No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook At Chetek

725 Knapp St, Chetek, WI 54728 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (715) 924-4891 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (715) 924-4891 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
220 Douglas St · (715) 924-4811 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
628 2nd St · (715) 924-3592 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
719 2nd St · (715) 924-3132 · Call to confirm hours
Park
633 Lakeview Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
324 Douglas St · (715) 924-3103

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%16.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.9%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.4%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%15.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.441.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.002.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 71.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.5%CMS range 26.2–46.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 6.9–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 6.4–16.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.13
RN hours/ resident / day
0.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.80
RN hoursweekends
50.7%
Total nursing turnover
47.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a system is in place to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication error for 6 of 9 residents (R) (R1, R3, R5, R7, R8, and R9) reviewed for medication errors.R1 is cited at a scope and severity level of G (actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy/isolated). R1 was administered R2's medications, which required R1 to receive Narcan and hospitalization. R3 was administered incorrect pain medication.R5 was administered medication that was discontinued and wrong dosage form.Pharmacy found that R7 had the wrong dose in the medical record for R7's Tacrolimus.R8 received a different resident's 40 mg tab of Atorvastatin. R9 received another resident's medications consisting of gabapentin, clonidine, and Vitamin D.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Medication Administration last revised on 12/2025, states: Resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner.Under section labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive infection prevention and control program was established and maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), sanitize mechanical lifts between resident use, complete proper hand hygiene, or provide residents with hand-hygiene before meals.-Registered Nurse (RN) C and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D entered R23's room and conducted wound care on R23's open leg wounds without donning PPE prior to and during wound care treatment, having the ability to potentially spread infection to all 75 residents in the facility.-Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) R and LPN D did not wear PPE while transferring R4 with the Hoyer mechanical lift.-CNA J and CNA G did not clean/sanitize the Hoyer lift after use on R3 who is on enhanced barrier precautions and then used it to transfer R15, having the ability to potentially spread infection to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident is free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by facility not providing adeuate drug monitoring for 5 of 5 residents (R) (R2, R5, R9, R11 and R45) reviewed for unnecessary medication reviews.R2 received Hydroxyzine HCl 25 mg by mouth one time a day related to anxiety disorder, unspecified. Physician orders stated for facility to document number of times the resident [R2] exhibits the following behaviors, Nervousness, Restlessness, sweating, increased heart rate, difficulty sleeping or trouble concentrating.)R2 received Trazodone HCL 50mg one time a day for insomnia. Physician orders stated for facility to document number of times the resident exhibits the following behaviors: crying, tearfulness, social isolation, changes in appetite, mood swing, or difficulty sleepingR2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) only showed documentation using a checkmark that a behavior occurred and not the number of episodes for each behavior.R5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 resident (R) of 18 residents reviewed for residents' rights can exercise their rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility in a sample of 18 residents (R10). The facility did not allow R10 an advanced diet unless R10 ate meals in a common dining area instead of in R10's room per R10's preference resulting in R10 refusing puree consistency meals, which in turn contributed to weight loss. The facility did not provide R10 and R10's family education on risks and benefits of R10 consuming regular texture meals brought in by R10's family which could result in R10 suffering physical harm due to R10 having dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Findings include: Facility policy, last revised 2/2026, states, Facility staff will treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement.R10 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, including services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 18 residents (R) reviewed for care planning (R15).-R15 has an open surgical wound with a wound vac present, and a laceration to 5th left toe with no care plan related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Findings include:On 05/19/26 at 1:30 PM, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a surgical procedure to the left hip/thigh. R15 has an open wound with a wound vac in place to the left thigh, and a laceration to the left 5th toe which would warrant the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).On 05/19/26 at 1:35 PM, Surveyor reviewed R15's care plan and noted no implementation of an EBP care plan to prevent infection.On 05/20/26 at 1:04 PM, Surveyor interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for one resident (R) of 18 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revisions in a sample of 18 residents (R10). R10's comprehensive care plan did not:- Include interventions for R10's refusal to wear dentures and how that affects R10's nutritional status which could contribute to R10's weight loss.- Include interventions for R10 refusing to eat meals and alternative meal options provided to R10 which could contribute to R10's weight loss. - Include interventions for R10 refusing tube feedings which could be contributing to R10's weight loss.Findings include: Facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, last revised 01/2026, states, The care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the resident's needs, wishes, or a change in condition.R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke of the brain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure services provided met professional standards for 2 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for medication pass. (R72 and R10).- Registered Nurse (RN) Q did not cue or assist R72 to blow nose prior to administration of nasal inhalant medication.- Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M did not properly check for gastrostomy tube placement prior to administering medications to R10. Example 1 Cleveland Clinic article dated February 18, 2026, under the heading, How To Correctly Use Nasal Spray, indicates, . Shake the nasal spray well. Wash your hands. Scrub your hands thoroughly with soap and water. Before applying, gently blow your nose. This will empty your nasal passages and clear the way for the medicine. R72 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestion, nasal crusting, and rhinorrhea. On 05/19/2026 at 7:34 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) Q administer saline nasal 3% to R72. RN Q did not ask R72 to blow nose prior to administration.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 18 residents (R) (R9, R10, and R15) reviewed for following physician orders. -Facility failed to notify physician on four occasions when R9's fluid restrictions exceeded 2500 cc in 24 hours as per physician ordered parameters. -Facility failed to provide thorough speech therapy services for R10 which contributed to R10's weight loss as R10 did not wear dentures. -R15's hospital discharge orders were omitted when readmitted , following surgical procedure on R15's left thigh requiring a wound vac. Example 1 R9 was admitted to facility on 06/19/2024 with diagnosis of Cor pulmonale, chronic respiratory failure, and chronic kidney disease. R9's care plan initiated on 06/28/2024, states: The resident is on diuretic therapy r/t diuretic use. Administer diuretic medications as ordered by physician. R9's physician orders dated 06/20/2024 state: 2500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for foot care (R15).-R15's physician discharge orders from hospital were omitted for treatment to the left foot/toes and a follow-up appointment with podiatry was not made for R15. Findings include:Facility policy titled, Physician Orders, last revised January 2026, includes .Physician orders are obtained to provide clear direction regarding the care of the resident .to ensure physician orders are implemented timely and accurately. On 05/19/26 at 6:45 AM, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after surgical procedure on left thigh requiring a wound vac.On 05/19/26 at 7:00 AM, Surveyor reviewed the hospital discharge summary from 05/12/26, which indicated R15 had a laceration to the 5th toe on the left foot with a treatment to be completed by nursing. The summary also indicated R15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with an indwelling catheter receive the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for indwelling catheters (R1, R6, R80).-R1 was observed with R1's catheter drainage bag in the wheelchair seat beside R1.-R6 was observed with R6's catheter drainage bag in the wheelchair seat beside R6 with staff present and no intervention.-R80 was observed with R80's catheter drainage bag and privacy bag wrapped around front wheelchair wheel for 24 minutes without intervention by 4 staff, who were present.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Catheter Care, last revised July 2025, includes.It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.Ensure drainage bag is located below the level of the bladder to discourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy services, receive such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (R) reviewed for nephrostomies (R6).-R6's nephrostomy tubes were placed up and over the back of the wheelchair and placed in a pouch above the kidneys.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Nephrostomy and Cystostomy Tube Care and Maintenance, last revised May 2026 includes.Residents with nephrostomy or cystostomy tubes will receive care consistent with professional standards of practice.Keep the drainage bag below the level of the kidneys at all times.On 05/18/26 at 10:21 AM, Surveyor observed R6's nephrostomy tubes placed up and over the back of the wheelchair and placed in a pouch on the back of the chair above kidney level.On 05/19/26 at 3:05 PM, Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 has bilateral nephrostomy tubes related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an incident of potential neglect to the state agency immediately upon learning of an incident wherein resident (R) received the wrong medication which required administration of Narcan and hospitalization, nor did the facility submit the 5-day investigation within 5 days as required. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 8 residents (R1). The facility policy titled Abuse prevention program facility procedures training program and staff materials undated, states under Option 5: Possible Neglect: Means the failure to provide goods or services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress or could be reasonably expected to cause, pain, injury or deathR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include orthostatic hypotension (condition, which is defined as low blood pressure (hypotension) that occurs upon standing) and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and implement corrective action in a timely manner for 1 of 8 residents (R) R3, resulting in 2 additional significant errors to occur for R1 and R5.R3 was administered incorrect opioid pain medication on 07/02/25.R1 was administered medications for R2, which required receiving Narcan and hospitalization on 07/04/25.R5 was administered medication that was discontinued and wrong dosage form on 07/06/25.The facility's policy, titled Medication Administration last revised on 12/2025, states: Resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner.Under section labeled Procedure states in part the following: Verify the medication label against the medication sheet for accuracy of drug frequency, duration, strength and route. If the label and medication sheet are different .or any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the physician's orders are checked for the correct dosage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a system was in place to establish disposition of destroying controlled drugs for 2 of 6 residents (R) (R2 and R5) reviewed for medication errors.R2's Lyrica was not destroyed in a timely fashion and by 2 licensed nurses.R5's Lorazepam medication was discontinued and not removed from circulation.The facility policy titled, Destruction of Unused Drugs, revised [DATE], states: All unused, contaminated, or expired prescription drugs shall be disposed of in accordance with state laws and regulations. This includes having a witness to medications being destroyed.Example 1On [DATE] at 1:25 PM, Surveyor reviewed R2's Narcotic sheet that states, .[R2] is to be given Pregabalin (Lyrica) 50 mg capsule by mouth two times a day ordered on [DATE]. Surveyor observed R2's narcotic sheet to have a crossed of X over top the whole sheet with Destroyed RN on [DATE] with one signature at the bottom.On [DATE] at 3:44 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B about destruction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that a system was in place to ensure residents receive medications that are properly labeled and administered accordingly for 2 of 8 residents (R5, R6) reviewed for medication errors. R5 was administered medication that was discontinued and incorrect dosage form. R6 was administered medication without proper labeling.The facility's policy, titled Medication Administration last revised on 12/2025, states: Resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner.Under section labeled Procedure states in part the following: If the label and medication sheet are different .or any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the physician's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule. Never administer medications from an unmarked container.Example 1R5 was admitted to facility on 03/21/25 with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pancreatitis and generalized anxiety disorder.On 06/02/25, R5 was placed on hospice care. On 06/02/25, R5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system which triggered that they have excessively low weekend staffing. This has the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS.1.2 Submission Timelines and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) who were prescribed psychotropic medication were comprehensively assessed for qualitative and quantitative data for individualized targeted behaviors, no gradual dose reductions (GDR) for the first year were completed, and non-pharmacological interventions were implemented, for use of the medications for 5 of 7 residents (R6, R21, R32, R53 and R261) reviewed. R6 receives psychotropic medications. R6 does not have a care plan identifying individualized targeted behaviors, tracking of behaviors, or non-pharmacological interventions in place for anti-psychotic and anti-anxiety medications use. R21 receives psychotropic medications. R21 does not have a care plan for individualized targeted behaviors, tracking of behaviors, or non-pharmacological interventions in place for anti-psychotic medication use. R53 receives psychotropic medications. R53 does not have a care plan for individualized targeted behaviors, tracking of behaviors, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 18 residents (R) (R34) reviewed. R34's call light was observed to be out of reach. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Fall Management, with a revised date of October 2024, states in part: The facility assists each resident in attaining/maintaining his or her highest practicable level of function by providing the resident adequate supervision, assistive device, and/or functional programs, as appropriate, to minimize the risk for falls. R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of monoplegia of upper limb affecting left non-dominant side (paralysis/weakness of one limb) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). R34's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment completed on 01/18/25 noted a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicated cognition intact. R34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards, to prevent pressure injuries (PI) from developing infection and promote healing for 1 of 1 resident (R) R20, reviewed for PIs. R20 was not provided PI treatment as ordered, and staff did not perform hand hygiene during PI treatment to prevent infection. This is evidenced by: R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R20's current diagnoses include in part, sepsis, surgical aftercare, muscle weakness, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, diabetic mellitus type 2, peripheral vascular, infection of skin and subcutaneous tissue, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and venous insufficiency chronic peripheral. Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], a 5 day assessment documented R20 having a brief interview of mental status score of 13/15 meaning R20 is cognitively intact. R20 is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accidents as possible for 2 of 4 residents (R) R23, R20, reviewed for accidents/falls. R23 had a fall in the bathroom after being left unsupervised for an extended period of time. R20 vapes and was not assessed to vape/smoke independently and a smoking care plan was not developed. This is evidenced by: Example 1 Facility policy titled, Fall Management, with a revised date of October 2024, states in part: The facility assists each resident in attaining/maintaining his or her highest practicable level of function by providing the resident adequate supervision, assistive device, and/or functional programs, as appropriate, to minimize the risk for falls. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) evaluates each resident's fall risk. A Care Plan is developed and implemented, based on this evaluation, with ongoing review. R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receives such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R20) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of R20's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments. This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled Hemodialysis with the revision date of March 2023, read in part, The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. 8. The nurse will monitor and document the status of the resident's access site(s) upon return from the dialysis treatment to observe for bleeding or other complications. 9. The facility will communicate with the dialysis facility, attending physician and/or nephrologist any significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 18 residents (R) (R20, R6, and R26) observed. Facility staff did not conduct appropriate hand hygiene when providing wound care for R20 and personal cares for R6. R20 has open wounds, and the facility did not implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing wound care. R26's urinary bag was observed on the floor. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled: Hand hygiene last revised on 09/22 states: Purpose: To provide guidelines to staff for proper and appropriate hand washing and hygiene techniques that will aid in the prevention of the transmissions of infections. Under the procedure sections titled Washing hands with Soap and Water states: 1. Staff will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness for 57 of 59 residents reviewed. Findings include: Facility policy titled Storage, Prepare, Distribute, and Serve Food, last revised April 2020, stated in part, .-#3. Storage (Refrigerated) c. All refrigerated and prepared food must be covered, labeled, and dated with use-by date . Facility policy titled Labeling Food and Date Marking, last revised February 2020, stated in part, .-#2. Recommended that all items placed in refrigeration units be labeled with the name of the item, the date the item is placed in the refrigerator and/or the date it is to be used .-#6. Refrigerators and storage areas are routinely checked for temperatures, labeling, and dating of food items with food being discarded when beyond the use-by date . Facility policy titled Food from Outside Sources, last revised 04/13/20, stated in part, .-#4. All food items that are already prepared by family or visitor brought into the facility must: a. Be labeled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R), R1, of 3 sampled residents reviewed for conveyance of resident funds, had funds returned to the Power of Attorney (POA), family, or estate within 30 days of resident death. The facility did not refund R1's trust funds to POA within 30 days of death. Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Resident Trust Accounts, dated 08/2022, states in part: .#7. Upon the death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility will convey promptly the residents' funds and final accounting of those funds, to the individual administering the residents estate . On [DATE] at 8:40 a.m., Surveyor toured facility. After tour was completed, a sample of residents was chosen from a list of discharged /expired residents during time frame of [DATE] to [DATE]. This list included R1. Surveyor reviewed R1's record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident expired [DATE]. Surveyor reviewed R1's account history.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately report to the physician on call post falls for 2 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for falls (R1 and R2). Findings include: The facility policy titled, Change in Condition Policy, dated 08/2024, states in part: .-#1: The physician and durable power of attorney/ responsible party will be notified when there has been a change that is sudden in onset, a change that is a marked difference in usual signs/symptoms and/or the signs/symptoms are unrelieved by measures already prescribed. -#2: a. significant change g. change in level of consciousness j. A discovery of injuries if an unknown source . Example 1 R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction, and muscle weakness. R1's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, completed on 08/27/24, confirmed R1 scored 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide care and treatment by professional standards of practice to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of physical well-being for 2 of 3 residents (R) reviewed. (R1 and R2) R1 and R2 did not receive accurate assessments and treatment following falls. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Fall Management, dated 07/2020, states in part: .#1. When a fall occurs, the resident is assessed for injury by the nurse. -#2. The nurse will enter the event information into risk console, complete an incident report, complete the SBAR communication form and progress note, add the fall even to the 24 hour report, and initiate the interdisciplinary post fall review. -#3. The nurse communicates the fall to the attending physician and the residents representative. -In the event a resident has a fall and it has been determined they hit their head, or it cannot be determined if they hit their head (unwitnessed), the nurse initiates the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure new care planned fall interventions were put into place post falls to prevent further incidents from occurring for 3 of 3 residents (R) R1, R2, and R3 reviewed for falls. R1 was at risk for falls and had a fall on 09/09/24. Facility did not implement new interventions post fall. R2 was at risk for falls, and had two falls, one on 10/09/24 and one on 10/24/24. Facility did not implement new interventions post fall. R3 was at risk for falls and had a fall on 10/21/24. Facility did not implement new interventions post fall. Findings include: Example 1 R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction, and muscle weakness. R1's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, completed on 08/27/24, confirmed R1 scored 5 out of 15 during a brief interview for mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene with food handling in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Dietary staff did not use hand hygiene after touching dirty surfaces and continued to serve food; also hair nets were not used in areas that require hair nets. This has the potential to affect one resident who would receive the coffee, and 4 plates prepared in an unsanitary manner. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Personal Cleanliness and Hygienic Practices, dated February 2020, States in part, 4. All dietary staff, including the Dietary Manager, and any person entering the kitchen, must wear an approved hair restraint to keep hair and particles in the hair from falling into the food. Hair restraints must entirely cover all hair . 6. Single-use gloves shall be worn as necessary to prevent bare hand contact with ready-to-eat food and shall be changed when they become soiled. Hands must be washed before putting on gloves and after removing gloves. On 04/21/24 at 9:28 AM, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review. the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 16 sampled residents (R161). The facility did not follow physician orders for R161, to obtain a follow up oncology appointment after a newly diagnosed condition requiring further evaluation, within 2-4 days after admission. Findings: The facility's admission checklist included, in part . Admitting nurse begin the process, orders, assessment, introduction, progress notes. 2nd nurse continues checking of items on the list. 3rd nurse completes, the checklist then goes to the DON/ADON for final checks and review. All orders need to be 2nd check by a nurse and 2 signatures are needed on each page. To be done within the first 4-8 hours of admission. 1st nurse enters in queue, 2nd nurse verifies. Note appointments, labs, etc. in appropriate place. R161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lesion noted on the left ninth rib, possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not evaluate for hazards or risks related to oscillating percussion vest for a resident with a diagnosis of quadriplegia and assessed as high risk for aspiration. Deficiency identified for 1 of 6 residents (R26) reviewed for accidents. Findings: R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, traumatic brain injury, diaphragmatic hernia with obstruction, dysphagia, feeding tube for nutrition, history of aspiration pneumonia, aphasia, contractures of bilateral hands, epilepsy, muscle spasms, and tremors. Minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/27/24, confirmed staff assessment indicated R26's cognition was severely impaired. R26 is dependent on all staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R26's physician orders included: Start date, 11/23/2023. Afflo Respiratory Vest, use x 30 minutes twice daily (BID) while sitting up in w/c. Stop tube feeding during session. Check mouth after session and suction as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents who are medicated by enteral means received the appropriate treatment to prevent complications during medication administration through a Gastric tube (G-tube). This was observed with 1 of 1 resident (R38) observed for medication administration through a G-tube. R38 received medication without ensuring the G-tube was appropriately placed prior to medication administration. Findings include: The American Association of Critical Care Nurses, April 2016, Initial and Ongoing Verification of Feeding Tube Placement in Adults advises, .Checking Tube Location at Regular Intervals After Feedings Are Started, Unfortunately, feeding tubes can become dislocated during use. For this reason, it is necessary to monitor tube location at regular intervals while the tube is being used for feedings or medication administration. Observing for change in external tube length .Reviewing routine chest and abdominal radiography reports…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration with Resident (R) 32 and the facility removed droplet precautions on R10 before the required isolation period was complete. This has the potential to affect 2 of 9 residents (R32, R10) observed for medication administration and contact precautions. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration with R32. Facility removed droplet precautions on R10 before the required isolation period was complete. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene revised September 2022 states in part: .Using Alcohol-Based Hand Gel 1. If hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub for all the following situations: .b. Before preparing or handling medications; .f. After providing direct resident care; R32 was admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide necessary respiratory care and services related to Trilogy, (an all-in-one device, capable of delivering both invasive and non-invasive ventilation) consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (R1). *R1's hospital referral received on [DATE] stated R1 used a BiPAP while in the hospital. Facility did not question hospital if BiPAP was to be continued once discharged to the skilled nursing facility. *R1's discharge orders on [DATE] stated BiPAP at night for OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea), which was transcribed under laboratory orders by the facility upon admission. *R1 did not receive BiPAP until family brought machine in on [DATE]. R1 went 3 days without BiPAP machine. This is evidenced by: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SYNERGY SENIOR CARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VANDER VELDEN, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
LINDEMANN, MITULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
SYNERGY SENIOR CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
BOHL, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
PUKSHANSKY, ROSTISLAVIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
REISNER, PETERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
CHETEK NURSING REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
ROTH & CO, LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
MASLOVSKY, BORISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 12%Other / private 19%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$405per resident / day
operating cost
$12,314per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$355per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525672. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next