Montello Care Center
251 Forest Lane, Montello, WI 53949 · Non profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (608) 297-2153 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $142,634 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-22)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.1% | 16.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.8% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.7% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.8% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.2% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.3% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.6% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.0%CMS range 47.3–71.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.7–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 3.5–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 32.1 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.89 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide adequate supervision for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 3 sampled residents who expressed suicidal ideation and threats of self-harm. On 4/19/26, R7 expressed suicidal ideation and was placed on 15-minute checks for 72 hours which the facility failed to complete in full. On 4/22/26, R7 pulled the call light out of the wall and threatened to wrap the cord around R7's neck. The facility failed to implement increased supervision for R7 despite the threats of self-harm. On 4/23/26, R7 was found with the call light cord wrapped around R7's neck. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision after R7 expressed suicidal ideation and self-harm created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 4/22/26. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 5/4/26 at 4:35 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 5/11/26; however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity level D (Potential for Harm/Isolated) as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was free of abuse for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R2) of 9 sampled residents. R2 had a diagnosis of dementia and an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). R2 had a history of sexually intimate encounters and sexual comments toward other residents and displayed verbally and physically aggressive behavior. On 1/10/25, 1/29/25, and 2/8/25, R2 made sexual comments, was verbally and physically aggressive toward other residents, and exhibited wandering behavior. The facility did not implement interventions to ensure the safety of R2 and other residents. On 3/18/25, a resident walked past R1's room and observed R2 touching R1's breasts underneath R1's shirt. R1 was cognitively impaired and had an activated POAHC. The facility's failure to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from being sexually abused by a resident with a history of inappropriate sexual behavior led to a finding of immediate jeopardy that began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-10-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide appropriate dementia care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a 5-day respite stay. R1 had a history of elopement but no physically aggressive behavior. On the evening of 9/25/25, staff attempted to assist R1 to get R1 ready for bed. R1 resisted the care and stated only R1's wife does that. R1 became physically aggressive with staff and stated R1 wanted to leave the facility and go home. R1 attempted to exit multiple doors. Multiple staff pursued R1 through the facility, blocked exit doors from the inside and outside, and put hands on R1 to keep R1 from exiting which increased R1's agitation. Staff called law enforcement due to R1's heightened aggression. When law enforcement arrived, R1 indicated that R1 had been attacked by numerous individuals.Findings include:The facility's undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 3 residents (R2 & R3) reviewed for medication errors. R3 did not receive her ordered morphine tablet on 5/28/26 (PM), 5/29/26 (AM), 5/29/26 (PM), and 5/30/26 (AM). The morphine was not given as ordered due to the medication being unavailable in the facility. R2 has not received his Trelegy since his admission on [DATE]. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Medication Administration, dated 1/1/26, states in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right resident b. Right drug c. Right dosage d. Right route e. Right time f. Right documentation.12. Compare medication source.with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident name, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medication errors.R3 did not receive her time-sensitive medication during the scheduled administration window 38 times between the dates of 5/1/26 and 6/8/26.This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Medication Administration, dated 1/1/26, states in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .10. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right resident b. Right drug c. Right dosage d. Right route e. Right time f. Right documentation.12. Compare medication source.with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time.b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician.According to the National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine (www.nih.gov), patients with Parkinson's disease require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets prescribed by the attending physician are entered and followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1). R1 did not have therapeutic diet entered as ordered. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Therapeutic Diet Orders dated 1/1/26 documents in part; The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician .Therapeutic Diet is a diet ordered by a physician .as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition. It also may be ordered to eliminate, decrease or increase specific nutrients in the diet. Examples include low salt, diabetic, or low cholesterol diets . R1 was a short-term admission to the facility and was admitted on [DATE]. R1 has the following diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy (altered brain function or structure caused by systemic chemical imbalances, organ failure, or toxins), chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident-to-resident altercations and a potential allegation of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 6 residents (R) (R3, R4, R1, R2, R5, and R6) of 6 sampled residents. On 2/16/26, R3 and R4 were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the altercation. On 2/24/26, R1 and R2 were involed in a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility did not thoroghly investigate the altercation. In addition, the facility's investigation indicated R2 would be on 1:1 supervison. The facility did not have documentation that 1:1 supervision was provided for R2. On 4/22/26, R5 and R3 were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the altercation. On 2/21/26, R6 reported a staff member was aggressive during peri-care. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the potential allegation of abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an appropriate discharge process for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 1 sampled resident.On 4/23/26, the facility called Emergency Medical Services (EMS) after R7 made suicidal statements and had a call light cord wrapped around R7's neck. Crisis was notified and developed a plan to keep R7 safe in the facility. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A told Power of Attorney (POAHC)-K the facility could not meet R7's needs and R7 could not return to the facility. POAHC-K did not receive a written transfer notice. R7's medical record did not contain a bed hold or transfer notice, discharge summary, or recapitulation of stay. Findings include:The facility's Transfer, Emergency Acute Care policy, dated March 2025, indicates: Residents transferred to an acute care setting for emergency treatment are provided with a notice of transfer and permitted to return to the facility .2. When a resident is temporarily transferred to an acute care facility, a notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility.Staff did not consistently monitor and document food holding and cooking temperatures.Staff did not adhere to temperature requirements when testing parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution.The temperatures of kitchen and unit coolers and freezers were not consistently monitored or documented.The dish machine temperatures and chlorine test strips were not consistently monitored or documented.Findings include:During an initial tour of the kitchen on 12/1/25 at 10:03 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-D stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code as their standard of practice.Holding/Cooking Temperatures:The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 3-401.11 Raw Animal Foods: .Raw animal foods such as eggs, fish, meat, poultry, and foods containing these raw animal foods, shall be cooked to heat all parts of the food to a temperature and for a time that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R10) of 4 sampled residents received a written transfer and bed-hold notice, including their right to return to the facility. In addition, the facility did not notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 29 residents residing in the facility.R10 was transferred to the hospital on 9/22/25, 10/10/25, and 11/18/25. The facility did not provide a written transfer notice to R10 for the hospital transfers. In addition, the facility did not provide bed-hold information for R10's 9/22/25 and 10/10/25 hospitalizations.The facility did not ensure the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman was notified of all transfers and discharges for 4 consecutive months. Findings include:The facility's Bed-Hold and Return policy, dated October 2022, indicates: All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 29 residents and staff residing or working in the facility.The kitchen oven door was not in working condition.Findings include:The Vulcan VG260 is a heavy-duty, 60-inch wide gas restaurant range featuring two standard ovens, each 26 inches wide with thermostats adjustable from 150 Fahrenheit (F) to 500 F, one rack, and two rack positions.During a follow-up visit to the kitchen on 12/2/25 at 12:42 PM, Surveyor observed a black bungee cord tied around the oven door handle and secured around the leg of a side table next to the oven.On 12/2/25 at 12:42 PM, Surveyor interviewed [NAME] (CK)-E who stated the cord is used to keep the oven door shut. CK-E stated the oven door will not stay closed and will slam open if the bungee cord is not secured. CK-E stated the oven door had been broken for 3 years. CK-E stated CK-E was injured when the door fell open and had a burn on CK-E's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a call light was within reach for 2 residents (R) (R8 and R12) of 15 sampled residents.R8 and R12 were observed without access to a call light or a means to notify staff if assistance was needed.Findings include:The facility's Answering the Call Light policy, revised September 2022, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to residents' requests and needs .Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility, and from the floor. 1.From 12/1/25 to 12/4/25, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, affective mood disorder, anxiety, stroke, convulsions, psychosis, and insomnia. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/26/25, indicated R8 was rarely/never understood. R8 had a Guardian for healthcare decisions.On 12/1/25 at 10:51 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R27 and R38) of 3 sampled residents signed and received copies of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form which is used to inform residents of their final day of Medicare Part A insurance coverage, potential liability for payment (daily cost of care and services at the facility), and standard claim appeal rights and instructions.The facility did not provide a NOMNC form to R27 or R38 at least two calendar days before their Medicare Part A services ended.Findings include:The facility's undated Advance Beneficiary Notices policy indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage .4. The current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-approved versions of the forms shall be used at the time of issuance to the beneficiary. Contents of the form shall comply with related instructions and regulations regarding the use of the form .c. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), form CMS-10123, shall be issued to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the effectiveness of psychotropic medication was assessed for 1 resident (R) (R25) of 5 sampled residents.R25 was prescribed trazodone (an antidepressant medication) for insomnia. The facility did not complete a sleep assessment for R25 to assess the effectiveness of the medication. In addition, R25 did not have a care plan for insomnia.Findings include:The facility's Sleep Disorders-Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018, indicates: .2. Nursing staff (especially night shift staff) will describe any sleep disturbance in detail; for example, patterns over time, associated behavior, daytime sleepiness, and factors that appear to improve or worsen the situation .Cause Identification: 1. The staff will consider various causes of sleep disturbance such as noise level, room temperature, lighting levels, bed comfort, roommate distractions, and staff intrusion .Treatment/Management: .2. The physician will order appropriate interventions to address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their abuse policy and procedure for 1 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-R) of 8 staff reviewed for caregiver background checks. CNA-R was hired through a staffing agency and worked shifts at the facility starting on 7/9/25. The facility did not ensure the staffing agency completed an out-of-state background check for CNA-R who resided outside of Wisconsin within 3 years of hire. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, indicates: .4. Conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: a. been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; b. had a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of their property; or c. a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a potential allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 1 sampled resident.On [DATE], staff discovered R5 in R5's room between the wall and the bed. Staffs' statements were inconsistent regarding R5's injuries. The facility did not investigate the discrepancy regarding the injuries. Findings include: From [DATE] to [DATE], Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, epilepsy, palliative care, asthma, hemiplegia, encephalopathy, and thrombocytosis. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated R5 was dependent for cares, transfers, and mobility. R5 had a legal Guardian. From [DATE] to [DATE], Surveyor reviewed a facility-reported incident that indicated R5 had a swollen right eye and face and abrasions on the right shoulder and arm on [DATE]. Administration was notified and started an investigation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements were met for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R25) of 4 sampled residents.R2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of epilepsy. The facility did not include the diagnosis on R2's PASRR Level I Screen and did not submit a referral for a PASRR Level II Screen.R25 was admitted to the facility without a diagnosis of mental illness and was not on psychotropic medication. R25 was later prescribed medication for psychosis, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and conduct disorder. The facility did not complete a new PASRR Level I Screen or submit a referral for a PASRR Level II Screen.Findings include: The facility's Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring Policy, revised February 2025, indicates: .2. Behavioral symptoms are identified using facility-approved behavioral screening tools and the comprehensive assessment. 3. The facility complies with regulatory requirements related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure nail care was provided for 2 residents (R) (R7 and R8) of 15 sampled residents.R7 and R8's fingernails were long, jagged, and contained dirt or chipped polish. R7 and R8 were not consistently provided nail care with activities of daily living (ADLs).Findings include:The facility's Care of Fingernails/Toenails policy, revised February 2018, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections .1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. 2. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed .4. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. 1.From 12/1/25 to 12/4/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, brain bleed, fractures of the right femur and second thoracic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure restorative care was provided for 1 resident (R) (R12) of 3 sampled residents. R12 had limited range of motion (ROM) and had a functional restorative program. Staff did not consistently provide restorative care for R12.Findings include:The facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy, revised July 2017, indicates: Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services. 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay, or when discharged from rehabilitative care. 3. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care .5. Restorative goals may include, but are not limited to, supporting and assisting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmacy services to ensure the accurate administration of medication for 2 residents (R) (R17 and R4) of 8 sampled residents.Staff did not administer a buprenorphine 10 microgram (mcg) per hour transdermal patch or a guaifenesin 600 mg extended release (ER) tablet to R17 in accordance with physician orders.Medications were left at the bedside for R4 to self-administer. R4's last self-administration of medication assessment indicated R4 could not safely and accurately self-administer medication. Findings include: The facility's Reordering, Changing, and Discontinuing Medication Orders policy, revised 7/1/24, indicates: .2. Reorder/Refill Orders: 2.1 Facilities are encouraged to reorder medications electronically or by fax whenever possible . The facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medications policy, revised 11/26/25, indicates: A resident may only self-administer medication after the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring for adverse reactions to a high-risk medication was in place for 1 resident (R) (R19) of 4 sampled residents.R19 was prescribed cefdinir (an antibiotic) for prophylactic measures. R19 was not monitored for adverse reactions to the medication.Findings include:The facility's High Risk Medications policy, dated 2025, indicates: The facility recognizes that some medications are associated with greater risks of adverse consequences than other medications. These high-risk medications can include .antibiotics .6. The resident's plan of care shall alert staff to monitor for adverse consequences of any high-risk medications given.https://medlineplus.gov indicates cefdinir may cause side effects including vomiting, nausea, stomach pain, diarrhea, headache, vaginal itching, reddish-colored stools, rash, hives, swelling of the face, throat, tongue, lips or eyes, difficulty breathing or swallowing, watery or bloody stools, stomach cramps, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0811 — isolatedEnsure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R8 and R13) of 2 sampled residents were assessed for safety and had care plans to guide assistance by Paid Feeding Assistants (PFAs).The facility did not assess if R8 and R13 were appropriate to be assisted by PFAs prior to using PFAs to assist R8 and R13 with dining. In addition, R8 and R13 did not have care plans that indicated they could be fed by PFAs.Findings include:The facility's undated Dining Assistant policy indicates: Dining Assistants will follow the requirements of federal regulations and the Wisconsin Feeding Assistant Program .I. The following individuals are able to provide feeding assistance: .C. Dining Assistants - 1) Who have successfully completed an approved training program, written quiz, and skills demonstration; 2) Who only physically assist feeding residents who have no complicated swallowing/feeding concerns, as determined by a Registered Nurse basic assessment who may consult with Interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 11 sampled residents.R3 had a Foley catheter but was not on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Staff provided high-contact care for R3 without wearing a gown. In addition, staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care.Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised December 2024, indicates: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are used to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents .1. EBP refers to infection prevention and control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of MDROs during high-contact resident care activities. 2. EBP applies when: a. A resident is infected or colonized with a Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC)-targeted MDRO, but does not have a wound or indwelling medical device, and does not have secretions or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents.R1 was admitted to the facility for a 5-day respite stay and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. On the evening of 9/25/25, R1 became agitated when staff tried to help R1 get ready for bed. R1 attempted to leave the facility through multiple doors, however, staff held the doors shut and put hands on R1 to prevent R1 from leaving. A crisis report indicated staff held R1 in a chair. A police report indicated R1 stated that R1 had been attacked by numerous individuals. The facility did not report the allegations of abuse to the SA.Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy indicates: If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents.R1 was admitted to the facility for a 5-day respite stay and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. On the evening of 9/25/25, R1 became agitated when staff tried to help R1 get ready for bed. R1 attempted to leave the facility through multiple doors, however, staff held the doors shut and put hands on R1 to prevent R1 from leaving. A crisis report indicated staff held R1 in a chair. A police report indicated R1 stated that R1 had been attacked by numerous individuals. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the incident by ensuring all staff involved were interviewed. The facility also did not obtain the police report or county crisis documentation which included allegations of abuse.Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, indicates:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R2) of 2 sampled residents.On 7/14/25, R2 struck R1 in the face. The facility did not notify local law enforcement of the abuse.Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, revised 9/2022, indicates: .2. The Administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: .e. Law enforcement officials. (The facility's policy did not include examples of crimes that should be reported, including but not limited to assault and battery, and did not indicate that the facility consulted with local law enforcement to discuss what to report or not report.)On 8/1/25, Surveyor reviewed a facility-reported incident that indicated R2 slapped R1 across the face on 7/14/25 and the incident was witnessed by Med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for residents outside the facility. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 28 residents residing in the facility. On 6/12/25, the front of the facility appeared unkempt which included weeds, dirt and landscaping bark, an open dumpster that contained garbage, a laundry bin that contained items, a plastic chair that contained cardboard, and exposed wires from a missing doorbell. In addition, the front door was reported to be unlocked when it should have been locked. On 6/12/25 from 9:00 AM to 5:45 PM, Surveyor made observations of the front of the facility which faced the main parking lot and public roadway. Surveyor noted long weeds along the front of the facility, under residents' windows, along and under the fencing, and around trees. A dumpster in the front of the facility was open and contained garbage bags. There were three walls of privacy fence around the dumpster, however, the front did not have fence panels. The unfenced area faced the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents received the necessary care and services to prevent pressure injuries and/or promote healing. On 5/25/25, staff reported to Director of Nursing (DON)-B that R2's wound vac (negative pressure wound therapy) dressing was not adhered properly. DON-B did not assess the wound vac dressing or ensure R1's wound vac was functioning appropriately. Findings include: The facility's Negative Pressure Wound Therapy policy, revised 2/2014, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for establishing and maintaining negative pressure wound therapy .change dressing per physician orders and manufacturer guidelines .secondary layer of barrier adhesive .create a vacuum seal over the wound . The facility's Prevention of Pressure Injuries policy, revised 3/1/21, indicates: .For prevention measures associated with specific devices, consult current clinical practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents and did not ensure a fall was thoroughly investigated to determine a root cause for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident. On 4/26/25, R1 fell out of bed and called 911 when staff did not respond to R1's calls for assistance. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation to determine the root cause of R1's fall. Findings include: The facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy, revised 3/2018, indicates: Based on previous evaluations and current data, staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling .According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a fall is defined as: Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level but not as a result of an overwhelming external force .A fall without injury is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 2 sampled residents was provided safe and accurate administration of drugs and biologicals. R1 was not administered a dose of an intravenous (IV) antibiotics on 5/25/25. Findings include: On 6/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including fibromyalgia, history of venous thrombosis embolism, Parkinson's disease, osteomyelitis of vertebra thoracic region, sciatica, and candidal stomatitis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/30/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 had intact cognition. R1 made R1's own medical decisions. R1 had an order for cefazolin reconstituted solution administer 6 grams in sodium chloride 0.9 % 320 milliliters (mls) intravenous (IV) to run continuously 24 hours once a day every morning for osteomylitis of vertebra, thoracic region. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R10) of 1 sampled resident had a medical record that contained complete and accurate information. Director of Nursing (DON)-B did not update R10's medical record when an observation and assessment was completed for R10. Findings include: The facility's Charting and Documentation policy, revised July 2017, indicates: All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care .2. The following information is to be documented in the resident's medical record: a. Objective observations; .d. Changes in the resident's condition; .3. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident of (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident. Registered Nurse (RN)-C did not complete proper hand hygiene during wound care for R2 and used soiled scissors to trim a clean dressing. Findings include: The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised 10/2023, indicates: .Hand hygiene is indicated .g. Immediately after glove removal .4. Single-use disposable gloves should be used .5. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene . The facility's undated Wound Care policy indicates: .2. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly .4. Put on exam glove. Loosen tape and remove dressing .5. Pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly. 6. Put on gloves .21. Wipe reusable supplies with alcohol as indicated (i.e., .scissor blades, etc.) . On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) timely for 2 residents (R2 and R8) of 8 sampled residents. R2's medical record indicated R2 was sexually inappropriate and/or verbally and physically aggressive toward other residents on 1/10/25 and 1/29/25. In addition, R2 and R8 were involved in a verbal altercation on 2/8/25. The facility did not report the allegations of abuse to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, indicates: All reports of resident abuse .are reported to local, state and federal agencies as required by current regulations and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported . The facility's Resident-to-Resident Altercations policy, revised September 2022, indicates: All altercations, including those that may represent resident-to-resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R8) of 8 sampled residents. Progress notes, dated 1/10/25 and 1/29/25, indicated R2's medical record indicated R2 was sexually inappropriate and/or verbally and physically aggressive toward other residents on 1/10/25 and 1/29/25. In addition, R2 and R8 were involved in a verbal altercation on 2/8/25. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegations of abuse. Findings include The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, indicates: All reports of resident abuse .are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported 6. Upon receiving an allegations of abuse .the Administrator is responsible for determining what actions (if any) are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were revised for 3 residents (R) (R4, R5 and R6 ) of 8 sampled residents. R4, R5 and R6 were assessed as high risk for falls. The facility did not ensure fall interventions were reviewed, revised, or added to R4, R5, and R6's falls care plans in a timely manner. Findings include: The facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy, revised March 2018, indicates: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling .5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, or indicate why the current approach remains relevant . 