Greenfield Care Center of Fillmore, LLC
118 B Street, Fillmore, CA 93015 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (805) 524-5250 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-13)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.75 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.8%CMS range 47.2–75.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.6–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.0–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 63.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.30 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions of a smoking care plan and ensure adequate supervision and assistance were provided as assessed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 smoking by himself off the facility premises and falling from the wheelchair to the ground sustaining an acute fracture of the left humerus (partial or complete break in the bone, upper arm between shoulder and elbow). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 2/12/24 at 10:03 a.m., inside Resident 1's room, the resident was awake and on bed with the left forearm resting on a pillow. Resident 1 stated, Out in the front of facility .having a cigarette and finished and headed back into the facility .I was trying to step up on the curb and slid and fell forward on my left shoulder .Left shoulder hurt after the fall. Resident 3 saw the fall and staff took fifteen minutes to come help. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 2/12/24 at 11:44 a.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain privacy and right for one of 19 residents sampled (Resident 1) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP an infection control strategy in nursing homes) inicated by foley catheter ( a flexible, indwelling tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine ) and G-tube (gastrostomy tube - a flexible tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications) when care was provided in the activity room in presence of other resdients. This facility failure has the potential to lead to resident's decline in mental health and a decline in overall physical well-being During an observation on 3/18/26 at 4:00 p.m., in the dementia care unit activity room. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN 1) and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 3) were observed providing tube feeding to Resident 1 and there were no privacy practices provided to the resident observed during the procedure. A review of the medical record for Resident 1, dated 2/18/26, revealed physician orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-physician orders indicating the patient's wishes during a medical crisis, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], and/or artificial nutrition/hydration [receiving food and water through a tube], was provided to one of nineteen sampled residents (Resident 3) or the legally recognized decisionmaker. This failure results in the unsigned POLST to be invalid and had the potential to cause uncertainty among healthcare staff regarding the resident's personal preferences with end of life care.During review of Resident 3's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form dated 2/11/23, the POLST indicated orders to Attempt Resuscitation/CPR, full treatment, and use of long-term artificial nutrition including feeding tubes. The POLST was marked to indicate the information was discussed with the resident and that there was no advance directive. The POLST was signed and dated 2/11/23 by the physician, listed the name of Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information to one of nineteen sampled residents (Resident 37) about a bed-hold (a reservation that allows one to stay in, or return to, a care facility) when Resident 37 was transferred to a hospital. This failure had the potential of Resident 37 not being fully informed of their right to request a bed hold and to return to the facility after hospitalization, potentially leading to an inappropriate discharge. ( I am not sure, if we can write this because the both hospital SNF know about the 7 day hold and there was no outcome. If resident was interviewed and they complaint about an issue with the document not being given)Review of an online article published by the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR) titled, Nursing Home Residents Have The Right To A 7-Day Bed Hold When hospitalized , dated May 2018, indicates in part, .In addition to including information about bed-hold policies in the admissions agreement, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to resubmit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a tool to determine if the person had or was suspected of having a mental illness or intellectual disability) for two out of nineteen sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 45) when the residents were diagnosed with a new mental illness. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 5 and Resident 45 to not receive the appropriate medical services for their mental illness diagnoses.During review of Resident 5's medical records, the admission Record (AR), dated 5/13/25, indicated Resident 5 was admitted with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (intense, irrational delusions and auditory hallucinations, often involving themes of persecution or conspiracy, feeling watched, followed, or plotted against, that leads to severe anxiety [feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness], social withdrawal, and potential agitation). Resident 5's medical record showed a level I PASRR on 5/2/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a care plan (CP - written document that outlines the specific nursing interventions and goals for a patient's care, based on their assessed needs and diagnoses) pertaining to noncompliance with dialysis was reviewed, evaluated for effectiveness, and revised accordingly for one out of the nineteen sampled residents ( Resident 3). This deficient practice has the potential to place Resident 3 at significant risk for hospitalization, severe cardiovascular events, and even death due to unmet medical needs.During a review of Resident 3's Order Summary (OS), 3/20/26, the OS indicates, Resident #3 goes to dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes (PN), dated 12/24/25, 1/3/26, 1/8/26, 1/17/26, 1/20/26, 1/27/26, 2/5/26, 2/28/26, and 3/19/26 indicate the resident refused to go to dialysis. During a review of Resident 3's Care Plan (CP), dated 5/15/24, the CP indicates the resident is at risk for complications related to refusing to go to dialysis. During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, intervview and facility policcy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure timely wound assessment assessment was done for one of nineteen sampled residents (Resident 7) when there were no documentation to show track changes in size, tissue type, moisture levels, and infection signs, on certain weeks.This failure had the potential to affect treatment plans and delay healing.During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR) dated 3/20/26, the AR indicated that Resident 7 is a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], current diagnoses includes, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (condition where the respiratory system fails to oxygenate the blood properly resulting in low oxygen saturation), Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region stage 4 (full thickness loss of skin with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone), Abnormal Finding of Blood Chemistry (laboratory values documented as outside the normal reference range),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:Expired items in the medication storage room were disposed of according to policy and procedures and manufacturer's instructions. Treatment medications and medical supplies in the treatment cart were properly labeled and expired medication and supplies were discarded.The temperature for station 3 medication refrigerator was within acceptable range. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired medications and and ineffective treatment supplies.1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/26 at 2:25 p.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS), the medications inside the refrigerator located in the respiratory storage room were inspected. A box of Acetaminophen suppositories (a rectal medication used to treat mild pain or fever) had expired on 9/1/25 and a bottle of Acidophilus Probiotic (beneficial bacteria supplements that promote digestive health, enhance immunity, and help maintain healthy gut…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment on the ice machine clean and in safe operating condition. This failure has the potential to expose residents to contaminated ice and increased risk for food related illnesses. During an observation and insepction of the ice machine on 03/18/26 at 2:36 pm at the kitchen, a white tissue test was performed on the lower bin made of stainless steel inside the ice machine. After wiping the base of the bin, the white tissue contains a minimal amount of greyish-black residue. Repeating the procedure further back into the bin also showed minimal greyish residue. The Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Representative (MR) and Dietician (DIET) validates the findings. During an interview with the MR, MR states that he had cleaned the parts of the ice machine and inspects water flow where mineral scale or limescale build up occurs. MR verbalized he must have missed cleaning the other parts of the ice machine. During a review of the manufactures' manual, titled Ice-O-Matic dated 01/14, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility failed to practice infection control when: 1. appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: clothing and equipment used in order to provide protection against hazardous substances or environments) for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP: an infection control strategy for nursing homes requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high contact care of residents) was not worn for two residents, Resident 1 and Resident 2.2. respiratory tubes were not changed in a timely manner for Resident 25 and 3. the facility failed to discard open or used saline bottles found in medication carts and de-cloggers (a flexible, threaded rod used to restore the patency [openness] of obstructed enteral feeding tubes). This failure had the potential to expose residents for further infection and contamination. 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/26 at 10:31 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (WN), WN was observed performing a blood sugar check without wearing a gown on Resident #2 who was on EBP. WN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and individualized plan of care (care plan) for 3 of 20 Sampled residents ( Resident 35, 11 and 47) when: 1. Resident 35's preference for communicating. 2. Resident 11's alarming devices on a wheelchair and bed. 3. Resident 47's need for the appropriate communication device based on physical condition . These failures had the potential for not meeting resident's needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 35's most recent MDS Annual Assessment, Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the end of observation period), dated 12/21/24, section A for language indicated, Resident 35's preferred language is Spanish. Further review of the language assessment, section A1110B was coded 0 (meaning an interpreter was not needed to communicate with a doctor or health care staff). During an observation and interview on 3/5/25, at 10:59 a.m. with Resident 35, Resident 35 was observed responding in Spanish after being questioned in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when : 1. Resident 719 supplemental oxygen was administered without a physician order. 2. Acetylcysteine (an oral inhalation used to help with breathing) was not administered as ordered by the physician for one of four sampled residents (Resident 27). 3. A respiratory therapist (RT1) failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure on medication administration ( nebulizer /aerosol medication) and documentation for one of four sampled residents (Resident 27). 4. Resident 4's insulin (a medication to lower blood sugar levels) was not administered per physician's ordered insulin sliding scale parameters. 5. Resident 4's insulin medication was not administered in a timely manner. These failures can result to residents medications ordered at a specified dose for a designated reason with specific timing and maximum dosing parameters when needed to be missed. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 7th Edition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on inspection of the facility's Medication storage room on Unit 3, interview with the facility's IP, and review of the facility's policy and procedures the facility failed to: 1. follow their policy and procedure for sharps waste, 2. ensure that Emergency Drug supplies (E-Kits), had not been opened for more than 72 hours as outlined in the facility's policy and procedure, 3. ensure that no expired medications were available for use, 4. ensure that medications were administered in accordance with the hospital's policies and procedures and 5. ensure that medications are immediately documented in the Medication Administration record (MAR) after the administration of medications to a resident. Findings include: 1) Inspection of the facility's Blue and white (non-controlled) waste containers (which were open, and not closed or sealed), the surveyor found three syringes full of drugs with needles still attached to the syringes. One syringe contained the dilutant for Glucagon (1 ml) and the other two syringes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Medication Pass observation, review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Physician's orders, Two out of two medication nurses observed for a total of 45 medication pass opportunities. Out of these 45 medication pass opportunities, there were a total of 8 medication errors which were observed. These 8 medication errors resulted in an overall medication error rate of 17.7% for the facility. Findings include: This LVN 3 administered medications to sample Resident 29 on 3/6/2025 at 9:00 am, which included Divalproex DR 250 mg tablet. The medication nurse proceeded to crush all of this resident's medications including this resident's Divalproex which had the designation of DR on the label of the bubble pack. Review of the manufacturer's package insert for this medication read: .The tablets should be swallowed whole and can be taken with or without food, Divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets are intended for oral administration. Divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets should be swallowed whole and should not be crushed or chewed, based on the drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the exhaust hoses of the portable air conditioning units (PACU) were properly installed as directed (not duct taped to the window frames) and filters were routinely cleaned according to manufacturer's guidelines (MFU) in 12 of 12 PACU's found inside Rooms 15, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,30, and 32. This failure had the risk for entrapment in the event of a fire secondary to the windows becoming inoperable due to exhaust hoses duct taped to the window frames, with the potential for poor air quality as filters were not cleaned as directed. Findings: During an observation on 3/04/25 at 10:40 a.m. the slider kits (plastic frame where exhaust hoses are attached) of the PACUs, inside Rooms 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, and 32 were noted to be short in length, horizontally installed, and card boards were used to fill in the gaps in the windows. The sliders were then duct taped to the window frames, preventing the windows to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record revie and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare professionals from various disciplines who collaborate to provide comprehensive, patient-centered care) assessed resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 51). This failure can result with resident not taking the medication correctly. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/6/25 at 2:45 p.m., in Resident 51's room, two vials of DuoNeb (a medication in a small plastic container that contains as a liquid that you breathe into the lungs with a nebulizer (special breathing machine) breathing treatments were observed in Resident 51's drawer. When resident was asked about the medication, Resident 51stated he administers the medication himself. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/6/25 at 3:02 p.m. in Resident 51's room, Licensed Nurse (LN 1) confirmed the two DuoNeb…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to have the most current survey results accessible to the public, in the facility survey results binder. This facility failure denied the opportunity for residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents, to be aware of the most recent survey results. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/6/25 at with the Director of Nursing (DON) inside the facility's main entrance, the facility's survey results binder was reviewed. The most current survey results in the binder were from 5/22/24. The survey results binder lacked the survey results from 8/8/24 through 2/19/25. The DON acknowledged the survey results binder was not current and verbalized the survey results binder would need to be updated. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure tilted Survey Results, Examination of dated 4/7, indicated in part A copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended surveys, follow-up revisits reports, etc., along with state approved plans of correction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 35 and 39) using the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized tool used to assess and plan care of residents in a nursing home) when: 1. Resident 35 - had an inaccurate language assessment. 2. Resident 39 - had an inaccurate functional status assessment. These failures resulted in the facility reporting inaccurate data to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that does not reflect Resident 35 and 39 statuses in MDS assessment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (AR), dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 35's primary language is Spanish. During a review of Resident 35's most recent MDS Annual Assessment, Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the end of observation period), dated 12/21/24, section A for language indicated, Resident 35's preferred language is Spanish. Further review of the language assessment, section A1110B was coded 0 (meaning an interpreter was not needed to communicate with a doctor or health care staff).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's medication refrigerator logs, review of the facility's policy and procedures, and interview with the facility's I P Nurse the facility failed to ensure that the refrigerator temperatures had been documented and remained within the temperature requirements as outlined by the facility's policy and procedure. Findings include: Inspection of the facility's Medication refrigerator temperature logs for station 3 on 3/4/2025 at 4:10 pm revealed that on 12/4/2024 the refrigerator temperature had been recorded as 35-degree Fahrenheit (which was below the facility's policy range). Review of the facility's policy and procedure entitled: Policy and Procedure on medication refrigerator temperature, date 1/2025, read: Per regulations, the Medication refrigerator temperature range should be between 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees. Further review of the facility's refrigerator logs revealed that on 2/19/2025, that no temperature had been documented on the facility's refrigerator temperature logs, so the facility was unable to indicate what the actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for labelling and dating foods. This failure has the potential for Foodborne illnesses (infections or intoxications caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an observation on 03/05/25 at 9:00 AM, the following were observed: 6 large bins each containing rice, pinto beans, long grain rice, brown rice and split peas with different dates but does not indicate received date/opened date and or expiry date; 1 bin labelled pasta with dated 9/18/24 not indicating expiry date or open date and contains 2 packs of pasta with 2 different dates; 1 box containing mixed vegetables, baby lima beans, green beans but the labeled delivery dates on the side of the box is not specific for the packaged produce. During an interview on 03/05/25 at 07:30 AM with the Kitchen Manager (KM) and Dietician (DT), both staff acknowledge the labelling is not specific and should indicate the expiry date and or opened date. During a review of Policies and Procedures (P&P) titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when: 1. Respiratory care equipment was not stored properly after use by Residents (4 and 27) 2. Oxygen plastic tubing and nasal cannula were not labelled according to the facility's policy for one of four residents (Resident 27). 3. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was not available prior to entering resident rooms on contact precautions in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. These facility failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) that could impact residents' health and safety and cause preventable Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) for residents with compromised condition. Findings: 1. During review of Resident 4's, admission Record (AD), the AD indicated diagnoses including gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall used to insert a tube to provide a route for tube feeding), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document its response and resolution on the recurring complaints of call lights not being answered in a timely manner raised by residents at its Resident Council Meetings for two consecutive months. This failure put the residents at risk of receiving poor and unmonitored care, with the possibility of the issues continuing. Findings: During a review of the resident council minutes for 12/2024 and 01/2025, recurring complaints were identified. On 12/2024, the resident council attendees expressed concerns about a long wait time for call lights to be answered, taking an hour to answer call lights, and lights being turned off; the resident reported that this occurred during the night shift. On 1/2025, the complaints were call lights not being answered in a timely manner; one patient stated that when the call lights were turned on, the staff that came in the room attended to a resident who does not use the call light; another resident stated that she had to hold her bladder longer, and that staff did not help much. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a total dependent resident (Resident 1) received necessary treatment and services, to promote healing, and prevent new pressure ulcers (deep tissue injury) from developing. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1 acquiring a new stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss) to the right buttock. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), Tracheostomy (opening in the windpipe to help with breathing), Quadriplegia (paralysis (loss of the ability to move and sometimes feel of all four limbs), Epilepsy (is a chronic brain disorder that causes repeated seizures, which are episodes of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), Diabetes (high sugar in the blood). Review of Resident 1 ' s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS (a standardized assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP) with regard to the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA- provides support and assistance to patients in their recovery and maintenance of physical function) program for fourteen sampled residents (Resident 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16). These failures increased the potential for Residents 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 to not receive treatment and care according to their needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Acute Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS; a disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; a group of lung diseases that block airflow and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent avoidable accident and injury. This failure resulted in, Resident 1 fell on the floor and sustained a right distal (further from the trunk of the body) femur (thighbone) fracture (partial or complete break in the bone). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/4/2024 at 9:45 a.m., in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was observed on a bed wearing a soft helmet (head protection) with blankets up to her chest. No bed tab alarm was observed. Resident 1 was awake and asked about her recent fall stated, My knee hurts, right side .I don't remember. I think I was going to get up or something, but I don't know. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) entered Resident 1's room and verbalized, Resident 1 didn't have a bed alarm. During an interview on 4/4/2024 at 9:53 a.m., in Resident 1's room with a Licensed Nurse (LN 2), when asked if Resident 1 had a bed tab alarm LN 2 stated, Not that I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing professional standards of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. A graft site discharge order was not followed up with the admitting physician. 2. Removal of the sutures from a post tracheostomy (surgical procedure that help with breathing through an opening on the neck) site was not obtained per facility policies and procedures. 3. Skin assessment was not accurately done upon admission ([NAME]-coccyx (tail bone)redness, right side open area on the neck). These failures had the potential and risk for Resident 1 to develop further skin breakdown, and infections from unmonitored skin areas with issues. Findings: According to Fundamentals of Nursing, Mosby ' s sixth edition by [NAME] and [NAME]; Chapter 34, page 847, A registered nurse checks all transcribed orders against the original order for accuracy and thoroughness. If an order seems incorrect or inappropriate, the nurse consults the prescriber. Review of [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) had an accurate documentation of Resident 1 ' s tracheostomy (a procedure that help with breathing through an opening on the neck) site skin condition. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s skin condition to be unmanaged and posed a risk for the delay in treatment. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Surgical Wound Care, dated 7/12, the Surgical Wound Care indicated, It is the policy of this facility to care for all types of wounds and prevent possible complications .4. Assess the surgical wound site for signs of infection like skin irritation, swelling, redness and drainage . During a review of admission Nursing Assessment (ANA), dated 2/13/24, the ANA indicated, Resident 1 was admitted with tracheostomy with redness on the surrounding area of the tracheostomy stoma (opening). During a review of the document titled, Skilled Charting, dated 2/13, 2/14, 2/18, 2/18, 2/20, 2/21, 2/22, 2/23, 2/24, 2/25, 2/26, and 2/27, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprensive person-centered care plan (document that provides the resident's condition, diagnosis and the nursing team's goals) for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had a new onset of right leg redness and swelling and required medical treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's care needs to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's medical record titled face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 1 was with admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage Huntington ' s disease (a progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain) severe depression, dementia, and muscle wasting. During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Nursing Progress Notes (NPN- accurate descriptions of nursing assessments and changes in patient conditions)) dated 4/3/24, the NPN indicated, upon assessment redness and swelling was noted on right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to repair a loose, broken handrail in the hallway of station three (3) where three sampled residents (Residents 10, 21, 10) and 16 unsampled residents, resides. This failure placed the residents at risk for injuries and accidents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/23 at 12:00 PM with a licensed nurse (LN1), in the hallway of station 3, the corner piece of an assistive handrail was loose and broken with a sharp edge. LN1 stated, the broken handrail was loose and sharp and should be replaced. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 12:04 PM with the maintenance supervisor (MS), MS stated the handrail on station 3 is loose and sharp and should be replaced. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 15:15 PM with the administrator (Admin), Admin stated the handrail on station 3 is loose and sharp and should be replaced. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P/P) titled, Handrails/Grab Bars, undated, indicated in part . 1. The Maintenance Supervisor or his/her designee will check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for 2 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 52 and 63) when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN3) flushed the gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) of Resident 52, with 10 milliliters (ml) of water in between medication administration with no physician orders or standard of practice reference. This failure can result to the clogging of the GT or less water intake of the resident which can be both detrimental to the resident's overall condition . 2. Resident 63's head-of-the-bed was not elevated ( at 30 degrees high instead of 45 ) enough, while the resident's feeding formula was infusing via G-tube. This failure can result to the formula going directly to the resident's lungs instead to the stomach causing aspiration pneumonia (occurs when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed). Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were locked, and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors when medications were left on top of a treatment cart (large capacity, flexible organization and simple maneuverability for easy transport and storage of medical or treatment supplies) unattended. This failure had the potential for visitors, residents, and unauthorized staff to access prescription medication assigned to residents. Findings: During an observation at station 2 hallway on 11/15/23 at 9:17 a.m., medications meant for residents was seen left on the treatment cart by a Pharmacy delivery personnel, unattended and easily accessible to anyone. During an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN 3) on 11/15/23 at 9:25 a.m. LN 3 stated It wasn't supposed to be left on the treatment cart unattended and further stated that she had told the pharmacy delivery personnel to wait for a Supervisor. During a concurrent observation and interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/15/23 at 9:25 a.m. DON picked up the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cook had the skill set to calibrate a food thermometer ( gadget to measure food themperature) to verify appropriate and acceptable food temperatures. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/23, at 09:22 a.m., with [NAME] (C), in the presence of the facility's Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen, C was observed calibrating a digital thermometer she used to check food temperatures. C obtained a cup with a small amount of ice and inserted the thermometer into the cup of ice. C stated the thermometer read 44 degrees F (Fahrenheit). DSS spoke to C in Spanish to ask C if 44 degrees F meant that the thermometer was calibrated, and C stated, yes. DSS stated, C should have known to look for 32 degrees F to demonstrate the thermometer was calibrated, and how to manually calibrate the digital thermometer from 44 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu and/or resident's individualized meal tray card as planned when: 1. The portion size for one pureed item did not match the menu for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 14). 2. The small portion size directions listed on Resident 44's meal tray card was not honored during lunch trayline ( A system of food preparation in which trays move along an assembly line) in the kitchen. 3. A diet order that included chopped was not followed during lunch trayline in the kitchen for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 4). This facility failure had the potential to not meet the resident's nutritional needs per the planned menu as approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian. In addition, failure of kitchen staff recognizing the chopped portion of a diet order and lack of knowledge base to follow the therapeutic menu spreadsheet for size of chopped placed resident's with a chopped diet order at an increased risk of choking. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/23, at 11:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fans inside the walk-in refrigerator were maintained in a sanitary manner. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination and place residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness (Illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/23, at 8:57 a.m., with Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), inside the walk-in refrigerator located in the kitchen, two fans were observed circulating and appeared with brown fuzzy extensive build up of debris along the circular rims of both fans. DSS stated, there were dust bunnies and the fans were not clean. During an interview on 11/13/23, at 10:14 am., with DSS, DSS stated, maintenance was responsible for cleaning the fans inside the refrigerator and should be done once a month. DSS was asked if the fans were on a cleaning schedule, and DSS stated, she did not know. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/23, at 10:38 am., with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) for the safe handling and use of an electronic cigarette (a cigarette-shaped device containing a nicotine-based liquid that is vaporized and inhaled, used to simulate the experience of smoking tobacco). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience negative outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 10/18/23 at 12:16 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 1 confirmed prior to 9/11/23, CNA 1 had seen Resident 1 with an electronic cigarette in Resident 1's possession. During an interview on 10/17/23, at 3 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 verbalized a couple of weeks prior to 9/11/23, LN 1 saw Resident 1 in the possession of an electronic cigarette and verbally reminded Resident 1 that he wasn't allowed to smoke. During an interview on 10/18/23 starting at 11:34 a.m. with the Administrator (Admin 1), Admin 1 was asked if Resident 1 had been assessed for the ability to safely use an electronic cigarette prior to 9/11/23. Admin 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVA CARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHEN, JENQ | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 50% | since 07/01/2013 |
| CHEN, TZE-YUN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 07/01/2013 |
| PADAMA, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 10/02/2017 |
| BUCKINGHAM, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| LYLES, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $839K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555066. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.