No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bayshire Torrey Pines Post-Acute

13101 Hartfield Ave, San Diego, CA 92130 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (858) 259-2222 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$87,153 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $87,153 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-08)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
12710 Carmel Country Road · (858) 499-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
3515 Del Mar Heights Rd · (858) 792-7040 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3455 Del Mar Heights Rd · (858) 259-1077 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4210 Carmel Center Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12750 Carmel Country Rd · (858) 333-4613

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%11.2%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 330 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.61hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.74hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.4%CMS range 65.8–75.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 9.1–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.4–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
44.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 38.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2023-03-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document reviews, the facility failed to ensure the management and oversight of food and nutrition service operations was maintained with a qualified full-time dietitian or nutrition professional who met the requirements as specified in established state (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) standards and federal standards, which include an onsite, qualified, full-time dietetic services supervisor (DSS) or food service manager (FSM); and a Dietitian employed full or part-time. The lack of oversight of dietetic and food services by a full-time DSS or FSM, resulted in the kitchen staff not having adequate oversight, tools, and training to develop the skills to carry out the Food and Nutrition Services in a competent, safe, and sanitary manner, particularly when the dietitian was part-time. In addition, because the facility did not employ a Dietitian from December 22, 2022 - January 23, 2023, regular frequently scheduled consultations between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a toileting schedule according to a resident's care plan intervention for one of three residents reviewed for care planning (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive appropriate care, treatment, and interventions for fall prevention. Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including difficulty walking, muscle weakness and respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. An interview on 3/25/26 at 9:42 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 was conducted. LN 1 stated Resident 1 had a fall incident, was sent out to the hospital and has not returned to the facility. LN 1 stated fall risk assessments were completed for new residents and after a fall incident. LN 1 further stated the resident's care plan was also updated after a fall to add interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan for two of 43 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) with actual pressure ulcers. This deficient practice had the potential to delay the necessary person-centered care needed to prevent negative outcomes. Cross reference F686 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of cerebral infarction (a stroke that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked). A record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/14/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 10 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive (pertaining to memory, judgement and reasoning ability) deficits. On 2/7/25 at 1:52 P.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess an actual pressure ulcer on admission, provide appropriate treatment and preventative measures according to standards of practice to prevent further progression of a pressure ulcer for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 1) at risk for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in a delay of Resident 1's stage III pressure ulcer to be appropriately staged during an initial admission assessment and proper treatment for continous care necessary to prevent the worsening of the pressure ulcer. Cross reference F655 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of cerebral infarction (a stroke that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked). A record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/14/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1. Opened food items had no use by date. 2. Food items with mold in it. 3. Employees' personal belongings were stored inappropriately in a food preparation area. 4. Boxes on top of the ice machine. These findings had the potential to expose the facility's residents to unsafe and unsanitary food practices that could lead to widespread foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. On 12/9/24 at 8:40 A.M., an observation was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the walk-in refrigerator. These observations included: - sweet and sour basting sauce with no use by date - grated carrots with no use by date - salsa with no use by date - noodle soup with no use by date - tomato soup with no use by date On 12/12/24 at 11:09 A.M., an interview was conducted with the CDM. The CDM stated it was important to label and indicate the use by date on the food items to ensure residents were not served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure it followed professional standards of practice when a gastrostomy tube (GT-tube inserted through the belly to bring nutrition and medications directly to the stomach) placement and residual (the amount of liquid drained from a stomach following administration of nutrition) was not checked before medication administration for one resident (20). This failure had the potential for causing complications related to GT health. Findings: Per the facility face sheet, Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy status (presence of an artificial opening into the stomach). On 12/11/24 at 8:22 A.M., licensed nurse (LN) 1 was observed and interviewed during a medication administration for Resident 20. On 12/11/24 at 8:31 A.M., LN 1 entered Resident 20's room. LN 1 explained the procedure to Resident 20 and detached Resident 20's GT from the nutrition feeding tube. LN 20 attached a syringe to the GT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to one of two residents (Resident 96), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, activities related to personal care) for dependent residents. As a result, Resident 96 was at risk for skin injury and infection. Findings: Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness and needed assistance for personal care, per the facility's admission Record. On 12/9/24 at 4:03 P.M., an observation and interview were conducted for Resident 96 as she laid in bed. Resident 96's arms and hands were exposed, and fingernails appeared long, split and with brown materials underneath the nails. Resident 96 stated, No one asked if I want my nails cut short, I want it trimmed but no one asked me. They (facility staff) see it. On 12/10/24, Resident 96's clinical record was reviewed. A review of Resident 96's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/30/24, indicated Resident 96 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a dressing for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein that allows delivery of medications) was changed in a timely manner for one resident (151). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection to Resident 151. Findings: Per the facility face sheet, Resident 151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pelvic osteomylitis (infection of the bone). On 12/9/24 at 3:56 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 151 in the resident's room. Resident 151 was sitting in the wheelchair watching TV. An observation of a PICC line on the resident's left upper arm covered with a dressing dated 12/1/24. Resident 151 stated that the dressing had not been changed since the nurse at the hospital did. On 12/12/24 at 2:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that Resident 151's PICC line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to indicate the appropriate indication for the use of anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication for one of two residents (Resident 22), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential for unnecessary medication use and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs) and atrial fibrillation (A-fib, irregular and rapid heartbeat). A review of Resident 22's physician order dated 11/9/22 indicated the following order: - Apixaban (blood thinner medication) for anticoagulant. On 12/10/24 at 4:33 P.M., a concurrent review of Resident 22's clinical record and an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 12 was conducted. LN 12 stated Resident 22 had been in the facility since 11/9/22. LN 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to indicate the appropriate use of anti-anxiety (medication used for worry and fear) medications and communicated the target behavioral monitoring for the use of anti-anxiety medication among staff members, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic (mind-altering) medications (Resident 96). This failure had the potential for unnecessary psychotropic medication use, its side effects, and a decline for residents psychological and mental well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 96's admission Record indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 96's physician order dated 11/28/24 indicated the following order: - Clorazepate (an anti-anxiety medication) for psychosis. - Monitor episodes of ( .psychosis .AEB [sic, as evidenced by]: hallucinations, agitation) .for drug use of clorazepate. On 12/10/24 at 4:33 P.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11, outside Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection control practices when a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to aid in urine flow) bag and dignity bag (a bag used to cover and conceal contents inside) was lying on the floor for one of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident 95). This failure had the potential for cross contamination (spread of germs and bacteria) and infection. Findings: A review of Resident 95's admission Record indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, a condition in which the prostate gland is larger than normal and may block the bladder and the urethra) with urinary tract symptoms. A review of Resident 95's history and physical (H&P) dated 11/29/24, indicated he had the capacity to make his own medical decisions. The H&P indicated Resident 95 had chronic urinary retention due to BPH with chronic urinary catheter. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures when the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive investigation of allegations of inappropriate comments that involved one resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for allegations of inappropriate behavior to not be fully investigated. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included visual loss and need for assistance with personal care. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), Resident 1 was cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status, a cognition tool) score of 12. On 10/22/24 at 10:59 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated on 9/16/24 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 reported while assisting Resident 1 with a shower, Resident 1 made inappropriate comments to her. The DSD stated the comments were of a sexual nature. On 10/22/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received foods in measured amounts when standardized recipes were not followed for residents receiving pureed diets. This failure had the potential for residents to have decreased nutrition and possible weight loss. Findings: An observation of the pureed food production for lunch was conducted on 1/10/24 at 10:30 A.M. The Culinary Director (CD) cut seven portions of the ravioli bake casserole and placed them in the blender. The CD did not measure or weigh the portions. In addition, seven portions of cauliflower were pureed with no measurement or weighing of the portions. The CD poured chicken stock into the blender without measuring the amount. There was no recipe/recipe book available for the CD to use. An interview was conducted with the CD on 1/10/24 at 10:45 A.M. The CD stated, I did not use a recipe, I know them. There is a recipe binder here in the department. It is important to follow the recipes to keep nutritional value. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Services Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety was maintained in the kitchen according to facility policy when multiple food items were not dated or were dated in the future; and no received on or use by date was noted. These deficient practices had the potential to cause foodborne illness. Findings: An observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted on 1/8/24 at 8:30 A.M. Seven containers had no received or expire dates: parsley flakes, black pepper, granulated garlic, oregano, paprika, thyme leaves, and basil. Multiple items were marked with received dates which were in the future (2/5/24): a one-pound package of ground beef, a one-pound package of ground pork, boxes of [NAME] Krispy Treats, quick oats, boxed pancake mix, boxed cake mix, cans of tomato soup, cans of cranberry sauce, cans of corned beef hash and a box of quinoa. There were multiple items with dates but not identified as whether the date was received by, or use-by dates: pecan pieces, sugar, pancake syrup, coffee creamer, brown sugar, salt, pound cake, and frozen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) stood while assisting with breakfast (Resident 108). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 108 a loss of self-esteem and/or self-worth. Findings: Resident 108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized muscle weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), per the admission Record. On 12/29/23, Resident 108 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On the same date, Resident 108 was assessed to require partial to moderate assistance with eating. On 1/9/24 at 8:30 A.M., an observation was conducted in the dining room. Six residents were seated, five were feeding themselves. Resident 108 was seated at a table, with his hands in his lap. CNA 1 was standing on Resident 108's right side, feeding him the plated food. On 1/9/24 at 8:35 A.M., an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and transmit Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) assessments for two of two residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (Residents 5, 8). This failure resulted in Resident 5 and 8's discharge status not being communicated to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) as required, and had the potential to result in delayed quality measurements from the data. Findings: On 1/11/24, a record review was conducted. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list: Resident 5 was due for a Discharge MDS assessment on 9/19/23. Resident 5's MDS status was indicated as, In progress. Resident 8 was due for a Discharge MDS assessment on 8/28/23. Resident 8's MDS status was indicated as, In progress. On 1/11/24 at 2:35 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC). The MDSC stated it was important to complete a Discharge MDS when a resident left the facility. The MDSC reviewed Resident 5 and Resident 8's MDS summaries and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize urine collection containers (UCC) in a safe, clean manner for two of two residents reviewed for Environment of Care. This failure had the potential to cause urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings: 1. Resident 156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include a fractured bone in the spine and UTI, per the admission Record. On 1/8/24, at 9:30 A.M., Resident 156 was observed in bed. A plastic device with long tubing was observed set on towels on the floor. The coiled tubing went from the device on the floor up under the blankets and between Resident 156's legs. A liquid which appeared to be urine was in the tubing, and in the UCC. Resident 156 stated she did not know what the tubing or device were for. On 1/11/24, a record review was conducted. On 12/29/23, Resident 156 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Per a nursing admission Evaluation, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the acceptable standard of care for the blood pressure medication was followed for one of two sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect Client 1 ' s quality of life, health and well- being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility ' s Face Sheet. On 11/15/23 a record review was conducted. Resident 1 had diagnoses which included subarachnoid bleed (bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain), per the physician ' s admission history and physical visit, dated 10/6/23. Per the MDS, dated [DATE], Resident 1 had a BIMS of 11 (BIM score of 8-12 indicated a resident was moderately cognitively impaired). On 11/15/23 at 3:07 P.M., an interview and record review were conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2. The LN 2 stated Client 1 had an order of blood pressure medicine since she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The blood pressure medication was ordered one time a day and scheduled at 9 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide regular showers to two of two sampled residents (1, 2). As a result, Resident 1 and Resident 2 were placed at an increased risk of skin infections. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paraplegia (difficulty moving the lower half of the body) and muscle weakness. Per the facility's Shower Schedule, each resident had showers scheduled on two days of the week based on what room they were in. Per the facility's Body Check Sheets, there was documentation of the facility providing 7 of the 11 scheduled showers to Resident 1. There was no documentation of the facility offering a shower to Resident 1 on 8/3, 8/10, 8/14, or 9/1. On 10/27/23 at 11:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, she was not able to find documentation to explain the missing shower notes for Resident 2. The DON further stated, the staff should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. A [NAME] (CK 1) and two diet aides (DA) 1 and DA 2 did not use standardized recipes and therapeutic menus in the kitchen to prepare and plate resident meals. 2. A [NAME] (CK 2) and a diet aide (DA 3) did not use a therapeutic menu or guide to prepare pureed meals and thickened drinks. 3. A [NAME] (CK 4) did not obtain or document the final cooking temperatures of prepared food for two months. 4. A Diet Aide (DA 2) did not correctly plate meals for residents on therapeutically prescribed carbohydrate-controlled (CCHO) diets. 5. A [NAME] (CK 3) did not know how to calibrate a food thermometer. 6. CK 3 who also worked as a dishwasher, did not know how to test a high-temperature dish machine to ensure it was operating within the specified heat range according to manufacturer's guidelines. 7. A [NAME] (CK 4) did not use proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the use of standardized recipes and therapeutic menus approved by a Registered Dietitian were used for skilled nursing home residents on therapeutic diets. This practice led to residents receiving meals did not match their physician ordered diet, or medical condition, which had the potential to compromise their nutrition status and other health consequences such as choking or death. Cross references: F800, F801, F804, F809 Findings: During an interview on 2/27/23 at 8:46 AM with CK 1 in the main kitchen, CK 1 stated he was the main cook in the mornings that prepares breakfast and lunch meals for the facility's residents, including the skilled nursing facility (SNF). CK 1 stated this morning he prepared 2 pureed (i.e. foods blended to a thick mashed potato texture for patients with difficulty swallowing), 5 mechanical soft (i.e. foods blended to a smaller pieces for ease in chewing and swallowing), 6 ground (i.e. food blended to a softer chewable texture for patients with difficulty chewing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received foods that retained nutritive value and were served at an appetizing temperature when: 1. Standardized recipes and therapeutic menus were not followed for residents receiving pureed diets. 2. Holding temperatures on the tray line and resident test tray were below acceptable range and three residents complained of cold food. This failure had the potential to result in decreased intake and further compromise the nutritional status of 38 residents receiving therapeutic diets from the facility's kitchens. 1. During an observation and interview in the main kitchen on 2/27/23 at 3:36 PM, CK 2 was preparing shredded barbeque chicken for pureed resident meals. CK 2 placed 3 scoops of shredded chicken in the blender and then added water directly from the faucet into the blender and blended the chicken before it was poured into a small silver shot pan, covered, and placed on the warming tray. CK 2 stated she did not always use thickener but when she did, she would just eyeball the amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a meal span of less than fourteen (14) hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day. This failure had the potential to increase hunger and negatively affect the nutrition status of 38 residents who consume meals at the Skilled Nursing facility. Cross reference F800, F804 Findings: A record review of the facilities scheduled mealtimes provided by EC on 2/27/28 indicated, breakfast was served at 7:30 A.M., Lunch was served at 11:15 A.M. and dinner was served at 4:15 P.M. On 2/27/23 at 4:45 P.M., an observation of the SNF satellite kitchen dining room was conducted. The SNF dining room did not have a main menu posted for the day, week, or month for the residents. DA 2 confirmed there were no menus posted in the SNF dining room. During an observation on 2/28/23 at 7:40 A.M., the satellite dining room did not have any meal carts being loaded. During an observation on 2/28/23 at 8:00 A.M., no meal carts were observed being delivered. During an observation and interview on 2/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices were maintained in the kitchen according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. A white powdered substance was stored in the main kitchen unlabeled and undated in a large plastic bin. 2. Breadcrumbs were opened and undated with no cover or closure device. 3. The walk-in refrigerator and satellite kitchen refrigerator had multiple TCS (time/temperature control for food safety foods- meats, dairy, pasta, etc.) foods that were stored uncovered, unlabeled, and/or undated. 4. The temperature of milk stored in the satellite kitchen refrigerator was 44.8F when tested. 5. A dirty rag with brown stains was on tray with nine 8 oz. glasses of juice on it in the satellite kitchen reach-in refrigerator. 6. The dish machine sanitizer solution in the satellite kitchen was not maintained at the correct concentration; the chemical sanitizer testing strip indicated there was no sanitizer solution entering the dish machine during the wash cycle. 7. Eighteen expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a kitchen garbage bin was kept clean and free of debris. This failure had the potential to promote an unsanitary environment that harbors pests and expose to unsafe conditions. Cross reference F800, F802, 812 Findings: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/27/23 at 8:26 A.M., an observation was conducted. The main kitchen was cluttered and with multiple empty cardboard boxes, empty food containers, chemical bottles scattered on the floor, along with wrappers, trash and other debris on the floor along the walkway from the kitchen entrance to the food equipment area. During an observation and interview on 3/6/23 at 12:39 P.M., CK 4 was observed taking the kitchen trash bin outside to empty the contents in the dumpster. An observation of the inside of the kitchen trash bin was conducted and the bin was dirty with old food and debris. CK 4 brought the kitchen trash bin back inside without cleaning or washing out the old food waste. CK 4 placed a new trash bag in the bin; which was observed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure two ice machines and the skilled nursing facility (SNF) kitchen dish machine were maintained in a safe, operating, and fully functioning manner, according to the manufacturer's guidelines and standards of practice. These failures had the potential to expose 38 residents to unsafe, unsanitary ice, which could lead to foodborne illnesses and further compromise their health. Cross reference F800, F801, F802, F812 Findings: 1. SNF Satellite and Main kitchen Dish machines On 2/27/23 at 10:06 AM, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with DA 1 in the satellite kitchen. DA 1 demonstrated how the low temperature dishwasher operated for the wash and rinse cycles. DA 1 showed how to check the chemical chlorine sanitizer with the manufacturer's test strips. DA 1 dipped a test strip from the first set of strips inside the dish machine solution and it was white, without a color change. DA 1 tried a different set of test strips, and there was no color change, and the container indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure when: 1. Nursing staff were competent and knowledgeable about the proper disinfection of shared glucometers (blood glucose meter to measure and display the amount of sugar [glucose] in your blood) according to the manufacturer's instructions and accepted professional standards of practice and administration of nebulizer treatment (a liquid medicaine to help control breathing problems). Four out of Four nursing staff in three out of three nursing stations, did not know about the appropriate disinfectant product to use and/or the allowance of wet time (the amount of time disinfectants need to remain wet on surfaces to properly disinfect) when disinfecting shared glucometers. 2. In addition, the facility failed to provide comprehensive nursing services for two of 39 sampled residents (25, 549) when Resident 25 medications were not ordered. 3. The director of Staff Development (DSD) did not review and ensure registry certified nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system of receipt and disposition of Controlled Substances (CS- a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) were established and implemented when: 1. The facility did not have a system in place in sufficient detail to accurately reconcile disposition of all controlled drugs. 2. The facility did not have a system in place to accurately periodically reconcile controlled drugs and account for controlled drugs for two out of two sampled residents (Residents 20, 555). These failures increased the risk for loss and/or diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) of a Controlled Substance. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/23, at 11:23 a.m., with Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) 1 in the medication room, discontinued CS medication were observed locked in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Residents 547, 245, 3, 25) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 547 was administered clonazepam (medication that works in brain to help with anxiety) without an appropriate end date. 2. Resident 245 was administered alprazolam, no resident specific behavioral interventions were attempted or implemented prior to initiation and/or during use of alprazolam. 3. Resident 3 was administered trazodone (medication for depression) without appropriate clinical justification for dose increase and no resident specific behavioral interventions were attempted or implemented prior to initiation and/or during use of trazodone. 4. Resident 25 was administered sertraline (medication for depression) without appropriate clinical justification for dose increase, gradual dose reduction, and no resident specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment (process used by facilities to assess the needs of its resident population and required resources to provide the care and services the residents need) addressed the dietary aides' training and competencies in order to provide food and nutrition services in a competent and safe manner. This failure placed 38 of the 38 residents in the facility, who received food from the licensed kitchen, at risk for food-borne illness, (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or toxins) and not meeting the nutritional needs of the residents. (Refer to F-801) Findings: On 2/28/23 at 5:31 P.M., an immediate jeopardy was called due to the lack of oversight of dietetic and food services by a full-time dietetic services supervisor manager, which resulted in kitchen staff not having adequate training, skills, and tools to carry out the Food and Nutrition Services in a competent and safe manner. A document review of the facility's Facility Assessment, updated on 3/7/23, was conducted. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0841 — pattern
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility Medical Director failed to ensure dietary policies and procedures and the Facility Assessment (process used by facilities to assess the needs of its resident population and required resources to provide the care and services the residents need) policy were implemented, when dietary staff did not prepare the residents' meals in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure placed 38 of the 38 residents in the facility, who received food from the licensed kitchen, at risk for food-borne illness, (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or toxins) and not meeting the nutritional needs of the residents. (Refer to F-801 and F-838) Findings: On 2/28/23 at 5:31 P.M., an immediate jeopardy was called due to the lack of oversight of dietetic and food services by a full-time dietetic services supervisor manager, which resulted in kitchen staff not having adequate training, skills, and tools to carry out the Food and Nutrition Services in a competent and safe manner. An interview with the Medical Director (MD) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining, and improving safety and quality in nursing homes) did not identify areas of improvement in the facility's dietary services, when dietary staff did not prepare the residents' meals in accordance with the physician's orders. In addition, the facility's QAPI program policy and procedure did not clearly describe all the elements required in accordance to the federal regulation. This failure placed 38 of the 38 residents in the facility, who received food from the licensed kitchen, at risk for food-borne illness, (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or toxins) and not meeting the nutritional needs of the residents. (Refer to F-801) In addition, an unclear QAPI policy and procedure had the potential to affect the facility's ability to efficiently identify high-risk (refers to care or service areas associated with significant risk to the health or safety of residents),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9. During a staff interview on 2/27/23 at approximately 8:20 am, IDON 1 (Interim Director of Nursing) identified the quarantine/isolation area as the three rooms at the end of the first hallway. IDON1 stated the Red Zone (isolation area) had COVID precautions in place for the residents with COVID 19 (dangerous viral infection) diagnoses. During observation on 2/27/23 at 9:09 am, the first hallway was observed to have a Red Zone laminated sheet attached to a post in front of the two Northeast (NE) rooms. In addition, three partially filled isolation carts, along with instruction sheets for donning Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), that included gowns, gloves, and mask, were observed outside of Resident 348, 349, and 350's rooms. Red Zone signs observed outside of Resident's 348 and 349's rooms. An observation and record review were conducted on 2/27/23 of the medical charts for Residents 346, 347, 348, 349, and 350. A. Resident 348's, diagnoses included a COVID positive infection and an exposure to Candida…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP- a person who coordinated the handling of facility's infection control practices) was employed full time. As a result, the facility did not have a full time IP overseeing infection control practices for all the residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview with the Licensed Nurse (LN) 36 on 2/27/23, LN 36 she was the current IP. A concurrent interview and record review of IP requirements on 2/27/23 was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated Licensed Nurse (LN) 36 did not have the required IP training and certificate. The ADM stated the contracted Interim Director of Nursing (IDON1) was the current IP for the facility. In addition, the ADM stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) did not have the Infection Control Certificate required for the position. During a concurrent interview and observation on 2/27/23 at 5:35 P.M., the IP was observed with a medication cart in the facility resident hallway. The IP stated he worked part time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an interdisciplinary team (IDT, staff from different department who coordinates the residents care), assessment, and obtain a physician order for one of 39 residents (Resident 25) when multiple prescribed topical creams were found in a blue container on top of resident's bedside table. This failure had the potential for unsafe and improper administration of the topical cream medications. Findings: Review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated, diagnoses including hypertension (increase in blood pressure), Parkinson's disease (disease marked by tremor, muscle rigidity). On 2/27/23 at 12:12 P.M., an observation in Resident 25's room and concurrent interview with the resident, an opened blue container was placed on the resident's bedside table. Inside the blue container were tubes of Clobatesol gel (skin treatment for psoriasis) hydrocortisone cream (medication to treat itching redness of the skin). Resident 25 applied Clobatesol gel on his face. Resident 25 stated he applied the medication as often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address resident's needs and preferences for two of 12 sampled residents (345, 549) when: 1. Resident 549's call light was not within reach. 2. Resident 345's preferred time for administration of her medications were not honored as requested. These failures had the potential for resident's needs not being met. In addition, failure to honor the preferred time of medication administration resulted to Resident 345's refusals of medications and feelings of frustration and low self-worth. Findings: 1. On 3/2/23 at 9:32 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 549 in her room. Resident 549 was hitting her table and stated she cannot find her call light to call for help. The call light was on the floor far from her reach. On 3/2/23 at 9:33 A.M., a concurrent observation of the call light inside Resident 549's room and interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) was conducted. The ADON acknowledged and stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform a resident's representative of a significant change in physical status for one of one resident (20) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure deprived resident 20's representative of the right of being informed of resident 20's change in physical condition. Findings: A review of resident 20's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower half of the body.) The admission Record listed Emergency Contact #1 and Responsible Party as the resident's wife. Resident 20 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to syncope (fainting) and collapse. On 3/6/23 at 9:08 A.M., a review of resident 20's SNF (skilled nursing facility) to Hospital Transfer Form (a form that provides information regarding a resident's clinical status/medical condition), dated 12/27/22 indicated, resident 20's wife was notified of the transfer but was not made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice to the resident's RP (responsible party - an individual authorized by the resident to act as an official representative) upon transfer to the hospital for one of one resident (20) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 20's RP being unaware of Resident 20's return to the facility after hospitalization. Findings: A review of resident 20's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower half of the body.) The admission Record listed the resident's wife as the RP. Resident 20 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to syncope (fainting) and collapse. On 3/6/23 at 10:39 A.M., an interview was conducted with the HRD (Human Resources Director.) The HRD stated residents were provided a notification with the daily rates for private and semi-private rooms upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessments for one of 12 residents (9) reviewed for resident's assessments with a significant change in condition. This failure had the potential to affect the provision of care and treatment/services to be provided to Resident 9. Findings: Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pneumonia, Peripheral Neuropathy and Congestive Heart Failure according to the physician's progress notes dated 2/24/23. On 3/1/23 at 8:22 A.M., an observation of Resident 9 was conducted. Resident 9 was in bed with eyes closed. The room had an odorous smell of urine. On 3/1/23 at 8:24 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 9. Resident 9 stated he did not have the same control of his bowel and bladder. Resident 9 stated when he had to have a bowel movement, he now needed staff to come right away, otherwise he would lose control. Resident 9 also stated he can walk slowly with his walker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a screening and an assessment tool) assessment was accurately coded for one of one resident (19) reviewed for MDS accuracy. This failure had the potential to affect the care and services to be provided for Resident 19. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Hepatobiliary Cancer (a group of malignancies (abnormal cells divide without control and invade nearby tissues) that includes liver, intra and extra hepatic biliary tracts, and the gall bladder) with Hospice care (care provided when there is no active or curative treatment) according to the physician's progress notes dated 1/12/23. On 2/27/23 at 4:15 P.M., an observation of Resident 19 was conducted. Resident 19 was lying flat in bed with lunch tray at bedside. Resident 19 stated he did not like what was served today, 2/27/23 and had asked for something else. Resident's fingernails were long with blackish debris. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and communicated to residents/residents representatives for three of 20 residents (44, 9, 19) reviewed for base-line care plan when: 1. Resident 44 did not have a completed baseline care plan created within 48 hours of admission. 2. Residents 44, 9 and 19 were not provided a written summary of their baseline care plans. As a result of this deficient practice, there was potential for lack of continuity of care and communication among nursing staff. This deficient practice also denied residents and their representatives the opportunity to participate in their care planning process. Findings: 1. A review of resident 44's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including encephalopathy (damage or disease that effects the brain), pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and urinary tract infection. On 3/6/23 at 3:55 P.M., an interview and record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised/updated for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 9 and Resident 19). This failure had the potential for residents not to receive the care needed to meet their individualized needs for safety, the potential for delayed care, miscommunication among caregivers, and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Pneumonia (infection affecting the lungs), Peripheral Neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain, usually in the hands and feet), and Congestive Heart Failure (a serious condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should) according to the physician's progress notes dated 2/24/23. During an observation on 2/27/23, at 9:45 A.M., Resident 9's door was closed. Resident 9 had a visitor and requested for surveyor to return at another time. During an observation on 2/28/23, at 3:54 P.M., Resident 9 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 2 residents sampled for ADL care. (Resident 19 and 350). This failure resulted in Resident 19 having long and dirty fingernails and Resident 350 did not have a shower as scheduled. Findings: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Hepatobiliary Cancer (having to do with the liver, bile ducts, and/or gallbladder) with Hospice care according to the physician's progress notes dated 1/12/23. A joint observation and interview of Resident 19 was conducted with LN 34 on 3/6/23, at 4:30 P.M. Resident 19 was in bed reading the newspaper. Resident 19 was observed with long fingernails with black debris under the nails. LN 34 removed Resident 19's socks and stated Resident 19 also had long toenails. Resident 19 stated he would like his fingernails and toenails trimmed. During an interview with the Interim DON 2 (IDON 2) on 3/8/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for two of two residents (Resident 549 and Resident 10) when the residents' skin condition was not monitored. This failure resulted in progression of dermatitis (inflammation of the skin) and had the potential to cause further skin breakdown. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 549's clinical record dated 2/21/23 indicated diagnoses of difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness. Review of Resident 549's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 2/24/23, indicated her cognition was intact. The MDS also indicated Resident had urine and bowel incontinent (inability to control urine and bowel movement). On 2/27/23 at 11:58 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 549 was conducted. Resident 549 was observed laying in bed grimacing and stated her buttocks was stinging. Resident 549 stated she had soiled her incontinence briefs for, Five hours. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to prevent pressure ulcer for one of two sampled residents (Resident 13 ) when Resident 13's heels were not floated while in bed. This failure had the potential to cause or worsen pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of Resident 13's admission diagnoses included, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 13's Braden score (Assessment tool to identify pressure sore risk) dated 2/1/23 indicated Resident 13 was, Moderate risk. During an observation on 2/28/23 at 4:16 P.M., Resident 13's heels were not floated while in bed. During a follow up observation and interview with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 15 on 2/28/23 at 5:51 P.M., Resident 13's heels were not floated in bed and heel protectors (padded device used to prevent, manage, treat pressure ulcers) were inside Resident 13's cabinet. CNA 15 acknowledged the observation and stated she was not aware that Resident 13's heels should be floated. During a concurrent observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a timely bowel and bladder incontinence (inability to control urine and bowel movement) care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 549). This failure had the potential to cause discomfort and skin impairment to all residents. Findings: A review of Resident 549's clinical record dated 2/21/2 indicated diagnoses of difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 549's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 2/24/23, indicated Resident 549's cognition was intact. In addition, the MDS also indicated Resident 549 was urine and bowel incontinent. During a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 549 on 2/27/23 at 11:58 A.M., Resident 549 was grimacing in bed. Resident 549 stated her buttocks were stinging then stated she was wet and soiled in for, Five hours. During an observation with certified nursing assistant (CNA 11) on 2/27/23 at 12:05 P.M., inside Resident 549's room. Resident 549's incontinence brief was soaked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25) when the incorrect tube feeding formula (delivery of a nutritionally complete feed, containing protein, carbohydrates, fat, water, minerals and vitamins directly into the stomach). was given to there resident. As a result, the resident had the potential to not receive a nutritionally complete diet which could lead to other health complications. Findings: Review of Resident 25's clinical record indicated diagnoses of dysphasia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving abilities). During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed nurse (LN 35) on 2/28/23 at 4:47 P.M., in Resident 25's room, an enteral feeding formula, Novasource renal bag, (brand name, liquid food product that is specially formulated to meet the needs of people with kidney disease) was observed infusing through Resident 25's enteral feeding pump (machine used to continuously deliver nutrition to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician supervised and managed the care of one of one residents (Resident 19) who was reviewed for weight loss. This failure had the potential for Resident 19's quality of life to be affected. Findings: During an observation on 2/27/23, at 4:15 p.m., Resident 19 was lying flat in bed with lunch tray at bedside. Lunch tray had uneaten, overcooked cabbage, small amount of mash potatoes and a small amount of meat eaten by Resident 19. Resident 19 stated he did not like what was served and had asked for something else. Resident 19 stated he did not know why he did not get an alternate. Resident 19 stated he did not know if he was losing weight. During an interview on 3/6/23, at 10:31 a.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 19 required set up for meal and ate 50% - 100% of meals. CNA 1 stated Resident 19 was able to use call light for assistance. During a review of Resident 19's weight in the electronic medical record, the weight record indicated, 11/20/22 122.8 lb, 11/27/22 123.4 lb, 12/4/22 119.2 lb,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations were communicated with the physician for 39 residents. In addition, the facility failed to keep pharmacy records of medication recommendation review. As a result, pharmacy medication recommendations were not acted upon, which could affect the medication regimen for all the residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview with the facility's Pharmacy Consultant (PC) on 3/7/23 at 12:42 P.M., the PC stated a full year of MRR reports were sent to the Interim DON last week. The PC stated it was difficult to track if facility was following up on recommendations, and there were no paper trails to evaluate follow up. The PC stated the facility had short term residents, and on the next visit, those residents were already discharged . The PC stated the facility did not send any follow up recommendations to the physician. The Interim DON (IDON 2) was interviewed on 3/8/23 at 4:01 P.M. The IDON 2 stated the MRRs were missing and therefore were not reviewed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and/or labeled in accordance with current accepted professional principles and facility policies and procedures, for eleven sampled residents (Residents 28, 556, 19, 553, 551, 547, 14, 554, 551, 1) and a stock bottle of over-the-counter medication when: 1. In 60s hall medication cart, a calcitonin (medication for osteoporosis) nasal spray for Resident 553 was observed laying on side not upright and did not have a use-by date and appropriate patient identifier labels, two opened latanoprost bottles for Resident 547 and an opened latanoprost bottle for Resident 14 did not have use-by date labels, an unopened latanoprost bottle for Resident 554 was being inappropriately stored with no use-by date label, a facility stock bottle of Vitamin A 3000 mcg (microgram- unit of measure) bottle was found to be expired with an expiration date of 12/22, two salmeterol/fluticasone 500/50 diskus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$87,153 in federal fines across 17 penalties.

  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BAYSHIRE SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BAYSHIRE CONTINUING CARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/03/2024
GOLDEN STATE CARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
KIRBY, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
COLEMAN, CHADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2023
SKILLED HARTFIELD LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
DANENHAUER, JEREMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/29/2024
SIT, ALANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
BAYSHIRE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2023
FOX, CYNTHIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/29/2024
PARROTT, JASONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$228K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 12%Other / private 88%

This home reported $228K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$461per resident / day
operating cost
$14,011per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$408per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555746. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next