Meadowbrook At Bloomer

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 26.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, or serve food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 30 residents. ~Staff did not consistently perform hand washing during food service.~Staff did not consistently take temperatures prior to food service.~Staff did not store cold and frozen foods in a timely manner after receiving food delivery.~Surveyor observed refrigerator/freezer logs incomplete on 3 separate units.~Surveyor observed ice scoop cleaning logs not complete.~Surveyor noted dishwasher temperature logs not complete.~Surveyor observed an open gallon of milk without a date on it.~Surveyor observed tray line service audit (food temps) incomplete.~Surveyor observed [NAME] F not wearing a beard restraint. ~Surveyor observed [NAME] F touching ready to eat foods with contaminated gloves. Findings include: Example 1 The facility policy, titled Hand Washing, dated January 2021, states: Proper hand washing promotes safe food handling practices and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling soiled linens and laundry. This has the potential to affect 30 out of 30 residents.Findings include: Per facility policy titled Handling Linens and Laundry, dated January 2026, states: Purpose: To provide a process for safe and aseptic handling, washing, and storage of linen.7. Employees sorting or washing linens shall wear a gown/apron, gloves and if aerosolization occurs, a mask.16. Remove barrier attire when leaving the soiled linen area. On 4/29/26 at 8:43 AM, Surveyor reviewed laundry services. Laundry Aide (LA) M started tour by walking Surveyor through the process. LA M stated that she uses gloves only, unless clothes come in a yellow bag, that is usually COVID stuff. LA M stated that if clothes come in a yellow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 of 5 residents (R5, R7, R11, R13, & R35) or the residents' legal representatives were notified of the resident's reason for transfer/discharge in writing to the resident and their representative, notify the ombudsman of the transfer and 3 of 5 residents (R5, R7 and R11) did not receive a bed hold. R5 was transferred from the facility, and no notice of transfer was given. R5 did not have a bed hold given.R7 was transferred from the facility, no notice of transfer or bed hold was given on 1/16/26 and no reason for transfer was listed on the notice of transfer on 1/12/26. R13's notice of transfer documentation was missing the date, location R13 was transferring to and reason for the transfer.R11's notice of transfer was missing the date, R11's name, location of transfer and reason for transfer. There was no notice of transfer with the 3/14/26 transfer. The notice for transfer dated 3/28/26 was missing location and the reason for transfer. R11 did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through with the appropriate steps of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for PASARR screening.R1 did not have a PASARR level II (2) completed. Findings include:R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1 has diagnoses that include . schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave) and bipolar (a common, severe, and persistent mental illness characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression).R1 had a 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. Section A, subsection 1500 of the MDS was marked No.PASARR Level I completed 3/13/26:Does the person have a major mental disorder? Yes.Has the person displayed any symptoms that may suggest the presence of a major mental illness? Yes.Has the person received a psychotropic medication to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that trauma informed care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and account for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress disorder (PTSD).R11's care plan did not provide individualized interventions based on the triggers noted in R11's trauma informed assessment.Findings:Facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care Revised on January 2026, stated in part:.6. The facility will identify triggers which may re-traumatize residents with a history of trauma. Trigger-specific interventions will identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the effect of the trigger on the resident and will be added to the residents care plan .R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This occurred for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed. Surveyor observed control medication Lorazepam not double locked in a permanently affixed compartment.Findings include:The facility policy, titled Controlled Substance Management, dated January 2026, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure.1. General Protocols:a. Controlled substances are stored in a separate compartment of an automated dispensing system or other locked storage unit with access limited to approved personnel. The facility policy, titled Storage of Medication, revised 4/2007, states in part:Compartments (including but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms.boxes) containing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not prepare, store or distribute foods in a sanitary manner. The facility practices had the potential to affect all 25 residents. Dietary Aide (DA) G did not allow the thermometer probe to air dry of alcohol prior to inserting into glasses of milk and juice intended to be served to residents for breakfast. Resident foods that were brought in were not labeled with resident names/dates and disposed of in a manner to prevent illness. DA G was observed with her shirt, which had been sprayed with water and food debris, putting away clean dishes in a manner that contaminated the clean dishes. DA G put the clean dishes away when still saturated with water. This is evidenced by: Example 1: Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled, Thermometer, dated February 2020. The policy, in part, read: Procedure: ~Sanitize thermometer before and between testing of different foods. ~The thermometer may be stored in or dipped into sanitized solution to sanitize. The policy does not direct if using an alcohol preparation pad to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 25 residents (R). -Residents with infection symptoms not placed on proper precautions. -Observations of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) not donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and providing proper hand hygiene prior to entering/exiting rooms for residents on precautions. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C did not wear her surgical mask in a manner (above her nose) to prevent the spread of infection during a facility outbreak of respiratory illness, covid 19 and gastrointestinal illness (GI). CNA C did not perform hand hygiene before donning gown and gloves and entering R23's room who was on precautions for gastrointestinal illness (GI). CNA D did not don gown and gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report 1 of 3 residents' (R), R131, allegations of exploitation to the State Survey Agency via the State's Misconduct Incident Reporting (MIR) system immediately upon learning of the incident. Findings include: Facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, stated in part, -#1. Initial Reporting of Allegations. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property has been made, the administrator, or designee, shall complete and submit a DQA form F-62617, notifying DQA that an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of a resident property has been reported to the administrator and is being investigated. This report shall be made immediately. On 03/13/25, Surveyor reviewed an anonymous complaint, dated 10/30/24, alleging that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E took a picture of R131's private area from her personal cell phone to show another staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 12 sampled residents (R) reviewed. (R18) -The MDS assessments are coded in error stating that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 2 screen had not been completed when it was completed at the time of assessment for R18. Findings include: R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Record review identified R18 had a PASARR level 2 screen completed on 12/06/24 indicating R18 has a major mental disorder. R18's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 12/08/24, indicated for question A 1500 that No PASARR level 2 had been completed. Section I of the MDS notes R18 has PTSD. On 03/12/25 at 2:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B who agrees that the discrepancy had occurred and question A 1500 should have been coded Yes.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SYNERGY SENIOR CARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $276K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI