, leading to a range of neurological symptoms due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for pests. The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for gnats flying in the dish room of the kitchen, and there was a foul odor in the dish room. These failures could put residents who consumed food from the kitchen at risk for infection and/or food contamination.The findings included: Observation and initial tour of the kitchen on 09/16/25 at 8:15 AM, revealed multiple gnats flying in the dish room and there was a foul odor in the dish room of the kitchen. An interview with the FSM on 09/16/25 at 8:45 a.m., she said the gnats in the dish room had been an on-going problem. Pest control was called and were there about 3 weeks ago. The FMS stated all the walls and floors were washed and scrubbed with disinfectant. Pest control invoices were requested. An interview on 09/18/25 at 4:38 PM with Maintenance Man he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from verbal abuse when CNA-A yelled at and ridiculed Resident #1 on 10/16/2025 as he was requesting assistance. These failures could place residents at risk of physical, mental and emotional decline, psychosocial harm, as well as result in isolation and withdrawal.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/16/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male first admitted to the facility on [DATE], and a readmission date of 11/18/2024. Pertinent diagnoses included vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow), major depressive disorder (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and generalized anxiety disorder (nagging feelings of worry or anxiety). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State) in accordance with state law for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure all alleged possible violations or allegations involving abuse for Resident #2 were reported to the proper entities immediately or as required by law on 10/08/2025. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for abuse or further potential for abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/14/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevented further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and/or misappropriation. The facility failed to do a thorough investigation to include having the CNA and/or charge nurse perform a thorough assessment of the situation and the environment of the residents identified in the abuse allegation the night of 10/08/2025. The facility also failed to have the charge nurse assess the residents identified in the allegation the night of 10/08/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their allegations investigated thoroughly or timely, as well as the potential for abuse to continue.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/14/2025, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures by one staff member (the SW) of five staff members reviewed for reporting of abuse allegations. The facility failed to ensure the SW reported all suspected abuse or mistreatment when a handful of residents informed her RN F and RN G were being mean to them approximately between March and April of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for physical, mental, and psychosocial harm. The findings include: In an anonymous interview, it was stated, night nurses RN F and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not fall out of his bed on 07/08/25 due to CNA C performing incontinent care alone instead of with a second person. This failure could place residents at risk for physical, mental, and psychosocial harm.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/18/25. His diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body), aphasia (an impairment in the ability to read, write, and speak), lack of coordination, seizures (abnormal brain activity which affects muscle control, behavior, and awareness), and history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7 had documented Quarterly Elopement Assessments since January 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate or incomplete assessments and records. Findings included: Record review of Quarterly Assessments for sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) revealed no quarterly assessments had been completed since 01/16/2025. In an interview with ADON-A on 06/26/2025 at 10:00 AM she stated the Quarterly Elopement Assessments were typically completed either by the charge nurse or one of the ADONs. She stated the previous MDS nurse would create a calendar for when the Quarterly Elopement Assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a respectful manner that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #3 with dignity and respect during a post-fall assessment by RN D in Resident #3's room on 05/16/25. RN D asked Resident #3 in a stern tone What is wrong with you and Do you want to break something while Resident #3 was still on the floor post-fall. This failure could place residents who require assistance from nurses at risk of feeling disrespected. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 06/19/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 04/18/25 and a discharge date of 06/19/25. Pertinent diagnosis included Depression. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 (cognition intact). Record review of Resident #3's comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and measures were taken to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment in accordance with State law, and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate, corrective action must have been taken for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and/or misappropriation. The facility failed to do a thorough investigation to include interviewing the victim (Resident #1) in the incident, the victim ' s RP, as well as other residents which may have been involved in the incident. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their allegations investigated thoroughly or timely. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 ' s face sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 07/16/2024. Diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (last stage of kidney failure), Anxiety, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to enforce the post-fall assessment policy leading to Resident #3 being moved after a fall prior to checking her vital signs and neurological status on 05/21/25. The failure could affect residents currently residing in the facility, resulting in not receiving needed care to maintain optimal health and placing them at risk for injury or deterioration in their condition. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 06/25/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 04/18/25 and a discharge date of 06/19/25. Pertinent diagnosis included Depression and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 (cognition intact). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN-A's medication cart on hall 300 contained an accurate count and record for Resident #1's Clonazepam 0.125 MG (a medication used to treat seizure disorders and panic disorder). This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion and/or a delay in medication administration, as well as risk of not having allegations investigated throoughly or timely. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 07/16/2024. Diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (last stage of kidney failure), Anxiety, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition which occurs when the body cannot use insulin effectively), and Depression. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the safe and orderly discharge for one (Resident #1) of four residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and orderly discharge for one (Resident #1) of four residents. The facility (Facility A) failed to plan a coordinated discharge and returned Resident #1 back to the discharging facility (Facility B) on the same day. This failure placed Resident #1 in the hospital due to the original discharging facility not accepting the resident. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face sheet dated 4/10/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted with diagnosis of Autistic Disorder (a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by repetitive, restricted, and inflexible patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as well as difficulties in social interaction and social communication), Epilepsy (a brain disorder characterized by recurrent seizures, which are episodes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA A used a gait belt to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to the wheelchair . This failure could place residents at risk for falls, injuries and a decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/30/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy , abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 14, which meant mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed. The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's preferences to leave the building and the actions or long-term goals to meet the needs of the resident. This failure could place residents at risk for unmet medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and preferences. Findings were: On 9/27/2024 at 1:24 p.m. review of face sheet dated 9/19/2023 revealed Resident 1 admitted on [DATE] for major depressive disorder, schizophrenia (mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), and acute gastritis (inflammation of intestine lining) without bleeding. On 9/27/2024 at 1:24 p.m. review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (Intact). On 9/27/2024 at 1:24 p.m. review of Resident 1's care plan last reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to perform preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability prior to admission for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for preadmission screenings. The facility failed to perform a PASRR for Resident #39 before or after she was admitted on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #39's admission record revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date on 08/13/18 and a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, dementia with psychotic disturbance, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent. Record review of Resident #39's care plan dated 08/02/24 revealed pg. 10 identified a problem dated 10/31/22 of potential for Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, for 3 residents (Resident #8, Resident #34, and Resident #48) of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed, in that: 1) Resident #8's comprehensive care plan was not reviewed or revised to include Resident #8's current code status of Full code, instead of Do Not Resuscitate. 2) Resident #34's comprehensive care plan was not reviewed or revised to discontinue Resident #34's use of insulin. 3) Resident #48's comprehensive care plan was not reviewed or revised to discontinue Resident #48's wounds or wound vac (medical device that helps wounds heal by applying negative pressure to the wound site). Resident #48's care plan was also not revised to include that Resident #48 changes out his own urinary catheter monthly. These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate care and services. The findings included: 1.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 2 nutrition rooms (first floor and second floor nutrition room) reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to maintain the dish room in a safe, sanitary condition. The facility failed to keep the dish room walls and floor clean. The facility failed to keep the ice machine clean and free of leaks. The facility failed to serve juices and milks in clean drinking glasses. The facility failed to keep the air intake filter above the stainless-steel refrigerator clean. The facility failed to keep hot dogs in the refrigerator tightly sealed. The facility failed to maintain 2 chest type freezers in good working order. The facility failed to discard a spatula with peeling edges and kept using it. The facility failed to discard eroded non-stick pans and kept using them. The facility failed to discard dented pans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for pests. The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for gnats flying in the dish room of the kitchen, and there was a foul odor in the dish room. The facility failed to ensure there was not a method for rodents to enter the kitchen due to a gaping hole in the baseboard. These failures could put residents who consumed food from the kitchen at risk for infection and/or food contamination. The findings included: Observation and initial tour of the kitchen on 08/25/24 at 11:15 a.m., revealed multiple gnats flying in the dish room and there was a foul odor in the dish room of the kitchen. There was a gaping hole approximately 6x6 inches in the base of a wall, adjacent to the floor under the 3-compartment sink. There were what appeared to be rat droppings along the same baseboard near the hole. An interview with the FSM on 08/25/24 at 11:45 a.m., she said she was unaware of the hole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing to the resident, resident representative, or the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two (Residents #37 and #81) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to send the notice of transfer or discharge in writing to Residents #37 and #81, their RP or the Ombudsman when Resident #37 transferred to emergency room on 8/13/24, and Resident #81 was transferred to the hospital on 6/28/2024. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes (disease in which the body has trouble controlling blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to refer for a PASRR level II screening who had newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for review upon a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to refer Resident #37 for a PASRR level II review after resident received diagnoses of Anxiety, Bipolar with Severe Psychotic Features, Adjustment Disorder, Suicidal Ideations, Depression, Personality Disorder, Mood Disorder. This deficient practice could affect residents who received new mental illness diagnoses by not receiving additional evaluations and needed services. The findings included: Record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet revealed an admission date of 9/1/23 with a readmission date of 2/9/24. Diagnoses included Insomnia, Anxiety, Bipolar with Severe Psychotic Features, Adjustment Disorder, Suicidal Ideations, Depression, Personality Disorder, Mood Disorder. Review of Resident #37's PASRR evaluation dated 9/1/23 revealed the mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with a urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #34) of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #34 ' s urinary catheter drainage bag did not touch the floor. This failure could place residents who had a urinary catheter at risk for developing or worsening of a urinary tract infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #34 ' s face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function has declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own), dependence on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were safely stored in 1 of 4 medication carts (300-hall cart) reviewed for storage of medications. -The facility failed to ensure disinfectant wipes on the 300-hall medication cart were kept in a separate compartment away from resident's medications. -The facility failed to ensure staff 's personal drink items were not stored in the 300-hall medication cart with resident's medications. This failure could affect residents receiving medications and put them at risk for cross contamination. The findings included: During an observation on 08/28/24 at 10:46 AM, this surveyor opened the 300-hall medication cart and found disinfectant wipes in the same compartment with a variety of resident ' s liquid medications along with one open water bottle and a closed energy drink. In an interview on 8/28/24 at 2:30 PM, RN A stated the personal drink items were hers and they were not supposed to be in the medication cart due to cross-contamination. RN A stated she did not have an answer on why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 stainless-steel refrigerator, 2 of 2 chest type freezers (freezer A and freezer B), 1 of 1 refrigerator intake filter, 1 of 1 electrical box, and 1 sink drain reviewed for essential equipment in the kitchen. The facility failed to maintain sink drainage in the dish room of the kitchen, and there was a foul odor in the dish room. The facility failed to maintain an electrical box in the dish room of the kitchen. The facility failed to maintain the seals/gaskets on 2 chest type freezers. The facility failed to keep the air intake filter above the stainless-steel refrigerator clean. The facility failed to keep the ice machine clean and free of leaks. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness from improper refrigeration of refrigerated and frozen foods, and potential injury to kitchen staff. The findings were: Observation and Initial tour of the kitchen on 08/25/24 at 11:15 a.m., revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 3 of 8 halls (Halls 200, 2200, and 2400) reviewed for environment. 1) The facility failed to keep a storage room containing mouthwash with alcohol on hall 2400 locked while not in use. 2) The facility failed to keep the shower room on hall 200 and hall 2200 locked while not in use. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not living in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The findings included: During an observation on 08/25/2024 at 12:56 PM, a storage room on the 2400 hall was left unlocked while not in use. Inside the storage room was a basket containing approximately 20 unopened bottles of mouthwash containing alcohol. During an observation on 08/25/2024 at 1:21 PM, the shower room on the 200 hall was left unlocked while not in use. Inside the shower room was a bottle of disinfectant left out in the open. During an observation on 08/25/2024 at 1:36 PM, the shower room on the 2200 hall was left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to securely store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature control, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to keys in that: An unknown nurse left Resident #2's discontinued medication in a clear bin, affixed to the ADON's office door, which left it easily accessible to all mobile residents and visitors. These deficient practices could affect residents with medications and could result in missing or misuse of drugs by unauthorized personnel. The findings included: Record review of Resident#2's Face Sheet dated 07/29/2024 revealed, Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], and was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of dementia (cognitive impairment), cellulitis (tissue inflammation infection), history of urinary problems, and acute cystitis without hematuria (inflammation of the bladder without blood in urine). Record review of Resident #2's MAR dated July 2024, revealed Resident #2 for a URI (Upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. CNA A did not perform hand hygiene during Resident #3's perineal care. 2. CNA A did not perform under foreskin cleansing care of Resident #3's penile area. These failures could place residents at risk for contamination and infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 07/22/2024, originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], documented a [AGE] year-old male with the following diagnoses of: dementia (cognitive impairment), Acute upper respiratory Failure (serious condition that causes fluid to build up in lungs), and personal history of urinary tract infections. Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 07/22/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy during care, for one (R#1) of five residents reviewed for privacy issues, in that: CNA A did not provide privacy when providing R#1 with perineal care. This failure could place residents at risk for embarrassment, poor self-esteem, and unmet needs. Findings included: Record review of R#1's Face Sheet dated 12/04/2023, admitted [DATE], reveaked she was a [AGE] year-old female with the diagnoses: Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning), mood disorder, diabetes mellitus (endocrine disorder), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis), end stage renal disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Record review of R #1's MDS dated [DATE], documented a 7/15 BIMS score documenting a severe cognitive impairment. R#1 was coded to be dependent of staff for activities of daily living. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one (R# 1) of five residents reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: CNA A did not perform hand hygiene after touching R#1's immediate environment, nor did she perform any glove changes or hand hygiene when cleaning from the R#1's perineal area to R#1's gluteal folds. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens. The findings included: Record review of R#1's Face Sheet dated 12/04/2023, admitted [DATE], documented a [AGE] year-old female with the diagnoses: Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning), mood disorder, diabetes mellitus (endocrine disorder), Hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to help prevent the standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent the spread of infections or diseases for 1 resident, Resident #1 (R#1) , and 1 of 2 staff members who were observed for infection control practices, in that: Restorative Aide A (RA A) did not wash her hands for at least 20 seconds after transfer care. Restorative Aide A (RA A) did not wash her hands for at least 20 seconds after disposing of waste bag in trash bin. These failures could place residents that require assistance with personal care at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Record Review of R #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed R#1 required limited assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Total assistance with transfers, mechanical lift x2 assist for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the water temperature was safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike for 1 out of 4 halls reviewed for water temperature. The facility did not provide water in the 200 hall shower that was between 100 and 110 degrees F This failure could place residents that resided on Hall 200 at risk for an unpleasant bathing experience, inadequate hygiene, burns, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 05/08/23 at 08:59 AM with Resident #62 of room [ROOM NUMBER] A, he said that his showers are Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and that the water turns hot or cold regardless of controlling temp on the 200-hall shower room. Resident #62 stated it happened often but not all of the time. Resident #62 stated he needed assistance while showering due to left side weakness but can pretty much shower himself. Resident #62 stated when the water temperature fluctuates, it was hard for him to move and change the temperature of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs, for one Residents (R#88) of fourteen residents reviewed for care plans. The facility did not implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan set forth for Resident #88. This failure could place residents at risk for not being provided necessary care and services. The findings included: Review of Resident #88's Face sheet, dated 05/09/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with the diagnosis of depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), muscle wasting, abnormal weight loss, gout (inflammatory arthritis), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Record Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified professional directed the activities program for the facility for one of 19 (Activity Director) employees reviewed for compliance. The current facility Activity Director was not a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who met state licensure requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interest/preferences of each resident. The findings were: Record review of the current Activity Director's (AD) employee file revealed the AD had been employed at the facility as a CNA on 04/07/22. There was no documentation in the AD's employee file the AD had an Activity Director's Certification. In an interview on 05/10/23 at 8:24 AM, the HR said the Activity Director has not finished her program. She enrolled but had not begun the classes. The HR said the current AD was hired on 04/07/23. In an interview on 05/10/23 at 10:02 AM, the current AD said she has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free of accident hazards, on hall 2500, for one of three shower rooms observed for chemical accidental hazards. Facility failed to secure the shower room door and securely store chemicals to keep out of reach from any mobile cognitively impaired resident that resided on the second floor. These failures could place residents at risk for accidental poisonous hazards The finding include: During an observation on 05/08/2023 at 01:51 PM, revealed the 2500 hallway shower door had visible blue tape over door jamb and door knob latch plate. This surveyor easily entered the shower room without needing to enter any combination on the combination pad. There was a full gallon of unlabeled questionable orange liquid chemical, which was situated on the floor. During the observation there were multiple residents traveling through the 2500 hallway. During an interview and observation on 05/08/23 at 02:06 PM, the Maintenance Director, stated the shower in 2500 hall shower was not in use, and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters, in that: CNA A did not ensure Resident #3's indwelling catheter tubing, was allowed to flow freely via gravity drainage, as indicated in Resident #3's physician's orders. Resident #3's catheter bag was incorrectly positioned on top of the resident's bed, which situated above the resident's bladder for an undetermined amount of time, during the whole duration of perineal catheter cleaning. Back-flow of urine was observed during the catheter cleaning as well as when CNA A held indwelling catheter, in midair, above shoulder length, for three to five seconds. These failures could place residents with indwelling urinary catheters at risk of infection. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 05/10/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as director of food and nutrition services who is a certified dietary manager 1 of 1 facility staff in that: The facility has been without a certified dietary manager since October 2020. This failure could result in the dietary needs of all residents served by the kitchen not being met. Findings included: Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) on 5/7/2023 at 9:30am revealed, DM does not currently have a Certified Dietary Manger certification (CDM) but is enrolled currently in the program with the University of Florida. DM stated she has about five months left to complete the program. DM stated, she has been working as the Dietary Manager as of 10/12/2020, with this facility and was hired for the position of Dietary Manger. DM was enrolled in the Certified Dietary Manger course upon hire but did not complete it in time and did not receive her certification. A Personnel file review on 5/10/2023 revealed that the facility's current Dietary Manager was hired on 10/12/2020. The file contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one (CNA A) of three staff that were observed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: CNA A did not remove her contaminated gloves after touching multiple surfaces prior to commencement of perineal foley catheter cleansing, as well as maintained usage of same contaminated gloves during perineal catheter foley care and did not perform hand hygiene during care procedure. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 05/10/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], with readmission date 05/26/2022, with the diagnoses of:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$69,235 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
  • $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-08-10
  • $44,766 — penalty dated 2023-12-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.8-2.8 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/17/2020
DE LA GARZA, ERNESTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/17/2020
GRIMERT, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/17/2020
THE PALMS SNF LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/17/2020
SHAPIRO, MENACHEMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/17/2020

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 2%Other / private 29%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$193per resident / day
operating cost
$5,859per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$185per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455557. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next