Riverside Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 159 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management which was acceptable to the resident's goals for 1 (#3) of 25 residents sampled. The deficient practice resulted in poor pain management and decreased quality of life for the resident who consistently reported having severe pain. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/14/26 at 3:45 p.m., resident #3 stated the pain in his back was horrific and rated it as 8/10. Resident #3 stated he pretty much always had back pain, and he did not feel the facility controlled it well. Resident #3 stated he would consider 5/10 to be an acceptable pain level. Resident #3 stated he had taken pain medication at noon and wanted something more for the pain. Resident #3 was observed lying in bed, grimacing, wincing, and frequently shifting his weight in the bed, during the interview.During an interview on 1/14/26 at 3:53 p.m., staff member M was notified of resident #3's pain and stated resident #3 had chronic pain issues. Staff member M stated nursing staff was responsible for notifying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing, which contributed to ADLs not being completed for dependent residents for 4 (#s 1, 3, 6, and 8), low staffing concerns reported by residents for 4 (#s 1, 4, 5, and 9) of 9 sampled residents; and multiple staff concerns of not having enough time to complete assigned tasks or take their breaks. Findings include:During an interview on 6/15/26 at 1:26 p.m., resident #1 stated, I have a private bathroom, and I think they assume I can just walk in there and take my own shower. I need assistance, and my showers are often missed.During an interview on 6/15/26 at 4:54 p.m., staff member G stated, Evening shift showers are probably the task that gets missed the most.During an interview on 6/17/26 at 7:16 a.m., staff member P stated the person working the hall is responsible for doing the daily scheduled baths. Staff member P stated, It's hard when there is only one person on the hall; many of the staff don't feel comfortable leaving the hall long enough to complete a bath or shower.During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL care of bathing for dependent residents for 4 (#s 1, 3, 6, and 8) of 9 sampled residents. This caused resident #1 to feel unclean. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/15/26 at 1:29 p.m., resident #1 was lying in his bed, and his nails were long and had a brownish substance under them. Resident #1 had flakes of dry skin peeling off on his arms. Resident #1 stated, I need assistance with showers. I have a private room with a bathroom. I don't trust myself alone in there because the whole bathroom gets wet when I shower, and I might slip. I need assistance, and my showers are often missed. I feel dirty when I miss my showers.During an interview on 6/15/26 at 4:54 p.m., staff member G stated, Evening shift showers are probably the task that gets missed the most.During an interview on 6/17/26 at 7:16 a.m., staff member P stated the person working the hall is responsible for doing the daily scheduled baths. Staff member P stated, It's hard to complete showers when there is only…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from non-consensual sexual contact by a staff member and ensure the resident had necessary social services following the alleged event for sexual abuse, and the resident was bothered, embarrassed, and felt humiliated after the event, for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practice did not allow the resident the opportunity to heal from the alleged event, which still bothered him as of the survey, and he was reportedly self-isolating due to his fear. Findings include: Review of a facility-reported incident, dated 5/22/26, showed: Resident (resident #1) reported to Unit Manager at 1615 (4:15 p.m.) that while 2 CNAs were changing his brief earlier in the day, (staff member M), CNA inserted her finger in his rectum. ED interviewed him and he states (staff member M) was checking his buttocks for open areas and was spreading his anus and he felt her finger enter his rectum. He believes she inserted it up to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of sexual abuse by a staff member for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents. This caused the resident to be frustrated that there was no resolution to the investigation. Findings include:Review of a facility-reported incident, dated 5/22/26, showed: Resident #1 reported to a staff member an incident of alleged sexual abuse by a staff member.Review of the facility's findings for this allegation, dated 5/29/26, showed: The investigation found that the allegations are unable to be verified. The witnessing CNA reports she was not in the room for all of the cares. The resident did not say anything at the time, but the witness reports that he was quiet. ED interviewed 5 other residents on the same hallway.During an interview on 6/15/26 at 1:26 p.m., resident #1 stated he reported the incident to the nurse on duty and later filed a police report. Resident #1 stated no one from the facility had followed up with him about the investigation or how he was doing. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve the substituted menu items to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines and have the facility's dietitian review the changes for nutritional adequacy for 2 (#s 40 and 69) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the residents becoming frustrated with menu selection and residents receiving food from the kitchen were not having nutritional needs met. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 4:11 p.m., resident #40 stated he wanted the chef salad alternate for lunch, but the kitchen sent everyone who ordered the chef salad chicken tenders instead. Resident #40 stated the kitchen often messed up the menus, and she was frustrated by the confusion. Resident #40 stated the CNAs .came around the night before and got your mouth watering for one thing, only to be disappointed the next day, when you did not get what you ordered. 2. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 4:20 p.m., resident #69 stated she would have preferred to receive the salad but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 7 (#s 40, 41, 49, 56, 66, 69, and 79) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the residents' dissatisfaction with the food, and it potentially affected any resident who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an interview on 1/12/26 at 12:11 p.m., staff member R stated that when the food trays are delivered to the hall, the floor staff deliver them immediately. Staff member R stated that if the resident was not ready to eat, the tray was left on the bedside table in the room until the resident was ready to eat. Staff member R stated she did not check food temperatures before the residents started eating, and she did not reheat the food before the resident ate. Staff member R was not able to state what the temperatures the food should be served at, and she was unaware of anyone checking the temperatures of the meals/food once it was delivered to the halls to be passed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to date and monitor refrigerated foods, dry goods, and items brought in by families, to ensure items were used by the use-by date or discarded, and the facility failed to store food items off the floor. This deficient practice placed residents who received meals from the facility at risk of food-borne illness. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 10:10 a.m., the following items were found in the kitchen: - [NAME] sauce with no open or discard dates, brought in by family,- Goddess dressing with no open or discard date, brought in by family,- Soy Sauce with no open or discard date,- Dijon Mustard with no open or discard date, and a manufacturer's expiration of 4/5/25,- Raw honey with no open or discard date,- Vanilla flavoring with no open or discard date,- Olive Oil Mayonnaise with no open or discard date, - Teriyaki sauce with no open or discard date,- Enchilada sauce with no open or discard date,- Heavy-duty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable environment for residents by maintaining a temperature range of 71 to 81 F in resident rooms for 1 (#64) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #64 being cold. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 4:02 p.m., resident #64 was in her room with the door closed. Resident #64 was in bed covered with several blankets and stated she was cold. The thermostat was set to 75 degrees and the current temperature reading was 65 degrees.During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 4:10 p.m., staff member C used a temperature gun and tested the room temperatures at the request of the surveyor. The following temperatures were noted:- Room D102: 64 degrees- Room A112: 66 degrees- Room D104: 66.5 degrees- Room D108: 67 degrees- Room A101: 63 degrees- Room A103: 67 degreesStaff member C stated [Repair company name] had been in the building in the morning to drain a heat system line and had the heat turned off for those repairs. Staff member C stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of resident funds by a staff member for 1 (#48) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the loss of $500 plus travel expenses for resident #48. The facility identified the failure of a staff member accepting money from a resident and addressed and corrected the deficient practice before the survey, resulting in the findings of past non-compliance. Findings include:During an interview on 1/13/26 at 12:01 p.m., resident #48 stated he met staff member Q at the facility. Resident #48 stated he and staff member Q became friendly and at some point, in December of 2025, staff member Q offered to assist resident #48 with travel to [City] for medical appointments. Resident #48 stated that staff member Q agreed to be paid $1000 plus expenses. Resident #48 stated he purchased two first-class airline tickets and booked hotel rooms for the trip. Resident #48 stated he paid the staff member Q $500 up front and agreed to pay the remaining $500 after the trip. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide clean equipment for respiratory treatment for 1 (#69) of 5 residents sampled. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for inhalation of foreign material and respiratory infections. Findings include:During an observation on 1/12/26 at 2:03 p.m., resident #69's nebulizer was observed to have a white crust and buildup on the mouthpiece and corrugated aerosol tubing that extended from the mouthpiece.During an interview on 1/14/26 at 12:16 p.m., staff member B stated that nursing staff were responsible for changing the nebulizer equipment and that this was done weekly. Staff member B stated that an order for changing nebulizer tubing was entered into the chart so it would alert the nursing staff to change the tubing each week.During an interview on 1/14/26 at 12:40 p.m., staff member P stated she did not know when resident #69's nebulizer tubing or mouthpiece had been changed. Staff member P stated the respiratory therapist was responsible for changing them weekly and was not sure why resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$35,139 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $35,139 — penalty dated 2026-01-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GOODMAN GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $612K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT