Village Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 414 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 247 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 193 beds and averages 147.1 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents for a resident who sustained a fall with pain resulting in a fracture, who was on a blood thinner; and failed to promptly notify the physician of a fall with pain resulting in a fracture impacting the physician's opportunity to determine if a higher level of care or treatment was necessary at the time of the fall for 1 (#85) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice contributed to delayed care, increased pain and a femur fracture.During an interview on 8/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., resident #85 explained that she was admitted to the facility in July after she developed complications from a right hip replacement. Resident #85 stated she had a fall when her leg got caught during a transfer, and she fell because the nurse went to get help and left her standing at the edge of the bed with nothing to hold on to. Resident #85 said the nurse who was on told a bunch of CNAs to say I wouldn't allow them help me. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 (#90) of 36 sampled residents. This resulted in the resident falling and sustaining a significant injury. Findings include: Review of resident #90's EMR admission assessment, dated 2/3/2023, showed, .2. Fall Risks . 3. Requires use of assistive devices . 5. Impaired mobility/assist with toileting . 8. hx of falls in last month, 9. hx of falls in last 1-6 months . 4. Current fall preventative measures in place . 5. Frequent checks . 8. Call light within reach when in room . [sic] Review of resident #90's EMR nursing progress notes, dated 3/17/2024, showed, Nurse's Description: Heard CNA radio for help saying a resident is out of bed. Seen resident on the floor next to his bed, laying on his left side, with head under table metal leg . Injuries?: Left elbow skin tear with minimal bleed. Res. c/o left hip pain . Predisposing factors: Noted res bed on highest position with res saying I kept on pressing the emergency button but it doesn't work Call light not in reach . [sic] Review of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit investigation findings for an incident in a timely manner, to the State Survey Agency, for 2 (#s 5 and 6) of 9 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of a facility-reported incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/4/25, involving a resident-to-resident interaction for residents #'s 5 and 6, showed the facility's investigation findings were submitted on 9/12/25 and were due by 9/11/25.During an interview on 11/19/25 at 10:30 a.m., staff member B stated a resident-to-resident incident was to be reported to the State Survey Agency with 24 hours, and the facility investigation findings were to be submitted within five days, not including weekends and holidays.A review of a facility policy, titled Incidents and Accidents, with a last reviewed date of 10/27/25, showed:Policy:It is the policy of this facility for staff to utilize the facility on-line risk management system to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions, staff failed to wear hair restraints in the kitchen area, and the facility failed to provide food at a safe and appetizing temperature for 4 (#s 6, 14,72, and 154) of 34 sampled residents. These deficient practices placed all residents who consumed meals prepared by the facility at risk of exposure to food-borne pathogens and or illness. Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen on 8/25/25 at 3:12 p.m., the following concerns were identified: - The juice dispenser had a sticky liquid on the dispenser nozzles, the front panel of the dispenser, and the backsplash.- The coffee dispenser had dried coffee on the front tray and on the dispenser nozzles.- A light brown liquid was spilled on the counter by the coffee dispenser. A drawer containing utensils was open under the spill, and the brown liquid had spilled into the utensil drawer.- There was ice buildup in the freezer, and there was ice on the floor of the freezer, which made the floor slick and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt physician notification for a resident who sustained a fall resulting in injury with pain for 1 (#85) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice contributed to a delay in treatment, and the resident was found to have a fracture. Findings include:During an interview on 8/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., resident #85 explained that she was admitted to the facility in July after she developed complications from a right hip replacement. Resident #85 stated she had a fall when her leg got caught during a transfer, and she fell because the nurse went to get help and left her standing at the edge of the bed with nothing to hold on to. During an interview on 8/27/25 at 9:48 a.m., staff member O stated the fall protocol was to notify the family, the physician, and write up a fall report. Staff member O stated he did not notify the physician on call after resident #85 fell. Staff member O stated resident #85's care was delayed by a couple of hours.During an interview on 8/27/25 at 2:54 p.m., staff member B stated the fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours of an incident for 2 (#s 99 and 129) of 5 residents sampled for Facility Reported Incidents. Findings include:Review of the facility reported incident dated 6/27/25 at 8:15 p.m., showed resident #99 and resident #129 were involved in a physical altercation. Resident #99 reported to the nurse resident #129 grabbed resident #99's groin. The initial allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was not received by the State Survey Agency until 6/30/25.During an interview on 8/27/25 at 11:22 a.m., staff member A stated she was not aware the facility failed to report the allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours for the facility reported incident which occurred on 6/27/25, involving residents #99 and #129. Staff member A stated the facility's video surveillance of the incident was no longer available for review. During an interview on 8/28/25 at 8:52 a.m., staff members A and C were present. Staff member C…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff had the necessary knowledge and skillset on the facility's post-fall protocol and physician notification, and a resident had a fall, with an injury and pain, and the proper notifications were not all made, for 1 (#85) of 34 sampled residents, and this resulted in a delay in care. Findings include:During an interview on 8/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., resident #85 explained she had a fall when her leg got caught during a transfer, and she fell because the nurse went to get help and left her standing at the edge of the bed with nothing to hold on to. During an interview on 8/27/25 at 9:48 a.m., staff member O stated resident #85 transferred with a walker and a one-person assist and was 50% weight bearing on her right leg. Staff member O stated the resident fell when moving from the bed to the recliner. Staff member O stated resident #85 was reporting pain in her right knee at the time of the fall. Staff member O stated the fall protocol was to notify the family, the physician, and write up a fall report.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a thickened therapeutic diet as ordered for 1 (#91) of 34 sampled residents. The failure increased the risk of aspiration for the resident. Findings include:Review of resident #91's care plan, dated 8/12/25, showed resident #91 was to be provided nectar-thick fluids, as prescribed by the Speech Language Pathologist on 8/16/24.Review of resident #91's medication administration record for August 2025 showed the resident was to have Boost Breeze, which was to be thickened to a nectar-thick consistency, or the Boost may be replaced with a thickened preferred supplement.During an observation and interview on 8/27/25 at 8:05 a.m., resident #91 was sitting at the breakfast table. Staff member D was observed putting three pumps of gel thickener into a glass of cranberry juice. The thickener was observed in the bottom of the glass. The juice was floating on top of the thickener. Staff member D did not stir the thickener into the juice to mix it to a nectar-thick consistency. Resident #91 had a thin consistency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to wear appropriate PPE while caring for residents for 2 (#s 3 and 16); and failed to educate and monitor staff on cleaning practices for residents positive for c-diff, for 2 (#s 14 and 17) of 17 sampled residents. The deficient practices increased the risk to others for contracting infections due to the deficient practices. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/1/25 at 12:14 p.m., 12 resident rooms were identified for special droplet/contact precautions, eight resident rooms were identified for enhanced barrier precautions, and three resident rooms were identified for contact precautions. Inspection of two PPE supply containers were found to have no N-95 masks available for use in the 300 hallway. The PPE supply containers held only yellow procedural masks. Staff member D was observed entering a resident room, identified with a special droplet/contact precaution sign, wearing a yellow procedural mask, no eye protection, and a yellow gown with a pair of gloves. Inspection of two PPE supply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide clean resident rooms for 3 (#s 72, 16 and 95) of 28 sampled residents, and failed to provide clean hallways, which had the potential to affect all staff and visitors. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 3:12 p.m., resident #72 said she did not know when the last time her floor had been mopped. Resident #72 said she knows she was not always in her room, but the same sticky substance had been on her floor for several days. Resident #72 said she did not like her room and the floor being dirty. The observation made of resident #72s room showed, a plastic knife, a pen, and three clear plastic wrappers were under the bed. Resident #72's floor was observed to have a red sticky substance in the middle of her floor beneath her overbed table. A [NAME] brown sticky substance was also observed under the edge of her nightstand. The substance looked like it had leaked onto the floor spread out onto the floor. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update resident care plans in a timely manner for 3 (# 1, #16 and #55) of 4 residents sampled for pressure ulcers and failed to revise a resident care plan to show effective behavior interventions following repeated resident to resident altercations for 1 (#33) of 3 residents sampled for behavior. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #1's nurses notes, dated 9/6/24, showed a new wound and the wound care was completed for a stage III pressure ulcer with full-thickness skin loss on the left heel. Review of resident #1's nurses notes written by the certified wound nurse on 9/6/24, showed resident #1 had a left heel wound. The wound nurse applied a dressing which was approved by the medical provider. Review of resident #1's nurses note documented on 9/10/24 showed the wound which was initially assessed as a stage III pressure ulcer was now noted to be a callous. Review of resident #1's care plan showed the care plan was updated on 11/18/24 and the potential for skin alteration changed from a potential to an actual wound.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete accurate assessments for 1 (#33) of 3 sampled residents who had been involved in two altercations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident care and safety as it inaccurately depicted the residents' care needs. Findings include: Review of resident #33's vulnerable resident evaluation dated 9/30/24, showed resident #33 did not have a history of any type of abuse toward others. The evaluation also showed the resident did not have behaviors which make the resident susceptible to abuse by others or behaviors which increase the resident's risk of abuse to others. Review of resident #33's MDS with an ARD of 10/3/24 showed the resident did not have any physical, verbal or other behavior symptoms directed toward others. Review of resident #33's nurse's note dated 10/2/24 showed, .Resident increased his voice .Resident has increasing confusion and increasing upset behaviors . The resident was administered a prn antianxiety medication because of the increasing behavior, agitation and inability of staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,846 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
• $16,656 — penalty dated 2024-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GOODMAN GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT