East Troy Manor
3271 North St, East Troy, WI 53120 · Non profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (262) 642-3995 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $129,433 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 16.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.5% | 18.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.5% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.3% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.7% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.7% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.2%CMS range 41.0–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.2–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.3–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 41.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, document review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that fall risks were assessed and that adequate fall interventions were developed, implemented and revised for one of three residents (Resident (R)2) reviewed for falls. R2 was admitted to the facility following a fall at home where R2 sustained a subdural hematoma. The subdural hematoma was still present and in need of monitoring post admission to the facility. Upon admission, R2 was assessed to be at risk for falls with initial safety interventions including a low bed and frequent rounding (frequency not specified). On 4/20/25 the facility placed a sensor alarm to prevent falls. Progress notes indicate R2 frequently setting off the alarms related to impulsivity and frequent self-transfers. On 4/24/25 R2's Nurse Practitioner noted, in their neuro psych initial evaluation of R2: (R2) is oriented times 1(oriented to self), unable to answer questions appropriately. Walking unsteadily in room while self-transfers to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R291) reviewed with a significant change in condition had a comprehensive assessment performed consistent with professional standards of nurse practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act,) the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices. *On [DATE], R291 was having increased difficulty with transfers and eating. The difficulty continued to worsen and on [DATE] at approximately 12:41 a.m., R291 required use of a mechanical lift and had difficulty speaking. The Registered Nurse (RN) on duty did not take vital signs (other than an undocumented pulse oximetry) and did not perform a comprehensive assessment into the change in condition. There was no physician notification of the change in condition. On [DATE] at approximately 7:50 a.m., R291 became unresponsive and was transferred and admitted into the hospital with a diagnosis of severe sepsis. R291 subsequently expired while in the hospital on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R24) of 2 residents reviewed was provided adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. R24 was identified by the facility as a wander/elopement risk due to altered mental status/dementia in June 2023. The facility did place a Wanderguard bracelet, however, at one point they placed it on the resident's wheelchair even when it was known resident was physically capable of standing up from her wheelchair and ambulating without assistance. Resident was able to elope from the facility and was found outside of the facility on two separate occasions, once when it was raining, and once at 1 am. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and proper assistance devices to R24 created a reasonable likelihood for serious harm, thus leading to a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 06/27/2024. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 8/15/24, however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint, subsequent encounter, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. R4's 2/12/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicates R4 had rejection of care 1-3 days during the assessment. R4 has a stage 1 or greater pressure injury, is at risk for pressure injuries. The MDS indicates R4 has 1 stage 2 pressure injury. R4's care plan, with a start date of 2/16/23, documented, [name of resident ] has been diagnosed with an infection to wound on the left buttocks, and had interventions including, -Administer medications and treatments as ordered . -Monitor for s/sx (signs /symptoms) of infection worsening or not showing signs of resolve with treatment . -dressing change per orders . Surveyor noted there was not a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 6 of 6 direct care staff, chosen at random, received required training on effective communication. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-2, and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) CNA1, CNA8, CNA9, CNA10 and CNA11 did not receive effective communication training. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents: Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. 2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers. 3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 facility staff, chosen at random, received required training on resident rights and responsibilities. Dietary Aide (DA)1 and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, and CNA9 did not receive required training on resident rights and responsibilities. This practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. 2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 facility staff, chosen at random, received training on abuse prevention, activities that constitute abuse, procedures for reporting abuse and dementia management and resident abuse prevention. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, CNA10 and CNA11 did not receive this required training. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. 2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 facility staff, chosen at random, received required training on Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, CNA9 and Dietary Aide (DA)1 did not receive required QAPI training. This practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. 2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 facility staff chosen at random, received required training on infection prevention and control. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, CNA9 and Dietary Aide (DA)1 did not receive required training on infection prevention and control. This practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education.2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0946 — widespreadProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 facility staff, chosen at random, received required training on compliance and ethics which includes training on standards, policies, and procedures of the facility's compliance and ethics program. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, CNA10 and CNA11 and Dietary Aide (DA)1 did not receive the required compliance and ethics training. This practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education.2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed completed the required 12 hours of educational inservice hours. CNA1, CNA8, CNA9, CNA10 and CNA11 did not receive 12 hours of annual inservice education training. This had the potential to affect all 39 Residents who reside in the facility.Findings include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. 2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of training.6. Required training topics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 8 of 8 facility staff, chosen at random, received required training on behavioral health. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA1, CNA8, CNA9, CNA10, CNA11, Housekeeper (HK)1, and Dietary Aide (DA)1 did not receive the required behavioral health training. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 Residents in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's In-Service Training, All Staff policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:Policy StatementAll staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education.2. For the purposes of this policy, staff means all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and volunteers.3. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the Resident's quality of life and quality of care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that obtained program feedback, utilized data, took action to conduct structured, systematic investigations, and analyzed underlying causes or contributing factors of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impacted quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the facility QAPI program failed to track and trend falls. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, revised 02/2020, revealed, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI Program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, The objectives of the QAPI Program are to: 1. Provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life. 2. Provide a means to establish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review and interview, the facility failed to establish a training program to include an effective system of communication with contracted agency staff related to the level of care a resident requires. Findings included: During an interview on 04/01/2025 at 4:35 PM, the Administrator stated that contracted agency staff were required to read resident care information contained in a binder prior to their first shift, and were to use care cards to determine a resident's transfer status. She stated she would provide the agency binder. An untitled facility document provided by the Administrator from a binder the facility used for agency staff, dated 01/06/2025, revealed, Topic: Care Cards. The document revealed, Care Cards are in residents [sic] rooms in their closet. Cares must be done according to the care card to meet the residents [sic] needs in the safest way possible. The document revealed that Agency CNAs (ACNAs) signed the document; however, ACNA K and ACNA M had not signed the document. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 5:30 PM, ACNA K stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 15 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used the appropriate method of transferring residents, which affected 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, staff transferred the resident using only one staff person on two separate occasions, and used an improper lift during one of those occasions, which resulted in the resident falling on both occasions. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Lift Machine, Using a Mechanical, revised 07/2017, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. It is not a substitute for manufacturer's training or instructions. The policy's General Guidelines included 1. At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift, 3. Types of lifts that may be available in the facility are: a. Floor-based full body sling lifts; b. Overhead full body sling lifts; and c. Sit-to-stand lifts, and 4. Lift design and operation vary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 of 4 facility infectious outbreaks were thoroughly investigated. The facility had a Covid 19 outbreak in August 2023 and November 2023, a norovirus outbreak in December 2023 and an influenza outbreak in January 2024. All of the infectious outbreaks were not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: 1.) On 8/13/24, Surveyor reviewed the facility's binder of infectious disease outbreaks. The facility had a Covid 19 outbreak that began on 8/24/23. The documents provided were line lists for residents and staff and PPE (personal protective equipment) and handwashing training. No other documentation was included with this outbreak. The facility had another Covid 19 outbreak that began on 11/20/23. The documents provided were line lists for residents and staff and PPE and handwashing training. No other documentation was included with this outbreak. The facility had a norovirus outbreak that began on 12/10/23. The documents provided were line lists for residents and staff and PPE and handwashing training along with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) On 8/2/24, R34 experienced a change in condition and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. R34 was admitted to the hospital for UTI and C-Diff (clostridium difficile)infection. R34 returned to the facility on 8/9/24. On 8/12/24 at 3:00 p.m. during the daily exit meeting with DON-B and NHA-A, Surveyor asked for the transfer notice for R34 when he was sent to the hospital on 8/2/24. On 8/14/24 NHA-A spoke with Surveyor and stated they have no evidence a transfer notice was given to R34 on 8/2/24. 4.) R17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. R17 was sent out of the facility with a discharge, return anticipated, on 11/27/2024 through 11/29/2024 and on 03/03/2024 through 03/06/2024 per R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS). On 08/13/2024, at 12:15 PM, Surveyor requested transfer notification documents for R17 from NHA-A. On 08/14/2024, at 03:31 PM, NHA-A indicated to Surveyor that she does not have any transfer consent documentation for R17. No additional information was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 1 (R13) out 1 injury of unknown origin investigations reviewed were reported to the state survey agency as required. R13 was observed to have bruising to her inner left thigh and knee and R13 could not state how the injuries occurred. This injury of unknown origin was not reported to the state survey agency as required. Findings include: The facility's policy dated 12/20/2018 and titled Abuse , Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property documents: G.) Reporting and Response It is the policy of this facility that abuse allegations ( abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) are reported per Federal and State Law. The alleged violations will be reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they thoroughly investigated 1 (R13) out 1 injury of unknown origin investigations. * R13 was observed to have bruising to her inner left thigh and knee and R13 could not state how the injuries occurred. The facility was aware of the injuries but did not investigate as to how the injuries may have occurred. The bruising to the inner thigh is an area that is not vulnerable to trauma and R13 is depended on staff for activities of daily living . Findings include: The facility's policy with a revision date of 12/20/2018 and titled, Abuse , Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property documents: Definitions of abuse and neglect: g.) Injuries of Unknown Origin : An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: i.) The source of the injury was not observed by any person, or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident. ii) The injury is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) On 8/2/24 R34 experienced a change in condition and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. R34 was admitted to the hospital for UTI and C-Diff (clostridium difficile)infection. R34 returned to the facility on 8/9/24. On 8/12/24 at 3:00 p.m. during the daily exit meeting with DON-B and NHA-A, Surveyor asked for the bed hold notice for R34 when he was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. On 8/14/24 NHA-A spoke with Surveyor and stated they have no evidence a bed hold notice was given to R34 on 8/2/24. No additional information was provided as to why the facility did not ensure that R2, R30, and R33 received written information of the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment payment policy and the right to return to the facility upon being transferred to the hospital. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 4 Residents (R2, R30, and R33) reviewed for hospitalizations received written information of the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility did not always ensure that 1 (R33) out 1 residents reviewed for the use of an indwelling catheter, had a plan of care developed based on the findings of the comprehensive assessment. R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling catheter in place. The facility did not developed a plan of care that addressed the services would be provided to R33 and her continued long-term use of the indwelling catheter. Findings include: 1.) R33 was admitted to facility on 5/30/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included retention of urine. R33's admission MDS ( minimum data set) dated 6/5/24, R33 had an indwelling catheter in place at the time of admission. R33's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter CAA (Care Area Assessment) dated 6/5/24 documents, Currently has catheter placed with dx of neurogenic bladder. She has indwelling catheter present without any complications. During hospital stay she had 3 failed voiding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R26) of 3 residents observed during medication pass task had medications labeled and dated with an expiration date. * Surveyor observed R26 receive her morning medications. R26 received a multivitamin with minerals, Vitamin D 125 mg and Zinc 22.5 mg (milligrams) from a bottle that was not labeled with R26 name, not dated when the bottle was opened and no expiration date on the bottles. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medications brought to the facility by the resident/family (not dated) indicates: 1. Residents and families must report to the nursing staff any medications that they want to bring or have brought into the facility . 5. Any medications approved by the facility, brought in by the resident/family, must have an open date. 1.) On 8/14/24 at 7:30 AM, Surveyor observed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-D prepare R26's morning medications. LPN-D brought out 3 bottles from the medication cart and stated these vitamins were purchased by R26 because she prefers her vitamins from this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. The facility had no evidence of monitoring or tracking/trending of infections during the months of January to May 2023, including a time when the facility experienced a Covid outbreak. Appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was not in place for staff sorting potentially contaminated linen. Findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Infection Preventionist revised September 2022 documents (in part) . .Policy statement: The infection preventionist (IP) is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of the infection prevention and control program. Policy interpretation and implementation. Responsibilities: 1. The IP (or designee) coordinates the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did provide supervision to prevent accidents for 3 (R20, R28 and R35) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. *R20 fell out of the wheelchair. The facility did not thoroughly investigate this fall to include whether R20's fall interventions were in place at the time of this fall. *R28 did not have Dycem in their wheelchair per care planned fall interventions. *R35 was lowered to the floor during a transfer with one staff member. Per R35's care plan, R35 should have been transferred with two staff members and not one staff member. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Falls, revised in March 2018 documented, Resident-centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk 1. The staff with the input from the physician will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls . 5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 (R29, R35) of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care received services and assistance to maintain continence and a resident that enters the facility with an indwelling catheter is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible. *R29-admitted to the facility with an indwelling catheter. R29 had an order for a follow-up appointment with urology and a trial removal of the catheter. The facility did not arrange the follow up appointment with urology and did not attempt a voiding trial for potential removal of the catheter. *R35 had a decline in bowel status without a comprehensive assessment related to the decline. R35 did not have a care plan related to bowel incontinence. Findings include: R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] post hospital visit due to generalized weakness and an inability to ambulate. R29 was found to have a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) during this hospitalization. R29 has diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility did not assess the risk of entrapment and review the risk & benefits for 1 (R28) of 4 Residents observed having bed rails. Examples of bed rails include but are not limited to side rails, bed side rails, safety rails, grab bars and assist bars. Findings include: The Bedrail Policy & Procedure which is not dated under policy documents To provide the necessary adaptive equipment to promote independence, while ensuring the safety of our resident, this policies identifies the risks, benefits and alternatives to bedrail use, to guide the orientation, assessment and care planning processes. Under procedure documents 1. All residents who are admitted to [Facility's Name] will be assessed for bedrail/grab bar use using the grab bar assessment. They will subsequently be assessed quarterly by the assigned nurse and PRN (as needed) by the therapy department and/or nursing. These assessment forms are kept in the observation section of the residents chart. R28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R28 & R30) of 2 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications had monitoring of behaviors. Findings include: Review of facility policy titles East [NAME] Manor Psychotropic Medication Use Policy and Procedure. (no date) Policy: A psychotropic drug is any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior, which includes but is not limited to antipsychotic's, anti-anxieties, hypnotics, and antidepressants. Procedure: (includes) 1.) Facility should comply with the State Operations Manual, and all other applicable law relating to the use of psychoactive medications, including gradual dose reductions. 7.) All medications used to treat behaviors must have a clinical indication and be used in the lowest possible dose to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. All residents receiving medication use to treat behaviors should be monitored for: a. efficacy b. risks c. benefits d. harm or adverse consequences. 12.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure there was a medication error rate below 5 percent. There were 2 medication errors in 28 opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 7.14%. Medication errors were identified for R27 & R7. * R27 was not administered Flonase Allergy Relief (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray. * R7 received one drop of artificial tears in each eye instead of two drops. Findings include: 1.) On 7/11/23 at 7:56 a.m. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-F informed Surveyor the name of R27 is going to get nasal spray. LPN-F checked the medication cart and stated she must be out of it. LPN-F informed Surveyor the nasal spray is stock and indicated she was going to get the nasal spray. At 7:57 a.m. LPN-F informed Surveyor we are out of the nasal spray and will give the doctors office a call. At 7:58 a.m. LPN-F cleansed her hands and then prepared R27's medication which consisted of an anoroa ellipa inhaler, 6 by mouth medications and cranberry supplement. At 8:02 a.m. LPN-F administered R27's medications with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-07-24 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the daily nurse staff posting included all required information accurately. This deficient practice has the potential to affect a pattern of all 39 residents residing in the facility.The facility's nurse staff posting did not accurately reflect the correct number of staff members on each daily nurse staff posting.Findings Include:The facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy and procedure revised August 2022 documents:. Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to Residents.Policy Interpretation and Implementation.1. Within two(2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (RNs, LPNs, and LVNs) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs and Nas) directly responsible for Resident care is posted in a prominent location (accessible to Residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format.2. The information recorded on the form shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$129,433 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $101,220 — penalty dated 2025-07-24
- $21,902 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
- $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WISCONSIN ILLINOIS SENIOR HOUSING, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUPONT, LORI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/25/2016 |
| GEHLER, MIRIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/14/2011 |
| GERLACH, KERI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2019 |
| KERWIN, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/26/2009 |
| KUMAR, RAJEEV SHIVA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/24/2012 |
| LACKE (CARRIG), KAREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| LYNN, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/14/2011 |
| CARRIAGE HEALTHCARE COMPANIES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2001 |
| HBT IT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| JT AND ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2010 |
| PARTNERS IN WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| PINION, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/1995 |
| REHAB SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| LEADLEY, CHRISTIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/02/2023 |
| SHERMAN, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/12/2012 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/10/2022 |
| SIEBEL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/1999 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $71K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525561. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.