1. On 4/2/25, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome and unspecified dementia without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent resident-to-resident altercations for 4 residents (R) (R1, R3, R4, and R5) of 5 sampled residents. On 7/20/24, R1 rolled R1's wheelchair into R2's foot. R2 said ouch and R1 raised R1's fists as if to hit R2. On 7/31/24, R1 was found in R3's room yelling at R3. R1 was placed on 15-minute checks. On 8/20/24, R1 was observed yelling at R4 in the hallway. R1 grabbed R4's shirt and hit R4's chest. R1 was placed on 1:1 supervision until a motion sensor and an audio monitor were in place. On 9/7/24, R1 became agitated and yelled at Med Tech (MT)-C. R5 approached R1 and said, Don't do that . R1 and R5 then hit each other. R1 was not provided 1:1 supervision at the time of the incident. Findings include: On 10/18/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fall with a fracture and dementia. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R5) of 5 sampled residents. On 9/7/24, R1 and R5 were involved in a physical altercation that involved hitting and slapping at each other. The resident-to-resident altercation was not reported to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, with a revision date of April 2021, indicates: Residents have the right to be free from abuse .Objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect .by anyone .If resident abuse .is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law .The Administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: a. The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; .e. Law…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility. Cooling logs were not completed for leftover foods. A refrigerator that stored food for resident consumption contained dried food debris and a sticky substance on the interior shelves. Food holding temperatures were not monitored or documented. Food items for resident consumption were not labeled with open or expiration dates and/or were beyond the labeled discard date. Findings include: On 7/29/24 at 9:36 AM, Surveyor began an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM)-O who stated the facility follows the State and Federal Food Codes. Cooling Logs: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022 documents at 3-501.14 Cooling: (A) Cooked Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food shall be cooled: (1) Within 2 hours from 135º Fahrenheit (F) to 70°F; and (2) Within a total of 6 hours from 135ºF to 41°F or less. The facility's Food Temperature for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not maintain monthly and quarterly infection surveillance data. The facility did not implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 3 Residents (R) (R15, R14, and R11) with a history of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Findings include: Infection Surveillance: The facility's Infection Control Manual, dated 2019, outlines the facility's procedure for creating monthly and quarterly infection summary reports. On 7/30/24 at 8:56 AM, Surveyor reviewed the facility's infection control binder which did not contain documentation of monthly and quarterly infection surveillance. On 7/30/24 at 9:19 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B who was also the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their abuse policy and complete timely and thorough background checks for 4 of 8 sampled staff. The facility did not obtain Integrative Background Information System (IBIS) or Department of Justice (DOJ) reports for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-T. The facility did not obtain IBIS or DOJ reports for Dietary Aide (DA)-S. The facility obtained Physical Therapist (PT)-R's IBIS and DOJ reports after PT-R's hire date. The facility di not ensure a background check was completed within the last four years for CNA-U. In addition, the facility did not obtain IBIS or DOJ reports for CNA-U. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, with a revision date of April 2021, indicates residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and exploitation. The facility prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives .4. Conduct employee background checks and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 7/30/24, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral hemorrhage (stroke), hemiplegia, and diabetes. R15's MDS assessment, dated 7/19/24, stated R15's BIMS score was 15 out of 15 which indicated R15 had intact cognition. On 7/30/24, Surveyor reviewed R26's medical record. R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder Lewy bodies and fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur. R26's MDS assessment, dated 6/18/24, stated R26's BIMS score was 1 out of 15 which indicated R26 had severe cogitative impairment. R26 had a guardian for healthcare decisions. On 7/30/24 at 12:48 PM, Surveyor interviewed R15 who stated R15 was attacked by R26 on 7/20/24 and R15's Family Member ((FM)-L) was not notified. R15 stated R26 made fists and hit R15 in the chest. R15's medical record contained a nursing progress note, dated 7/22/24, that indicated: Two days ago, R26's wheelchair bumped into R15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 Residents (R) (R19, R15, R4, R6, and R31) of 6 sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) were assisted per their plans of care. R19 was not assisted with meals as indicated in R19's plan of care. R15, R4, R6, and R31 did not consistently receive weekly scheduled showers. Findings include: The facility's Assistance with Meals policy, dated March 2022, states: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident .Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, for example: a. not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. 1. On 7/31/24, Surveyor reviewed R19's medical record. R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and failure to thrive. R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/16/24, indicated R19 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not make a prompt effort to resolve a grievance for 1 Resident (R) (R15) of 1 sampled resident. In addition, the grievance was not contained in the facility's grievance file. During an interview on 7/30/24, R15 stated R15 called Family Member (FM)-L and asked FM-L to call the facility for assistance when staff didn't answer R15's call light. FM-L stated FM-L phoned the facility numerous times with no answer or ability to leave a message. R15 told staff the telephone wasn't answered and there was no way to leave a message. The facility did not follow-up with R15 and FM-L or resolve the grievance in a timely manner. Findings include: On 7/30/24, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral hemorrhage (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and diabetes. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/19/24, stated R15's Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure incidents involving potential abuse were reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the State Agency (SA) for 3 Residents (R) (R24, R15 and R26) of 5 sampled residents. On 4/2/24, staff discovered R24 had an injury of unknown origin. The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the NHA and the SA. On 7/20/24, R15 had a physical altercation with R26. The facility did not report the resident-to-resident altercation to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, with revision date of April 2021, indicates: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .Objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone .If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written notification of transfer, including the reason for the transfer, location of the transfer, appeal rights, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was provided for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. R6 was not provided a written transfer notice when R6 was transferred to the hospital on 5/12/24. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated policy states: The transfer .is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in this facility .Transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility when the resident expects to return to the original facility .The resident and representative are notified in writing of the following information: the effective date of the transfer .the specific location (such as the name of the new provider .to which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received written information of the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R6 was transferred to the hospital on 5/12/24 and was not provided a bed hold notice. Findings include: The facility's Bed-Holds and Returns policy, revised October 2022, indicates: All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies .at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours) .The written bed-hold notice provided to the resident/representative explains in detail: the duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements were met for 1 Resident (R) (R22) of 5 sampled residents. R22's medical record indicated R22 had a history of mental illness (MI) or mental disorder (MD) diagnosis upon admission and was prescribed psychotropic medication. R22's PASRR Level I Screen was marked no for major mental disorder, yes for psychotropic medication, and no for history of intellectual disability (ID). The facility did not complete a PASRR Level II Screen when R22 remained in the facility for long-term care. Findings include: According to the State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS), PASRR is a federal requirement that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be assessed to determine whether they might have an intellectual/developmental disability (ID/DD) and/or mental illness (MI). This is called a Level I Screen. The purpose of a Level I Screen is to identify individuals whose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive plan of care following a smoking assessment for 1 Resident (R) (R25) of 15 sampled residents. R25's plan of care did not address R25's smoking assessment or include interventions specific to smoking at the facility. Findings include: The facility's undated Smoking Policy states: It is the policy of this facility to meet the needs and provide a safe environment for our residents that smoke. Smoking regulations will not be established to restrict the resident's smoking privileges. However, some restrictions will apply. The facility will have designated smoking areas. Smoking will be prohibited in any other area. If it becomes necessary to restrict an individual resident's smoking privileges because of safety and/or medical reasons, such information will be noted on the resident's care plan. Smoking policies will be reviewed with the resident and/or responsible party prior to or upon admission and as needed on an individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R14) of 1 resident with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI). During an observation on 7/29/24, staff did not keep R14's catheter drainage bag below the level of the bladder which prevented the flow of urine. Findings include: The facility's Catheter Care, Urinary policy, revised 4/2022, states: Maintaining Unobstructed Urine Flow: 3. Position the drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. From 7/29/24 to 7/31/24, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia C5-C7 complete, pressure injury sacral region stage 4, osteomyelitis, neurogenic bowel, diabetes mellitus type 2, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R20) of 3 sampled residents was offered fluid intake between meals. The facility did not provide fluids to R20 between meals. Findings include: The facility's Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration policy states: .6. Nurse aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside, snack, and meal fluids on a daily and routine basis as part of daily care. From 7/29/24 to 7/31/24, Surveyor reviewed R20's medical record. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia (the loss or impairment of one's capacity to use or comprehend language), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy body dementia, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease. R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/31/24, stated R20's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 00 out of 15 which indicated R20 was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. R20 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure high-risk medications were monitored for 2 Residents (R) (R6 and R19) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility did not monitor R6 for side effects or adverse reactions of insulin and bumetanide. The facility did not monitor R19 for side effects or adverse reactions of apixaban and furosemide. Findings include: FDA.gov states drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for sale in the United States must be safe and effective which means the benefits of the drug must be greater than the known risks .Side effects, also known as adverse reactions, are unwanted undesirable effects that are possibly related to a drug. Medline plus.gov states insulin is used to control blood sugar in people who have type 1 diabetes (a condition in which the body does not make insulin and cannot control the amount of sugar in the blood) or in people who have type 2 diabetes (a condition in which the blood sugar is too high because the body does not produce or use insulin normally) that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure assessment and rationale for psychotropic medications were completed for 3 Residents (R) (R1, R22, and R19) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R1 was prescribed lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) as needed (PRN) three times daily (TID) on 6/20/24. There was no rationale provided for continued use of the medication beyond 14 days. R22 was prescribed lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet twice daily (BID) PRN on 2/7/24. There was no rationale provided for continued use of the medication beyond 14 days. R19 was prescribed lorazepam PRN TID on 6/20/24. There was no rationale provided for continued use of the medication beyond 14 days. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use Policy, dated July 2022, states: A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were stored appropriately for 1 Resident (R) (R4) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. On 7/31/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-N left two bottles of eye drops (fluorometholone and Sil-Optho) and a container of betamethasone valerate topical lotion that were prescribed to R4 and a scopolamine transdermal system 1 mg (milligram)/3 days patch that was not prescribed to R4 on R4's bedside table. Findings include: During an observation of medication administration on 7/31/24 at 6:59 AM, Surveyor observed a bottle of fluoromethalone 0.1 % ophthalmic suspension (a steroid medication used to treat eye inflammation) and a bottle of Sil-Optho eye lubricant (a silicone lubricant made for artificial eyes) labeled with R4's name on R4's bedside table. A scopolamine transdermal system (a medication to decrease secretions to prevent nausea and vomiting) 1 mg/3 days patch was also observed on R4's bedside table. On 7/31/24 at 6:59 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff, resident, and family interview, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R15) of 12 sampled residents resided in a clean, comfortable, and home-like environment. This had the potential to affect multiple residents in the facility. During observations on 7/29/24 and 7/30/24, the 100 and 200 wings of the facility smelled of urine. During an interview on 7/30/24, R15 stated the facility smelled like an [NAME]. Findings include: Upon entering the facility on 7/29/24, Surveyors noted a urine odor. On 7/29/24, Surveyors noted a urine odor in the dining room during lunch service and in resident hallways and common areas. On 7/30/24, Surveyor noted a urine odor in resident hallways. The urine odor was strongest on the 100 wing. On 7/30/24 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor interviewed Housekeeper (HK)-K who verified the facility had a urine odor. HK-K stated the facility used to have air fresheners but did not have them any longer. HK-K indicated HK-K thought the caulk around the toilets contributed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility. In addition, staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care for 2 residents (R) (R9 and R6) of 2 residents. The facility did not appropriately monitor for infections and outbreaks. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care for R9 and R6. Findings include: The facility's Surveillance for Infections policy, dated 9/2017, indicates: .5. Nursing staff will monitor residents for signs and symptoms that may suggest infection, according to current criteria and definitions of infections and will document and report suspected infections to the charge nurse as soon as possible. Data Collection and Recording 1. For residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not ensure medications were properly secured in a medication cart. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents whose medications were stored in the cart. Surveyor observed R15 open a drawer of an unlocked medication cart in the lobby and remove two medication cards. Findings include: The facility's Security of Medication Cart policy, revised April 2007, indicates: .5. When the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked and parked at the nurses' station or inside the medication room. On 4/9/25, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/24/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated R15 had severe cognitive impairment. On 4/9/24 at 2:12 PM, Surveyor entered the lobby and observed a medication cart next to the nurses' station. Surveyor observed R15 lean from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 2 residents (R) (R16 and R17) of 10 sampled residents. R16 stated in a resident council meeting that a staff kicked R16's foot off R16's chair on purpose and was rough with R16. The allegation of abuse was not reported to the State Agency (SA) or local law enforcement. R17 stated someone took money out of R17's purse. The allegation of misappropriation was not reported to the SA or local law enforcement. Findings include: The facility's Resident/Employee Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment Policy and Procedure, dated 8/24/15, indicates: 1. Any alleged violation involving mistreatment, misappropriation of property, abuse, exploitation, neglect, or injuries of unknown source of a resident shall be immediately reported to the Administrator, the Clinical Manager or designee, the Division of Quality Assurance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and misappropriation for 2 residents (R) (R16 and R17) of 10 residents. R16 stated in a resident council meeting that staff kicked R16's foot of R16's chair on purpose and was rough with R16. The allegation of abuse was not thoroughly investigated. R17 stated someone took money out of R17's purse. The allegation of misappropriation was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility's Resident/Employee Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment Policy and Procedure, dated 8/24/15, indicates: 4. The Administrator or designee shall thoroughly investigate all allegations and show evidence that they thoroughly investigated and must prevent further incidents while the investigation is in process. A thorough investigation includes but is not limited to: Interviewing alleged victims and witnesses, interviewing accused individuals, interviewing other residents to determine if they have ben abused or mistreated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure necessary care and services were provided to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from worsening or developing for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 17 sampled residents. R6's medical record indicated R6 had open area(s) on the buttocks on 1/10/24 and 3/27/24. R6's medical record did not contain assessments or proof of monitoring for effectiveness of treatments. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol document, with a revision date of April 2018, indicates: .1. The nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers .2. In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following: a. Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic (dead) tissue .d. Current treatments .4. The physician will assist the staff to identify the type (for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 residents observed during the provision of cares. Staff did not appropriately cleanse hands during the provision of cares for R1. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings Guidance: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: * Immediately before touching a patient * Before performing an aseptic task (e.g., placing an indwelling device) or handling invasive medical devices * Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient * After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment * After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces * Immediately after glove removal Healthcare facilities should: *…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure safe food handling practices were implemented. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing in the facility. Food items for resident consumption were not labeled with open dates and/or expiration dates. A refrigerator with food for resident consumption contained missing daily temperature checks on the temperature log form. An air-handling unit and a condenser in the kitchen/kitchen walk-in cooler contained debris. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 5/30/23 at 9:13 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-C stated the facility follows the Wisconsin State Food Code as their standard of practice. 1. Date Marking Wisconsin (WI) Food Code 2022 documents at 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking .(A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E), (F), and (H) of this section, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program based on current standards of practice and designed to provide a safe environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was not based on current standards of practice and did not: -Include water management team members who were knowledgeable about Legionella and the facility's water system -Describe the building's water system using text and an accurate flow diagram of the system -Include an assessment of the facility's water system to identify all locations where Legionella could grow and spread -Identify where control measures should be applied based on where Legionella could grow and spread -Identify acceptable ranges of control limits (temperature ranges) and corrective action when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing in the facility. The facility does not currently have an IP who completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Ref: QSO-22-19-NH last revised date: June 29, 2022 contains the following information: In 2016, CMS overhauled the Requirements for Participation for Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities (i.e., nursing homes), which was implemented in three phases: Phase 3 - November 28, 2019 .Phase 3 .regulations which require nursing homes to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) who has specialized training onsite at least part-time to effectively oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP). On 6/1/23 at 8:36 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B who verified DON-B started employment with the facility in November 2022. DON-B stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the development of a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable goals, timeframes, and interventions for 1 Resident (R) (R18) of 2 sampled residents. R18 was diagnosed with a right corneal eye ulcer and bacterial conjunctivitis. R18 was started on antibiotics. The facility did not develop a care plan to address R18's infection or antibiotic use including monitoring and possible side effects. Findings include: 1. From 5/31/23 through 6/1/23, Surveyor reviewed R18's medical record. Surveyor noted R18 was diagnosed with a right corneal eye ulcer and bacterial conjunctivitis (commonly known as pink eye, a common eye infection that causes inflammation of the tissues lining the eyelid (conjunctiva). Pink eye due to bacteria is highly contagious.) R18 was receiving moxifloxacin, tobramycin, and vancomycin (all antibiotic eye drops), and was placed on contact precautions (healthcare personnel caring for patients on contact precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were reviewed, offered, and administered for 2 Residents (R) (R9 and R20) of 5 residents. The facility did not review R9's vaccination history or offer R9 the PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®). In addition, the facility did not offer R9 an annual influenza vaccine. The facility did not review R20's vaccination history or offer R20 the PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®). Findings include: Abbreviations (www.cdc.gov): PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13®) PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvance®) PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®) PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®) The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations indicate: For adults 65 years or older who have only received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the risks versus benefits of COVID-19 immunization and did not obtain consent or refusal for COVID-19 immunization for 3 Residents (R) (R9, R18 and R20) of 5 residents reviewed. R9's medical record did not contain documentation to indicate R9 or R9's representative was provided education regarding COVID-19 immunization and offered the opportunity to receive or decline COVID-19 immunization. R18's medical record did not contain documentation to indicate R18 or R18's representative was provided education regarding COVID-19 immunization and offered the opportunity to receive or decline COVID-19 immunization. R20's medical record did not contain documentation to indicate R20 or R20's representative was provided education regarding COVID-19 immunization and offered the opportunity to receive or decline COVID-19 immunization. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-06-01 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Surveyor reviewed R18's medical record and noted R18 was transferred to the hospital on 5/10/23. R18 had an Activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (APOAHC). R18's medical record did not include documentation that a transfer notice was provided to R18's resident representative. Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written notification of transfer, including the reason for the transfer, location of the transfer, appeal rights and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was provided for 4 Residents (R) (R12, R18, R9, and R25) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. R12 was not provided a written transfer notice when R12 was transferred to the hospital on 3/6/22 and 3/30/23. R18's resident representative was not provided a written transfer notice when R18 was transferred to the hospital on 5/10/23. R9's Guardian was not provided a written transfer notice when R8 was transferred to the hospital on 1/18/23. R25's resident representative was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-06-01 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 5/30/23, Surveyor reviewed R18's medical record and noted R18 was transferred to the hospital on 5/10/23. R18 had an Activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (APOAHC). R18's medical record did not include documentation that R18's resident representative was provided a bed hold notice. Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 Residents (R) (R12, R18, R9 and R25) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization received written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy, including the duration of the bed hold, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R12 was transferred to the hospital on 3/6/23 and 3/30/23 and was not provided a bed hold notice. R18 was transferred to the hospital on 5/10/23. R18's resident representative was not provided a bed hold notice. R9 was transferred to the hospital on 1/18/23. R9's Guardian was not provided a bed hold notice. R25 was transferred to the hospital on 3/16/23. R25's resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$142,634 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-10-22
- $132,276 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WISCONSIN ILLINOIS SENIOR HOUSING, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURKE, DANA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/07/2019 |
| DUPONT, LORI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| GEHLER, MIRIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| GERLACH, KERI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2019 |
| KERWIN, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| KUMAR, RAJEEV SHIVA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/24/2012 |
| LACKE (CARRIG), KAREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| LYNN, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/14/2011 |
| SHERMAN, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/11/2020 |
| CARRIAGE HEALTHCARE COMPANIES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/15/2001 |
| SIEBEL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2016 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $57K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525657. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.