Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing
3665 Brinker Avenue, Ogden, UT 84403 · Government - City/county · 88 certified beds · (801) 627-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,839 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-29)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.1% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.4% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.8% | 16.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.7% | 21.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 0.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.4% | 91.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 1.43 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 83.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY D. Medication Pass: On 4/19/22 at 9:08 AM, an observation was made of LPN 1. LPN 1 dropped a sublingual medication film on the top of the medication cart. LPN 1 donned a glove, picked up the sublingual film and placed it in the medication cup that held resident 33's other morning medications. LPN 1 then administered all the medications to resident 33. On 4/20/22 at 8:25 AM, an observation was made of the ADON. The ADON placed his pointer and middle finger on the back side of resident 17's medication card. Each medication touched the ADON's fingers when pressed out of the medication card into the medication cup. The ADON administered the medications to resident 17. Hand hygiene was not used prior to medications being placed in the cup. On 4/20/22 at 8:35 AM, an observation was made of the ADON. The ADON placed his pointer and middle finger on the back side of resident 29's medication card. Each medication touched the ADON's fingers when pressed out of the medication card into the medication cup. The ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident developed a shearing injury related to a Hoyer lift transfer. This will be cited at a Harm level at past non-compliance with a completion date of 3/6/26. Resident identifier: 10. Findings included: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified fracture of right lower leg, paraplegia, cirrhosis of liver, rhabdomyolysis, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. On 4/22/26 at 3:04 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 10, who stated that he had been cut on the buttocks during a Hoyer lift transfer by a new Hoyer sling, which had sharper edges than his previous sling. Resident 10 stated that after the initial injury the sling was replaced. Resident 10 stated that the wound had been painful. On 3/12/2026 at 4:18 PM, a nursing progress Event…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, a resident's pain medications were decreased after admission and no appointment was made after the resident requested an appointment with the pain clinic. This example will be cited at a harm level. In addition, another resident's pain to her thumb knuckles was not addressed. Resident identifiers: 4 and 8. Findings included: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stage 4 pressure ulcers, paraplegia, osteomyelitis, spastic hemiplegia and injury of root of cervical spine. On 4/19/26 at 3:27 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 8. Resident 8 stated he was in a lot of pain and when he was admitted the house…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, for 1 of 33 residents sampled, the facility did not provide care to a resident who sustained a head laceration after a fall and requested to be sent to the hospital via ambulance for treatment. The deficient practice identified was determined to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier 35. Findings included: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, unsteadiness on feet, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness, suicidal ideation, malignant neoplasm of larynx, tracheotomy status, presence of artificial larynx, chronic kidney disease, and hypothyroidism. On 1/23/24 at 10:16 AM, resident 35 was observed ambulating independently in the hallway directly outside of his room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility dish machine was not reaching the required temperature, dirty dishes were loaded from the clean side, gloves were not changed between touching dirty dishes and then clean, there were foods in the refrigerator that had been in there longer than 7 days and there were soiled areas in the kitchen. Findings include: 1. On 4/19/26 at 8:26 AM, an observation was made of the facility kitchen. The following was observed: a. There were 2 sanitizer buckets. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 stated she had changed the sanitizers 15 minutes prior. DA 1 was observed to use chlorine sanitizer testing strips. The white strips did not change color. DA 1 stated she did not know what color the strip should change to. DA 1 stated she used a sanitizer from the 3 compartment sink. An observation was made of the sanitizer and it was labeled Quaternary [Quat] sanitizer. b. [NAME] 1 was observed to place an omelet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, for 12 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not provide each resident with food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of food quality, the test tray was not palatable or attractive, and there were resident council minutes and grievances with complaints of food quality. Resident identifiers: 1, 8, 10, 33, 50, 52, 54, 63, 66, 76, 78 and 92. Findings included: Resident interviews 1. On 4/19/26 at 9:48 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 10, who stated the food and coffee were usually served cold. Additionally, Resident 10 stated the food tasted awful. 2. On 4/19/26 at 12:44 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 33, who stated he was unable to chew the meat served because it was too tough. 3. On 4/19/26 at 10:43 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 63. Resident 63 stated Oh God, you had to ask when asked about food quality. Resident 63 stated I skip, honestly indicating he skipped meals. Resident 63 stated the cooks were bad and most of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, observations were made of cross-contamination and improper hand hygiene practices during wound care, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) was not implemented during wound care. Additionally, multiple observations were made of resident drinks being delivered throughout the facility while uncovered during transport. Resident identifier: 76. Findings included: 1. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, peripheral vascular disease, lymphedema, and atopic dermatitis. On 4/19/26 at 10:41 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 76. Resident 76 stated he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not clean a resident's window which was covered in dryer lint. Resident identifier: 63. Findings included: On 4/19/26 at 10:43 AM, an observation was made of resident 63's room. The window was covered in dryer lint. Resident 63 was interviewed. Resident 63 stated general cleaning was getting done but deep cleaning was not happening. Resident 63 stated the window needed to be wiped down. On 4/27/26 at 1:26 PM, an interview was conducted with Housekeeper (HK) 1.HK 1 stated that resident 63's room was deep cleaned last Monday (4/20/26). HK 1 stated that resident 63's window was located next to the dryer vent. HK 1 stated that she did not know when the last time the outside dryer vent was cleaned. HK 1 stated to ask the Housekeeping Manager when the window was cleaned last. On 4/27/26 at approximately 1:30 PM, an observation was made of resident 63's window. The window was completely obscured from view with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 residents sampled, that the facility did not ensure that prompt efforts to resolve grievances made by the residents were completed, tracked through the conclusion with a summary of the findings, and a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed with any corrective action taken and the date it was completed. Specifically, the facility did not promptly resolve the grievance made by the resident and the grievance did not contain the investigation, summary of findings, or the conclusion of the investigation with dates. Resident identifier: 1. Findings included: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 4/19/26 at 2:44 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 1. Resident 1 stated that she told the Resident Advocate (RA) that a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) let…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner or attending physician documented a rationale in the resident's medical record and indicated the duration for the PRN order. Specifically, a resident's PRN order for Trazodone exceeded 14 days and the resident's medical record did not have a documented indication to extend the use with a duration for the order. Resident identifier: 8. Findings included Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. On 4/8/26, resident 8's physician ordered Trazodone HCL [hydrochloride] Tablet 150 milligram (mg) by mouth every 24 hours as needed for insomnia. The order was discontinued on 4/20/26, and reinstated on the same day. Resident 8's April Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that allegations of neglect, including events that caused reasonable suspicion of neglect, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Specifically, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not report a resident injury that occurred during a staff-assisted transfer with a mechanical lift to the SSA. Resident Identifier: 10. Findings included: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified fracture of right lower leg, paraplegia, cirrhosis of liver, rhabdomyolysis, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. On 3/12/26 at 2:18 PM, an Event Note Template documented On 3/6/2026 as the Skilled nurse [SN] was completing a weekly skin assessment, skin breakdown was noted to resident buttocks. SN contacted nurse management and assessment of wound noted. Resident noted to have breakdown on right buttock, and shearing injury related to Hoyer sling being removed by CNA [Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. Specifically, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, a resident was not provided discharge planning. Resident identifier: 52. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, schizophrenia, and history of transient ischemic attack. On 4/19/26 at 3:43 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 52. Resident 52 stated he would like to discharge to his own apartment or maybe an assisted living. Resident 52 stated the staff said he did not make enough money for the New Choice Waiver but he was on Medicaid. A Behavioral Complex Interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 40 residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice. Specifically, the facility did not provide a resident timely orders and treatments after they sustained a shearing wound. Resident identifier: 10 Findings included: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified fracture of right lower leg, paraplegia, cirrhosis of liver, rhabdomyolysis, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. On 4/22/26 at 3:04 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 10, who stated that he had been cut on the buttocks during a Hoyer lift transfer by a new sling, which had sharper edges than his previous sling. Resident 10 stated that after the initial injury the sling was replaced. Resident 10 stated that the wound had been painful. On 3/6/26 at 6:30 PM, a Late…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 residents sampled, that the facility did not provide each resident the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility did not demonstrate reasonable attempts to provide or arrange behavioral health services for a resident who was monitored for depressive statements and had tearfully expressed his lack of independence since suffering a stroke. Resident identifier: 54. Findings included: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included ischemic cardiomyopathy, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, history of falling, need for assistance with personal care, asthma, chest pain, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cachexia, contracture of left and right hand, takotsubo syndrome, and portal hypertension. On 4/19/26 at 11:39 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 54. Resident 54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. Specifically, a medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended outside of resident rooms. Findings included: On 4/19/26 at 8:05 AM, an observation was made of the medication cart on the second floor between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 204. The cart was unlocked and unattended by nursing staff. On 4/19/26 at approximately 8:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 was observed exiting room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN 1 confirmed that he had left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. On 4/22/26 at 8:33 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that when staff walk away from the medication cart and no other staff were present it should be locked.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 residents sampled, that the facility did not obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Specifically, the facility did not obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) when ordered by the provider. Resident identifier: 8. Findings included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, osteomyelitis, anemia, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. On 4/15/26, resident 8's physician ordered a BMP to be obtained. No documentation could be found of the laboratory results in resident 8's medical records. On 4/27/26 at approximately 8:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the results for the BMP that was ordered on 4/15/26. On 4/27/26 at 8:40 AM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) communicated via email that they were still looking for the results of resident 8's BMP. On 4/27/26 at 9:40 AM, the DON stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 40 residents sampled, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, a resident's urinalysis laboratory report was not located in the medical records. Resident identifier: 8. Findings included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, osteomyelitis, anemia, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. On 3/21/26, resident 8's physician ordered a urinalysis to be obtained. No documentation could be found of the laboratory results in resident 8's medical records. On 4/27/26 at approximately 8:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the results for the urinalysis that was ordered on 3/21/26. On 4/27/26 at 8:40 AM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) provided via email the laboratory results for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiologic and other diagnostic services. Specifically, the resident's chest x-ray report was not located in the medical records. Resident identifier: 6. Findings included: Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included contracture right and left hand, dysphagia, hypothyroidism, dementia, atrial-fibrillation, pain, hypertension, chronic pain, deformity of left lower leg, peripheral vascular disease, and idiopathic neuropathy. On 4/19/26, resident 6's medical records were reviewed. On 1/10/26 at 9:37 AM, resident 6's progress note documented, Resident has productive cough and crackles bilaterally, MD [Medical Doctor] notified and STAT [immediate] CXR [chest x-ray] ordered.No documentation of the chest x-ray was found in resident 6's medical records. On 4/22/26 at 9:49 AM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not employ a full-time, designated person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not have a qualified food service director. Findings included: On 4/22/26 at 1:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated she did not have a certification. The DM stated she had been the DM for 3 years. The DM stated the Registered Dietitian (RD) was at the facility weekly for the nutrition at risk meeting and was available by phone anytime. The DM stated she had registered for the course a few times but then staffing was low in the kitchen and she was pulled to work in the kitchen. On 4/22/26 at 4:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that he did not know if the DM had a certification. The Administrator stated the RD worked 1 day a week at the facility. (Cross refer to F804 and F812)
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not arrange timely services for outside resources that met professional standards and principles that applied to professional providing services. Specifically, a resident was not scheduled for a pain clinic appointment when pain was identified and the resident requested. Additionally, resident records were not secured, left unattended, and visible to any passerby. Resident identifier: 8. Findings included: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stage 4 pressure ulcers, paraplegia, osteomyelitis, spastic hemiplegia and injury of root of cervical spine. On 4/19/26 at 3:27 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 8. Resident 8 stated he was in a lot of pain and when he was admitted the house physician decreased his pain medication. Resident 8 stated he requested to be sent to a pain clinic because his pain medications were decreased when he was admitted .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented. Specifically, a resident had an order for 12 tablets of an antidepressant when the physician ordered 1 tablet. Additionally, the medication cart had the computer open to resident records and left unattended and a nurse report sheet with resident medical information was visible. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, altered mental status, dementia, bipolar and pulmonary hypertension. A physician's order dated 2/27/25 and discontinued 3/4/25 revealed Wellbutrin XL [extended-release] oral tablet extended release 24 hours 150 milligrams [MG]. The directions were to give 12 tablets by mouth one time a day for depressive symptoms. A nursing progress note dated 2/26/25 at 10:38 AM revealed, .I received new orders and reviewed them with the facility NP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 19 sampled residents, the facility did not provide each resident with food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of food quality, the test tray was not attractive or palatable, and there were complaints in the resident council meetings. Resident identifiers: 2, 16, and 17. Findings include:On 12/29/25 at 11:51 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 17. Resident 17 stated the food tasted like shit. Resident 17 stated They could starve a bird with the food they serve here. Resident 17 stated he was served only a piece of toast and coffee for breakfast yesterday. On 12/29/25 at 1:39 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 2. Resident 2 stated the food was served cold. On 12/30/25 at 11:07 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 16. Resident 16 stated the food was not good and she did not eat lunch on 12/29/25. Resident 16 stated it was popcorn chicken with all breading and it looked horrible. Resident 16 stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not provide drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration. Specifically, a sign was hung in the elevator instructing residents that water was the only beverage available between meals and coffee was served at specific times. Findings include: On 12/30/25, a sign was observed in the resident elevator. The sign revealed UPCOMING CHANGES!!! COFFEE WILL NOW START BEING SERVED AT 7 am AT THE EARLIEST COFFEE AND JUICE WILL ONLY BE SERVED AT MEAL TIMES AND WE ARE NO LONGER FILLING UP MUGS WITH JUICE OR COFFEE! IF YOU WANT TO HAVE ANY BEVERAGES BESIDES WATER BETWEEN MEAL TIMES YOU WILL HAVE TO PROVIDE YOUR OWN (WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING VENDING MACHINES). THIS WILL BEGIN ON MONDAY NOVEMBER 17TH!!! On 12/30/25 at 12:28 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). The DS stated recently there was a policy change that residents were not provided beverages other than water between meal times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 19 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident who was assessed as high risk for exit seeking and had a wanderguard alarm system placed on his body eloped from the facility and was missing for multiple hours. Resident identifier: 1. Findings included: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, alcohol dependence, Wernicke's encephalopathy, osteoarthritis left knee, and chronic pain. On 12/29/25 at 9:53 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 1. Resident 1 stated that he exited the building from the door located inside his room, and the alarm on the inside of the door did not work. The resident was observed to ambulate independently and open the door to the outside courtyard. The courtyard was enclosed by a fence with locked gates on both sides of the courtyard. Resident 1 stated that a long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency (SSA), within 5 days of the incident. Specifically, for 2 out of 7 sampled residents, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse from misappropriation of funds and an allegation of neglect from a fall with serious injury. Resident Identifiers: 1 and 2. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, and cellulitis. On 5/1/24, resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Exhibit 358 Initial Report dated 2/28/24 at 4:49 PM, indicated that the facility reported an incident to the SSA. The initial report indicated an allegation of misappropriation of funds and exploitation when resident 1's money from his wallet went missing. On 5/1/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 7 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the discharge needs of the resident was identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan for the resident; that regular re-evaluation to identify changes that required modification to the discharge plan was completed; and referrals to local agencies for the purpose of returning to the community were documented. Specifically, a resident desired to return to the community through the New Choice Waiver (NCW) program and the facility did not submit the required paperwork for a whole year. Resident identifier: 6. Findings Included: Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of right renal pelvis, atrial fibrillation, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unsteadiness of feet, and difficulty in walking. On 5/1/24 at 10:02 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6's Family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the medication error rates was not 5 percent or greater. Observations of 31 opportunities revealed 2 medication errors which resulted in a 6.45 percent medication error rate. Specifically, a resident was administered a multivitamin supplement instead of the ordered multivitamin with mineral, and a resident was administered a fiber suppliment when the order did not specify the dosage to be administered. Resident identifiers 23 and 218. Findings included: 1. On 1/24/24 at 7:31 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 during morning medication administration. LPN 1 was observed to administer a Multivitamin one tablet orally to resident 23. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, iron deficiency anemia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident 23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Specifically, a resident had an order for a Complete Blood Count (CBC), a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), and a Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) level that was not obtained, a resident had an order for an iron level to be drawn every six weeks and a lipid panel every six months that was not obtained, and a resident had an order for a CBC to be drawn monthly that was not obtained. Resident identifiers: 3, 35, and 37. Findings included: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, unsteadiness on feet, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness, suicidal ideation, malignant neoplasm of larynx, tracheotomy status, presence of artificial larynx, chronic kidney disease, and hypothyroidism. On 1/23/24, resident 35's medical records were reviewed. On 10/16/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 9 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. Specifically, residents sitting at the same table in the dining room were not served meals at the same time and food was served in disposable cups. Resident identifiers: 25, 28, 29, 31, 50, 54, 55, 61 and 165. Findings include: 1. On 1/22/24 11:59 AM, a dining observation was conducted in the 100 hallway dining room. The following residents were sitting at the same table: a. At 12:21 PM, resident 165 was served lunch and was observed to feed himself. b. At 12:22 PM, resident 50 and resident 55 were observed to be served lunch. c. At 12:25 PM, resident 29 was observed to be served lunch. d. At 12:29 PM, resident 61 was observed to be served lunch. e. At 12:30 PM, resident 28 was served lunch. Resident 28 was observed to give resident 61 a bottle of ensure. f. At 12:31 PM, resident 54 was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status or a need to alter treatment. Specifically, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, the facility did not notify the Medical Director (MD) when blood sugar results were outside of the physician ordered parameters for notification. Resident identifier 49. Findings included: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of left femur, acquired absence of right and left leg below the knee, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, iron deficiency anemia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic pain, and personality disorder. Resident 49's January Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: a. On 1/17/24, in the morning the blood sugar (BS) was 442…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled resident, that the facility did not ensure that residents remained free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Specifically, there were residents in a relationship that had not been evaluated to have the capacity to consent. Resident identifier: 3 and 55. Findings included: On 1/22/24 at 9:16 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 and resident 55 in the 100 hall dining room. Resident 3 and resident 55 were sitting close to each other holding hands with their heads together at the dining room table. On 1/23/24 at 1:50 PM, an observation was made of resident 55 walking past resident 3 and touches her on the right shoulder with a patting motion. On 1/24/24 at 12:02 PM, an observation was made of resident 55 entering the dining area. Resident 55 then approaches resident 3, who was sitting at the dining room table. Resident 55 then touched with a patting motion resident 3 on the left shoulder. Resident 55 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that when the facility transferred a resident the facility did not ensure that the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record and the information communicated to the receiving provider included: the basis for the transfer, the contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, the resident representative information, the Advanced Directive information, all special instructions for ongoing care, the comprehensive care plans, and a copy of the resident's discharge summary. Specifically, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, the facility did not document a transfer or discharge assessment/note or what documentation was provided to the receiving provider to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Resident identifiers 35 and 37. Findings included: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, unsteadiness on feet, adult failure to thrive, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not ensure that services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality and care. Specifically, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed to attempt to change a physician medication order without direction by the medical provider and the LPN confirmed that another medication order was modified without direction by the medical provider. Resident identifier: 23 and 218. Findings included: 1. On 1/24/24 at 7:31 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 during morning medication administration. LPN 1 was observed to administer a Multivitamin one tablet orally to resident 23. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, iron deficiency anemia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident 23's medical records were reviewed. On 10/14/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled resident, that the facility did not provide necessary services to maintain good nutrition for a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living. Specifically, a resident waited 35 minutes to be fed by staff after her meal was served to her. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness. On 1/22/24 at 12:22 PM, an observation was made of resident 13. Resident 13 was observed to be served her lunch tray. The plate was observed to be in front of her with a dome over it. There were 2 disposable cups with lids in front of her. At 12:46 PM, resident 13 was observed with eyes closed with her chin on chest and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was observed to be yelling for help from a staff bathroom located by the therapy department. Staff were not aware there was a call light for the bathroom. Resident identifier 51. Findings included: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormalities of fait and mobility, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, suicide attempt, major depressive disorder, and acquired absence of right leg below knee. On 1/25/24 at 1:34 PM, a resident was heard in the staff only bathroom calling for help multiple times. The resident was later identified as resident 51. Resident 51 was observed to open the bathroom door and yell for help. The Director of Therapy (DOT) was observed to answer resident 51's calls for help. Resident 51 could be heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, lab results for a iron level, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), Hemoglobin A1c, and a lipid panel were obtained but the reports were not filed in the residents medical records. Resident identifier: 3 and 37. Findings included: 1. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cerebral infarction, asthma, testicular hypofunction, anxiety disorder, polyneuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic pain, type II diabetes mellitus, reduced mobility, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, tremor, aphasia, mood disorder, dysphagia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 1/24/24, resident 37's medical records were reviewed. Resident 37's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiologic and other diagnostic services. Specifically, a resident's chest x-ray (CXR) results were not filed in their medical records. Resident identifier 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonitis, metabolic encephalopathy, fibromyalgia, asthma, pneumonia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, charcot's joint, scoliosis, hyperthyroidism, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 1/23/24, resident 4's medical records were reviewed. On 1/9/24, the physician ordered a chest x-ray one time for a non-productive cough. No documentation of the chest x-ray results could be found in resident 4's medical records. On 1/29/24 at 12:18 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that resident 4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not keep confidential information contained in the resident's medical record. Specifically, a residents name was used in another resident's medical record. Resident identifiers: 6 and 53. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, convulsions, intellectual disabilities, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive and lack of coordination. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 1/22/24 through 1/29/24. A nursing progress note dated 1/12/24 at 7:20 PM, This nurse was called to dining room with urgency by another resident, [Resident 53's name]. [Resident 53's name] reports she put a whole string cheese in her mouth. It is not clear where or how she got the string cheese. On 1/29/24 at 2:47 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated other resident names should not be in other residents medical records. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of correction to remedy identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F880, which was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy, scope and severity of L. Findings included: Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff members were screened for COVID-19 prior to entering the facility to work. The facility failed to ensure a symptomatic staff member, who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19, was screened accurately and notification and evaluation was completed per the facility protocol. The failure resulted in 3 residents being exposed to COVID-19. After the staff member tested positive for COVID-19, the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-25 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident medical records were reviewed. 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity due to excess calories, cirrhosis of liver, essential hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, asthma, pain in right hip, post traumatic stress disorder, cognitive communication deficit, liver disease, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, and major depressive disorder. Resident 50's medical record was reviewed on 4/19/22. No documentation of resident or family notification of a positive COVID-19 test within the facility on 4/16/22 was located within the medical record. 2. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, malignant neoplasm of bladder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, acute ischemic heart disease, metabolic encephalopathy, and cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 6 of 34 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's medical records were secure and confidential. Specifically, observations were made of computer screens left unattended and displaying resident's personal information. Resident identifier: 17, 25, 29, 33, 46 and 51. Findings included: On 4/18/22 at 8:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was observed to walk away from the medication cart and walk to the nurses station. The laptop computer on the medication cart was open to resident 51's medical record. The computer was visible from the hallway. On 4/18/22 at 9:00 AM, LPN 1 was observed to have left the medication cart unlocked and walked into resident 33's room. The computer on the medication cart was left open to resident 33's medical record. The computer was visible from the hallway, resident 25 was in the hallway. On 4/19/22 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 1. After preparing medications for resident 51, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 of 34 sample residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, two residents did not have updated care plans for pressure sores, and two residents had care plans that did not address their dental needs. In addition, a residents was not evaluated for a bowel and bladder program. Resident identifiers: 5, 41, 49, and 56. Findings included: 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, convulsions, dysphagia, intellectual disabilities, constipation, edema, pain, muscle weakness and nutritional deficiency. On 4/25/22 resident 41's medical record was reviewed. A Physician's Order dated 3/25/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 34 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, facility staff were not changing the residents oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles per physician's order. Resident identifiers: 34, 38 and 55. Findings included: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, stage 4 pressure ulcer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, pain, and adult failure to thrive. On 4/18/22 at 2:36 PM, an observation was made of an oxygen concentrator next to resident 34's bed. The disposable humidifier bottle was a quarter of the way full of water. Neither the humidifier bottle nor the oxygen tubing were dated. A gallon sized plastic bag was taped to the side of the oxygen concentrator. The bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility menus were not prepared in advance, followed, and reviewed by the facility dietitian for nutritional adequacy. Specifically, menu items were changed without notifying the facility dietitian and the portion sizes were not served according to the menu. Resident identifiers: 15, 39 and 56. Findings included: On 4/18/22 at 11:35 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 56. Resident 56 stated there was a situation over the weekend. Resident 56 stated that there was no cook and the kitchen was short handed, so everyone was served a dollar coin size of meat loaf, a salad with no dressing, and a very small amount of potatoes. Resident 56 stated that a family member had to bring more food to her. On 4/18/22 at 1:24 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 15. Resident 15 stated that he was provided baby sized food portions. Resident 15 stated he had to request more food. On 4/18/22 at 1:49 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated it felt like there was not enough food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not distribute and serve food in accordance with the professional standards of food service safety. Specifically, food items in a refrigerator and multiple freezers were not dated or were past the use by date, logs on refrigerators and freezers were not completed, and there were cracked tiles in the dish machine area. Findings included: 1. On 4/18/22 at 9:35 AM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) who stated the resident refrigerator in the lower-level storage area was for resident food only. The DM stated there was a log on the door of the refrigerator to keep track of what was inside, the date it was placed in the refrigerator, and when it was to be removed. On 4/18/22 at 9:37 AM, an observation was made in the 100 level storage area where the resident refrigerator and three other freezers were located. The following observations were made: a. For the resident refrigerator, the log on the side of the refrigerator was from March 2022. There were two entries, one from 3/2/22 and one from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-25 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not have adequate outside ventilation by means of window, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Specifically, there were odors throughout the facility during the survey. Findings included: On 4/18/22 at 8:40 AM, on initial entry into the facility there was a strong feces odor noted. On 4/18/22 at 9:37 AM, an observation was made of 2 residents sitting in the lower level dining area watching television. A strong odor of urine was observed in the dining area at that time. On 4/18/22 at 9:40 PM, an observation was made in the elevator. There was a strong urine odor. On 4/18/22 at 9:45 AM, an observation was made of the 100 hallway. There was a strong urine and feces odor. On 4/18/22 at 9:53 AM, a fecal odor was observed in the hallway leading from the therapy gym to the 200 hall. On the 200 hall, there was a fecal odor observed throughout the entire 200 hall. On 4/18/22 at 10:00 AM, an observation was made of strong urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the resident's right to self administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, for 1 of 34 sample residents, a resident was observed to have medication in a lock box available for use in the resident's room and the resident was not evaluated to determine if she was safe to self administer medications. Resident identifier: 50. Findings included: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity due to excess calories, cirrhosis of liver, essential hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, asthma, pain in right hip, post traumatic stress disorder, cognitive communication deficit, liver disease, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, and major depressive disorder. On 4/18/22 at 1:23 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 50. Resident 50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that each resident received an accurate assessment that reflected the status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline for each resident. Specifically, for 2 of 34 sample residents, the facility did not provide an accurate assessment of the resident's dental status resulting in the resident's dental needs not being identified. Resident identifiers: 5 and 56. Findings included: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of right fibula, displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of left fibula, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, foot drop (left foot), morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, and unspecified convulsions. On 4/18/22 at 12:06 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 5. Resident 5 stated she had dentures that did not fit correctly.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 34 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was observed not being supervised during smoking and dropped cigarettes and ashes onto his lap. Resident identifier: 54. Findings included: Resident 54 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, dependence on renal dialysis, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, nicotine dependence and difficulty walking. On 4/19/22 at 9:27 AM, an observation was made of resident 54. Resident 54 was observed to be alone under a gazebo outside. Resident 54 was observed to be smoking. Resident 54 was observed to have long ash on his cigarette. Resident 54's ash was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who were continent of bladder and bowel on admission received services and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition was or became such that continence was not possible to maintain. Specifically, the facility did not assess a resident for possible bowel and bladder retraining. Resident identifier: 56. Findings included: Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcoholic liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, hypothyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety disorder. On 4/18/22 at 10:35 AM, an interview and observation was made of resident 56. Resident 56 stated she had fallen because she tried to get to the bathroom by herself. Resident 56 stated that staff told her not to get up to the bathroom without staff assistance or she might…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, that the facility did not offer a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet. Specifically, the facility was not offering fortified diets for residents. Resident identifier: 49. Findings included: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dementia, dysphagia, and Gilbert Syndrome. On 4/25/22 at 12:20 PM, an observation was conducted of resident 49 during the lunch meal. Resident 49 had broccoli, pasta, and ice cream on his tray. Resident 49's medical record was reviewed on 4/21/22. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident 49 required supervision while eating with set up help only and no swallowing problems. There was no information regarding resident 49's diet. A care plan dated 9/18/19 and updated on 3/16/22, revealed [Resident 49] has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, a resident's medications were not administered as ordered by the physician due to not being available by the pharmacy. Resident identifier: 50. Findings included: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity due to excess calories, cirrhosis of liver, essential hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, asthma, pain in right hip, post traumatic stress disorder, cognitive communication deficit, liver disease, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, and major depressive disorder. On 4/18/22 at 1:23 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 50. Resident 50 stated the staff kept losing her AirDuo medication. Resident 50 was observed to reach for a lock box that was on a shelf above her bed. The lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug used without adequate monitoring. Specifically, a resident was provided medications when their blood pressure was outside of the physician's ordered parameters. Resident identifier: 49. Findings included: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dementia, hyperlipidemia, and Gilbert Syndrome. Resident 49's medical record was reviewed on 4/25/22. A physician's order dated 9/6/19, revealed Lisinopril 2.5 milligrams by mouth in the morning. The instructions revealed that the medication was to be held if the systolic blood pressures was less than 110 or the diastolic blood pressure was less than 60. Resident 49's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2022 was reviewed. The following dates revealed when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not label all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and did not include appropriate accessory instructions and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, an expired medication was administered to a resident. Resident identifier: 29. Findings included: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension, pleural effusion, dysphasia, major depressive disorder, and alcohol abuse. On [DATE] at 8:42 AM, a medication that was in a bubble pack card from a local pharmacy was observed to be removed from the medication cart by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). There were two bubbles, which held medication, that remained in the bubble pack card. The ADON was observed to place the medication from bubble #2 into a medication cup for resident 29. The bubble pack card…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that each resident obtained needed dental services. Specifically, for 2 of 34 sample residents, the facility did not provide needed dental services for a resident with dentures that did not fit experiencing mouth pain and a resident with missing teeth experiencing mouth pain. Resident identifiers: 5 and 56. Findings included: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of right fibula, displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of left fibula, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, foot drop (left foot), morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, and unspecified convulsions. On 4/18/22 at 12:06 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 5. Resident 5 stated she had dentures that did not fit correctly. Resident 5 stated her dentures did not fit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,839 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-01-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANGFORD, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2016 |
| COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2016 |
| CRESTWOOD REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| MYERS, WALTER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2016 |
| PEARCE, FORREST | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| STUBBS, RACHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| BURWELL, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| BURWELL, NICOLE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| CARTER, MARK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| CARTER, SHAUNA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| MYERS, KATIE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| SWAIN, HOLLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
| SWAIN, JARED | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/14/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465083. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.