Alpine Meadow Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.54 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.66 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 4 out of 13 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident received and partially consumed a meal that had not been mechanically altered per the physician orders which resulted in the resident choking on the food and requiring emergency medical attention. Additionally, 3 other residents received and/or consumed meals that were not mechanically altered per the physician orders. These identified deficient practices were found to have occurred at the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Level. Resident identifier: 1, 5, 6, and 14. NOTICE On 8/23/23 at 4:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to identify hazard(s) and risk(s); evaluate and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 4 out of 13 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the residents received food prepared in a form designed to meet their individual needs. Specifically, a resident received and partially consumed a meal that had not been mechanically altered per the physician orders which resulted in the resident choking on the food and requiring emergency medical attention. Additionally, 3 other residents received and/or consumed meals that were not mechanically altered per the physician orders. These identified deficient practices were found to have occurred at the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Level. Resident identifier: 1, 5, 6, and 14. NOTICE On 8/23/23 at 4:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to observe meals and food preparation to assure the food was prepared and appropriate to meet the resident's needs according to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the irregularities reported by the pharmacist to the attending physician and Medical Director (MD) were acted upon. In addition, the facility did not ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it. Specifically, for 5 out of 20 sampled residents, pharmacy recommendations were not acted upon by the MD and the MD did not document the identified irregularity and what action was taken in the resident's medical record. Resident identifiers: 10, 18, 19, 24, and 34.Findings included:1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, and paranoid schizophrenia. The facility Pharmacy Consult for March 2026 was reviewed. The recommendation for the physician documented, [Name redacted], [resident 18] uses Lantus and sliding scale…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically, for 1 out of 20 sampled residents, a resident was observed to have medication in their room and was not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self-administer that medication. Resident identifier: 1.Findings included:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, personal history of pneumonia (recurrent), and pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit.On 4/19/26 at 8:23 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with resident 1. A nebulizer machine and three vials of medication were observed on resident 1's night stand. Resident 1 stated the vials contained his nebulizer medication, which he administered throughout the day. Resident 1 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, for 1 out of 20 sampled residents, a resident taking two types of diuretics had those diuretics administered at the same time when they should have been 30 minutes apart. Resident identifier: 10.Findings included:Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, heart failure, systolic congestive heart failure, essential hypertension. A physician's order dated 4/1/26, documented metOLazone Oral Tablet 5 MG [milligrams] (Metolazone) Give 5 mg by mouth every 48 hours related to HEART FAILURE, UNSPECIFIED . *GIVE 30 MINUTES PRIOR TO BUMEX [bumetanide].A physician's order dated 4/1/26, documented Bumetanide Oral Tablet 2 MG (Bumetanide) Give 3 mg by mouth every 48 hours related to HEART FAILURE, UNSPECIFIED.The April 2026 Medication Administration Record was reviewed. The metolazone and bumetanide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 1 out of 20 sampled residents, staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during wound care for a resident that should have been on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Resident identifier: 34.Findings included:Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, unspecified open wound of lower back and pelvis without penetration into retroperitoneum.A physician's order dated 4/8/26, documented SKIN TX [treatment] to chronic pilonidal ulcer: cleanse, pack with collagen sheet, cover with bordered dressing. every day shift.Resident 34 was observed to not have EBP signage outside his door or PPE available for use.On 4/20/26 at 10:30 AM, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were offered the influenza vaccine and that the medical record included documentation that the resident either received the vaccine or did not due to medical contraindications or refusal. Specifically, for 1 out of 5 sampled residents, there was no documentation of declination of the influenza vaccine. Resident identifier: 19.Findings included: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which include, but were not limited to, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies.A review of resident 19's immunizations in the medical record documented the last influenza vaccine was completed on 10/25/24. There was no documentation for the current 2025/2026 influenza season.On 4/22/26 at 11:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). The RNC stated they did not have the requested documentation for resident 19. The RNC stated they had a spreadsheet that resident 19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were offered the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Specifically, for 1 out of 5 sampled residents, no documentation was located to demonstrate how the resident accepted or refused the COVID-19 vaccination. Resident identifiers: 19. Findings included:Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which include, but were not limited to, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies.A review of resident 19's immunization in the medical record revealed no documentation for the current 2025/2026 COVID-19 season.On 4/22/26 at 11:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). The RNC stated they did not have the requested documentation for resident 19. The RNC stated they had a spreadsheet that resident 19 refused but no declination form was completed. The RNC stated on admission the immunization consent forms were in the admission paperwork. The RNC stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, hand hygiene was not performed when delivering lunch trays between multiple resident rooms. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 12:40 PM through 12:47 PM, an observation of the East Wing during lunch service was completed. An observation was made of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 who served room [ROOM NUMBER] a food tray and placed the tray on the bedside table. CNA 1 was observed to have moved the table closer to the resident then exited room. CNA 1 then went to the meal cart without performing hand hygiene and grabbed a food tray for room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 1 delivered the tray, set up the meal for the resident, exited the room and hand hygiene was not completed. Certified Nursing Assistant Coordinator (CNAC) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 19 sampled residents, the facility must obtain laboratory services only when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist. In addition, the facility must promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges. Specifically, resident's urinalysis (UA) results were not obtained from the lab and reported to the ordering physician. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with generalized muscle weakness, type II diabetes, need for assistance with personal cares, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. The medical record of resident 6 was reviewed 3/31/25 through 4/3/25. A progress note dated 1/16/25 documented, .pt [patient] co [complained of] retaining urine [sic] retention, straight Cath [catheter] performed on patient and there was 255 mls [milliliters] postvoid. PT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 12 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, three residents were not administered insulin at the correct time per the physician orders. Resident identifiers: 2, 4, and 10. Findings include: The facility's posted insulin administration times are: 7:00 AM, 11:30 AM, and 4:30 PM. Resident Council Notes dated 5/14/24 revealed the following. Not getting meds in a timely manner . Resident Council Notes dated 6/12/24 revealed the following. Meds still not on time Resident Council Notes dated 7/9/24 revealed the following. Meds being passed too late at [sic.] night Resident Council Notes dated 8/27/24 revealed the following. Meds not given when asked. 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/29/24 with diagnoses which included Type 1 diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, sepsis, encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, and depression. Review of Resident 2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 12 sampled residents that the facility did not ensure that the residents were free from abuse. Specifically, two residents reported that a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) inappropriately touched them on their genitals. Resident identifiers: 1 and 11. Findings included: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left knee osteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic pain syndrome, and venous peripheral insufficiency. The facility investigation was reviewed 10/28/24 through 10/29/24. Form 358 was submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/16/24 at 7:55 PM. The form indicated an incident of sexual abuse was reported by the Administrator (ADM). It indicated, [CNA 2]- CNA during her shift was helping another CNA on shift help change resident [resident 1]. [Resident 1] had been engaging in small talk with [CNA 2] and then told her that a man (CNA [CNA 3]) on night shift got 'touchy' with her and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,025 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,025 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT