West Hills Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 94.5 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 86 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.29 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#485) reviewed for medication administration. This failure resulted in an increased potassium level and required Resident 485's hospitalization. Findings include: On 6/14/23, the Past Noncompliance was corrected when the facility completed a root cause analysis of the incident and staff were trained on steps to take if a medication was thought to be missing which included: -Performing a thorough search of all med carts and the med room including the refrigerator to find the missing medication. -Placing notes on or in the med cart to advise oncoming workers of a medication's location. -Providing detailed documentation of why the medication was not given beyond only writing unavailable. -Notifying the provider and documenting when the provider was notified. According to the National Library of Medicine, revised 6/20/23, the normal range for potassium is 3.7 milliequivalent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper personal hygiene practices and safe food storage handling techniques for 1 of 1 facility kitchen and 2 of 2 facility ice machines reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 4/21/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff 29 (Cook) was observed to have head and facial hair exposed with no facial and head hair restraints. Staff 30 (Cook) was observed to have with facial hair exposed and no facial hair covering. Staff 29 and Staff 30 were actively prepping the lunch meal. On 4/21/25 at 10:20 AM, Staff 8 (AM Dining Services Director) acknowledged hair and beard nets were to be worn at all times when working in the kitchen. She stated the facility provided hair restraints for all staff. On 4/23/25 at 11:10 AM, Staff 7 (PM Dining Services Director) was observed to pick up a pen off the floor and then changed her gloves without performing hand hygiene. Staff 7 confirmed she did not wash her hands after removing her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#293) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 11/20/16, revealed: A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. Resident 293 admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (a condition were the spaces within the spine narrow). A review of Resident 293's record revealed there was no assessment for Resident 293 to self-administer medications. On 4/21/25 at 9:57 AM Resident 293 was observed alone in her/his room with a small cup on her/his bedside table, the cup contained multiple medications. On 4/21/25 at 12:23 PM Resident 293 was in her/his room, the same cup with medications was on the bedside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain information related to advance directives and health care decisions for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 45, 62 & 392) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having health care decisions honored. Findings include: a. Resident 45 admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnosis including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (an autoimmune disease that leads to weakness). Resident 45's care plan initiated 4/24/25 indicated advance directives are in effect, and they will be carried out in accordance with the wishes on an ongoing basis. A 2/26/25 care conference note indicated an advanced directive was reviewed. A review of Resident 45's clinical record found no advanced directive. During an interview on 04/22/25 11:45am Resident 45 stated she/he had not completed an advanced directive. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 2:31pm Staff 11 (Social Services Coordinator) stated Resident 45 did not have an advanced directive on file, could not remember whether Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide education and training for the self-administration of an anticoagulant subcutaneous medication prior to discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge. Findings include: The 10/14/24 Facility Discharge Planning Policy stated it is the facility's responsibility to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, and the preparation of residents to be active partners so they may be effectively transitioned into post-discharge care to prevent readmissions. This included an evaluation of the resident's discharge needs, the development of a final discharge plan, and continuous education to be provided to the resident and the resident's family to ensure any unnecessary delays in the resident's care post discharge. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnosis including left femur fracture and stroke. Resident 2's Care Plan revealed the resident received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: The Facility's 10/14/24 Medication Administration Procedure revealed the following: Medication Incidents are to be reported to the Director of Nurses so that an investigation can be initiated. Medication incidents are incidents where medication is omitted from the order, administered to the incorrect resident, provided with the wrong dosage, form, route or time of administration, and/or provided with unprescribed medications. When the incident is made, the person committing the incident shall: - Notify the nurse of the resident (if this incident is made by the nurse, then the supervisor or DON is to be notified immediately). - Complete a medication incident form when appropriate which will go directly to the DNS and the ED. - Notify the MD, family, and relay physician response. - Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary staff were available to ensure food service was delivered in a timely manner for 1 or 1 kitchens reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: A public complaint was made to the state agency on 10/9/23 which alleged all meals were served late daily and timeliness had been an issue for several months. Witness 2 (Complainant) stated meals were served hours after the posted times and residents complained to staff their meals were late. On 5/1/24 at 2:51 PM, the Resident Council President stated the food was always served late and at times was cold. On 5/7/24 at 11:30 AM, Staff 10 (Cook) stated the dining room was served meals first, then east hall due to several residents who required one to one assistance with eating, then west hall and lastly, the skilled hall. Staff 10 stated there were staffing shortages in the facility. On 5/8/24 at 1:15 PM, Staff 5 (CNA) stated there was a shortage of dietary staff last fall and CNA's were told meals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#100) reviewed for hot beverage safety. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: Resident 100 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a disturbance of brain function) and dementia. Resident 100's care plan dated 3/22/23, revealed she/he was on an altered diet and required one to one supervision for meals to encourage intake. A care plan revision dated 4/11/23, noted that staff were not to leave cups in front of her/him without supervision. On 3/27/23 the facility submitted a report to the state agency which revealed Resident 100 was given a hot cup of tea on 3/26/23. Resident 100 picked up the cup, dropped it and some of the hot liquid splashed on her/his left thigh which resulted in a first degree burn. Resident 100 was not interviewed due to she/he was discharged from the facility. On 5/8/24 at 1:15 PM, Staff 5 (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a palatable and at appetizing temperatures for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 105 and 106) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: The facility's Food Temperature policy, revised 8/2023, noted food should be transported as quickly as possible to maintain temperatures for delivery and service. The facility's 3/2024 Resident Council notes documented the food is always cold and tasteless, have to ask for coffee 2X (two times) because it's cold and portions are inconsistent. Resident 105 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including acute cystitis (bladder infection) and weakness. On 5/1/24 at 3:16 PM, Resident 105 stated the food was terrible and she/he usually ate peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for lunch and oatmeal and cinnamon rolls for dinner. She/he stated the scalloped potatoes were hard and most meals were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of waterborne pathogens for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed all residents at risk for exposure to waterborne pathogens. Findings include: On 12/14/23 at 9:53 AM Staff 20 (Maintenance Director) confirmed he was in charge of the facility's legionella program and reported he did not receive any training on how to protect the facility from waterborne pathogens such as legionella. He also stated was not aware of the need to complete a thorough analysis of the facility's water systems to identify and address the risk of waterborne pathogens such as legionella. Staff 20 reported he did not know where to find a water flow chart that would help to identify problem areas within the facility's system. He added, It's probably in a set of plans somewhere. Staff 20 confirmed he tested water temperatures but did not complete any other testing of the facility's water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident needs and preferences related to showers and lighting were accommodated for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 3, 4, 21 and 440) reviewed for ADLs and accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene, an unhomelike environment and not honoring preferences. Findings include: The facility's 10/22/23 Accommodation of Needs policy indicated: -The facility would assist residents in maintaining or achieving independent functioning, dignity and well-being to the extent possible. -The facility would make efforts to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of the resident. 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a progressive neurological disease). Resident 4's 9/27/23 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had moderate cognitive impairment, required total assistance for bathing/showering and had no rejection of care. An 11/15/23 Progress Note written by Staff 15 (LPN) indicated Resident 4 refused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,659 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,659 — penalty dated 2023-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GOODMAN GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR