No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edgerton Care Center, Inc

313 Stoughton Rd., Edgerton, WI 53534 · Non profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (608) 884-1330 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
217 N Main St · (608) 884-9431 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
711 N Main St · (608) 884-6644 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1101 N Main St · (608) 884-4076 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Edgerton Care Center, 313 Stoughton Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.2%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.8%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.5%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.6%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.8%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.941.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.162.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.1%CMS range 36.9–61.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.0–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.8–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.98 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-18)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-05-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 1 Residents reviewed (R6) this has the potential to affect 25 full code residents that reside in the facility. R6 indicated he wished his code status to be full code. R6 was found to be pulseless and not breathing. Facility staff failed to utilize life-support equipment while providing CPR on R6. Facility staff indicated the facility does not have easily accessible life-support equipment, including a backboard or Ambu bag to provide effective emergency CPR. The facility failed to have a process and procedure in place to ensure CPR certified staff members have readily available and organized life-support equipment for when a resident is found pulseless and not breathing and there is a need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act N6) for 1 of 6 sampled residents (R9) out of a total sample of 16 Residents.R9 had a change of condition that was not assessed properly, communicated to on-coming shifts, nor reported to the resident's medical provider. R9 was sent to the hospital where they remained for 3 days, receiving IV antibiotics.Evidenced by:The Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act states in part .N 6.04 Standards of practice for licensed practical nurses. (1) Performance of acts in basic patient situations. In the performance of acts in basic patient situations, the L.P.N. shall, under the general supervision of an R.N. or the direction of a provider: (a) Accept only patient care delegated acts which the L.P.N. is competent to perform. (b) Provide basic nursing care. (c) Record nursing care given and report to the appropriate person changes in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for falls.R1 had a history of falls including one that resulted in multiple rib fractures. The facility did not complete a thorough root cause analysis on the falls or ensure that care planned interventions were in place for R1.As evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Falls - Clinical Protocol, with last revision date of March 2018, states, in part: Assessment and Recognition: 1. The physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for falling. c. While many falls are isolated individual incidents, a few individuals fall repeatedly. Those individuals often have an identifiable underlying cause. 2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: . c. Musculoskeletal function, observing for change in normal range of motion. g. Frequency and number of falls since last physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) for 4 of 17 sampled residents (R6, R2, R24, and R16). R6 and R16 are being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R2 and R24 are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). R6 has diagnoses of neurogenic bowel (loss of normal bowel function) and constipation. The facility failed to accurately assess and monitor R6 for constipation, decreased fluid intake and output as well as changes in R6's mental status, resulting in frequent visits to the emergency department. The facility failed to notify R6's primary care physician of his level of inadequate fluid intake and significant increases in urine output. Between 1/1/25 and 3/31/25, R6 has been send to the hospital several times requiring IV (intravenous) fluid administration. R16 experienced sudden onset of four (4) projectile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect 36 of 36 residents. Infection control concerns:The facility's employee line list is not inclusive and does not document and track employee symptom onset, well date, last day worked, and date may return to work.Surveyor observed NS H (Nursing Scheduler) delivering linens to resident rooms with the cart uncovered.Surveyor also observed boxes of gloves on the same linen cart touching towels, washcloths, chux (washable bed pads), and gowns. As evidenced by:The facility policy, Handling Clean Line, undated, documents in part, as follows: It is the policy of this facility to handle, store, process, and transport clean linens in a safe and sanitary method to prevent contamination of the linen, which can lead to infection. Linen includes sheets, blankets, pillows,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure written bed holds were completed for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R4 and R19) reviewed for bed holds out of a sample of 16. R1 was transferred to the hospital. The facility did not provide written bed hold notice to R1 and/or R1's resident representative. R2 was transferred to the hospital. The facility did not provide written bed hold notice to R2 and/or R2's resident representative. R4 did not receive a bed hold notice prior to going to the hospital. R19 was sent to the hospital for a change of condition and the facility failed to provide a bed hold. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold Notice policy, dated 2025, includes, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. As part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented for 1 of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. The facility did not complete the Background Information Disclosure (BID) form, Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) upon hire and every 4 years thereafter for LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse). Findings include:The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, with a review date of 4/1/26. Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. A. Screening: Potential employees will be screened for history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through with the appropriate steps of the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process for 3 of 5 residents (R6, R7, and R27) reviewed for PASARR screening. R6 did not have a level II PASARR screening completed. R7 did not have a level II PASARR screening completed. R27 was admitted with diagnoses that include schizophrenia and anxiety disorder and was prescribed medications to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia and anxiety. No PASARR 1 or PASARR 2 was completed. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Resident Assessment – Coordination with PASARR Program, indicates, in part: Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for 1 of 2 residents out of a sample of 16 Residents (R40). The facility was not walking R40 in accordance with her plan of care. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Programs, dated 2025 states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practical level. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. Nursing personnel are trained on basic, or maintenance nursing care that does not require the use of qualified therapist or licensed nurse oversight. This training may include but is not limited to: . c. Encouraging residents to remain active and assisting with any exercises according to the plan of care. 7. Residents may receive restorative nursing services upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R9) out of a total sample of 16.R9 has orders for a BiPAP (a noninvasive ventilatory device that helps patients breathe by delivering two levels of air pressure: higher during inhalation and lower during exhalation) that has not been applied properly and that CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff were not trained to apply, Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy) no date, states in part .2. The facility will obtain an order for the use of CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS, or Trilogy device and settings from the practitioner.5. The facility will follow manufacturer's instruction for use of the machine.The manufacturer's manual for R9's BiPAP machine ([NAME] DreamStation) states in part .Personnel qualifications: .The operator should read and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure laboratory services were obtained as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for laboratory services out of 16 sampled Residents. R19's laboratory orders were not carried out as ordered. Evidenced by: R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include alcohol dependence, history of a stroke, toxic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. R19 is being seen by a behavioral health Nurse Practitioner (NP). On 6/9/26, the facility had a Quarterly Psychotropic Review. Documentation states in part: Medication.depakote, olanzapine. Target Behavior: 1. Paranoid Behaviors. 2. Agg-Abuse behave (behavior). Paranoia beh- accusatory of theft etc. at home in past. Depakote lab ordered for levels. Surveyor reviewed R19's electronic health record and did not find documentation of the behavior meeting or orders for labs to be drawn. On 6/16/26 at 2:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed Behavioral Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately notify and consult with a resident's physician when there was a change in condition. This occurred for 1 of 5 Residents (R3) reviewed for notification of change in condition.On 4/30/26 R3 had no urine output on the NOC (overnight) shift. The facility did not notify the provider of the change of conditionThis is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Change of Condition Process, undated, states in part: Unit Nurse Expectations: The unit nurse will identify/assess for changes of condition. All nurses will update the provider and POA (Power of Attorney) immediately of change in condition.R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include urinary tract infection, sepsis (extreme response to an infection), infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (condition where the nervous system disrupts the bladders ability to control its function), retention of urine,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 out of 3 total sampled Residents (R1).R1 experienced a change of condition following onset of nasal congestion and a productive cough. R1 was not assessed by a RN (Registered Nurse) prior to being hospitalization for 2 weeks. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, Change of Condition Process, undated, documents in part, as follows: Unit Nurse Expectations: The unit nurse will identify/assess for changes of condition. All nurses will update the provider and POA (Power of Attorney) immediately of change in condition. The nurse will document the assessment, what the interventions are including any new orders. Unit nurses will assess the resident with COC (change of condition) every shift for 48 hours. The unit nurse will notify the Nurse Manager on call.R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide evidence that MAs (Medication Aide) had 4 hours of medication based in-service training per year for 1 of 1 MA reviewed for in-service training.MA CC did not have documentation of 4 hours of medication based in-service. Evidenced by:The facility's Continuing Education policy, dated 2/9/26, states, in part: . 