No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook at Appleton

1335 S Oneida St, Appleton, WI 54915 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (920) 731-6646 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (920) 731-6646 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jun 20251 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,642 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,642 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-02)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1506 S Oneida St · (920) 730-2650 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1506 S Oneida St · (920) 831-8467 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1707 S Oneida St · (920) 716-2705 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S Jefferson St · (920) 832-5905 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
222 E Fremont St · (920) 739-3196

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.2%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.2%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.3%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.1%15.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.5%82.2%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.6%CMS range 37.8–66.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.3–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.98
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.79
RN hoursweekends
55.7%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 41.9 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 residents who had an order for a mechanically-altered diet. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospitalization. R1's hospital discharge orders indicated R1 should receive a pureed diet, however, staff transcribed R1's diet order as mechanical soft with nectar-thickened liquids. On 3/13/24, R1 received the wrong meal tray and was served food that was not in accordance with R1's diet order. R1 aspirated, required hospitalization, and passed away on 3/23/24 from respiratory failure secondary to aspiration pneumonia. The facility's failure to prepare and serve food in a form to meet a resident's needs created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on 3/13/24. The State Agency (SA) notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/2/24 at 3:34 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed and corrected on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing for 1 resident (R) (R13) of 2 sampled residents. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a stage 4 pressure injury on the right hip and a wound vac (a device used to promote healing in wounds that are slow to close that includes a sealed dressing and a vacuum pump which helps remove fluid and bacteria, reduce swelling, and encourage new tissue growth). On 6/18/25, Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP)-P indicated R13's wound vac dressing had been applied incorrectly which caused the skin around the wound to deteriorate and the wound to increase in size. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment policy, revised August 2024, indicates the facility must ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure a qualified person was designated to serve as the Dietary Manager. This practice had the potential to affect kitchen sanitation and quality of care related to food and nutrition for all 35 residents residing in the facility. The former Dietary Manager left employement with the facility in October. The Administrator was acting as the Dietary Manager. The Administrator was not certified in food service management.Findings include: The facility's Dietitian policy, revised February 2021, indicates: .7. If a Dietitian is not employed full time (35 or more hours per week) a Director of Food Service Management will be designated. This individual will: a. Be a certified Dietary Manager; or b. Be a certified Food Service Manager; or c. Be nationally certified in food service management and safety; or d. Have an associates (or higher) level degree in food service management or hospitality (must be from an accredited institution and include courses in food service or restaurant management); e. Meet any state requirements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not notify a representative when an antipsychotic medication was increased for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents.R1 was prescribed an atypical antipsychotic medication. R1's representative was not notified when the dose of the medication was increased.Findings include: The facility's undated Notify of Changes policy indicates: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification .3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment. This may include: a. New treatment; b. Discontinuation of current treatment due to: .iii. Exacerbation of a chronic condition. R1's admission Record revealed a facility admission date of 8/18/25. A psychiatric practitioner note, dated 8/21/25, indicated R1 was admitted with hallucinations and the dose of R1's atypical antipsychotic medication was increased. R1's progress notes and assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility.The facility did not monitor and document food cooling temperatures.Staff did not test the Quaternary sanitizing solution (used to sanitize food preparation surfaces) per manufacturer's instructions. In addition, the facility did not monitor the Quaternary sanitizing solution for proper water temperature and parts per million (PPM). Findings include:Food Cooling:The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code documents at 3 501.14 Cooling: (A) Cooked time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled: (1) Within 2 hours from 57 Celsius (C) (135 Fahrenheit) (F) to 21 C (70 F); and (2) Within a total of 6 hours from 57 C (135 F) to 5 C (41 F) or less. (B) Time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled within 4 hours to 5 C (41 F) or less.The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at section 3 501.15 Cooling Methods: (A) Cooling shall be accomplished in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 residents (R) (R5, R6, R8, R12, and R30) of 16 sampled residents.During interviews on 7/21/25 and 7/22/25, R5, R6, R8, R12 and R30 indicated their food was not appetizing and was served at a temperature they did not prefer. A test tray obtained during meal service on 7/22/25 indicated the food was not served at a palatable temperature.Findings include:1.On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 had diagnoses including chronic deep vein thromboses (DVTs) of bilateral lower extremities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neuropathy, edema, and anxiety. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R5 had intact cognition. R5 was R5's own decision maker.On 7/21/2025 at 1:16 PM, Surveyor interviewed R5 who indicated food is delivered cold at every meal. R5 indicated R5 does not ask staff to reheat the food because staff are too busy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R5, R7, and R6) of 16 sampled residents were given the right to participate in care planning.R5 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024. R5's medical record did not contain documentation of any care conferences.R7 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024. R7's medical record did not contain documentation of any care conferences.R6 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024. R6's medical record did not contain documentation of any care conferences.Findings include: The facility's Care Plan Conference policy, revised 2/2021, states the Interdisciplinary Team, in conjunction with the resident and/or the resident representative, will develop the plan of care based on the comprehensive assessment. The care plan conference is held to identify resident needs and establish obtainable goals .The facility must encourage residents and/or their representatives to participate in care planning including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R28) of 17 sampled residents was offered the opportunity to create or obtain Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) paperwork.R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility did not obtain R28's POAHC document or offer R28 the chance to fill out a new document prior to 7/21/25. Findings include:The facility's Advanced Directive policy and procedure, dated October 2020, indicates: The resident has a right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive in accordance with state and federal law .Purpose: To help ensure a resident's right to formulate an advanced directive .2. The facility will inquire at the time of admission whether the resident has previously executed an advance directive. 3. If a resident has executed an advance directive, the facility must obtain a copy from the resident or the legal representative which is stored in the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 1 resident (R) (R31) of 16 sampled residents.The facility did not ensure food debris, spills, dirt, and used medical supplies were removed from R31's floor or that R31's garbage was emptied in a timely manner. Findings include:On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R31's medical record. R31 had diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, paraplegia, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, and pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 3. R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/26/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R31 had intact cognition. R31 was R31's own decision maker.On 7/21/25 at 9:15 AM, Surveyor observed R31 in bed. R31 expressed concerns with room cleanliness, specifically that the floor is dirty and the garbage is overflowing. R31 also indicated housekeeping was an issue. Surveyor observed clothing, linens, and various items stacked on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive bowel and bladder care plan for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 16 sampled residents.R7 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024. Documentation indicated R7 was occasionally incontinent of bladder, typically during the night. R7's comprehensive care plan, updated on 5/16/25, did not include problems, goals, or interventions related to incontinence. Findings include: On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizophrenia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, and diabetes. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated R7 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also indicated R7 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and did not have a toileting program. R7 was R7's own decision maker. On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R25) of 4 sampled residents.R25 fell on 5/2/25. An intervention was added to R25's care plan to ensure R25's bed was in the lowest position. The intervention was not consistently followed. Findings include:The facility's Fall Management Policy, revised October 2024, indicates: .9. The Interdisciplinary Team designee will discuss recommended significant changes to the care plan to minimize repeat falls with the resident and/or resident's representative. The care plan will be reviewed and/or revised as indicated .Kardexes (abbreviated care plans used by nursing staff) are updated as appropriate .On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R25's medical record. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including sequalae following cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the appropriate care and services for 2 residents (R) (R31 and R25) of 3 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter.R31 recently recovered from a urinary tract infection (UTI). On 7/21/25, R31's uncovered catheter bag was observed on the floor.R25 had a history of UTIs. On 7/22/25, R25's catheter bag was observed on the floor.Findings include: The facility's Catheter Care Policy, revised July 2025, indicates: …9. Ensure drainage bag is located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline For Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection 2009 https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/cauti/index.html, indicates: .III. Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance .B. Maintain unobstructed urine flow .2. Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor . 1. On 7/21/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R35 and R4) of 2 sampled residents who were fed via enteral feeding (a way of sending nutrition right to the stomach or small intestine via tube) received care and services to avoid complications.On 7/21/25, Registered Nurse (RN)-C did not check for placement or residual prior to administering medication and enteral feeding to R35 .On 7/21/25 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H did not check placement or residual prior to administering medication to R4. Findings include: The facility's Enteral Feeding and Medication Administration Policy, dated March 2020, indicates: .Registered Nurse (RN)/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) will administer nutrition and medication through nasogastric, gastrostomy, or jejunostomy tube upon order of physician to provide nutrition and hydration for residents with compromised nutritional status or inability to consume oral intake .3. Check for proper placement prior to each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure effective pain management was provided for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 2 sampled residents.R5 had an order for a Fentanyl patch for pain to be changed every three days. During observations on 7/21/25 and 7/22/25, R5's Fentanyl patch was dated 7/17/25. R5 stated R5 felt achy and had difficulty sleeping. Findings include:The facility's Pain Management policy, revised 10/2024, states the facility will develop and implement a care plan for pain management. The goal of the pain management system is to effectively and consistently identify and treat pain .Staff should be proactive to address the resident's pain to aid in achieving relief. Evaluation of pain, implementation of interventions, and communicating with the care team regarding pain management strategies are important components of a successful pain management system .Nursing staff are to administer pain medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness. From…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were implemented for 1 resident (R) (R52) of 2 residents with a diagnosis of a transmittable infection.R52 had diagnoses of sepsis and pneumonia and was placed on droplet precautions. Staff did not don the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering R52's room on 7/21/25 and 7/22/25. Findings include:The facility's Isolation Precautions policy, revised 3/2020, indicates: To establish transmission-based precautions for residents who are suspected or confirmed to have communicable diseases/infections that can be transmitted to others. Transmission- based precautions will be used when transmission cannot be reasonably prevented by standard precautions alone .Droplet precautions .prior to entering the isolation room, the following steps are required: Perform hand-hygiene and apply gloves and mask prior to entering the room, while providing direct resident care, remove gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure they completed regular pest control which affected 1 resident (R) (R30) of 17 sampled residents.R30 indicated there were fruit flies in R30's room and R30 had a bug bite on the right hand. The facility did not ensure they completed regular pest control.Findings include:On 7/21/25, Surveyor reviewed R30's medical record. R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism secondary to factor V Leiden mutation on Xarelto, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and morbid obesity. R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/9/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R30 had intact cognition. A progress note, dated 7/21/25 at 9:24 AM, indicated the writer updated the Nurse Practitioner (NP) that R30 had a new bug bite on the right hand and had a previous bug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 residents (R) (R7, R12, R15, and R17) of 19 sampled residents were provided safe administration of drugs and biologicals. On 6/24/25, Surveyor observed an albuterol inhaler and a vial of DuoNeb solution on R7's bedside table. Surveyor also observed a nebulizer on the nightstand that contained a full chamber of solution. R7 did not have a physician's order or self-administration of medication assessment that indicated R7 could self-administer medication. On 6/24/25, Surveyor observed a 1 ounce bottle of Afrin nasal spray on R12's nightstand. R12 did not have a physician's order for Afrin nasal spray or a self-administration of medication assessment that indicated R12 could self-administer medication or store medication at the bedside. On 6/24/25, Surveyor observed an albuterol inhaler on R15's bedside table. R15 did not have a physician's order or a self-administration of medication assessment indicated R15 could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The 2022 Federal Food and Drug (FDA) Food Code documents at 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles: Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered: .(B) With tight-fitting lids or doors if kept outside the food establishment . On 6/24/25 at 7:33 AM, Surveyor conducted an environmental tour of the facility and noted a garbage dumpster in the rear parking lot was open on top and in the back. On 6/24/25 at 2:38 PM, Surveyor observed multiple pieces of discarded furniture near the dumpster in the rear parking lot and noted the top of the dumpster was still open. On 6/25/25 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor observed multiple pieces of discarded furniture near the dumpster in the rear parking lot and noted the top of the dumpster was still open. Surveyor observed Dietary Aide (DA)-D throw boxes in the recycling dumpster and walk back into the building without closing the lid of the dumpster that contained garbage. Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Informed Consent for Medication forms were signed or verbal consent was obtained prior to administering psychotropic medication for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 1 sampled resident. R6 was administered psychotropic medication without written or verbal consent from R6's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Management policy, revised July 2020, indicates: .1. Upon receipt of new orders for psychotropic medication, the licensed nurse will implement the following: .B. Complete the appropriate psychotropic medication consent form; Consents for psychoactive medications must be obtained by the physician if state regulation requires it. C. Education of the resident and/or the resident representative is conducted to communicate the risks and benefits of the medication. Per the facility's Psychotropic Management System flow chart step 3 .Nurse/physician completes informed consent and education with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 1 sampled resident. On 5/16/25, R3 reported to the facility that R3 was a missing a blue jacket worth $75. The facility did not provide staff education on misappropriation of resident property or documenting residents' personal property upon admission despite the fact education was listed as an immediate and ongoing intervention in the facility's investigation. Findings include: The facility's Missing Resident Belongings policy, dated 3/2021, indicates: Synergy Senior Care seeks to ensure residents' belongings are protected from loss/theft. Every effort to ensure that missing items are located will be made .1. Missing belongings will be reported to all departments by residents, families, and nursing staff. 2. Staff should promptly fill out a concern form to identify missing item(s). The form should include follow-up and conclusion to be communicated to the resident or responsible party. 3. Social Services will assist the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff provided activities of daily living (ADLs) in accordance with preferences for 1 resident (R) (R13) of 19 sampled residents. R13 was dependent on staff for oral care, pericare, and personal hygiene and filed a grievance on 5/26/25 regarding the provision of timely care. The grievance indicated the issue was resolved, however, staff continued to not provide care in a timely manner or at R13's preferred time of day. Findings include: The facility's Routine Resident Care policy, revised May 2020, indicates: Residents receive the necessary assistance to maintain good grooming and personal/oral hygiene .3. Daily personal hygiene minimally includes assisting or encouraging residents with washing their faces and hands, combing their hair each morning, and brushing their teeth and/or providing denture care .Incontinence care is provided timely according to each resident's needs .9. Residents' call lights are answered timely and residents' requests are addressed . From 6/24/25 to 6/25/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the appropriate care and treatment was provided for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 5 sampled residents. R4 had a PICC line. Staff did not complete a PICC line dressing change as ordered and in accordance with the facility's policy. Findings include: The facility's PICC/Central Vascular Access Device Dressing Change policy, revised 5/1/25, indicates: .To provide consistent guidance to licensed nursing staff in regards to changing PICC/Central access device (CVAD) dressings weekly or if soiled or not intact. Guidelines in this policy are to ensure that appropriate standards of care are followed to decrease the potential for infection .Catheter insertion site is a high-risk for bacteria to enter and could cause a catheter-related infection if not cared for and monitored correctly .2. Dressing changes to be done: a. Upon admission unless current dressing is clean, dry, and intact and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R16) of 19 sampled residents. R16's bilevel positive airway presure (BiPAP) machine and equipment were not properly cleaned or cared for in accordance with the facility's policy. Findings include: The facility's CPAP-BiPAP Use policy, revised October 2020, indicates: .6. The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/BiPAP mask, tubing, and humidifiers shall be cleansed weekly with soap and water and rinsed thoroughly unless otherwise specified by the physician or respiratory therapist. 7. If a humidifier is in use, the water will be discarded and replaced daily with fresh distilled water. From 6/24/25 to 6/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R16's medical record. R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including heart failure, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet the requirements of a mechanical soft diet for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 1 sampled resident. R8 had an order for a mechanical soft diet (smaller than bite-sized pieces/chopped). On 6/24/25, R8's lunch tray was delivered to the unit with regular texture roast beef. Findings include: www.iddsi.org Level 5 Minced & Moist Food for Adults (formerly known as mechanical soft diet) indicates minced and moist food texture consists of soft and moist but with no liquid leaking/dripping from the food. Biting is not required. Minimal chewing is required lumps of 4 millimeter (mm) in size which can be mashed with the tongue. Food can be easily mashed with a little pressure from a fork and should be able to be scooped onto a fork with no liquid dripping and no crumbles falling off the fork Level 5 Minced & Moist food may be used if you are not able to bite off pieces of food safely but have some basic chewing ability. Some people may be able to bite off a large piece of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a grievance was documented, thoroughly investigated, or resolved for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 9 sampled residents. R4's legal representative expressed concerns following R4's respite stay at the facility. The facility did not appropriately document, investigate, or thoroughly resolve the grievance. Findings include: The facility's Company Concerns Policy, dated October 2020, states it is the policy of the facility to provide a system whereby residents, and/or their significant others or representatives, can voice concerns about the quality of services received at the facility. The facility will designate a Concern Officer who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion .The facility will maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all concerns for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision .6. All concerns receive immediate priority and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who was a certified dietary manager, a certified food service manager, had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body, or who had an associate's or higher level degree in food service management or hospitality. This practice has the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-C did not complete an approved dietary manager or food service manager certification course or other related education. Findings include: During a continuous kitchen observation that began at 7:15 AM on 1/21/25, Surveyor interviewed DM-C who stated DM-C was hired as a Dietary Aide in 2021 and was promoted to Dietary Manager in April of 2024. DM-C did not indicate that DM-C had any experience or training prior to employment in the facility. DM-C indicated DM-C worked with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Regional Dietitian (RD)-E to get certified, however, DM-C had to file for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure nutritional needs were met for 5 residents (R) (R1, R4, R5, R8, and R9) of 5 residents. This practice had the potential to affect multiple other residents in the facility. R1, R4, R5, R8, and R9 were ordered carbohydrate-controlled diets. R1, R4, R5, R8, and R9's meal tickets did not contain diet modifications and the residents were served regular diet portions of dessert. In addition, dietary staff did not serve residents recommended portion sizes for all diet types. Finding include: The facility's Diet Orders policy, revised January 2021, indicates: Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician. Diet order terminology that is consistent with the list of available therapeutic diets in the diet Manual facilitates serving meals that meet the nutritional and therapeutic needs of the patients. Diets not available on the menu are developed by the Registered Dietitian .8. When physician orders for portion size changes are necessary, it is suggested that they be as specific as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure neurological checks were completed per the facility's policy after a fall for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident. Staff did not consistently complete neurological checks after R1 fell on 8/12/24 and 9/8/24. Findings include: The facility's Fall Management policy, revised July 2020, indicates: In the event a resident has a fall and it has been determined they hit their head, or it cannot be determined if they hit their head (i.e., the fall was unwitnessed or the patient cannot verbalize if they hit their head), the nurse initiates the following actions: .2. Neurological checks are completed and documented per instructions. Neurochecks should be completed per the facility's Neuro Check Assessment Form which indicates: Initial, every 15 minutes for 1 hour (4), every 30 minutes for 1 hour (2), every 1 hour for 4 hours (4), every 4 hours for 24 hours (6) and every shift until 72 hours (5). On 10/24/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not have a system for monitoring cooked food temperatures or hot/cold holding temperatures. Staff did not practice safe food handling by donning hair and beard restraints while cooking and serving food. Findings include: Cooked and Hot/Cold Holding Temperatures: The facility's Food Temperature Record policy, with a revision date of February 2020, indicates: To ensure that foods and beverage are held and served at temperatures which comply with state and federal regulations. Each resident receives and the facility provides food that is palatable and at the proper temperature. Time and temperature control foods such as meat, poultry, fish, and eggs should be cooked to the minimum temperature specified below: Pork, beef, or veal - 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for 15 seconds Poultry - 165 degrees F for 15 seconds Fish - 145 degrees F for 15 seconds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the individual designated as the food and nutritional services director met the minimum qualifications for the role. This had the potential to affect 47 of 48 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-G did not complete an approved dietary manager or food service manager certification course or other related education. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 8:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM-G who stated DM-G was hired as a Dietary Aide 3 years ago and was promoted to Dietary Manager a little over a month ago. DM-G did not indicate DM-G had any prior experience or training. DM-G stated DM-G was working with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Regional Dietitian (RD)-P to get certified but was not enrolled and had not started a certification program. DM-G stated RD-P was in the building monthly and was available via email or phone. On 5/6/24 at 3:05 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who stated NHA-A was aware DM-G was not certified or enrolled in a certified training program. NHA-A stated RD-P and NHA-A have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 47 of 48 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not monitor or document food cooling temperatures. The handwashing sink did not reach the required minimum temperature for proper hand hygiene. A can opener was not properly cleaned. Staff left visibly soiled oven mitts on top of condiment containers. Chemicals used for cleaning were stored by food containers and near food preparation areas. On two occasions, three resident room trays were delivered to the floor uncovered and on top of the food cart. Staff did not test or document parts per million (PPM) of the quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Seven food items were not dated when opened, not discarded when beyond the use-by/expiration date, and/or not stored appropriately. Findings include: The facility's Storage, Prepare, Distribute and Serve Food policy, dated April 2020, indicates the facility follows the Federal Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This practice had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Director of Nursing (DON)-B was the facility's designated IP. DON-B did not complete specialized training for infection prevention and control. Findings include: On 5/7/24 at 1:20 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B who was the facility's designated IP. When Surveyor asked if DON-B completed specialized infection prevention and control training as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), DON-B stated DON-B completed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) training modules but did not pass the certification test and could not retake the test until 2025. DON-B stated the facility hired an Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who would eventually become the IP, however, the ADON had not started the position yet. On 5/13/24 at 1:28 PM, Regional Consultant (RC)-M provided an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R25) of 14 sampled residents was offered the opportunity to create or obtain Power of Attorney for Health Care (POAHC) paperwork. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility did not obtain R25's POAHC document or offer R25 the chance to fill out a new document prior to 5/7/24. Findings include: The facility's Advanced Directive policy and procedure, dated October 2020, indicates: The resident has a right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive in accordance with state and federal law .Purpose: To help ensure a resident's right to formulate an advanced directive .Procedure: .2. The facility will inquire at the time of admission whether the resident has previously executed an advance directive. 3. If a resident has executed an advance directive, the facility must obtain a copy from the resident or the legal representative which is stored in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not notify a Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) for when 1 resident (R) (R34) of 14 sampled residents experienced a change in condition. The facility did not notify R34's POAHC following a fall on 5/1/24. Findings include: The facility's Fall Management policy, dated July 2020, indicates when a fall occurs, it is the responsibility of the nurse to communicate the fall to the attending physician and the resident's representative, and document the notification on the Interdisciplinary Post Fall Review report. The nurse will discuss recommended interventions to reduce or prevent further falls with the resident and/or the resident representative. 1. From 5/6/24 to 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R34's medical record. R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and altered mental status. R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/20/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R145 and R32) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received a transfer notice that included the date of the transfer, the reason for the transfer, the location of the transfer, and appeal rights. R145 was transferred to the hospital on 4/18/24 and was not provided with a written transfer notice. R32 was transferred to the hospital on 3/10/24. R32 and/or R32's legal representative were not provided with a written transfer notice. Findings include: The facility's Bedhold Notification policy, dated March 2021, includes a sample letter Notice of Transfer that states the reason for the resident's transfer and their right to appeal. 1. From 5/6/24 to 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R145's medical record. R145's latest admission to the facility was on 4/25/24. R145 had diagnoses including heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a condition where the lungs do not get enough air which causes high levels of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R145 and R32) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received notification of the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. R145 was transferred to the hospital following a fall on 4/18/24. R145 was not provided written notice of the facility's bed hold policy. R32 was transferred to the hospital on 3/10/24. R32 was not provided written notice of the facility's bed hold policy. Findings include: The facility's Bedhold Notification policy, dated March 2021, states when a resident is transferred to the hospital, the facility will provide written notice to the resident and/or resident's representative regarding the resident's bed hold rights and the facility's bed hold policy. 1. From 5/6/24 to 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R145's medical record. R145's latest admission to the facility was on 4/25/24. R145 had diagnoses including heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed after a significant change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 14 sampled residents. R8 started Hospice services on 3/13/24. The facility did not complete comprehensive assessment for a significant change in condition. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service's (CMS's) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, dated October 2023, indicates: OBRA-required comprehensive assessments include the completion of both the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process, as well as care planning. Comprehensive assessments are completed upon admission, annually, and when a significant change in a resident's status has occurred or a significant correction to a prior comprehensive assessment is required . On 5/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and coronary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 resident (R) (R149) of 14 sampled residents. R149's baseline care plan did not include information related to R149's dialysis, diet, and smoking status. Findings include: The facility's Baseline Care Plan (BCP) policy, revised February 2021, indicates: Each resident will have a baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of admission that addresses identified risk areas and the resident's initial individual needs .The BCP documents and communicates the resident's initial needs until the comprehensive care plan is finalized .Procedure: 1) The admitting nurse will perform an initial nursing assessment of the resident and gather specific information from the following sources: physician orders, diet, therapy, medications, activity limitations, treatments, and social services .4) The BCP includes the following key elements: Initial goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 14 sampled residents. R8 started Hospice services on 3/13/24. The facility did not develop a care plan to address R8's Hospice care. In addition, R8 did not have an order for Hospice prior to 5/8/24 Findings include: On 5/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and coronary heart disease. R8 began Hospice care on 3/13/24. On 5/6/24 at 2:26 PM, Surveyor interviewed Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC)-Q via telephone who stated R8 started Hospice care in March of 2024. On 5/7/24, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record and noted R8 did not have a care plan for Hospice or an order for Hospice care. On 5/8/24 at 10:19 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B who indicated staff should obtain a referral from the Hospice provider, obtain an order from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R33 and R4) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing. R33 had an order to remove R33's wound vac on 3/13/24 and reapply the wound vac on 3/20/24. On 3/20/24, the order was changed to reapply the wound vac on 3/27/24. The facility did not reorder wound vac supplies in a timely manner and the wound vac was not reapplied until 4/10/24. R4 had a pressure injury on the coccyx and an order to cleanse the wound with Vanshe wound cleanser. During an observation of wound care on 5/8/24, staff did not use Vanshe cleanser during R4's dressing change and stated the facility was out of the cleanser. Findings include: The facility's Dressing Change policy, with a revision date of 3/2020, indicates staff should prevent wound contamination and promote healing and complete dressing changes per physician orders. 1. On 5/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R33's medical record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide adequate monitoring post fall for 1 resident (R) (R34) of 2 residents reviewed for falls. The facility did not complete neurological checks per their policy after R34's unwitnessed falls on 9/21/23 and 10/21/23. Findings include: The facility's Fall Management policy, dated July 2020, indicates: In the event a resident has a fall and it is determined that they hit their head, or it cannot be determined if they hit their head, such as an unwitnessed fall, the nurse initiates neurological checks (an assessment used to monitor and detect possibility of head injury), and documents the checks. The facility's Neuro Check Assessment Form, copyright 2023, indicates nurses should complete neurochecks every 15 minutes for the first hour following the fall, then every 30 minutes for an hour, every hour for 4 hours, every 4 hours for 24 hours and then once per shift until 72 hours post fall. Neurochecks should include the resident's vital signs, level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility did not ensure respiratory equipment was routinely cleaned for 2 residents (R) (R145 and R156) of 2 sampled residents. Staff did not clean R145 and R156's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment and did not change R145 and R156's oxygen tubing per the facility's policy. Findings include: The facility's CPAP-BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) Use policy, dated October 2020, indicates: Residents using CPAP/BiPAP will require a physician order to include approved order setting, duration of use, use of humidifier, if necessary, and a supporting diagnosis .6) The CPAP/BiPAP mask, tubing, and humidifiers shall be cleaned weekly with soap and water and rinsed thoroughly, unless otherwise specified by the physician or respiratory therapist. 7) If a humidifier is in use, the water will be discarded and replaced daily with fresh distilled water. The facility's Liquid Oxygen Use policy, dated October 2020, indicates: 3) Cleaning the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 2 resident reviewed for dialysis services. R17 received peritoneal dialysis daily at the facility and had an order for daily weights. R17's daily weight was not obtained on 8 out of 38 days. In addition, R17's physician orders were not clarified and the physician was not notified of weight increases above the specified parameters. Findings include: The facility's Peritoneal Dialysis policy dated March 2023, indicates: .15. Before, during and after receiving peritoneal dialysis, facility staff must, based on the physician's orders and professional standards of practice, do the following: a. Obtain vital signs, weights, assess the resident's stability, level of consciousness, and comfort or distress; b. Monitor for post-dialysis complications and symptoms such as, but not limited to dizziness, nausea, fatigue, or hypotension; . On 5/8/24, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician order was transcribed for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 5 sampled residents. R4's hospital discharge paperwork, dated 4/4/24, contained an order for emergency administration of diazepam (an anxiolytic and sedative medication) during a seizure lasting longer than three minutes. The order was not transcribed in R4's medical record. Findings include: The facility's Physician Orders policy, with a revision date of March 2020, indicates: Physician orders are obtained to provide clear direction regarding the care of the resident .Orders given by a physician or state permitted health care professional must be accepted by a licensed nurse and documented in the resident's medical record .Transcribing a written/faxed order .Once the order is verified, the receiving licensed nurse documents the word noted next to the written order along with his or her signature with title and date .after noting an order, the receiving licensed nurse enters the order into the electronic medical record and ensures it is active in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medication regimens were reviewed monthly and pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and acted upon by a physician for 1 resident (R) (R32) of 5 sampled residents. A monthly medication regimen review (MRR) was not completed for R32 in September 2023, October 2023, November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, and March 2024. In addition, pharmacy recommendations for April 2024 were not acted upon or reviewed by R32's physician. Findings include: From 5/6/24 to 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R32's medical record. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neoplasm of uncertain behavior of brain, moderate persistent asthma with (acute) exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/7/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R32 had intact cognition. R32 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R15 and R4) of 2 residents were provided services to help prevent the transmission of infection. R15 had an order for droplet precautions pending further testing related to respiratory concerns. On 5/8/24, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-I assist R15's roommate (R4) with a room tray. CNA-I did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) in the room. During an observation of wound care on 5/8/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-H reached beneath RN-H's gown to obtain a flashlight and scissors from RN-H's pocket. Without disinfecting the scissors, RN-H used the scissors to cut a dressing used to pack R4's wound. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline for PPE indicate: PPE, e.g., gloves, gowns, face masks, respirators, goggles and face shields, can be effective barriers to transmission of infections . The CDC guidelines at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure influenza B and pneumococcal vaccinations were reviewed, offered, and administered for 3 residents (R) (R8, R2, and R4) of 5 sampled residents. The facility did not review R8's vaccination history or offer R8 the PCV20 (Prevnar 20®) and influenza B vaccines. The facility did not review R2's vaccination history or offer R2 the Prevnar 20® and influenza B vaccines. The facility did not review R4's vaccination history or offer R4 the Prevnar 20® vaccine. Findings include: Abbreviations (www.cdc.gov): PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13®) PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®) PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®) The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations indicate: For adults 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23, the CDC recommends: Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20. The PCV20 dose should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 immunization for 3 residents (R) (R19, R2, and R7) of 5 sampled residents. In addition, the facility did not implement a COVID-19 immunization program for staff. R19, R2, and R7's medical records did not include documentation that indicated the facility offered or administered COVID-19 immunizations. The facility did not have proof of a COVID-19 immunization program for staff. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 Vaccination policy, effective January 2024, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by educating and offering our residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine .COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to residents when supplies are available, as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and/or Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines unless such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1 received two different narcotic pain medications together multiple times between 1/13/24 and 1/22/24 which affected R1's mentation. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management policy, with a revision date of July 2020, indicates: .Guiding Principles .4. When medication is indicated, the goal should be to provide satisfactory pain relief by using the lowest possible dose of a medication with the fewest adverse effects . On 3/11/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of right humerus (bone in upper arm), wedge compression fracture of unspecified vertebra (bone in spine) and osteoarthritis (a type of painful joint disease that results from breakdown of joint cartilage and underlying bone). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents was provided for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 10 sampled residents. The facility did not reassess R2 for elopement risk or revise R2's care plan after R2 left the faciity on 9/15/23. Findings include: The facility's Elopement policy, dated June 2023, indicates: It is the policy of this facility that all residents are afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible. All residents will be assessed for behaviors or conditions that put them at risk for wandering/elopement. All residents so identified will have these issues addressed in their individual care plan .All residents shall be reviewed for safety awareness impairment and elopement concerns upon admission, readmission, quarterly, and as needed . On 10/6/23, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (paralysis/immobility on one side of the body) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not monitor and document food cooling and holding temperatures. Staff did not test quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 3/27/23 at 8:50 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-E stated the facility followed the Wisconsin Food Code. 1. Food Cooling Temperature Requirement The Wisconsin Food Code 2022 documents at section 3-501.14 Cooling. (A) Cooked time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled: (1) Within 2 hours from 57° Celsius (C) (135° Fahrenheit) (F) to 21° C (70° F); and (2) Within a total of 6 hours from 57° C (135° F) to 5° C (41° F) or less. (B) time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled within 4 hours to 5° C (41° F) or less. The Wisconsin Food Code 2022 section 3-501.15 documents Cooling Methods. (A) Cooling shall be accomplished in accordance with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not conduct continuous infection surveillance including tracking and trending of illnesses, potential infectious agents, and monitoring of staff signs and symptoms of infection or potential infection. The facility did not provide a cover for R23's catheter drainage bag which was observed dragging on the floor from 3/27/23 to 3/29/23. R23 had a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and was currently being treated with an antibiotic for a UTI. Findings include: 1. On 3/29/23, Surveyor reviewed the facility's infection control documentation for tracking staff illness. The facility provided Surveyor with staff surveillance for December of 2022. Surveyor noted the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak during the month of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not have a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) who completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Director of Nursing (DON)-B started as the facility's IP in December of 2022; however, DON-B did not complete specialized training for infection prevention and control. DON-B accepted the Director of Nursing role in February of 2023. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-C started at the facility in March of 2023 and assisted with IP duties; however, ADON-C did not complete specialized training for infection prevention and control. Findings include: CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Ref: QSO-22-19-NH last revised date: June 29, 2022 contains the following information: In 2016, CMS overhauled the Requirements for Participation for Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities (i.e., nursing homes), which was implemented in three phases: Phase 3 - November 28, 2019 .Phase 3 .regulations which require nursing homes to have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 3/29/23, Surveyor reviewed R24's medical record. R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle which makes it difficult for the heart to pump blood to other parts of the body). R24's medical record contained the following physician orders: ~ Apixaban Tablet 5 mg (milligrams) - Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day ~ Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 5-325 MG - Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain ~ Furosemide Tablet 40 mg Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day .Give 20 mg daily Surveyor noted R24's care plan did not address R24's need for and use of apixaban, hydrocodone-acetaminophen and furosemide, including monitoring for side effects related to the medications. On 3/29/23 at 12:44 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who verified the high-risk medications should have been addressed on R24's care plan. 3. On 3/29/23, Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements were met for 2 Residents (R) (R8 and R30) of 13 sampled residents. R8's Level I and Level II PASRR Screens were not completed timely. R30's Level I PASRR Screen was not completed timely. Findings include: The facility's Coordination-Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) policy, with a revision date of March 2021, contained the following information: Purpose .Evaluate individuals seeking admission to nursing facilities and current nursing facility residents to determine if they have a serious mental illness or intellectual disability .The PASRR screening consists of a two-stage identification and evaluation process and is conducted to ensure appropriate placement and treatment for those identified with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and/or Mental Retardation (MR) .The facility will coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an accurate nutrition assessment was completed for 1 Resident (R) (R19) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition concerns. The facility did not complete an accurate nutrition assessment or update the physician when R19 had a significant weight loss of 18 pounds (6%) between 1/13/23 and 1/18/23. Findings include: The facility's Weight Management policy, with a revision date of 11/2021, contained the following information: Residents' nutritional status will be monitored on a regular basis to aid in the maintenance of acceptable parameters, such as body weight and protein levels .Significant weight variance is defined as: 5% in one month, 7.5% in three months, and 10% in six months .6. As residents are weighed, staff can compare current weight to previous weight. Residents with a weight variance are re-weighed within 48 hours .9. The Director of Nursing or designee will notify the attending physician of significant weight changes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure consistent communication for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 1 resident who received dialysis services. The facility did not provide R6 with a dialysis communication binder prior to routine dialysis appointments and did not have evidence of communication between the facility and the dialysis center on R6's dialysis days. Findings include: The facility's Hemodialysis policy, with a revision date of March 2023, contained the following information: Purpose: The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include: -The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. -Ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident before, during and after dialysis treatments, including monitoring of the resident's condition during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmacy services to ensure the accurate administration of medication for 3 Residents (R) (R4, R9, and R23) of 13 sampled residents. R4's medications were left at the bedside for R4 to self-administer. R4 did not have a physician's order to self-administer medication and was not assessed to determine if R4 could safely do so. R9's Humalog solution (Insulin Lispro) (fast-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar) pen was not marked with an open date. Per manufacturer's recommendations, Insulin Lispro is less effective 28 days after opening. R23's Refresh eye drops were not marked with an open date. In addition, staff were unsure of the facility's policy and were unable to determine when to discard the eye drops after opening. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medication policy, revised on 5/2020, contained the following information: Each resident has the right to self-administer medications if he or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-03-29 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R23 and R27) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and contact information. R27 was transferred to the hospital on 1/2/23, 1/31/23, 2/16/23, and 3/21/23. A written notice of transfer was not provided to R27's representative for any of the transfers. R23 was not provided a written notice of transfer when R23 was transferred to the hospital on 2/2/23 and 2/15/23. Findings include: 1. On 3/29/23, Surveyor reviewed R27's medical record. R27 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include diabetes, non-pressure injuries to bilateral lower extremities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute kidney injury, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain syndrome with pain pump placement. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,642 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SYNERGY SENIOR CARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MASLOVSKY, BORISIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2020
PUKSHANSKY, ROSTISLAVIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2020
VANDER VELDEN, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2020
LINDEMANN, MITULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
BIEDERWOLF, ALISONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2024
JENSON, MATTHEWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$127K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 7%Other / private 26%

This home reported $127K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,794per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$358per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next