Aspire Transitional Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 500 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 253 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.85 to 1.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that an allegation of resident abuse was reported to all applicable agencies for 3 out of 4 residents. Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident abuse was reported to all applicable state agencies for 3 out of 4 residents (#57, #58, and #59). The deficient practice could result in further allegations of abuse not being reported and investigated by the appropriate state agencies. Findings include:-Regarding Resident # 57Resident # 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of surgery aftercare for genitourinary system, urinary tract infection, sepsis, Parkinson's, and dementia. A comprehensive care plan dated February 27, 2024, revealed that Resident # 57 required assistance with activities of daily livings (ADL) due to weakness. The care plan also revealed that Resident # 57 had a potential for alteration in comfort related to decrease ability to move and recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented during wound care for one of one sampled residents (Resident #62). The deficient practice could result in the transmission of infection.Findings Include:Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device of the right tibia, bacteremia, end-stage renal disease, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.During the initial pool screening on August 19, 2025, Resident #62 revealed he had a wound to his right lower extremity. He stated that nurses change the dressing every day.A provider order written on August 4, 2025, instructed staff to clean the wound to the right lower extremity with normal saline (NS), cover with xeroform, wrap with rolled gauze, and cover with an ACE wrap, every day.An additional provider order, written on August 2, 2025, instructed staff to wear personal protective equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident abuse was reported to all applicable state agencies for 3 out of 3 residents (#3, #7, and #5). The deficient practice could result in further allegations of abuse not being reported and investigated by the appropriate state agencies. Findings include:-Regarding Resident # 3Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cellulitis, streptococcal infection, and depression. A comprehensive care plan dated June 27, 2023, revealed that Resident # 3 had alteration in skin integrity related to cellulitis. A progress note dated June 27, 2023 at 4:30 p.m., revealed that Resident # 3 was upset with the wound nurse because the nurse seemed inexperienced and lacked wound care experience. Resident # 3 stated to staff that wound nurse intentionally shoved trauma scissors right into the wound causing an indentation.Review of the initial State Agency Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two of ten sampled staff (Staff # 19 and #49) had current Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification. The deficient practice could result in staff not knowledgeable of how to provide emergency care to residents. Findings include: Review of the personnel file records for a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/ Staff #49) revealed a hire date of [DATE] with a valid CPR certification issued on [DATE], however, the CPR expired on [DATE]. Further review revealed no evidence of current CPR certification. Review of the personnel file for a Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA/Staff #19), revealed a hire date of [DATE] with valid CPR certification issued on February 18, 2022, however, CPR certification expired on February 28, 2024. Further review revealed no evidence of current CPR certification. Review of staff #49 punch detail revealed that the Staff #49 worked as LPN at this facility after CPR certification had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained free from accident hazards for 3 residents (#281, #26, and #482). The deficient practice could result in potential harm to residents due to unsupervised access to sharps. Findings include: - Regarding Resident #281 Resident #281 was admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the medical diagnoses for resident #281 revealed type two diabetes mellitus accompanied by unspecified dementia and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident #281 had a BIMS score of 08 that indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Within the same MDS assessment it was documented that resident #281 was able to utilize a walker and wheelchair to mobilize. On August 19, 2024 at 2:08 p.m, an observation of the resident environment revealed a blood glucometer and an opened container of lancets on a table in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records and policy the facility failed to ensure dialysis care and services, including nutrition, assessments, or coordination of care, were appropriately followed for 3 Residents (#15, #10, and #234). The deficient practice may result in complications of care and services to residents receiving dialysis. Findings include: -Regarding Resident # 15 Resident # 15 was admitted into the facility on August 01, 2024 with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis, implants and grafts, and end stage renal disease. A review of the admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 8, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The care-plan initiated on August 06, 2024 revealed that Resident # 15 needs dialysis (hemo) related to renal failure. The goal was for resident to have no signs or symptoms through the review date. Interventions included to not draw…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and controlled substances were kept locked. The deficient practice could result in residents, staff, and visitors having access to medications. Findings include: An observation of a medication cart on Hall A was conducted on August 19, 2024 at 11:58 AM. The medication cart was unlocked and unattended outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. An observation of a treatment cart on Hall A was conducted on August 21, 2024 at 10:30 AM. The treatment cart was unlocked in the 140 ' s hall. An interview was conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #36) on August 19, 2024 at 12:11 PM, and confirmed that the medication cart was left unlocked. The RN stated that medication carts are secured and keys are passed between staff each shift, and when leaving the unit. He further stated that the risk of leaving the cart unlocked could result in patients or visitors accessing the medication. An interview was conducted with an RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions that maintained freshness in the kitchen fridge and nourishment refrigerator. The deficient practice could result in potential foodborne illness. Findings include: An observation was conducted on August 19, 2024 at 10:44 a.m. of the walk-in fridge during the initial kitchen tour which revealed the Dining Services Director (staff#68) attempted to discard macaroni and cheese labeled with a discard date of 8/6 - 8/12, cheese sauce labeled with a discard date of 8/9 - 8/16, turkey gravy with a discard date of 8/13 - 8/19, and bread stuffing without a label or discard date. Moreover, a bowl of unlabeled cooked potatoes without a discard date was observed on the fridge shelf. A follow-up observation was conducted on August 19, 2024 at 11:05 a.m. which revealed a gallon of cow's milk labeled August 18 2024 and another labeled August 15 2024. On August 19, 2024 at 11:29 a.m., an observation by surveyor #51124 revealed a wait…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records accurately reflected care and services provided to two out of two sampled residents (#281 and #19), regarding fluid restriction, care interventions, and the use of an air mattress. The deficient practice has the potential for clinical records to inaccurately and incompletely reflect the status of residents and alter the actual care that is provided. Findings Include: - Regarding Resident #281 regarding fluid restriction: Resident #281 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified injury of head, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, and hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia. Review of the care plan initiated on August 04, 2024, revealed that Resident #234 had potential for alteration in nutrition needs related to conditions associated with confusion, dementia, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that proper documentation was provided to responsible parties and the receiving facility(short-term general hospital) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#29) and one of two sampled residents ( #29) received proper notice of discharge. The deficient practice could lead to notifications of resident transfer/discharge not being made to all required parties. Findings include: Resident #29 was initially admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included unspecified fracture of left foot, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) assessment score of 15 identifying no cognitive impairment. A discharge MDS dated [DATE], revealed a discharge code 04 indicating that Resident #29 was discharged on August 1, 2024 to a short-term general hospital (acute hospital, inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS)).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GOODMAN GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