1. All levels of employees are expected to complete required trainings within designated time frames.MA CC has a hire date of 8/14/13. MA CC education record for 2025 indicates 2.5 hours of medication related in-service, including:*Medication Administration Pass 1 contact hours*Medication Administration: Antibiotics 0.5 contact hours*Medication Administration: Controlled Substances 0.5 contact hours*Medication Assistance for Medication Aides 0.5 contact hoursOn 5/14/26 at 12:43 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and asked how many hours of medication related in-service are required for MAs. NHA A stated 4 hours every year. Surveyor asked how many hours MA CC had completed for 2025. NHA A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not always ensure that they implemented written procedures for screening agency staff prior to working with residents at the facility. This has the potential to affect all 51 residents residing with in the facility.On 3/4/26, the facility became aware that an agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA S), who had worked 12 previous shifts on various units/floors was working under a false identification as CNA T. The facility did not put new processes in place related to verifying identification of the agency staff prior to orientation and their first scheduled shift. This gave CNA S the continued ability to obtain work while posing as CNA T. This has the potential to affect the safety of all 51 residents of the facility. This is evidenced by:Policy Review: Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation (date implemented, revised, and reviewed is blank.)Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents. The facility did not ensure that lids on the dumpster were shut and secured to prevent pests.This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Sanitization, states in part: . 14. Garbage and refuse containers are in good condition, without leaks, and waste is properly contained in dumpsters with lids. On 3/26/26 at 10:25 AM Surveyor observed one lid open on recycling dumpster, and one lid open on regular trash dumpster.On 3/26/26 at 11:10 AM Surveyor interviewed DM V (Dietary Manager). Surveyor asked DM V if she knew why the dumpster lids would be open. DM V stated that sometimes the wind will catch them or when the truck comes to dump the trash the lid will remain open. Surveyor asked DM V what days they pick up trash. DM V stated Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for regular trash, and only Fridays for recycling dumpster. DM V stated that her staff tries to remember to shut the lids when the trash is taken out. Surveyor asked DM V how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 6 (R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) of 12 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, and R11 expressed long call light wait times. Facility documentation shows residents waited an hour or more for ADL care when prompted with their call lights. Findings includeThe facility uses a call light system that alarms mini mobile devices on each of the facility's 2 resident floors (2nd floor and 3rd floor). When a resident uses their call light to notify staff of a need, the devices for that floor sound an alarm. The devices are meant to be carried so that nursing staff can hear the alarms while they are on the floor providing cares and services on behalf of the residents. There is no central hub that alarms, nor are their any indicators outside of each room (light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse from another Resident for 1 of 11 residents (R5) reviewed for abuse. R12 had witnessed R1 slap R5 when both R1 and R5's wheelchairs got hung up on each other. R12 reported the incident to staff immediately. R1 has a history of aggressive behaviors towards staff and other residents. R1 has had another known altercation with R12 in the past. Evidenced by:The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and ExploitationThe facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law though established procedures for 3 of 3 incidents involving 3 residents (R1, R5 & R6) reviewed for abuse. The facility became aware of a resident-to-resident altercation between R1 and R5 on 2/16/26. The facility failed to do an investigation and report to the state if indicated. Facility did not report a suspicion of a crime when they became aware of a staffing agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) working under false identification. A staff member was alleged to have abused R6, and the facility did not report it to the State Agency. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, and that steps were taken to prevent further abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. The facility became aware of a resident-to-resident altercation between R1 and R5 on 2/16/26. The facility failed to do a thorough investigation and put interventions into place to prevent future occurrences. Evidenced by:The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.The components of the facility abuse prohibition plan are discussed herein: . The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) reviewed.CNA U did not have an annual performance review.CNA H did not have an annual performance review.Evidenced by:The facility's Performance Evaluations policy, dated 9/2020, states, in part: The job performance of each employee shall be reviewed and evaluated at least annually. 1. A performance evaluation will be completed on each employee at the conclusion of his/her 90-day probationary period, and at least annually thereafter.CNA U was hired 1/28/15. CNA U did not have an annual performance evaluation completed for 2025.CNA H was hired 8/21/19. CNA H did not have an annual performance evaluation completed for 2025.On 3/26/26 at 2:31 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA H about performance evaluations. CNA H stated I don't recall having one. I have received paperwork about whether or not there was a raise, but no information about my performance.On 3/26/26 at 2:16 PM, Surveyor interviewed HRM W (Human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 Residents (R2) were free from significant medication errors. R2's medication was given late per documentation from 1/14/26 to 2/15/26. Findings Include: A policy titled Administering Medications Revised April 2019 documented:Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Policy interpretation and implementation. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include:enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication;preventing potential medication or food interactions; andhonoring resident choices and preferences, consistent with his or her care plan.Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff trainingmedications are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0948 — isolated
    Ensure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not assure that the Feeding Assistant Program included annual training and skills review for 2 of 4 feeding assistants reviewed.The facility did not provide annual training or skills monitoring, per state regulations for two Feeding Assistants.This is evidenced by:Wisconsin's State requirements for Feeding Assistants, specified in 42 CFR 483.60(h), includes, in part: . Feeding Assistants must receive an annual in-service on relevant feeding assistant topics (any topic area included in the curriculum is appropriate). In addition, Feeding Assistants must be evaluated on a yearly basis to document that their skill performance and feeding competence is satisfactory .Surveyor reviewed DOR K's (Director of Rehabilitation) Feeding Assistant Training Program documents and noted that the facility developed a state approved Feeding Assistant Program and identified DOR K as a Feeding Assistant. DOR K successfully completed training and skills review on 4/17/24 for this program. Surveyor did not see any annual training for DOR K since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and admission packet review, the facility failed to refund a resident's money within 30 days of discharge for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for refunds of eight sample residents. This failure could potentially cause financial hardship for the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated admission packet, provided by the facility, revealed Refunds. Facility will make any refunds of any prepaid fees within thirty (30) days of discharge. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 12/31/24 and located in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 12/24/24. R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1 had diagnoses of benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges, other specified disorders of the brain, and hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left dominant side. Review of R1's January 2025 Resident Account Detail, provided by the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 45 residents. Facility staff were observed touching multiple items in the kitchenette while serving and handling food without changing gloves or performing proper hand hygiene. Cook D was observed dishing up lunch from the steam table with gloves on, stepping away from the steam table, touching other surfaces in the kitchenette, returning to the steam table for meal plating and touching ready to eat foods while wearing the same pair of gloves. Surveyor observed visible build on and debris in two ovens. Surveyor observed a visible white substance on inside and outside of a steam kettle. Surveyor observed a visible white substance on the outside of an ice machine. Surveyors observed a refrigerator containing resident food and drink in a kitchenette on 2nd floor without daily temperature monitoring being completed. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the appropriate agencies for 5 of 5 allegations involving residents (R46, R146, R6, and R3) and 2 of 3 supplemental residents (R18, R19) and failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime. During a NOC (night) shift on 11/28/24 to 11/29/24, CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) heard R46 calling for help. CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) observed R46 to be bright red and shaking with fresh blood on his right forearm (from a skin tear) and bedding. R46 stated, CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) and LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse), both agency staff, wouldn't let him get up and held his hands down. On 11/29/24 at 1:54 AM, CNA H called NHA A (Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 3 of 3 sampled residents (R3, R6, R46) and 2 of 3 supplemental residents (R19, R18) reviewed for abuse investigations. On 10/8/24 the facility became aware that R18 had been left in her wheelchair all night without being changed or assisted to bed. The facility completed a grievance form but did not complete a thorough investigation. On 12/15/24 the facility became aware that R19 had her call light on all night, but that staff had shut her door and not assisted her to get changed from her wet brief. The facility completed a grievance form but did not complete a thorough investigation. On 12/16/24 the facility became aware that R6 had received an enema then was left in his stool for hours without being changed and cleaned up by staff. The facility completed a grievance form but did not complete a thorough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of a resident's advance directive was included in the resident's medical record, for 3 of 17 sampled residents (R25, R33, and R146) reviewed for advance directives. The facility did not have advanced directives on file in R25, R33, or R146's medical record. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Advance Directives, dated 2001 with a Revision Date of [DATE], states, in part: . Policy Statement: The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive . Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy . Definitions: 1.b. Advance Directive - a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized by state law . relating to the provisions of health care when the individual is incapacitated . 1.b.(3) Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) - indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident, legal guardian, health care proxy, or representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for grievances (R28 and R6). R28 voiced a grievance to the facility and the facility did not complete appropriate interviews, audits, education, or provide follow up with R28 after the conclusion of the investigation. R6 and his family voiced grievances to the facility. The facility did not complete appropriate interviews, audits, education, or provide follow up with R6 or his family after the conclusion of the investigation. Evidenced by: Surveyor requested a Grievance Policy from the facility; however, one was not provided. Example 1: R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include, in part: heart failure, epilepsy (seizure disorder), generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), history of cardiac arrest (heart stops beating), and presence of other cardiac implants and grafts. R28's most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a Residents right to be free from physical abuse by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) for 1 of 17 residents (R46). During a NOC (night) shift CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) heard R46 calling for help. CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) observed R46 to be bright red and shaking with fresh blood on his right forearm (from a skin tear) and bedding. CNA H also observed fresh blood on R46's sheets. R46 stated, CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) and LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse), both agency staff, wouldn't let him get up and held his hands down. The police officer documents, he observed significant bruising to R46's right hand and thumb print bruise to his left hand. As evidenced by The State Operations Manual under F600 states in part; §483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident is free from physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for restraints (R146). R146 was observed in an power lift recliner with the remote not in reach and thus restricting R146's movement. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Use of Restraints, revision date, April 2017, indicates, in part: Policy Statement: Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls . Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 resident (R24 and R2) reviewed. R24 was observed not disposing of cigarette materials properly and not returning materials to staff after returning from smoking. R2 has had eight falls from 1/6/25 - 3/13/25 and has several care planned interventions including Dycem (a non-slip product that grips on both sides placed in a resident's wheelchair to prevent sliding out), gripper socks to be on resident's feet when out of bed, gripper strips on the floor, a mat on the floor by the bed, and shoes to be kept in the wheelchair at bedside when resident was in bed. The facility did not ensure these interventions were in place to prevent R2 from having further falls. Example 1: The undated facility policy, Smoking Policy and Procedure, indicates, in part: Policy: It is the policy of [NAME] Care Center to provide for the safety and welfare of all residents who wish to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter receives appropriate treatment and services 1 of 1 residents (R28) reviewed for indwelling catheters. R28 has an indwelling catheter, and has no physician order for the catheter, including its size and replacement schedule. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled: Catheter Care, Urinary, dated 10/2022, states, in part: .Catheter Evaluation 1. Review and document the clinical indications for catheter use prior to inserting. 2. Nursing and the interdisciplinary team should assess and document the ongoing need for a catheter that is in place . The facility policy, entitled: Medication Orders, dated 11/2014, states, in part: . Supervision by a Physician . 2. A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record for each resident . R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include, in part: heart failure, epilepsy (seizure disorder), history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff did not adequately assess and treat pain and provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (R10) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to adequately assess and treat R10's pain while providing wound care, causing R10 to feel pain throughout the dressing change. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Pain Assessment and Management, dated 10/2022, states, in part: . 2. Pain Management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. 3. Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes the following: . b. Recognizing the presence of pain; . f. Identifying and using specific strategies for different levels and sources of pain; g. Monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions; and h. Modifying approaches as necessary . Recognizing Pain . 2. Possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 17 sampled Residents (R15) and 1 of 1 test trays. R15 voiced a concern about hot foods being served cold. Surveyor received a breakfast test tray and the food temperatures were not palatable. Evidenced by: The undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, indicates, in part: Policy: Food temperatures shall be tested & recorded prior to meal service by food service employee. Purpose: To ensure that food is held at safe temperatures to prevent food borne illness and to ensure palatable food temperatures . On 3/25/25 at 2:00 PM, Surveyors interviewed R15 as part of the initial screening process. R15 indicated that the scrambled eggs and vegetables are sometimes cold. R15 indicated the food is cold around 3 times a week and that she stopped eating scrambled eggs because of it. On 3/26/25 at 3:50 PM Surveyors interviewed CNA M (Certified Nursing Assistant) and asked if residents have brought up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with a physician when needed to alter treatment for 1 resident (R2) of 4 sampled residents. During a transfer with the EZ stand, the strap/belt to the EZ stand hit R2 in the left eye causing discomfort. Physician was not notified immediately. Facility did not investigate this incident. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Notification of Changes Policy, undated, states, in part: PURPOSE: The facility shall promptly notify the resident and/or the resident representative and his or her physician or delegate of changes in the resident's condition or status in order to obtain orders for appropriate treatment and monitoring and promote the resident's right to make choices about treatment and care preferences. PROCEDURE: 1. The nurse will immediately notify the resident, resident's physician and the resident representative(s) for the following . a. An accident involving the resident, which results in injury and has the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure that accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 out of 4 sampled residents (R2). R2 did not receive his Tobramycin-dexamethasone eye drops as scheduled on 5/16/24, 5/17/24, and 5/18/24. R2 did not receive his Maxitrol eye drops as scheduled on 5/18/24 and on 5/19/24. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Medication Pass Protocol, dated 01/2018 states in part . 9. Check all medications against the MAR (medication administration record) prior to administration. 10. Ensure medications that are being administered have a physician's order, medications are administered as ordered . 11. Sign out all medications immediately after administration. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement its policy and procedure to prevent abuse, neglect, and mistreatment of residents which had a potential to affect all 13 residents on the unit. The facility did not implement its policy and procedures to safeguard residents by removing CNA D (Certified Nursing Assistant) from patient care when R2 accused CNA D of sexual abuse on 4/20/24. This is evidenced by: The Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy, revised April 2021, documents in part: Policy Statement -- Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse were reported to the state agency and other officials, and that the residents were protected during the facilities investigation for 1 of 3 abuse investigations reviewed (R2) of a total sample of 3. On 4/20/24 the facility became aware of an allegation by R2 that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had touched her breasts. This allegation of abuse was not reported to the state agency and other officials and the facility failed to protect other residents during the investigation. This is evidenced by: The Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy, revised April 2021, documents in part: Policy Statement -- Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an accusation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. On 4/20/24, the facility became aware of a sexual abuse allegation involving R2 and a thorough investigation was not completed. This is evidenced by: The Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy, revised April 2021, documents in part: Policy Statement -- Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 1. Protect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement professional standards of practice to promote healing or prevent pressure injury (PI) development for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PIs out of a sample of 3 residents (R1). R1 is care planned to be repositioned every two to four hours and facility documentation shows R1 was not being repositioned every two to four hours. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Repositioning, dated 2013, states, in part: . Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the evaluation of resident repositioning needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for repositioning, to promote comfort for all bed- or chair- bound residents and to prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation and provide pressure relief for residents. Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to evaluate for any special needs of the resident . General Guidelines: 1. Repositioning is a common, effective intervention for preventing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 40 residents. Cook Q did not allow the thermometer to air dry after sanitizing and before temping resident food. Surveyor observed [NAME] L's personal lunch to be stored in the facility's walk-in refrigerator with resident food. Surveyor observed undated and unmarked food in the unit refrigerator. Surveyor observed facility's mixer to be stored with food particles on it. Surveyor observed facility's ice machine to have a black and a white build up on the piping and the top inside of the ice cube storage compartment. Surveyor observed two (2) dented cans in circulation. Evidenced by: Example- thermometer/Quat Quaternary Sanitizer Safety Data Sheet, issued 4/24/2015, includes Acute oral toxicity equals 4. Harmful if swallowed. If swallowed, contact a physician immediately and allow advice from medical professional . Ingestion: obtain medical attention. Facility policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 71 residents (R) in the facility. The facility failed to identify a COVID-19 outbreak when DA R (Dietary Aide) tested positive for COVID-19. The facility failed to test and/or exclude staff (Driver S and Housekeeping T) when they were displaying symptoms consistent with COVID-19. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled COVID-19 Policy, dated September 2023, indicates in part: .Facility staff, regardless of vaccination status, must report any of the following criteria to point of contact designated by the facility so they can be properly managed: A positive viral test for SARS-CoV-2. Symptoms of COVID-19 . Outbreak investigation: An outbreak investigation is initiated when a single…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including State Survey Agency in accordance with State law though established procedures for 4 of 5 abuse investigations (R21, R31, R17, R45) reviewed of a total sample of 17 residents. R21 had a resident-to-resident incident that was neither reported to NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) nor the State Agency. R31 had a resident-to-resident incident that was neither reported to the NHA A nor the State Agency. R17 did not have the initial report submitted for a self-report the facility reported. On 12/4/23, the facility became aware of an allegation that R45 felt staff was rough when putting her into bed. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within two hours of discovery. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident that is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) receives the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 4 of 6 reviewed for ADL's (R17, R21, R31, R23) of a core sample 12 residents. R17 is not receiving showers per schedule. R21 is not receiving showers per schedule. R31 is not receiving showers per schedule. R23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not receive shower until 1/25/24. R23 went 7 weeks without a shower or bath. This is evidenced by: On 3/27/24 at 11:42 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator). Surveyor asked NHA A for a Policy and Procedure for showers, NHA A stated they don't have a Policy and Procedure for showers. NHA A went on to say that their shower sheet lays out her expectations of showers- they are to approach twice and document if the resident doesn't comply. Example 1 R17's shower day per the shower schedule is Saturday. R17 has the following dates documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 17 sampled residents (R347). R347 expressed concerns regarding LPN U (Licensed Practical Nurse) because he does not explain anything to her and LPN U does not knock on R347's door before entering. As evidenced by: The facility's policy. Resident Rights, revised 2/2021, states, in part, as follows: Copies of our resident rights are posted throughout the facility, and a copy is provided to each employee, provider and contracted staff member. In addition, staff will have appropriate in-service training on resident rights prior to having direct- care responsibilities for residents. Orientation and in- service training programs are conducted quarterly to assist our employees in understanding our resident's rights. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a dignified existence; be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of all grievances for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for grievances (R47). Resident Representative N and Resident Representative O indicated they voiced concerns regarding R47's care and stay to facility staff and the facility did not provide any feedback to them about their concerns. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Grievances/Concerns/Complaints, undated, includes It is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has been not furnished, the behavior of staff, and other residents, and other concerns regarding their stay. The facility will ensure prompt resolution to all grievances, keeping the resident and resident representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are thoroughly investigated for 2 of 5 abuse investigations (R21, R31) reviewed of a total sample of 17 residents. R21 had a resident-to-resident incident that was not investigated. R31 had a resident-to-resident incident that was not investigated. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated April 2021 documents the following, in part: .1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property by anyone including, by not necessarily limited to a. facility staff; b. other residents .8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. 9. Investigate and report any allegations within time frames required by Federal requirements. 10. Protect residents from any further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement professional standards of practice to promote healing or prevent pressure injury (PI) development for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PIs out of a sample of 17 residents (R16 and R47). R16 was admitted to facility on 9/28/23 with an unstageable pressure injury (PI) to left lateral foot. R16 did not receive a treatment for PI until 10/5/23. R16's PI was not assessed with measurements or wound description until 10/5/23. R47 is at risk for pressure injury development and Surveyor observed R47 to be sitting in his recliner without a pressure reducing cushion underneath him. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Wound Care, with a revision date of October 2010, states, in part: . Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing . Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record . 2. The date and time wound care was given . 6. All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 resident (R23 and R1 reviewed for supervision and accidents out of a total sample of 17. R23 had 4 falls from admission on [DATE]. The facility did not identify root/cause for falls or implement interventions to prevent falls for R23. R1 has a history of putting non-food items in her mouth R1's comprehensive care plan does not address the need for supervision or placing non-food items in her mouth. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Falls, with a revision date of 3/2018, states, in part: . Cause Identification- 1. For an individual who has fallen, the staff and practitioner will begin to try to identify possible causes within 24 hours of the fall . Treatment/Management- 1. Based on the preceding assessment, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and address the risks of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that residents and/or the resident's responsible party receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization prior to offering the immunization and documentation is noted in the medical record on whether the resident received or declined the immunization. This affected 2 of 5 residents (R37 and R41) reviewed for influenza immunizations. R37's medical record did not show evidence of a declination, consent, or administration for the 2023 to 2024 seasonal influenza vaccine. R41's medical record did not show evidence of a declination, consent, or administration for the 2023 to 2024 seasonal influenza vaccine. This evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Influenza Vaccine, revised August 2023, indicates, in part: Policy Statement: All residents .who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually . Policy Interpretation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they transcribed physicians' orders for surgical wound care, which resulted in staff not administering treatment as ordered for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled for wound care. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy titled Skin Prevalence Protocol, revealed, In order to ensure all residents skin is checked in a comprehensive and regular manner for any new or worsening skin issues and as a part of a prevention program the following process will be followed, including, The assessment will be a head-to-toe inspection and will be completed on all residents. A review of a facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, Dental Services, revised in February 2014 and provided by the facility as its transcription orders policy, revealed, Orders for the treatment of the resident's dental problems must be signed by the attending dentist. All orders for the treatment of the resident's dental problems must be in writing and signed and dated by the dentist providing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WISCONSIN ILLINOIS SENIOR HOUSING, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GEHLER, MIRIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/14/2011
KERWIN, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2009
KUMAR, RAJEEV SHIVAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/24/2012
LYNN, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/14/2011
CARRIAGE HEALTHCARE COMPANIES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
HBT IT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2026
JT AND ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
PARTNERS IN WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
PINION, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1995
REHAB SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
SHERMAN, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$74K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 9%Other / private 28%

This home reported $74K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$482per resident / day
operating cost
$14,664per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next