The Villa At Texarkana

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 93.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #2) The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for Resident #2 to prevent falls with and without injury. This failure places residents at risk for serious injury related to falls. Findings included: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment) and repeated falls. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was sometimes understood but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves during Resident #1's incontinent care on 06/29/26. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 06/22/26, reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) without behaviors. Record review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 06/22/26, reflected Resident #1 had clear speech, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 memory care unit consisting of 14 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide meaningful activities for dementia residents on the memory care unit. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: Record review of the March 2026 Group Activities Calendar posted in the memory care unit dining area revealed the following activities: 03/09/2026 03/10/2026 03/11/202610 a.m.-Exercise 10 a.m.-Dancing 10 a.m.-Sit to Fit1 p.m.- Bean Bag Toss 1 p.m.- Match Up 1 p.m.- Tic Tac Toe2 p.m.- Memory Lane 2 p.m.-Name that Tune 2 p.m.-Nail Care3 p.m.-[NAME] Toss 3 p.m.- Art Shop 3 p.m.-Match Up During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility did not ensure:1. The flour scoop was kept out of the storage container on 03/09/2026, 03/10/2026, and 03/11/2026.2. The deep fryer and stove were free of caked on grease. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and food-borne illness.The findings included: During an initial tour observation in the kitchen on 03/09/2026 beginning at 9:00 a.m., it was revealed that the flour scoop was left inside the flour container. The deep fryer was located beside the stove with a small gap between them. There was solidified grease on the floor between the stove and the deep fryer, that was caked up around the legs of the deep fryer. The whole side of the stove had caked on yellowish-brown grease. The back of the deep fryer had thick layers of caked on grease that were yellowish-brown. The fryer baskets were hanging on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident-centered assessment of each resident's cognitive, medical, and functional capacity in a timely manner for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessment timing. The facility failed to complete Resident #47's annual comprehensive MDS assessment within 366 days of the previous comprehensive MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met. The findings included: Record review the face sheet, dated 03/10/2026, revealed Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (memory loss). Record review of Resident #47's annual MDS assessment reflected an ARD date of 01/28/2025. The next comprehensive MDS assessment should have been scheduled on or before 01/28/2026. Record review of Resident #47's annual MDS assessment reflected an ARD date of 02/27/2026, which indicated the comprehensive MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete the quarterly MDS assessment not less frequently than every 3 months for 1 of 16 (Resident #62) residents reviewed for MDS completion. The facility failed to complete the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #62, within 92 calendar days of the previous annual assessment dated [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services to provide quality care.The findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 03/09/2026 indicated Resident #62 was a [AGE] year-old male that admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive decline in mental ability-including memory, thinking, and behavior-that interferes with daily life and is not a normal part of aging), benign prostatic hypertrophy (a common, noncancerous condition in men over 50 where the prostate gland enlarges, pressing on the urethra and causing urinary issues like weak stream, frequency, and urgency), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS assessment was completed for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #8) The facility failed to accurately code Resident #8's psychotropic medication use. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unneeded care and services.Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), fibromyalgia (a chronic disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive difficulties), and diabetes type II (a chronic condition where the body resists insulin or fails to produce enough, causing high blood sugar). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #8 revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for accident hazards.The facility failed to keep prohibited items, chemical insecticide (targeting roaches), out of Resident #84's room.This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment or death.Findings included: Record review of Resident #84's face sheet, dated 11/21/25, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder (a common, serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and fatigue lasting at least two weeks, significantly impairing daily life), Cerebral Infarction (a type of ischemic stroke caused by a blockage in a blood vessel, leading to brain tissue death due to lack of oxygen and nutrient), and Pneumonia (an infection causing inflammation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #63, Resident #53) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to protect and value Resident # 63's rights when the facility failed to allow Resident #63 call the police to report a potential crime. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #53 by not knocking on the door prior to entering the resident's room. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, increased anxiety, decreased privacy, and increased stress. Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's face sheet dated 10/24/22 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (the loss of muscle mass and strength, often caused by disuse, injury, malnutrition, or neurological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 of 23 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #57 and Resident #72) 1. The facility failed to repair an electrical outlet in the room of Resident #57 a timely manner. 2. The facility failed to provide a functioning bed light pull string for Resident #72. These failures placed residents at risk of injury of, living in an uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet 12/10/24 indicated Resident #57 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, dementia, and weakness. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #57 was sometimes understood and sometimes understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 07 indicating Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS indicated Resident #72 was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #20) of 12 residents reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20's MDS quarterly assessment accurately reflected the resident had 5 injections of insulin and had no UTI (urinary tract infection). This failure put residents at risk for not receiving care and services needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 12/09/2024 revealed she was a 77-years-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of depression, obesity, glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can lead to damage of the optic nerve) Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #20 received injections of insulin for 5 days in the prior 7 days. The MDS was not coded for UTI.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX