No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

El Centro Post-Acute Care

1700 S. Imperial Ave, El Centro, CA 92243 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (760) 352-8471 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 352-8471 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$10,254 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,254 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1600 S Imperial Ave · (760) 336-3773 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1600 S Imperial Ave · (760) 353-5130 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1537 W Main St · (760) 592-4464 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1910 S Waterman Ave · (760) 337-4555 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1290 S Imperial Ave · (760) 352-3662

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.1%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.8%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.0%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.9%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.562.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.801.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 386 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.2%CMS range 57.8–69.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.6–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.6–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.26
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
31.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 111.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-12)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2021-05-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident ' s (Resident 1) rights to be free from sexual abuse when Resident 2 ' s wandering behavior was not assessed, and he was found in Resident 1 ' s bed engaging in sexual act. As a result, Resident 1 and Resident 2 engaged in sexual encounter which was not consensual and Resident 1 required hospitalization for evaluation of sexual assault. Findings: On 6/9/22 at 2:24 P.M., an unannounced onsite at the facility was conducted related to a facility reported resident abuse. On 6/9/22, a review of Resident 1 and Resident 2 ' s record was conducted. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an acute care hospital (ACH) for skilled nursing (a patient's need for care or treatment that can only be performed by licensed nurse), with diagnoses which included stroke (a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, which damages brain tissue) and generalized muscle weakness, per the facility ' s admission Record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication for the appropriate pain scale as indicated by the physician ' s orders for one of two residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 1 further discomfort and pain. Findings: A review of the facility ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a fracture of the right humerus (a broken right upper arm bone), lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 9/21/24, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact with a BIMS (assessment of cognition) score of 14. A review of the physician ' s orders dated 9/20/24 indicated, Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet 5mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain . and Oxycodone HCl Tablet 10mg Give 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed for Severe Pain Score 7-10 for 7 days . On 9/24/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly, affecting 1 of 2 trash dumpsters and 2 of 2 recycle dumpsters. Specifically, a trash dumpster was missing a lid and the recycle dumpsters were full to the point of being unable to be covered. The deficiency had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Waste Management, dated 2001, indicated, The facility will maintain the outside dumpster area in a manner that minimizes health hazards, pest infestations, and environmental contamination, ensuring all waste is properly disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal guidelines. The policy indicated, 1. Dumpster Maintenance: included a. Dumpsters must be kept closed at all times to prevent the attraction of pests and to contain odors. An observation on 09/09/2024 at 8:52 AM revealed two trash dumpsters at the end of the parking lot. The dumpsters were designed to have two lids each. One trash dumpster was completely missing one of its two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff were fit tested for a respirator required for respiratory protection when working with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive residents, which had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility, and failed to use proper hand hygiene during catheter care for 1 (Resident #221) of 1 resident observed for catheter care. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Personal Protective Equipment - Contingency and Crisis Use of N-95 Respirators (COVID-19 Outbreak), revised 09/2021, specified, When N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) are available and there is not an anticipated shortage, the facility operates under conventional capacity measures, including: a. using airborne isolation rooms for aerosol-generating procedures performed on residents with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 [severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2] infection. A facility policy titled, Coronavirus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 was accurate for 3 (Resident #37, #91, and #71) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, dated 2001, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions for a Medicaid contracted facility are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #37 on 04/03/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified psychosis (onset date 04/03/2023) and anxiety disorder (onset date 04/03/2023). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/2024, revealed Resident #37 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) was completed accurately for 2 (Resident #60 and Resident #118) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, Minimum Data Set (MDS), revised March 2022, revealed, 8. Accuracy of MDS Data: d. All sections of the MDS must be completed with information that accurately reflects the resident's status during the assessment reference period. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #60 on 01/06/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of schizophrenia. An annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/11/2024, revealed Resident #60 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for treatment of a diabetic ulcer was obtained for 1 (Resident #43) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Wound Treatment Management, dated 2001, revealed, 1. Initial Assessment and Documentation a. Wound assessment: Upon identification of a wound, a licensed nurse (RN [Registered Nurse] or LVN [Licensed Vocational Nurse]) will: Conduct an initial wound assessment including location, size, depth, appearance, drainage, any signs of infection. Document the wound's characteristics in the resident's medical record and update the care plan. Notify the attending physician to obtain wound treatment orders. b. Physician orders: The attending physician will provide written orders for wound care, specifying the type of treatment (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], cleansing solution, dressing type, frequency of dressing changes, etc. [et cetera; and so forth]). Ensure the orders are clear and concise, and document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for 2 (Resident #75 and Resident #171) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber order, including any required time frame. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #75 on 08/06/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and an acute peptic ulcer. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/2024, revealed Resident #75 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #75's Order Summary Report, dated 09/12/2024, contained an order, dated 08/06/2024, for pantoprazole sodium 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for GERD. Resident #75's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on timely for 1 (Resident #82) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, revised in 10/2018, specified, The consultant pharmacist documents in a separate written report any found irregularities. The policy indicated, e. Otherwise, if an irregularity does not require urgent action, attending physician is to be contacted by nursing using the provided recommendation forms. The policy also indicated, The physician may choose to decline the pharmacist's suggestion either directly on the recommendation form, through a telephone order with a licensed nurse, or within the resident's chart (such as in a progress note); but a response must be noted within 30 days with rationale documented in the resident's medical record. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #82 on 03/09/2022. According to the admission Record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an as-needed (PRN, pro re nata) order for psychotropic medication specified the duration of use for 1 (Resident #82) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 07/2022, specified, a. PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #82 on 03/09/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/2024, revealed Resident #82 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident received an antianxiety medication during the assessment period. Resident #82's Order Summary Report, dated 09/12/2024, contained an order dated 05/30/2024 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 medication errors out of 28 opportunities, affecting 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #171) of 6 residents reviewed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.14%. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 on 06/28/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition and osteoarthritis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/30/2024, revealed Resident #3 had modified independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making and had a short-term and long-term memory problem per a staff assessment of mental status (SAMS). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for 1 (Resident #93) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, facility staff failed to follow a physician's order to hold losartan potassium and metoprolol tartrate (medications used to treat high blood pressure) when the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the top number in a blood pressure reading) was less than 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The policy also indicated, 11. The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a. Allergies to medications; and b. Vital signs, if necessary. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #93 on 06/10/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a physician's order for hospice services for 1 (Resident #221) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Hospice Program, revised 07/2017, revealed, 12. Our facility has designated [Name] (Name) RN [registered nurse] DON [Director of Nursing] (Title) to coordinate care provided to the resident by our facility staff and the hospice staff. The policy also indicated, He or she is responsible for the following: d. Obtaining the following information from the hospice: (7.) Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each resident. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #221 on 09/06/2024. According to the admission Record, Resident #221 had a medical history that included diagnoses of adult failure to thrive and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #221's Skilled Nursing-admission Initial Eval [Evaluation], dated 09/06/2024, revealed New…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident ' s right was honored when one of 3 residents was not allowed to have a visitor after a fall incident (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to have feelings of isolation, anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and/or sadness. Findings: On 8/15/24 at 11:08 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported complaint regarding Resident 6 ' s fall incident at the facility. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness and unspecified fall according to the facility ' s admission Record. During a review of Resident 6 ' s nurse ' s notes dated 6/9/24, at 3:22 A.M., the nurse ' s note indicated Resident 6 was found on the floor lying on her back. The nurse ' s notes indicated Resident 6 was resistant, yelling in Spanish, hitting staff, refused assessment and then called her daughter on the phone. The nurse ' s note indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the tube feeding (the amount of formula) order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was the same as the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (1). As a result, there was a potential for Resident 1 to receive an incorrect tube feeding amount. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease that occurs when the blood glucose [blood sugar} is too high) and gastrostomy (artificial opening to the stomach to feed), per the admission Record. On 5/7/24 at 1 P.M., an observation was conducted. Resident 1 was with a family member. The tube feeding had a label for Glucerna 1.5 (the name of the tube feeding formula) 50 millimeters per hour (ml/hr). A record review was conducted. Per the Order Summary Report, dated 4/11/24, Resident 1 was to receive Glucerna 1.5 at 60 ml/hr for eight hours, to start at 8 P.M. until 4 A.M. or until the volume order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident ' s (Resident 2) wandering behavior and develop a baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) of Resident 2's wandering behavior. As a result, the lack of a resident centered care plan with specific interventions to reduce wandering behavior had the potential for Resident 2 to enter the rooms of other residents without permission. In addition, Resident 2 was found in another resident's room engaging in a sexual act. Findings: On 6/9/22 at 2:24 P.M., an unannounced onsite at the facility was conducted. 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from a skilled nursing facility (nursing home), with diagnoses which included dementia (the loss of cognitive function like thinking, remembering, and reasoning), per the facility ' s admission Record. Resident 2 ' s history and physical (H&P), dated 2/7/22, indicated, the attending physician (AP 1) documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to adequately store medications behind a locked door. This failure had the potential to result in resident harm, for approximately 20 residents in Hallway 1, through accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications without staff awareness or supervision. On 10/25/23 at 11:40 A.M. and at 12: 21 P.M. an observation was made of an unlabeled door noted to be ajar and not completely closed. Upon opening the door, the room was noted to have over the counter, non-prespricption medications stored on open shelves, as well as a locked refrigerator and three tackle boxes sealed with zip-tie closures. The door did not self-close. An interview was held with LN 1, on 10/25/23 at 12:23 P.M., regarding the unlocked door. LN 1 demonstrated opening the door and letting it close, and stated that the door did not close all the way. LN 1 stated when a person left the room the door needed to be pushed shut behind them. LN 1 stated the door should have been fixed because it would allow everyone access to the medications. The medication room should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper hand washing technique during a meal service for 7 residents. This failure had the potential to spread germs and cause infections among the residents. On 10/25/23 at 12:09 P.M., the following observations were made during meal service on Hallway 1. CNA 1 was seen leaving a resident room and walking to the meal delivery cart in the hallway. CNA 1 selected and held resident ' s meal tray and delivered to resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 1 then returned from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] to the meal tray cart and selected and held another tray. No hand hygiene was observed. CNA 2 was seen leaving resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 2 selected and held a tray from the meal delivery cart, and delivered to another resident room. No hand hygiene was observed. CNA 3 was seen leaving a resident room, then selected and held a tray and delivered to room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 3 was next seen walking from the other end of the hallway and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans related to: 1. Smoking, for one of one resident (2) reviewed for smoking, 2. Oxygen use, for three of three residents (24, 4, and 42) and 3. Indwelling catheter for one of three residents (25) reviewed for urinary catheter care. This failure had the potential to affect residents medical needs and care. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), per the facility's Record of Admission. An observation of Resident 2 was conducted on 5/3/21, at 3 P.M. Resident 2 was walking in the hallway with her walker. An interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA)12 on 5/4/21 at 8:13 A.M. CNA 12 stated, She (Resident 2) is the only smoker in the facility, and she smokes occasionally. A review of Resident 2's medical record was conducted on 5/4/21 at 8 A.M. A smoking assessment was performed for Resident 2 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not serve food in an appealing manner for five of five residents (23, 28, 9, 47, & 50) reviewed for food preferences. In addition, food concerns were identified during the confidential general resident council meeting for eight of 11 confidential residents. This failure had the potential for residents to suffer from a lack of daily nutritional requirements, because the food was not palatable. Findings: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included polyneuropathy (a degeneration of the peripheral nerves of the body), per the facility's Record of Admission. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) was conducted on 5/4/21. Resident 23 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 8 (mildly impaired), and required supervision with meals (encouragement and oversight). On 5/3/21 at 5:39 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 23. Resident 23 sat up in bed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods were clearly labeled with their use-by date. This failure had the potential to cause the food to develop pathogens that contaminate food and may cause foodborne illness if consumed. Findings: On 5/3/21 at 11:30 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour observation, several potentially hazardous foods and time control for safety foods (PHF/TCS) were not labeled with a use-by date. These foods were stored in the walk-in refrigerator, a stand up refrigerator, the dry storage area, and the freezers. In the walk-in refrigerator a carton of liquid eggs was opened with no use by date. Canned tuna was opened and stored in a stainless steel container covered with plastic wrap with an opened date of 4/26/21, but no use-by date. In the dry storage area shaved almonds in a bag, prepared garlic cloves in a jar, a packet of opened instant vanilla pudding, a box of opened raisins, an opened bag of marshmallows, a bin of saltine crackers, a box of cornbread mix, and a container of ground ginger…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5) Resident 10 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in muscle mass due to extended immobility). An MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool), dated 1/27/21, indicated Resident 10 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status; an assessment tool) score of 99 (unable to assess mental status). On 5/3/21 at 1:07 P.M., an observation of Resident 10 was conducted. Resident 10 was in bed, lying on his left side, and the head of the bed was elevated. A review of Resident 10's medical record was conducted on 5/3/21. A physician order, dated 11/5/20, indicated to Cleanse with NS (normal saline) & pat dry to SC (sacro-coccygeal; tail-bone area) stage 4 apply Santyl (a medication to treat wounds) & cover with Island (a type of dressing) drsg (dressing) daily & as needed. On 5/5/21 at 10:06 A.M., an observation of Resident 10, and an interview with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 21 was conducted. Resident 10 was turned on to his left side. CNA 21 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of residents developing antibiotic-resistant organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: A concurrent record review (of facility residents currently taking antibiotics) and an interview was conducted on 5/5/21 at 10:52 A.M., with the Infection Practitioner (IP). The IP stated the antibiotics were prescribed by physicians based on symptoms; waiting for labs or cultures was uncommon. The IP stated, We try to discuss it with the MD (medical doctor) but they don't like being told what to do. We are not using the McGeer's criteria (a tool to review antibiotic use), but would like to implement it soon. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 5/5/21 at 3:28 P.M. The DON stated, It is sometimes difficult to approach physicians about their orders; they need to be more aware of the process and lab (laboratory) results need to be used as a criteria, not just one symptom. The Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a physician's order related to: a. medication administration, and b. monitoring for side effects of a medication for one of one sampled residents (2). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's physical and emotional needs and care. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included insomnia (inability to sleep) and anxiety (excessive worrying), per the physician's progress note, dated 4/29/19. a. A review of Resident 2's medical record was conducted on 5/5/21 at 11:45 A.M. A physician's order, with no date, indicated, d/c (discontinue) temazepam (medication to treat insomnia); start lorazepam (medication to treat anxiety and insomnia) 1 mg q (every) hs (bedtime) for insomnia. A concurrent record review and interview was conducted on 5/5/21 at 11:47 A.M. with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS). The DCS stated that the physician's order had no date, and had not been implemented. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide podiatry services for one of one residents (25) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure had the potential to cause pain and possible infection if the overgrown toenails damaged the resident's skin. Findings: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure (the kidneys did not function), per the facility's Record of Admission. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) was conducted on 5/4/21. Resident 25 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 7 which indicated, severe intellectual impairment, and required extensive assistance with ADL. On 5/5/21 at 8:26 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 25. Resident 25 had long curling toenails on both feet. The last toenail of the right foot was approximately one and a half inches long. Resident 25's toenails on both feet were curling over the ends of his toes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide restorative nurse's aide (RNA) services as ordered for one of one resident (10) reviewed for RNA services. This failure had the potential for Resident 10's contractures to worsen. Findings: Resident 10 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in muscle mass due to extended immobility). An MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool), dated 1/27/21, indicated Resident 10 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - an assessment tool) score of 99 (99 indicates unable to assess mental status). On 5/3/21 at 1:07 P.M., an observation of Resident 10 was conducted. Resident 10 was in bed, lying on his left side, and head of the bed was elevated. Resident 10 was fully covered by a thick blanket, with only his head exposed. On 5/4/21 at 8:58 A.M., an observation of Resident 10 was conducted. Resident 10 was lying on his left side and his eyes closed. His contractures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease, too much oxygen [O2] could cause oxygen buildup, due to high carbon dioxide content in the blood that leads to drowsiness and possible death), per the facility's Record of Admission. A review of Resident 4's history and physical (H&P), dated 3/4/21, indicated Resident 4 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 5/3/21 at 2:41 P.M., an observation and interview of Resident 4 was conducted. Resident 4 was in bed, using oxygen (O2) via a concentrator (a device that concentrates the oxygen), running at 4 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC - tubing to deliver oxygen). Resident 4 stated she needed the oxygen when she was in bed, and but did not need it when she was up in the wheelchair. An additional observation of Resident 4 was conducted 5/3/21 at 6 P.M., 5/4/21 at 8:52 A.M., 11:45 A.M., 3:37 P.M., and 5/5/21 at 8:35 A.M., 1:50 P.M., and at 2:31 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for one of three residents (25) reviewed for catheter care. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of treatment and services for a resident with an indwelling catheter. Findings: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (as the kidneys fail, waste and excess fluid from the blood builds up in the body), per the facility's Record of Admission. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was conducted on 5/4/21. Resident 25 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 7, which indicated, severe intellectual impairment. On 5/3/21 at 2:31 P.M., an observation was conducted. Resident 25 was lying on the bed. Catheter tubing was visible under Resident 25's left leg. The catheter tubing was attached to a covered catheter bag that hung from the lower part of the bedframe. On 5/4/21 at 9:45 A.M., a record review and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. Fifteen medication errors out of 29 opportunities were identified during medication (med) administration, when nursing: 1. Administered seven crushed medications all at once (instead of individually) via the PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube - a tube placed directly into the stomach for the administration of food, fluids, and medications) tube to Resident 37, 2. Administered four crushed medications all at once (instead of individually) via PEG tube to Resident 18, and 3. Omitted four oral medications for Resident 304. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 51.72% Findings: 1. On 5/5/21 at 10:11 A.M., a med pass observation for Resident 37 was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 2. LN 2 took Resident 37's med blister packs of: -Vitamin C 500 milligram (mg) tablet (tab) one tab, - Levothyroxine [med to treat hypothyroidism] (condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) 150 microgram (mcg) tab one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications (med/s) were administered correctly when: 1. Licensed nurse (LN) 2 crushed seven medications and administered all at once (instead of individually), via PEG tube (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube - a tube placed directly into the stomach for the administration of food, fluids, and medications) to Resident 37; 2. LN 2 crushed four medications and administered all at once (instead of individually), via PEG tube to Resident 18. 3. LNs checked the medication label and expiration date of Resident 304's medications. These failures could cause harm to the residents due to unsafe administration of the medications. Findings: 1. Resident 37 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar) and with PEG tube, per the facility's Record of Admission. On 5/5/21 at 10:11 A.M., an observation of medication administration for Resident 37 was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Medications (med) were labeled with an expiration date for one resident (304), and an opened bottle of normal saline was dated and labeled for one of three medication carts; 2. Expired bottles of iron supplements were co-mingled with current medications readily available for use; 3. Expired biologicals (glucose test solutions, glucose test strips, iodine swab sticks, nasal swabs, and laboratory [lab] tubes) were co-mingled with treatment supplies in two of three medication carts; and 4. The temperature was monitored for one of two medication storage rooms. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired medications, and affect the efficacy of medications and effectiveness of treatment. Findings: 1a. Resident 304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness and difficulty with walking, balance and coordination),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an alternative weekly meal menu for four of four residents (23, 50, 9, & 47) reviewed for food preferences. This failure had the potential for residents to suffer from a lack of daily nutritional requirements because the food was not appealing and there were no alternate choices. Findings: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included polyneuropathy (a degeneration of the peripheral nerves of the body), per the facility's Record of Admission. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) was conducted on 5/4/21. Resident 23 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 8 (mildly impaired), and required supervision with meals (encouragement and oversight). On 5/3/21 at 5:39 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted. Resident 23 sat up in bed with a tray table over her legs. Resident 23 ate two tacos from a disposable polystyrene food container. Resident 23 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA- checks on standards and quality of care) Committee had the Medical Director or designee in attendance during the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. The lack of participation of the medical director or designee in QAPI meetings had the potential risk to not identify care issues/services that could affect the quality of life of the residents. Findings: During an interview with the Director of Operations (DO), the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), the Administrator (ADM), and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/6/21 at 2:47 P.M., the DCS discussed concerns with the facility's process of the QAPI meeting. The DON stated she attended a QAA meeting on 3/6/21. The DON stated she was not aware if the Medical Director was notified. The DON acknowledged the Medical Director or designee was not present. The DO stated he found the QAA committee meeting documents in 2019 and some in 2020. The DO stated a QAA meeting was last held on 3/6/21. The DO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the RD provided adequate oversight related to residents' (3, 83, 238) nutritional assessments reviewed for nutritional services, dietetic service operations, and staff performance in accordance with the facility contract. As a result, 1. Resident 83 was a tube feeder and weekly weights were not reviewed by the RD prior to being discontinued. 2. Following the recipe menu and updating the puree recipe. 3. Maintain sanitary kitchen equipment, storage of food, and dietary staff menu compliance. 4. Resident 238 was not accurately assessed for nutritional needs to heal his pressure ulcer. 5. Resident 3 had not been evaluated by a RD after weight loss, and abnormal lab values. These failures to ensure effective oversight of day to day dietetic service operations and nutrition services for the residents had the potential to put the residents at risk of their nutritional needs and further compromised the residents medical condition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and, record review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment when resident's rooms, a hallway and the shower room were not well maintained. This failure had the potential to affect resident's comfort and quality of life. Findings: On 9/23/19 at 7:53 A.M., an observation was conducted in Resident 58's room. The wallpaper was peeling and cracked. On 9/23/19 at 8:06 A.M., an observation was conducted in Resident 19's bathroom. The wall behind the sink had a crack running along the back of the sink and the light fixture was missing a light bulb. On 9/23/19 at 8:19 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted in Resident 54's room. Resident 54 pointed to the wall behind her bed, a sheet of wallpaper had fallen off and laid behind her bed, she stated it was no good and mal (Spanish for bad) and it did not feel like home. On 9/23/19 at 8:40 A.M., an observation was conducted in Resident 3's room. The vinyl flooring under the middle bed had lifted up and was folded over under the foot of the bed. On 9/23/19 at 9:42 A.M., an observation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and document review, the facility did not ensure oxygenation protocols were obtained and implemented for three of 19 sampled residents (16, 67, 238). In addition, there were no care plans developed for the interventions and monitoring of Resident 16's oxygen therapy. These failures had the potential for shortness of breath, and infection from dirty oxygen equipment. In addition, these failures subjected residents to ill-fitting nasal cannulas (NC). Findings: 1. On 9/24/19 at 9:14 AM, an observation and interview was conducted with LN 26. Resident 16 was lying in bed on his back, mouth opened, eyes closed and the NC was tight against Resident 16's cheekbones. LN 26 readjusted the resident's NC and indentations were observed on his right and left cheekbones and behind both earlobes. The oxygen tubing did not have a date to indicate when it was most recently placed. LN 26 stated the facility expected Nursing to label a date on the humidified water and tubing and to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipe for the pureed chicken was followed for 22 residents (11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 34, 40, 45, 51, 59, 66, 68, 74, 77, 78, 79, 238). In addition, the recipe had not been updated. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive adequate consistency of food and nutritional values which could further compromise their health status. Findings: On 9/24/19 at 11:32 A.M., an observation was conducted with the DSS and [NAME] during preparation of the chicken puree diet for lunch. The [NAME] poured the cooked chicken into the big blender along with the chicken soup base, and blended. After blending, the [NAME] poured the puree chicken in a clear rectangular container, took the big measuring cup that contained 3/4 full of thickener powder, and poured the thickener powder into the pureed chicken, and mixed them with the big spoon. The [NAME] put back the remaining thickener on the table, approximately half of the thickener was left in the measuring cup. On 9/24/19 at 11:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary kitchen equipment to prevent foodborne illnesses. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for widespread foodborne illness. Findings: On 9/23/19 at 8:06 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the DSS. 1. On 9/23/19 at 8:12 A.M., an inspection of the kitchen equipment was conducted. The microwave had a hard, thick, dark brown, and orange colored substance throughout the inside. On 9/23/19 at 8:12 A.M., a concurrent, observation, and interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated the microwave should be cleaned every shift and as needed by the staff. The DSS acknowledged the microwave was dirty. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Cleaning Procedures, dated 2/28/19, indicated, .all cleaning equipment and supplies should be cleaned and stored in the same sanitary manner as food equipment and utensils are cleaned as recommended 2. On 9/23/19 at 8:16 A.M., an inspection of the food storage inside the freezer number three was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. On 9/24/19 at 9:14 AM, an observation and interview was conducted with LN 26. Resident 16 was lying in bed on his back, mouth opened, eyes closed NC was tight against Resident 16's cheekbones. LN 26 readjusted the Resident's NC and indentations were observed on his right and left cheekbones and behind both earlobes. On 9/25/19 at 11:25 AM, an observation of Resident 16 was conducted with Resident the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS-RN who attests to the assessment of residents on an initial, quarterly, change of condition, and annual basis) Res. 16 was lying in bed, eyes closed, nasal cannula was placed in nares and held in place behind both ears. The nasal cannula had left visible lines of indentations around the cheekbones. MDS stated he had not received any report from Nursing about the Resident's nasal cannula indentations and therefore, did not do a change of condition assessment. On 9/26/19 at 10:20 AM, an interview was conducted with the RD. The RD stated the DSS conducts residents initial and quarterly nutrition assessments and faxes those assessments to the RD for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices to prevent cross contamination and infections. As a result, oral hygiene items and grooming items were unlabeled and left on top of the sink in a shared restroom. In addition, the facility did not follow their hand hygiene policy. Findings: 1. On 9/23/19 at 9:31 A.M., an inspection of the shared restroom was conducted. A used blue colored handle toothbrush with thin, curled bristles, a bottle of shaving cream, and small tube of toothpaste were placed on top of the hand washing sink. The oral hygiene and grooming items were all unlabeled. There were two residents who lived in the shared bedroom. On 9/23/19 at 9:42 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with LN 5. LN 5 stated the unlabeled toothbrush, toothpaste, and shaving cream belonged to the resident in bed A. LN 5 acknowledged all oral hygiene and grooming items should have been labeled and kept inside the resident's drawer due to a potential for cross contamination. On 9/23/19 at 9:59 A.M., a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed for dignity (32, 48) were treated with respect and dignity when: 1. Staff did not cover urinary catheter collection bags (bag that collects urine draining from a tube inserted into the bladder) for Residents 32 and 48, and; 2. Staff did not provide Resident 48 with accessibility for the use of a call light, good oral hygiene, and activity participation with other residents. These failures had the potential to affect the emotional and psychosocial well-being of Resident 32 and Resident 48. Findings: 1a. Resident 32 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary retention (difficulty urinating or completely emptying the bladder) and a suprapubic catheter (a tube to drain urine is inserted directly into the bladder), per the facility's Admitting Information. On 9/25/19 at 8:08 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 32. Resident 32's catheter collection bag was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment to accommodate a resident's needs for one of three residents (19) sampled for nutrition. This failure inhibited Resident 19's ability to feed himself during meals and had the potential to affect his quality of life and dignity. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle wasting (loss of muscle caused by disease or lack of use) and lack of coordination, per the facility's Record of Admission. Per the physician's order, dated 9/11/19, Resident 19 was to have a plate guard (a raised edge, attached to a plate, to prevent food from being pushed off a plate) during meals. On 9/23/19 at 12:45 P.M., an observation of Resident 19 was conducted. Resident 19 was being fed by a family member. There was no plate guard on his plate. On 9/24/19 at 8:20 A.M., an observation of Resident 19 and an interview with LN 37 was conducted. There was no plate guard on Resident 19's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for the use of a telephone without being overheard for one unsampled resident (50). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to privacy. Findings: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (memory problem) without behavior, per the facility's Record of Admission. On 9/25/19 at 9:10 A.M., an observation was conducted. The telephone in station 1 was heard ringing. Resident 50 was seated in the wheelchair being wheeled towards station 1 by CNA 2. CNA 2 picked up the telephone, handed it to Resident 50, and stood next to Resident 50. Another resident (18) was seated in a wheelchair next to Resident 50. Resident 50 started talking loud in a foreign language. The station 1 was busy with visitors, and residents passing by the hallway. Resident 50's telephone conversation ended at 9:16 A.M. and Resident 50 was wheeled back to her room by CNA 2. On 9/25/19 at 9:53 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated there were no phones inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the form Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN/CMS 1055-a form which gave the choice to continue services under private pay if Medicare did not provide payment), with the appeal contact information, to two of three residents (A, B) sampled for Beneficiary Protection Notification. As a result, Resident A and B did not have the information needed to appeal the decision, or to make an informed decision about their care. Findings: 1. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for skilled services under Medicare part A, and designated a family member as the responsible party (RP), per the facility's Record of Admission. On 5/6/19, Resident A's RP signed the form CMS-R-131 Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN). Under section D (treatment or service Medicare may not pay for) was written D/C Rehab, under section E. Reason Medicare May Not Pay was written Pt. and family request to go home and section F. Estimated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive assessment for the need of specialized rehabilitative services for one resident (76) reviewed for limited ROM (movement around the joint) exercise. This failure had the potential to cause loss of muscle strength and joint deformity for Residents 76. Findings: Resident 76 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Face Sheet. The Physical Therapy (PT) service notes dated, 9/27/18- 12/25/18, indicated Resident 76 was a S/P (status post) reduction of right distal femur (surgery to stabilize and heal a broken bone). On 9/23/19 at 9:52 A.M., Resident 76 was in bed in an upright position, awake, and spoke in a foreign language. On 9/24/19 at 11:12 A.M., a record review was conducted. The MDS quarterly assessment, dated 8/18/19, indicated Resident 76 required one person extensive physical assistance with mobility, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. The PT service notes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and document review, the facility failed to consistently provide the correct measurement of nectar thickened liquids (supplement added to liquids which alters consistency of the liquid to aide with swallow difficulty) to seven residents (16, 18, 30, 38, 45, 51, 68). CNA and RNA staff provided residents nectar thickened liquids which was not in accordance with facilty policy. In addition, staff were unaware of contraindications when providing residents straws to consume their thickened liquids.The lack of providing residents with the correct measurement and delivery of nectar thickened liquids, posed a risk for ineffective swallowing precautions. Findings: On 9/23/19 at 11:24 A.M., an observation of CNA 25 was conducted. CNA 25 entered Resident 30's room and dropped off a cup which contained thickener at the bottom of the cup, onto the Resident's bedside table. In addition, CNA 25 threw a partially full cup of thickened liquid and a straw, into the trashcan. On 9/23/19 at 11:30 A.M., CNA 25 stated resident's who received thickened liquids can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective means of communication for two residents (27, 79) reviewed for communication. As a result, Resident 27 was not provided with a communication board (board with pictures depicting ADLs, pain, hunger, etc) to communicate his needs. For Resident 79, translation services were not provided to the resident. This failure had the potential to not meet their needs and could affect the residents' psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings: 1. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (impaired memory) per the Record of Admission. During an initial tour of the facility on 9/23/19 at 3:25 P.M., Resident 27 was lying in bed and his eyes were closed. On 9/24/19 at 9:11 A.M., an observation was conducted in the activity room for Resident 27. The activity room was filled with residents. A group of female guests were singing and playing a violin while residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (238) was accurately assessed for nutritional needs. This failure placed Resident 238 at risk of not receiving adequate and appropriate nutrition to heal his pressure ulcer. Findings: Resident 238 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in thinking, problem solving, and memory skills), per the facility's Admitting Information. The clinical record of Resident 238 was reviewed. The Nursing admission Assessment performed on 9/10/19, indicated Resident 238 had a 1.5 cm by 0.5 cm wound on the coccyx (tailbone area). The Resident Care Plan, dated 9/10/19, indicated Resident 238 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer upon admission, with interventions that included Encourage/provide adequate nutrition/hydration. The Initial Nutrition Evaluation, dated 9/11/19, signed by the DSS, indicated Resident 238 had no pressure ulcers. The Nutritional Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label the enteral feeding formula (EFF-a nutritionally complete solution fed directly into the stomach) bag via tube feeding and water flush bag with frequency and volume to be infused according to the physician's order for one resident (83) reviewed for tube feeding. This failure had the potential to cause a resident to receive the wrong EFF. Findings: Resident 83 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired memory) without behaviors, per the Record of Admission. During an initial tour and observation on 9/23/19 at 10:50 A.M. and 9/24/19 at 8:05 A.M., Resident 83 was lying in bed and his eyes were closed. The enteral feeding pump machine was turned off and a bag of 1.5 liter Glytrol, dated 9/23/19 at 12:30 A.M. and a bag of water flush dated 9/23/19 at 12:30 A.M. were both hung on the enteral feeding pump machine. There was no instructions documented on the label of the enteral feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sack meal for one unsampled resident (7) who received dialysis. This failure had the potential to affect the health of Resident 7 and reduce his quality of life. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Record of Admission. On 9/25/19 at 2:53 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 2. Resident 7 stated he went to dialysis in the morning, had breakfast before he left, and was sent to dialysis without food. Resident 7 stated he had only had juice and milk at the dialysis center. Resident 7 stated he was upset and hungry, because he had not been given food. Resident 7 stated the facility had never given him food to take to dialysis. LN 2 stated the facility had not allowed Resident 7 to take food to dialysis, because the food would have become contaminated. On 9/25/19 at 3:17 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated residents would have been given a sack meal when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure physicians orders were recapitulation (reviewing the new MAR against the physicians orders to ensure accuracy before the start of the next month) accurately for one of one residents (67) reviewed for recapitulation of orders. This failure potentially caused confusion among staff as to whether Resident 67 needed continuous supplemental oxygen or supplemental oxygen as needed. Findings: Resident 67 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonia (infection of the lungs), per the facility's Record of Admission. The clinical record for Resident 67 was reviewed. Physician's Orders on admission indicated an order was written on 7/25/19 to .give O2 2 LPM PRN if O2 sat <92%. Physician's Orders recapitulated on 9/1/19 indicated the oxygen order was Oxygen at 2 liters per minute via NC (nasal cannula) continuously / SOB (shortness of breath). On 9/24/19 at 2:14 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,254 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $6,836 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BAYSHIRE SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAYSHIRE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/25/2021
KIRBY, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/25/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 19%Other / private 72%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$317per resident / day
operating cost
$9,630per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$337per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555158. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next